By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Advertisements

© 2007 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP® SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Presented by: Julie M. Allen
Chapter 19-Securities Securities Regulation Public Offerings of New Securities. zWhen “going public” there are many different types of securities that.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 UAA – ACCT 316 – Fall 2003 Accounting Information Systems Dr. Fred Barbee.
1 4 th session: Corporate Governance – Sarbanes Oxley Performance Evaluation IMSc in Business Administration October-November 2009.
Forces of Change Don H. Hansen Health Care Services Partner
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP | ATTORNEYS AT LAW | Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Highlights for Foreign Private Issuers February 16, 2005 James P.S.
Corporate Governance: The New Age The Expanded Role of Outside Counsel and Standards of Professional Conduct for Attorneys March 10, 2003 Turnaround Management.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Benefits of Act Three quarters of the financial executives in the Oversight Systems survey said that their company had realized.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 2 What Is It? Act passed by Congress in response to the recent and continuing corporate scandals. Signed into law July 30, Established.
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 The Role of Government McGraw-Hill.
Fraud and SOX Compliance McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Third ICAC Symposium The New York Stock Exchange – A Regulator and a Listed Company James F. Duffy Executive Vice President & General Counsel NYSE Regulation,
Sarbanes Oxley Act. WHY? Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 Response to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals.
COMPLIANCE & SOX.
© 2008 Pearson Education Canada8.1 Chapter 8 An Economic Analysis of Financial Structure.
Stockholder Rights and Corporate Governance Stockholders Corporate Governance Executive Compensation: A Special Issue Shareholder Activism Government.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Ernesto G. Rodriguez EC 521 Winter 2007.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Slide 12-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter Twelve Financial Reporting and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Sarbanes Oxley Act. WHY? Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act a.k.a. “SOX”
 Corporate governance is based on three interrelated components: corporate governance principles, functions and mechanisms.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
This PPP #2 based on chapter 8 of the textbook ( pp ) will be reviewed again in PPP #3 in “Review of Chapters 2 and 8, and Advanced Discussion”.
Section 12-2-Regulatory Agencies and Laws.   These agencies make or enforce rules and regulations  Agencies provide oversight or supervision of activities.
Copyright © 2008 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd.1 Chapter Twelve Corporate Governance Canadian Business and Society: Ethics & Responsibilities.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
1-1 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
HROFFICE USER CONFERENCE 2005 Creating an Effective Ethics and Compliance Program Ascentis User Group September, 2005.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 46 Securities Regulation Twomey Jennings Anderson’s Business.
Chapter 8 An Economic Analysis of Financial Structure.
2012 Governance & Leadership Institute January 29 – 30, 2012.
Implementation Issues of Sarbanes-Oxley CASE Presentation September 23, 2004 By Denise Farnan.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
Summary of the Investor Protection, Auditor Reform, and Transparency Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning..
1 Today’s Presentation Sarbanes Oxley and Financial Reporting An NSTAR Perspective.
The Institutionalization of Business Ethics
Prentice Hall © PowerPoint Slides to accompany The Legal Environment of Business and Online Commerce 5E, by Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 27 Investor.
Sarbanes Oxley Act. The Sarbanes Oxley Act consists of 11 Sections I – Public Company Accounting Oversight Board II – Auditor independence III – Corporate.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
1 © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Accounting for Managers, 4th edition, Chapter 2 Accounting and its Relationship to Shareholder Value and.
Chapter 19-1 Chapter 19 BUSINESS & SOCIETY Ethics and Stakeholder Management Carroll & Buchholtz 6e Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management,
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN STRATEGIC PLANNING By Charles D. Little, Ph.D.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Regulation of Securities, Corporate Governance, and.
1 Sarbanes-Oxley Overview. 2 Sarbanes-Oxley Act Summary The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 §201Prohibited Non-Audit Services §202Audit Committee Pre-Approval.
ECON 308 Week 15 Corporate Governance Chapter 18 1.
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Public Law (JFZ edited)
WorldCom This fraud occurred in a major public company and went undetected for 3-4 years. How could this occur? Why did this occur? Was Betty Vinson a.
ASSOCIATION GOVERNANCE Sarbanes-Oxley Thomas E. Arend, Jr. Shaw Pittman ASAE 2003 LEGAL SYMPOSIUM.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act a.k.a. “SOX” Georgia CTAE Resource Network Curriculum Office, February 2009 To accompany curriculum for the Georgia Peach State Career.
Sarbanes Oxley Act. General Provisions of SOX To make rules governing audits of public companies To make rules governing audits of public companies To.
BusinessAllstars.com 1 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 BusinessAllstarsPresents Copyright © 2004 by Gainbridge Associates All right reserved This material may.
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Lecture 5 Control and AIS Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education 7-1.
Sarbanes-Oxley: Its effect on the accounting profession Signed into law on July 30, 2002 Response to highly publicized corporate scandals Provisions affect.
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 The Role of Government McGraw-Hill.
Chapter 4 The Institutionalization of Business Ethics Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. MGT University of Bahrain College.
Impact On Government Contractors
Summary of the Investor Protection, Auditor Reform, and Transparency Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
Customized by Professor Ludlum December 6, 2016
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Dr. Donald K. McConnell Jr.
Dr. Donald K. McConnell Jr.
Dr. Donald K. McConnell Jr.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Chapter 46 SECURITIES REGULATION
CHAPTER 11 PUBLIC CORPORATIONS AND SECURITIES REGULATIONS
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Presentation transcript:

By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando

Lesson 22

 Last Lecture Review ◦ Role of Media in ensuring Corporate Governance ◦ Media can play role in CG by effecting in three ways;  Pressure on politicians to go for corporate law reforms  Pressure on managers to take care of the shareholders money  Pressure on managers to take care of the societal norms

◦ Importance of media  Can play role even in the absence of legal act ◦ Harms of using advertisement as a media tool.  Misrepresentation of facts ◦ Media and corporate governance  Should be broadened rather than just legal and contractual aspects  Managers focus should be shareholders but also the societal norms

◦ Individual as well as institutional investors can use press to fight with the management. ◦ Selective coverage and media credibility  Sometimes foreign newspapers are more credible than the local.  The issue of credibility can question the investigation made by the newspaper

 Management side deals can increase the query of credibility.  A single credible newspaper can’t fight with lots more incredible newspapers. ◦ Adverse effects of advertising  Deception  Fear appeals ◦ Positive effects of advertising  Guidance to children in making decisions  Developing skills  socialization

◦ Materialism ◦ Advertising Alcoholic Beverages ◦ Competitive Advertising ◦ Increasing cost ◦ Absence of full disclosure ◦ Use of celebrities ◦ Fantasy and reality

 Lecture Outlines ◦ Introduction  Also know as Public Company Accounting Reforms and Investor Protection Act of  SOX contain laws pertaining to corporate governance ◦ SOX  To regulate auditors  Created laws pertaining to corporate responsibilities  And increased punishments for corporate white-collar crime

 Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 1. registration 2. standard auditing 3. inspection of firms 4. investigations and sanctions 5. improve auditing services 6. compliance with the rule of Board 7. oversee the board budget

◦ Auditors independence  Accounting firms will not perform both auditing as well as consulting activities for a single firm.  Changes after five years in audit team.  An executive from the accounting firm within the past year will disqualify the public company to be audited  Rotation of accounting firms conducting audits.

◦ Corporate Responsibilities  Making audit committee independent from the management.  CEO and CFO will be responsible for the financial statement.  Separate any profit from bonuses or stock sales that needs to be restated as a result of misconduct.  No stock transaction during employee pension plan.

◦ Enhanced Financial Disclosure  All transactions must be disclosed  Report to SEC within 2 days  Encourage code of ethics and report everything to SEC ◦ Analysts conflicts of Interests  Analysts should be separated from the investment banking

◦ SEC Resources and Authority  SEC budget expanded greatly ◦ Corporate and criminal fraud, accountability and penalties  Different sentences and penalties were introduces

 Introduction ◦ In July of 2002, the US passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, other wise known as the Public Company Accounting Reforms and Investor Protection Act of ◦ SOX is without question the most dramatic federal law pertaining to corporate governance since the initial securities laws of the 1930s.

◦ It provide an overview of the new NYSE and NASDAQ corporate governance rules imposed on their listed firms. ◦ A brief history documented how market conditions lead to both the strengthening and the relaxing of securities regulations in the US is presented. ◦ Finally, the discussion concludes by illustrating that the trend for increasing corporate governance standards was a global trend.

 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 ◦ Signed by US President George W.Bush on July 30,  To regulate auditors  Created laws pertaining to corporate responsibilities  And increased punishments for corporate white-collar crime

 Public Company Accounting Oversight Board The Act established a non-profit corporations called the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to oversee the audit of public companies in order to improve the accuracy of audit reports. Following are the duties 1. registration 2. standard auditing 3. inspection of firms 4. investigations and sanctions 5. improve auditing services 6. compliance with the rule of Board 7. oversee the board budget

 Auditors Independence ◦ Prohibit accounting firms from providing both auditing as well as consulting activities to the same firm; ◦ Gives the audit committee of the company’s board of directors more authority over auditing activities; ◦ Forces the lead audit partners in an audit team to change at least after five years.

◦ Disallows auditing by an accounting firm if any of the top executives of the public company were employed by the accounting firm within the past year; and ◦ Requires a study to be conducted that investigates the potential outcomes of mandatory rotation of accounting firms conducting audits.

 Corporate Responsibilities SOX also attempt to increase the monitoring ability and responsibilities of board of directors and improve their credibility. Specifically, the Act does the following ◦ Making audit committee of the board of directors both more independent from management and more responsible for the hiring and oversight of auditing services and the accounting complaint process;

◦ Forces CEO and CFO to certify the appropriateness of the financial statement filed with the SEC; ◦ Makes it unlawful to mislead, coerce or fraudulently influence an accountant engaged in auditing activities; ◦ Forces executives of the firm to forfeit any profit from bonus or stock sales resulting in earnings that needed to be restated as a result of misconduct; and ◦ Prohibits executives from making stock transactions during the time in which the employee pension plan blacks out employee stock transactions.

 Enhanced Financial Disclosure The new law tries to make executives actions more transparent to shareholders. Specifically, the Act does the following ◦ Require the disclosure of “off balance sheet transactions” and its corrections ◦ Decreases the time an executives has to report company stocks trades to the SEC to two days;

◦ Prohibit the lending of money by public companies to executives, except for the use of home loans; ◦ Requires increased internal financial controls and review by the board of directors. ◦ Encourages a code of ethics for senior officers of the company and report changes and exemptions to the SEC; and ◦ Requires a financial expert on the board of director’s audit committee.

 Analysts Conflicts of Interests ◦ Analysts should be separated from the investment banking and their conflict of interest should be disclosed  SEC Resources and Authority ◦ SEC budget expanded greatly after the passage of SOX, to regulate tens of thousands of public companies.

 Corporate and Criminal Fraud, Accountability and Penalties ◦ Different sentences and penalties were introduced, ranges from millions of fine and/or many years of imprisonment.

 Summary ◦ Introduction  Also know as Public Company Accounting Reforms and Investor Protection Act of  SOX contain laws pertaining to corporate governance ◦ SOX  To regulate auditors  Created laws pertaining to corporate responsibilities  And increased punishments for corporate white-collar crime

 Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 1. registration 2. standard auditing 3. inspection of firms 4. investigations and sanctions 5. improve auditing services 6. compliance with the rule of Board 7. oversee the board budget

◦ Auditors independence  Accounting firms will not perform both auditing as well as consulting activities for a single firm.  Changes after five years in audit team.  An executive from the accounting firm within the past year will disqualify the public company to be audited  Rotation of accounting firms conducting audits.

◦ Corporate Responsibilities  Making audit committee independent from the management.  CEO and CFO will be responsible for the financial statement.  Separate any profit from bonuses or stock sales that needs to be restated as a result of misconduct.  No stock transaction during employee pension plan.

◦ Enhanced Financial Disclosure  All transactions must be disclosed  Report to SEC within 2 days  Encourage code of ethics and report everything to SEC ◦ Analysts conflicts of Interests  Analysts should be separated from the investment banking

◦ SEC Resources and Authority  SEC budget expanded greatly ◦ Corporate and criminal fraud, accountability and penalties  Different sentences and penalties were introduces The End