© Crown copyright Met Office Met Office Experiences with Convection Permitting Models Humphrey Lean Reading, UK Nowcasting Workshop,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALARO-0 at ZAMG Experiences, verification, identified problems, ….
Advertisements

Recent & planned developments to the Met Office Global and Regional Ensemble Prediction System (MOGREPS) Richard Swinbank, Warren Tennant, Sarah Beare,
Ensemble Forecasting of High-Impact Weather Richard Swinbank with thanks to various, mainly Met Office, colleagues High-Impact Weather THORPEX follow-on.
JMA Takayuki MATSUMURA (Forecast Department, JMA) C Asia Air Survey co., ltd New Forecast Technologies for Disaster Prevention and Mitigation 1.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AGU Dec 2008 Boundary Layer Ventilation by Convection and Coastal Processes Helen Dacre, Sue Gray, Stephen Belcher.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre UM user 2009 Forecasting the transport of pollution using a NWP model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
Urban Modelling 1 03/2003 © Crown copyright Urban Scale NWP with the Met Office's Unified Model Peter Clark Mesoscale Modelling Group Met Office Joint.
Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (DYMECS) University: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein, Kirsty Hanley, John Nicol Met Office:
DYnamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol DYMECS.
Convection Initiative discussion points What info do parametrizations & 1.5-km forecasts need? –Initiation mechanism, time-resolved cell size & updraft.
Some questions on convection that could be addressed through another UK field program centered at Chilbolton Dan Kirshbaum 1.
DYnamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol DYMECS.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
1 NCAS SMA presentation 14/15 September 2004 The August 2002 European floods: atmospheric teleconnections and mechanisms Mike Blackburn (1), Brian Hoskins.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Damian Wilson Malcolm Brooks Evaluation statistics of cloud fraction and water content.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
© Crown copyright Met Office Met Office progress report Andy Brown WGNE, Tokyo, October 2010.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Carol Roadnight, Peter Clark Met Office, JCMM Halliwell Representing convection in convective scale NWP models : An idealised.
Comparing GEM Regional, GEM-LAM 2.5 and RUC Model Simulations of Mesoscale Features over Southern Ontario 2009 CMOS Congress 31 May – 4 June, Halifax,
Page 1 NAE 4DVAR Oct 2006 © Crown copyright 2006 Mark Naylor Data Assimilation, NWP NAE 4D-Var – Testing and Issues EWGLAM/SRNWP meeting Zurich 9 th -12.
Regional Models Lake Victoria Model Prepared by C. Tubbs, P. Davies, Met Office UK Revised, delivered by P. Chen, WMO Secretariat SWFDP-Eastern Africa.
The development of GRAPES_RAFS and its applications Xu Zhifang Hao Min Zhu Lijuan Gong Jiangdong Chen Dehui National Meteorological Center, CMA Wan Qilin.
Page 1© Crown copyright Simulation of radar reflectivities in the UK Met Office model: comparison with CloudSat Data Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, M.E. Brooks.
Ingredients to improve rainfall forecast in very short-range: Diabatic initialization and microphysics Eunha Lim 1, Yong-Hee Lee 2, and Jong-Chul Ha 2.
Development of Data Assimilation Systems for Short-Term Numerical Weather Prediction at JMA Tadashi Fujita (NPD JMA) Y. Honda, Y. Ikuta, J. Fukuda, Y.
Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
COSMO General Meeting Zürich, Sept Stefan Klink, Klaus Stephan and Christoph Schraff and Daniel.
DYnamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol DYMECS.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006 The Convective-scale UM Physics Developments Richard Forbes (MET OFFICE, Joint Centre for Mesoscale Meteorology, Reading)
© University of Reading 2006www.reading.ac.uk Quasi-stationary Convective Storms in the UK: A Case Study Robert Warren Supervised by Bob Plant, Humphrey.
The DYMECS project A statistical approach for the evaluation of convective storms in high-resolution models Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol, Robert.
© Crown copyright Met Office Experiences with a 100m version of the Unified Model over an Urban Area Humphrey Lean Reading, UK WWOSC.
“High resolution ensemble analysis: linking correlations and spread to physical processes ” S. Dey, R. Plant, N. Roberts and S. Migliorini Mesoscale group.
Click to add Text © Crown copyright Met Office Statistical Analysis of UK Convection and its representation in high resolution NWP Models Humphrey Lean,
“Spatial ensemble characterisation for summer convective cases” S. Dey Supervisors: R. Plant, N. Roberts and S. Migliorini Mesoscale group 03/06/2014.
13 June, 2013 Dymecs Meeting, Reading Tropical convective organisation in the UM Chris Holloway NCAS-Climate, Dept. of Meteorology, University of Reading.
“New tools for the evaluation of convective scale ensemble systems” Seonaid Dey Supervisors: Bob Plant, Nigel Roberts and Stefano Migliorini.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
“A view of the 2 nd and 3 rd August COPE cases using storm-permitting ensemble MOGREPS-UK” S. Dey Supervisors: R. Plant, N. Roberts and S. Migliorini COPE.
© Crown copyright Met Office High resolution COPE simulations Kirsty Hanley, Humphrey Lean UK.
© Crown copyright Met Office High resolution COPE simulations Kirsty Hanley, Humphrey Lean UK.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 The convective-scale Unified Model: Results from UK case studies Richard Forbes (JCMM, Met Office) October 2005.
Page 1© Crown copyright Scale selective verification of precipitation forecasts Nigel Roberts and Humphrey Lean.
© University of Reading 2006www.reading.ac. uk Anchoring of convective storms Robert Warren.
Reading, 13 June 2013 Workshop on Convection in the high resolution Met Office models.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 SRNWP Lead Centre Report on Data Assimilation 2005 for EWGLAM/SRNWP Annual Meeting October 2005, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Evaluation of three-dimensional cloud structures in DYMECS Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean.
DYMECS The evolution of thunderstorms in the Met Office Unified Model Kirsty Hanley Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Thorwald Stein Emilie Carter Carol.
Chasing April Showers Convective storms on Wednesday 11 th April, 2012 WCD Friday 4 th May, 2012 Thorwald Stein DYMECS research assistant *Not by running.
Page 1 Developments in regional DA Oct 2007 © Crown copyright 2007 Mark Naylor, Bruce Macpherson, Richard Renshaw, Gareth Dow Data Assimilation and Ensembles,
Trials of a 1km Version of the Unified Model for Short Range Forecasting of Convective Events Humphrey Lean, Susan Ballard, Peter Clark, Mark Dixon, Zhihong.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 DEVELOPMENT OF 1- 4KM RESOLUTION DATA ASSIMILATION FOR NOWCASTING AT THE MET OFFICE Sue Ballard, September 2005 Z. Li, M.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
© Crown copyright Met Office High resolution model developments at the Met Office Mike Bush Thanks to Jorge Bornemann, Peter Lean, Alison Eadie, Pete Francis,
© Crown copyright Met Office Convection Permitting Modelling Humphrey Lean et al. Reading, UK Leeds April 2014.
© Crown copyright Met Office How will we COPE in Summer 2013? - The COnvective Precipitation Experiment Phil Brown.
The evaluation of updrafts in the Unified Model using single-Doppler radar measurements Nicol JC a, Hogan RJ b, Stein THM b, Hanley KE c, Lean HW c, Plant.
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
© Crown copyright Met Office Convective Scale Data Assimilation needs and experiences from Nowcast Demponstration Project real-time trial in 2012 Susan.
Characteristics of precipitating convection in the UM at Δx≈200m-2km
Nigel Roberts Met Reading
Systematic timing errors in km-scale NWP precipitation forecasts
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
The DYMECS project A statistical approach for the evaluation of convective storms in high-resolution models Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol, Robert.
Convective Scale Modelling Humphrey Lean et. al
COPE: The COnvective Precipitation Experiment. Met Office interests
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms
Science of Rainstorms with applications to Flood Forecasting
Presentation transcript:

© Crown copyright Met Office Met Office Experiences with Convection Permitting Models Humphrey Lean Reading, UK Nowcasting Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2011

© Crown copyright Met Office Timeline of MO convection permitting models Met Office has been experimenting with convection permitting versions of UM since 2001 (NH UM version). UK 4km model in operational suite since April On demand 1.5km model (9 domains) from Dec 2006 UKV 1.5km model from Nov Extended range UK 4km (global downscaler) from Dec 2010 Nowcasting Demonstration system from June 2012 Convective ensemble (2.2km) from June 2012

© Crown copyright Met Office UKV Model Runs out to T+36 4 times a day. 3 hour 3dvar assimilation cycle with nudging of radar reflectivity. 1.5km over most of UK, variable res to 4km at edge of domain Similar configuration to low res models except: No convection scheme Smagorinsky turbulence Prognostic rain

© Crown copyright Met Office UKV Domain 744(622) x 928( 810) points 1.5x x4 4x1.5 4x4 Variable zone Inner 1.5km domain covers most of UK. Gridlength increases to 4km at edge.

© Crown copyright Met Office UKV Model from 03UTC 19/11/2009

© Crown copyright Met Office Carlisle Flood - Observed and Forecast Accumulations Roberts, Forbes + EA 12 km 4 km 1 km Hand analysis of gauges and radar 12 km 1 km Model Orography Why High resolution? Benefits from more detailed orography 1: Orographic Rain

© Crown copyright Met Office Forecast visibility at 12 UTC 10/12/2003 from 18 UTC 09/12/ km L38 (part domain) 1km L76 Visibility (m) at station height, synoptic observations (km) Rachel Capon and Peter Clark Why High resolution? Benefits from more detailed orography 2: Fog in valleys

© Crown copyright Met Office Urban heat islands in UKV Heatwave temperature (00 UTC 19 th July 2006) Why High resolution? Benefits from more detailed land use: Urban Heat Islands

© Crown copyright Met Office However biggest benefit is expected to be in representation of Convection. Explicit convection means losing problems associated with parameterisation at these gridlengths. Also represent related features which are important (convergence lines etc).

© Crown copyright Met Office 3 rd May 2002 Scattered convection case History 1: No convection scheme Nigel Roberts

© Crown copyright Met Office History 2: Smagorinsky turbulence At early stage in research into km scale models found that horizontal diffusion was needed to reduce gridscale structure. Also discovered that applying too much uniform horizontal diffusion had detrimental effect on convective initiation (delay). This was motivation for using Smagorinsky turbulence (only apply once shear built up). Currently UKV uses 2D Smagorinsky with BL mixing in vertical.

© Crown copyright Met Office Example of rainfall forecasts Squall line southern England 14 UTC 1 st July 2003 T+7 forecast 12km4km 1kmRadar

© Crown copyright Met Office Rainfall Accumulations UTC 16 th August km 4 km NIMROD radar Forecasts from 03 UTC Peak Accumulations >60mm On 4 km grid Positional error and false alarm Boscastle Flood Peter Clark

© Crown copyright Met Office Snow Showers penetrating inland Well known problem with parameterised convection is showers not penetrating far enough inland. 25 th Nov 2010 Snow showers coming in on NE wind gave significant snow in NE England

© Crown copyright Met Office Snow Showers penetrating inland 24 hour precip accumulation (mm) 25 th Nov km radarUKV (1.5km) NAE (12km) Operational models

© Crown copyright Met Office How about objective verification? Need to take care with standard gridpoint scores! April to Oct 2010 Equitable Threat Score (ETS) Using gauges M Mittermaier, N Roberts & S Thompson submitted to Met Apps UKV 1.5 km UK 4 km NAE 12 km Global ~25 km

© Crown copyright Met Office Predictability Issues Use of 1.5km model does NOT automatically mean that we can issue forecasts with 1.5km accuracy. Small scales less predictable so individual showers not predictable more than a few hours ahead (unless driven by larger scale feature such as orography or convergence line). Consequences for: 1. Sensitivity testing of convective scale systems except in extreme cases one case is meaningless 2. Verification of models scale selective techniques 3. Interpretation/presentation of forecasts Avoid presenting unpredicable information. Move to probabalistic presentation.

© Crown copyright Met Office Skill depends on the scale you look at Nigel Roberts Roberts and Lean MWR 2008

© Crown copyright Met Office Summary FSS scores UKV vs NAE Forecast Ranges Percentage of times UKV better minus percentage of times its worse. Background colour gives indication of statistical significance (green >95%). Marion Mittermaier and Matthew Trueman

© Crown copyright Met Office Summary FSS scores UKV vs UK4 Forecast Ranges Percentage of times UKV better minus percentage of times its worse. Background colour gives indication of statistical significance (Green >95%). Marion Mittermaier and Matthew Trueman

© Crown copyright Met Office Problems with representation of convection UKV does improve on representation of convection in lower resolution models with convective parameterisations. However problems remain: Peak rain rates often too great. w too large (up to 15m/s in UK) Cell properties very dependent on mixing settings. Too much gridscale structure (esp in w). Know in principle that deep convection very under-resolved at 1.5km. Evidence that behaviour at 1.5km still dominated by gridlength (convection permitting rather than resolving)

© Crown copyright Met Office Gridscale structure in 750 hPa w 13UTC 12/05/2010 4km 1.5km 500m Emilie Carter

© Crown copyright Met Office Compare gridlengths down to 100m 4km1.5km 500m 100mRadar (1km) Emilie Carter Features continue to get smaller 12 UTC from 06 UTC run 7 th Aug 2011 Areas shown are 80x80km (whole domain of 100m)

© Crown copyright Met Office Need to find out how to do best we can at 1.5km. Mixing (horizontal and vertical) Shallow convection scheme Standard convection scheme (as in UK4)? Stochastic backscatter Microphysics Other?

© Crown copyright Met Office Effect of vertical mixing at 1.5km Radar ControlSmag+Vert mixing Vertical Mixing has big effect on no of cells

© Crown copyright Met Office Need to constrain model set up with observations DYnamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (DYMECS). Hogan et. al. U of Reading Track cells with Chilbolton research radar and build up statistics of properties of convection. (runs from now through summer 2012). COnvective Precipiatation Experiment (COPE). Blythe et. al. with Met Office. Development of convection in SW England. (Peninsular convergence lines) (field programme summer 2013). For both of these will compare to UM at gridlengths between 100m and 4km.

© Crown copyright Met Office Rainfall (mm/hr) Reflectivity (dBZ) Chilbolton Radar Radar CompositePPI Composite Grey: 5dBZ isosurface Red: 30dBZ isosurface Thorwald Stein

© Crown copyright Met Office Conclusions Met Office has gathered much experience with convection permitting versions of the UM. Current models are used for longer time ranges than nowcasting. Many benefits seen for representation of convection and other phenomena Problems still remain with representation of convection which are being addressed Need to consider predictability issues for verification and interpretation of forecasts.

© Crown copyright Met Office Thank you for listening. Any questions?