May 4-8, 2009 Japan Proposals to enhance Quality and Efficiency of the PCT Route (PCT/WG/2/8)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary International Search (SIS) (PCT Rule 45bis)
Advertisements

U.S. Entry from PCT Application
1 Practical Impact of Recent PCT Changes on US Practice Maria Eliseeva Houston Eliseeva LLP American Intellectual Property Law Association October 15,
1 Standards Development: An Overview Discovery to Delivery Topic Committee Meeting October 30, 2007 Karen A. Wetzel NISO Standards Program Manager
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects STCU/NATO Workshop From Science to Business Kiev, Ukraine October 11, 2006 Judson R. Hightower.
WIPO Recentdv03-1 Changes to the PCT Regulations which came into effect on 1 January 2004.
Key Decision Points in the PCT System
PCT Supplementary International Search Service (PCT Rule 45bis applicable from January 1, 2009)
Amendments to the PCT Regulations as from 1 January 2009 New publication languages Supplementary international search.
Amendments to the PCT Regulations as from 1 July 2011.
Amendments to the PCT Regulations as from 1 July 2012.
Copyright © 2010 IPOS All Rights Reserved How can small and medium sized IP offices search and examine patent applications efficiently and effectively?
United States Patent and Trademark Office – IP5 Foundation Projects: why are they necessary for work sharing and what challenges are IP5.
WIPO Patent Information Services
Developing an International Perspective: Using the PCT Jay Erstling Director, Office of the PCT World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Geneva,
Global Business Solutions for Patent Prosecution Niclas Morey Geneva, 22 September 2011 Director International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 European.
EPCT Ann Bardini PCT Business Development Division.
Presentation of the Chinese Delegation on Its Proposal March 15 to 17, 2011 Moscow.
WIPO 2nd Global Symposium 17 Sep 2010 IP5 Foundation Projects – why are they necessary and what are the challenges? Jan Modin, FICPI CET Special Reporter,
PCT REFORM: Why It Is Needed and What Lies Ahead Charles A. Pearson Director Office of PCT Legal Administration.
0 Progress Report on Work for Establishing Mechanisms for Feedback and Analysis on WOISAs /ISRs 9 February 2014 PCT/MIA Quality Subgroup Meeting.
PCT – Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-First Session Tel Aviv, February 11 to 13, 2014.
The International Patent System Amendments to the PCT Regulations as from 1 July 2014.
Comments of American Intellectual Property Law Association Public meeting January 13, 2009 Patent Cooperation Treaty Presenter: Carl Oppedahl Oppedahl.
International Worksharing and its Perspective Inhong YEO International Cooperation Division.
© 3M All Rights Reserved. July 20, 2010 Response to USPTO Request for Public Comment on Enhanced Examination Timing Control Initiative.
Introduction to the Patent Cooperation Treaty
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Amendment & Response Practice
PCT Direct Current program and extension for non-European applicants
COORDINATION OF NATIONAL and INTERNATIONAL PHASE OF PCT APPLICATIONS Samson Helfgott Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP New York, NY USPTO PCT Public.
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Eighth Session Geneva May 26 to 29, 2015.
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Second Session Tokyo, February 4 to 6, 2015.
The U.S. Patent System is Changing – A Summary of the New Patent Reform Law.
1 USER REACTION TO RECENT CHANGES IN THE PCT Melvin C. Garner Darby & Darby P.C. New York, NY AIPLA – FICPI COLLOQUIUM NICE,
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office Revised PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination Guidelines Biotech/ChemPharm Customer Partnership.
Practical tips and Strategies for US applicants before EPO
PCT Search & Publication. PCT Timetable Months from Earliest Priority DateDeadline/Action 16 th MonthInternational Searching Authority (ISA) Prepares.
Dr. Michael Berger, European Patent Attorney © Michael Berger Intellectual Property (IP): Patents for Inventions.
Patents- Practical Aspects of International Patent Procurement/Prosecution June 2015 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Practice Overview.
Nice TE. FICPI/AIPLA COLLOQUIUM ON REFORM OF THE PCT (NICE, 8-9 APRIL 2003) “PROBLEMS AND ADVANTAGES THE PCT HAS FOR OFFICES”
PCT FILING - ADVANTAGES© Dr. S. Padmaja, Managing Partner, iProPAT June 21, 2012.
Varian Australia Pty Ltd – Some Patenting Issues David Carmichael 6 th May 2004.
AIPLA/FICPI Colloquium on Reform of the PCT Hotel Radisson SAS, Nice April 8-9, 2003 OVERVIEW OF RECENT CHANGES Claus Matthes Head, PCT Reform Section,
Why and How the PCT is Used - Advantages and Problems Michael J Caine Convenor - International Patents Committee The Institute of Patent and Trade Mark.
Lawrence T. Welch April, 2003 Company Confidential Copyright © 2003 Eli Lilly and Company FICPI/AIPLA Colloquium Reform of the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
PCT Reform - FICPI views Jan Modin Chair, FICPI CET Group 3 PCT Reform - FICPI views Jan Modin Chair, FICPI CET Group 3 Colloquium on PCT –Nice, 9 April.
JPO’s Initiatives for World‘s Best Examination Quality January, 2015 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE.
PCT PATENT COOPERATION TREATY By: Nico Reyes & Keziah Tan.
Recent changes to the PCT - Impact on Third Parties Introduction -Many, if not all, of recent amendments to PCT are user friendly -are they third party.
1 The Patent Prosecution Highway A Brief History and Current Status Mark R. Powell Director, TC 2600 USPTO.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
February 2016Patent Procedures Management PCT Direct Cost effective strategy for global patenting.
Niclas Morey, Director International Co-operation PCT developments at the EPO Partnership for Quality, Washington D.C.
Japan’s activities for achieving the world’s fastest and highest quality examination system Atsushi Kimura Assistant Director International Cooperation.
Patent Cooperation Treaty Improvements Past, Present & Future
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Tenth Session
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Ninth Session
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects
PPH at the Israel Patent Office
Milena Lonati PD Quality Management DG2, European Patent Office
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Eleventh Session
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Fifth Session Madrid February 21 to 23, 2018.
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Fourth Session Reykjavík February 8 to 10, 2017.
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Third Session Santiago January 20 to 22, 2016.
Article 34 Paperwork (Response to WO)
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Sixth Session Cairo February 13 and 14, 2019.
Amendments to the PCT Regulations as from 1 July 2019
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Twelfth Session
Presentation transcript:

May 4-8, 2009 Japan Proposals to enhance Quality and Efficiency of the PCT Route (PCT/WG/2/8)

1 Proposal Image International Publication Current PCT Proposal International Publication ISR/WOISA ISR/WOISA ISR/WOISA +Secret Prior Art +Third party observation

2 Whole rate across all the technical fields: 6.5% High rate (10% or more): wide variety of fields JPO data Technical Fields (example)Rate of secret prior art MRAM or Spin Memory Techniques39.0% ( 172) Secondary Cells (other Accumulators)31.6% (1348) Electroluminescent Light Sources27.9% (1542) Photoresist Materials27.4% (2419) Battery Electrode and Active Substance27.3% (2599) Luminescent Composition26.9% (1143) …… Source: JPO database Importance of secret prior art

3 Source: JPO database The number of submission cases reaches as many as 7,500 (2% of all applications) in 2007 and is on the increase. 76% of the applications, for which information was submitted, utilize the information to issue the office action to negate patentability. JPO system Year Number Number of Submissions Third party observation

4 Phase to be made more complete and useful Comparison of Chapter I (ISR/WOISA) and Chapter II (IPER) from users perspective Chapter IChapter II TimingEarlierLater BenefitAll applicantsDemander

5 JP Proposal Benefits for users and offices (a)(b)(c)(d) # The current timing of establishment of the ISR/WOISA should be maintained as an option Complete search can be provided in the first instance. Complete search can be provided in the first instance. ISR/WOISA can cover all secret prior art. ISR/WOISA can cover all secret prior art. Applicant can respond to negative secret prior art at one time. Applicant can respond to negative secret prior art at one time. The ISAs do not have to conduct top-up search on secret prior art at a later stage. The ISAs do not have to conduct top-up search on secret prior art at a later stage. All applicants can receive the reports which cover all secret prior art. All applicants can receive the reports which cover all secret prior art. Third party observation can be reflected in the ISR/WOISA. Third party observation can be reflected in the ISR/WOISA. Establishment of ISR/WOISA after international publication(#) Introduction of the system for the filing of third party observation

PCT filing date International PhaseNational Phase A Grant of Patent B Substantive Exam. Priority date ISR / WOISA 012 Publication National Phase Entry Timeline (in months) Substantive Exam. Grant of Patent Enhance quality and usability of ISR etc. ISR/WOISA after the international publication Third party observation C Substantive Exam. Grant of Patent ISR/WOISA after the international publication Third party observation

7 Roadmap for the development of the future PCT Making International Examination More Complete, Relevant and Useful Aim: To create the time limit of establishing the ISR/WOISA at the earliest feasible time after international publication, while maintaining the current timing as an option. PCT/WG/2/3 Annex I, page 3

8 Possible reflection point Extension of subsequent time limits Demand for IPE Establishment of IPER National phase entry ISR / WOISA 18 Publication (22) (28)(30)

9 PCT filing date 30 Priority date ISR / WOISA 0 12 Timeline (in months) i Substantive Exam. Grant of Patent National Phase Entry here is equal to parallel processing Grant of Patent Substantive Examination The cases (i) through (iii) are PCT use modes among which applicants can choose. PCT use modes Enhance confidence and usability of ISR etc. Earlier National Phase Entry Article 23(2) ii Grant of Patent Substantive Exam. Article 23(2) Earliest National Phase Entry upon express request by an applicant iii No repetition The case (iii) is a kind of mode where No repetition can be performed by conducting parallel processing. Less duplication No repetition

10 Compliance and Consistency Aim: For International Search Authorities and International Preliminary Examination Authorities to conduct parallel processing of international application as ISA/IPEA and early national entry application as DO where applicable. Roadmap for the development of the future PCT PCT/WG/2/3 Annex I, page 1

11 Thank you!