Progress Monitoring for students in Strategic or Intensive intervention levels Based on the work of Roland Good and Ruth Kaminski.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Advertisements

WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *systematically assessing.
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
Changing the World through an Outcomes-Driven Model Roland H. Good III University of Oregon 38 th Annual PA School Psychologists.
First Sound Fluency & Phoneme Segmentation Fluency Phonemic Awareness
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
Eugene, OR Brown Bag Presentation: November 19, 2007
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Informal Academic Diagnostic Assessment: Using Data to Guide Intensive Instruction Part 2: Reviewing Graphed Data 1.
Curriculum Based Evaluations Informed Decision Making Leads to Greater Student Achievement Margy Bailey 2006.
Thinking Smart About Assessment Ben Clarke, Ph.D. Rachell Katz, Ph.D. August 25, 2004 Oregon Reading First Mentor Coach Training © 2004 by the Oregon Reading.
Implementing a Comprehensive Reading First Assessment Plan
What Can We Do to Improve Outcomes? Identifying Targets of Opportunity Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.
Changing the World through Reading First Using an Outcomes-Driven Model Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
Oregon Reading First Cohort B Regional Coaches’ Meeting October, 2005
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Child Study. What is Child Study? The CSC is a school-based team, convened for the purpose of reviewing any problems (academic/developmental, behavioral,
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Assessment: Universal Screening Cadre 7 Initial Training September 29, 2011.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
DATA BASED DECISION MAKING IN THE RTI PROCESS: WEBINAR #2 SETTING GOALS & INSTRUCTION FOR THE GRADE Edward S. Shapiro, Ph.D. Director, Center for Promoting.
1 Reading First Grant Writing Workshop: Instructional Reading Assessments Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Portland, Oregon.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
DIBELS: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills 6 th Edition A guide for Parents.
Dynamic Measurement Group (DMG) Part 2.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Progress Monitoring Overview Neshaminy School District Bucks County Intermediate Unit #22.
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Instructional Decision Making in Iowa IOWA. Iowa’s Experience: How it all started Began in Discussions with stakeholders Parents Teachers Administrators.
Intervention Team / Tier III Overview Harding University High School
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
Standard Behavior Protocols for TTSD September 26,2008.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Tallassee Elementary Summary of Effectiveness DIBELS Report Data Meeting May 9, 2012 Presenter: Cynthia Martin, ARI Reading Coach.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *using a researched-based.
What Do I Do With My DIBELS Data? Aligning Student Needs and Instruction source: Tracy Cormane:
EBIS Effective Behavior & Instructional Supports Tina Rodriguez June 23, 2013.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance Kira Florence Jonathan Potter University of Oregon.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Training Modules  Participants will understand… Progress Monitoring Graphing Data Data-Based Decisions Linking Cases to PS/RtI.
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support 21.
Extending an RTI Approach to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
K-5: Progress Monitoring JANUARY, 2010 WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM INTERVENTION ALIGNMENT.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED
Data-Driven Decision Making
Progress monitoring Is the Help Helping?.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Data-Based Leadership
DIBELS Next Overview.
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance
DIBELS: An Overview Kelli Anderson Early Intervention Specialist - ECC
Presentation transcript:

Progress Monitoring for students in Strategic or Intensive intervention levels Based on the work of Roland Good and Ruth Kaminski

“Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there” Will Rogers “Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there” Will Rogers

"If we keep doing what we're doing, we're going to keep getting what we're getting." Steven Covey "If we keep doing what we're doing, we're going to keep getting what we're getting." Steven Covey

“Never discourage anyone who continually makes progress, no matter how slow” Plato “Never discourage anyone who continually makes progress, no matter how slow” Plato

Steps for Implementing Progress Monitoring  Identify Students who are experiencing reading difficulties  Conduct frequent progress monitoring probes (1- 2x per week)  Chart student progress on chart with aimline and goal  Review progress frequently  Make instructional decisions based on student performance data  Identify Students who are experiencing reading difficulties  Conduct frequent progress monitoring probes (1- 2x per week)  Chart student progress on chart with aimline and goal  Review progress frequently  Make instructional decisions based on student performance data

Outcomes Driven Model

Model of Big Ideas, Indicators, and Timeline for Achieving

DIBELS Progress Monitoring Directions

DIBELS Progress Monitoring Examiner Copy

DIBELS Progress Monitoring Student Copy

Progress Monitoring

Evaluating Support – Modify Instruction? Whoops! Time to make a change! Phoneme Segmentation Fluency Aimline

Evaluating Support - Is Instructional Support Sufficient Now? Phoneme Segmentation Fluency Aimline

DIBELS are the GPS for educators Phoneme Segmentation Fluency Aimline

Evaluate the Data  Assumptions to consider before evaluating the data  Teacher is implementing instructional strategies  Student is actively engaged in instruction  Aim line has been correctly identified based on present levels of educational performance  Appropriate identification of annual goals and objectives  Assumptions to consider before evaluating the data  Teacher is implementing instructional strategies  Student is actively engaged in instruction  Aim line has been correctly identified based on present levels of educational performance  Appropriate identification of annual goals and objectives

Goal-Oriented Decision Making  A consistent rule is to make program changes when performance falls below the aimline for 3 consecutive data points.  Using aimlines and decision rules takes much of the guess work out of data analysis.  A consistent rule is to make program changes when performance falls below the aimline for 3 consecutive data points.  Using aimlines and decision rules takes much of the guess work out of data analysis.

Example Decision Rules...  If a student ’ s performance is below the aimline on 3 consecutive days, but is parallel to the aimline, one may decide to “ wait ” to see if student performance accelerates in level to reach the original aimline.  If the student performance continues below the original aimline, implement a different teaching strategy. Draw a vertical line of the graph that symbolizes a change in the program.  If the student ’ s performance is above the aimline after 3- days (or wait another 3-days), it may be appropriate to raise the aimline.  If a student ’ s performance is below the aimline on 3 consecutive days, but is parallel to the aimline, one may decide to “ wait ” to see if student performance accelerates in level to reach the original aimline.  If the student performance continues below the original aimline, implement a different teaching strategy. Draw a vertical line of the graph that symbolizes a change in the program.  If the student ’ s performance is above the aimline after 3- days (or wait another 3-days), it may be appropriate to raise the aimline.

Display Current Performance and Goal on a Progress Monitoring Graph  Goal includes both a target level of skill and a specific time during the school year to attain that skill.  The aimline provides a roadmap showing where you are, where you want to get to, and the rate at which you must progress in order to get there on time.mm

Progress Monitoring No Progress Monitoring

Types of student performance difficulties Source: academic and behavior problems, Witt, Daly, & Noell (2000)  Motivation problems (can do the work but won’t do it)  Skill deficit problems (can’t do work)  Not enough time spent doing work(guided/independent practice)  Not had enough help to do work (prompt/feedback)  Activity is not teaching the student what the teacher wants the student to learn  The work is too difficult for the student  Motivation problems (can do the work but won’t do it)  Skill deficit problems (can’t do work)  Not enough time spent doing work(guided/independent practice)  Not had enough help to do work (prompt/feedback)  Activity is not teaching the student what the teacher wants the student to learn  The work is too difficult for the student

Support process for students experiencing academic difficulty  Universal Interventions  Use current supports as much as possible (student assistant team, child study team etc.)  Student referred to team for support  Conduct academic functional assessment  Develop intervention linked to results of assessment  Frequently monitor, review, and modify student’s progress  Universal Interventions  Use current supports as much as possible (student assistant team, child study team etc.)  Student referred to team for support  Conduct academic functional assessment  Develop intervention linked to results of assessment  Frequently monitor, review, and modify student’s progress

Planning Instructional Support Key Decisions:  What are the Goals of instruction?  Where are we? Where do we want to be? By when? What course do we need to follow to get there?  What skills should we teach?  Focus on the Big Ideas: Phonological Awareness, Alphabetic Principle, Accuracy and Fluency with Connected Text  Level of skills based on error analysis.  How much instructional support may be needed?  Intensive Instructional Support  Strategic Instructional Support  Benchmark Instruction Key Decisions:  What are the Goals of instruction?  Where are we? Where do we want to be? By when? What course do we need to follow to get there?  What skills should we teach?  Focus on the Big Ideas: Phonological Awareness, Alphabetic Principle, Accuracy and Fluency with Connected Text  Level of skills based on error analysis.  How much instructional support may be needed?  Intensive Instructional Support  Strategic Instructional Support  Benchmark Instruction

Themes  Don’t loose track of the bottom line. Are we getting closer to important and meaningful outcomes?  Monitor Progress on -- and teach -- what is important: Phonemic Awareness, Alphabetic Principle, Accuracy and Fluency with Connected Text  Oral Reading Fluency is an important instructional goal and target of progress monitoring.  Use progress monitoring to make decisions that change outcomes for children.  Progress monitoring should be efficient and purposeful.  Start early! Trajectories of reading progress are very difficult to change.  Don’t loose track of the bottom line. Are we getting closer to important and meaningful outcomes?  Monitor Progress on -- and teach -- what is important: Phonemic Awareness, Alphabetic Principle, Accuracy and Fluency with Connected Text  Oral Reading Fluency is an important instructional goal and target of progress monitoring.  Use progress monitoring to make decisions that change outcomes for children.  Progress monitoring should be efficient and purposeful.  Start early! Trajectories of reading progress are very difficult to change.