Project 2: Geospatial and Statistical Basis for Mine Soil Sampling for C Sequestration Accounting. Objectives: To determine the horizontal and vertical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effects of Land Use Change on Forest Carbon Budgets Throughout the Southern USA from 1900 to 2050 Peter B. Woodbury Crop and Soil Sciences Department,
Advertisements

Assessing, Measuring, and Monitoring Carbon Sequestration from Changes in Land Management Sandra Brown Winrock International Regional.
Carbon storage in silvopastoral systems Farm Woodland Forum Annual Meeting 13 June 2013 Matthew Upson and Paul Burgess Centre for Environmental Risk and.
Zhengxi Tan *,1,2, Shuguang Liu 2, Carol A. Johnston 1, Thomas R. Loveland 3 Jinxun Liu 4, Rachel Kurtz 3, and Larry Tieszen 3 1 South Dakota State University,
Soil and Water Quality with Miscanthus on a Louisiana Coastal Plain Hillside L. Gaston and W. Felicien LSU AgCenter School of Plant, Environmental and.
A MONASH UNIVERSITY PERSPECTIVE Musa Kilinc and Danielle Martin School of Geography and Environmental Science.
Forest Project Protocol v3.1 Use of FIA Data John Nickerson FIA Conference February 2010.
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
Modeling Effects of Genetic Improvement in Loblolly Pine Plantations Barry D. Shiver Stephen Logan.
Carbon sequestration in reclaimed soils Andrew Trlica, Sally Brown U. of Washington, College of Forest Resources INTRODUCTION: World soils contain more.
FOREST SERVICE GHG ISSUES AND INFORMATION NEEDS Elizabeth Reinhardt, FS Climate Change Office.
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change.
IMPROVING LUCF GHG INVENTORY and the FAO FRA: the Philippine Case Rodel D. Lasco Environmental Forestry Programme University of the Philippines.
Quantifying the availability and volume of the forest resides resource B.Hock, P.Nielsen, S.Grigolato, J.Firth, B.Moeller, T.Evanson Scion, Rotorua, New.
Long-Term Effects of Organic Amendments and Potential Carbon Sequestration in Southwest Virginia Mine Soils Whitney Nash, W. Lee Daniels and Jim Burger.
An introduction to the monitoring of forestry carbon sequestration projects Developing Forestry and Bioenergy Projects within CDM Ecuador March, 2004 Igino.
Carbon content of managed grasslands: implications for carbon sequestration Justine J. Owen * and Whendee L. Silver Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy.
Forest Inventory Methods and Carbon Analysis Linda S. Heath Richard A. Birdsey USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station In Support of the United.
Copyright © 2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc Chapter 24 Statistical Inference: Conclusion.
Recovery of Soil Functionality and Quality in a Post-Lignite Surface Mine Chronosequence in East Texas J.P. Ng, F.M. Hons, and T.J. Gentry. Texas A&M University,
Carbon Offset Projects and the FIA Neil Sampson March 3, 2009.
Case Study 1 Canadian Prairies: Soil C management Biophysical information M. Boehm, B. McConkey & H. Janzen Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada How can we.
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS Project Level Carbon Accounting Toolkit CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products Department of Forestry, Australian National University.
IntroductionIntroduction Land-use change or intensification can influence the dynamics and storage of soil organic matter (SOM) and the extent of carbon.
SOIL CONDITION INDEX – (SCI) AS AN INDICATOR OF THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AT THE FARM BUTMIR NEAR SARAJEVO Prof. Dr. Hamid Čustović Tvica Mirza.
Guidance on Measurement Elaboration and Examples.
A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies Q: What is Carbon Sequestration? A: Capture and Storage of Carbon in Sinks Terrestrial (forest, agriculture)
CARBON SEQUESTRATION BY HYBRID POPLARS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Dr. Jon D. Johnson Hybrid Poplar Research Program Washington State University - Puyallup.
Methods Model. The TECOS model is used as forward model to simulate carbon transfer among the carbon pools (Fig.1). In the model, ecosystem is simplified.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Effects of Forest Management Practices on Carbon Storage Coeli M. Hoover USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station Forest PLUS, Washington DC December.
Introduction: Globally, atmospheric concentrations of CO 2 are rising, and are expected to increase forest productivity and carbon storage. However, forest.
Approach: Samples were obtained from 4 different plots of land, each with a different land-use. The land uses that were examined were a grassland (hayed),
Suborna Shekhor Ahmed Department of Forest Resources Management Faculty of Forestry, UBC Western Mensurationists Conference Missoula, MT June 20 to 22,
InVEST Blue Carbon model October F =Feedback please.
Site Description This research is being conducted as a part of the Detritus Input and Removal Treatments Project (DIRT), a cross-continental experiment.
Development of a Forest Carbon Sequestration Protocol for the State of Georgia J. Siry, P. Bettinger, B. Borders, C. Cieszewski, M. Clutter, B. Izlar,
Systems and livelihoods meta-analysis workshop for the East Showa and Yabello action sites On going research activities and status Under BMZ funded carbon.
Inventory Approaches to Forest Baselines: MAV Bottomland Hardwoods Case Study James E. Smith and Linda S. Heath Northeastern Research Station Durham, NH.
WP coordinator meeting June 17/ WP3 progress report.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Effects of simulated climate change on the abundance of an exotic weevil, Cyrtepistomus castaneus Bryan Marbert (ASU ) and Paul Hanson (ORNL) Contact Information:
Introduction Acid deposition (AD) from air pollution is a chronic stress on forest ecosystems in the northeast and mid-Atlantic regions of the U. S. The.
Eucalyptus globoidea productivity in New Zealand Dean Meason, Tobias Herrman, Christine Todoroki.
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Applied Plant Sciences and Plant Biotechnology Universität für Bodenkultur.
Carbon in United States Forests and Wood Products, : State-by-State Estimates Richard A. Birdsey George M. Lewis USDA Forest Service Global Change.
Risk to Long-term Site Productivity Due to Whole-tree Harvesting in the Coastal Pacific Northwest Austin Himes 1,2, Rob Harrison 1, Darlene Zabowski 1,
Comparison of Soils and Plants at Prairie Ridge: % C and % N Lori Skidmore.
Alum Effects on Phosphorus Runoff Loss from Turfgrass Amended with Biosolids R.W. Schnell, D.M. Vietor, C.L. Munster, T.L. Provin, and R.H. White, Texas.
Above and Below ground decomposition of leaf litter Sukhpreet Sandhu.
Carbon Dioxide Fluxes in a Forest Soil in the Citronelle Oil Field of South Alabama Latasha Lyte and E.Z. Nyakatawa Department of Natural Resources and.
Land-Use Types Depth (cm) Soil pHTotal N (g N/kg soil) Soil Particle Size Density (%)Land-Use Types ClaySiltSand Forest Forest.
NE: No effect. Data were not significantly different from control. (p
Wood ash, the residue remaining from the combustion of bark, sawdust and yard waste for energy generation for forestry product operations, is an effective.
Carbon Sequestration Akilah Martin Fall 2005.
2015 RPA Update: Forest Carbon Projections for the United States
Results and Discussion
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Aweke M. Gelaw1, B. R. Singh1 and R. Lal2
Carbon Cycling in Perennial Biofuel Management Systems
HEAVY METAL SOLUBILITY AND MOBILITY IN HUMUS LAYERS IMPACTED BY COPPER INDUSTRY IN SOUTH - WEST POLAND Agnieszka Medyńska-Juraszek, Cezary Kabała Institute.
Assessment of Soil Amendment and Carbon Sequestration
Land Management, Mycorrhizal Diversity, and Soil Carbon Sequestration
Paris workshop, Sino-French Institute for Earth System Science (SOFIE)
C. Kallenbach1. , W. Horwath1, Z. Kabir1, J. Mitchell2, D
Conclusion & Discussion
West Virginia University
Can managed forest land provide effective strategies for climate change mitigation ? - examples from Sweden IEA Bioenergy Canberra, March 26-30, 2001.
Chapter 10 Introduction to the Analysis of Variance
Presentation transcript:

Project 2: Geospatial and Statistical Basis for Mine Soil Sampling for C Sequestration Accounting. Objectives: To determine the horizontal and vertical distribution and variability of sequestered C in mine soils. To determine the MCD and MDD of SOC on mined land for carbon accreditation analysis. Methods: Determined the horizontal and vertical distributions of SOC (Mg ha -1 ) to estimate the profit-to-cost ratio $(SOC Credits ) / $(SOC Inventory ), based on the market price of C and the costs of C inventorying. Project 3: Carbon Sequestration Empirical Models for Forests and Soils on Mined Land in the Eastern U.S. Coalfields. Objectives: To estimate and compare the Eco_C content sequestered on disturbed and undisturbed forest land. To determine the effects of mine soil quality and stand age on the C sequestration potential of forested mined land. Methods: Analyzed C data from 14 mined and 8 non-mined forests in seven states. Results and Inferences:  The Eco_C in forest stands on mined land was in the decreasing order pine (148 Mg ha -1 ) > hardwood (130 Mg ha -1 ) > mixed (118 Mg ha -1 ), where 75% was in the total tree biomass (stem, roots, branches).  The tree and litter carbon pools were similar on mined and non-mined hardwood stands across the entire range of site quality. However, mined land SOC levels were lower than average natural sites. (Fig. 2) Beyhan Y. Amichev Ph. D. Candidate Department of Forestry Introduction Main objective: To develop a decision support tool for predicting carbon sequestration by forests and soils on coal-mined land in the Appalachians. Hypothesis: New managed forests on mined land sequester carbon at significantly higher rates than mined lands sown to grasses and abandoned. James A. Burger Professor of Forestry and Soil Science Department of Forestry Conclusions and Implications  Reforestation on mined land establishes a long-term sink for atmospheric carbon which is stored in the soil and litter and is locked in tree biomass and wood products.  Site quality has an exponential effect on Eco_C sequestration in both pine and mixed stands and the models showed Eco_C decrease with stand age due to natural pine tree deterioration in older pine stands and in the pine component of mixed stands. Eco_C increased asymptotically with stand age in hardwood stands but was not affected by site quality.  The results indicated that pre-law (pre-1977) surface coal mining procedures used in the Eastern U.S. could degrade forest site quality and could jeopardize the long- term productivity and C sequestration potential of forested mined lands.  The proposed DSS tool will be suitable for use by private landowners, regional planners, and politicians in managing reclaimed mined lands. It will help guide reclamation practices on thousands of hectares of mined land with the goal of increasing forest productivity and carbon sequestration. Four individual projects contributed specific parts needed to test the hypothesis. In Project 1, we developed a new laboratory procedure for soil organic carbon (SOC) measurement that differentiated between plant- sequestered and coal-derived carbon in mine soils. In Project 2, we used SOC data from selected mined study sites to develop a field measurement protocol for SOC estimation on mined land, including the vertical and horizontal accuracy and precision of SOC inventorying, the maximum cost-effective depth (MCD) and the minimum detectable difference (MDD) of SOC measurements between two successive carbon inventories. In Project 3, we developed empirical models for ecosystem carbon sequestration by reclaimed forests as a function of mine soil quality and stand age. In Project 4, we used the results and inferences from Projects 2 and 3 to design and develop a DSS tool to estimate the ecosystem carbon (Eco_C) content sequestered by forests established by a combination of treatments of different intensity for three commonly- used forest species groups, and the carbon stock in wood products from harvested biomass obtained from these forests. Project 1: Soil Organic Carbon Measurement Procedure for Mine Soils. Objectives: To design a new technique for mine soil C measurement that will differentiate between pedogenic (organic matter) and geogenic (coal) C forms present in mine soils. To evaluate and compare the performance of the new C measurement method and the Walkley-Black (WB) procedure, a wet oxidation technique) for soil organic carbon (SOC) analysis on mine soils. Methods: The 16-step procedure: combination of a chemical treatment to remove carbonates, a thermal treatment at 375 o C to remove pedogenic organic matter, and an elemental C analysis at 900 o C. Determined correction factors for the loss of volatile C forms from coal and soil organic matter during the thermal treatment. Tested the 16-step and the WB procedures on mine soil mixtures of homogeneous coal content; percent relative uncertainty from the mean (PRUM, %) was computed as Results and Inferences:  The 16-step method yielded better results than the WB procedure for mine spoil materials that are most commonly used for mined land reclamation in the Eastern U.S. coalfields, i.e., weathered SS and SiS.  Coal fragments in mine soils lead to SOC overestimation when measured by the WB method; 55% of the variation in SOC was due to the oxidation of carbon from coal fragments in the soil.  Developed a regression model (R 2 =55%) for coal correction of SOC measurements obtained by the WB procedure (WB–SOC, wt%): where SOC (wt%) = true soil organic carbon content expressed as percent by sample weight; Order =1 for SS, =2 for SiS, and =3 for 50/50 SS/SiS material. Table 1. Evaluation results for the 16-step and WB methods used in Project 1. Estimated MCD as the soil depth at which the profit-to-cost ratio becomes less than 1, i.e. we lose money. Estimated MDD as SOC(Mg ha -1 ) future – SOC(Mg ha -1 ) present, measured at a future C inventory event, so that the difference is statistically significant at a chosen confidence level, e.g. 95%. Results and Inferences: Figure 1. Field measurement protocol for SOC estimation on mined land. Acknowledgements We thank the U.S. Department of Energy (DE-FG26-02NT41619), the Powell River Project, and Office of Surface Mining / Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy for funding this research. Figure 2. Empirical models for Eco_C sequestration on forested mined land. Project 4 (in progress) : DSS Based on Expert Knowledge for Predicting Carbon Sequestration for Forest Establishment Practices on Mined Land. Objective: To build the framework of a decision support tool consisting of the first iteration of a dynamic simulation model to predict carbon sequestration for nine reforestation scenarios on mined land: 3 forest types (white pine, hybrid poplar, and native hardwoods) by forest establishment practices of 3 levels of intensity using weed control, soil tillage, and fertilization. Methods: Modeled the C sequestration in wood products in-use and in-landfills: Used the results and inferences from Projects 2 and 3 to model C sequestration in tree biomass, soils (accounting for the MCD), roots, and litter layer as a function of site quality and stand age:  SOC concentration ranged from 0.14 to 1.02 wt%, and coal C concentration ranged from 0.00 to 2.80 wt% among all soil samples in obtained from Ohio, West Virginia, and Virginia.  The surface SOC content, 0-10cm, was spatially dependant up to 575 m for the mined sites in Ohio, and up to 590 m in West Virginia.  The results indicated that mined sites older than 9-years of age should be selected for C sequestration projects, due to the inherent variation of soil carbon in mine soils.