Accounting for tree growth in resource assessment: A case study using the VENTOS code on Kyle wind farm Presenter: Oisin BRADY (VENTEC) Contributors: Anabel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phoenics User Conference on CFD May 2004 Vipac Engineers & Scientists Ltd COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS Simulation of Turbulent Flows and Pollutant Dispersion.
Advertisements

Turbulent flow over groups of urban-like obstacles
CFD Modeling of Wind Farms in Flat and Complex Terrain J. M. Prospathopoulos, E. S. Politis, P. K. Chaviaropoulos K. G. Rados, G. Schepers, D. Cabezon,
Layout Optimisation Brings Step Change in Wind Farm Yield Dr Andrej Horvat, Intelligent Fluid Solutions Dr Althea de Souza, dezineforce Come and visit.
Lauren Sanchez, Middlebury College
Wind Flow Over Forested Hills: Mean Flow and Turbulence Characteristics CEsA - Centre for Wind Energy and Atmospheric Flows, Portugal J. Lopes da Costa,
Giorgio Crasto University of Cagliari - ITALY Forest Modelling A canopy model for WindSim 4.5.
Wind Resource Assessment
ALBERTA WIND POWER VARIABILITY STUDY Represented by Tommi Pensas.
Inflow angle and Energy Production Jørgen Højstrup Wind Solutions / Højstrup Wind Energy Power Curve Working Group, Louisville 6 October 2014.
2 nd September 2014 REWS – using ANSYS CFX (CFD).
Predicting the yield of small wind turbines in the roof-top urban environment S J Watson, D G Infield and M R Harding Centre for Renewable Energy Systems.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Wall Effects in Offshore Wind Farms
NovEnergia II Technical Bureau - Sep08 THE OPPORTUNITIES OF HUNGARIAN WIND ENERGY Álvaro Rodrigues September 2008.
CEREA – Group « Meteorological Measurements » 15 September METEOROLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER E. Dupont – D. Demengel.
Boundary Layer Correction of Viscous Flow Through 2 D Turbine Cascades
LiDAR analysis at a site with simple terrain Alex Clerc, Lee Cameron Tuesday 2 nd September
The effect of ship shape and anemometer location on wind speed measurements obtained from ships B I Moat 1, M J Yelland 1, A F Molland 2 and R W Pascal.
Validated adjustment of remote sensing bias in complex terrain using CFD Michael Harris, Ian Locker, Neil Douglas, Romain Girault, Claude Abiven, Oisin.
Wind Energy Forecaster A Web-based Wind Energy Prediction Tool Aditya Trivedi ’16 Advisor: Dr. Eric Larson.
A CSP ARA Assessment of Wind Borne Debris Criteria for the Florida Panhandle February 2006 ARA Progress Report.
Wind. W per person ? Population density for Great Britain: 250 people / km 2.
Atmospheric Flow over Terrain using Hybrid RANS/LES European Wind Energy Conference & Exhibition 2007 A. Bechmann, N.N. Sørensen and J. Johansen Wind Energy.
SODAR: Uses and Acceptance Laura Tabor Wind Engineering Intern EAPC Wind Energy Services August 7, 2009.
Ahmet Ozbay, Wei Tian and Hui Hu
Centre for Wind Energy and Atmospheric Flows Centro de Estudos de Energia Eólica e Escoamentos Atmosféricos 1 VALIDATION OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS.
Wind Power Analysis Using Non-Standard Statistical Models
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE OF METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATE RESEARCH,
Advisor Martin Wosnik Graduate Co-Advisor Kyle Charmanski Characterize blade design/turbine performance in free stream in student wind tunnel (and validate.
 Winds are caused by the uneven heating of the atmosphere by the sun, the irregularities of the earth's surface, and rotation of the earth.  Wind flow.
© Vattenfall AB Vattenfall Perspective on Wind in Forest Jens Madsen Principal R&D Engineer, Ph.D Vattenfall Research & Development AB.
Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens VERIFICATION OF POWER PERFORMANCE OF ACTIVE POWER CONTROL WIND TURBINES IN COMPLEX.
1 Predicting and Understanding the Breakdown of Linear Flow Models P. Stuart, I. Hunter, R. Chevallaz-Perrier, G. Habenicht 19 March 2009.
A control algorithm for attaining stationary statistics in LES of thermally stratified wind-turbine array boundary layers Adrian Sescu * and Charles Meneveau.
Improving WAsP predictions in (too) complex terrain
Wei Li, Fan Wang, Simon Bell Speaker :古緯中.  Introduction  Wind tunnel experiment  Numerical  Result and analyses.
Hiromasa Nakayama*, Klara Jurcakova** and Haruyasu Nagai*
Effects of Upwind Roughness Changes and Impacts on Hub-Height Winds Peter A. Taylor 1,2, Wensong Weng 1 and James R. Salmon 2 1 Centre for Research in.
Dynamical downscaling of wind fields in stratified flow: a high resolution mesoscale approach Pedro Miranda, R Tomé, A Rodrigues, J Palma, F Castro, J.
Utility Scale Wind Energy Prof. Park UTI-111 Essex County College.
Influence of wind characteristics on turbine performance Ioannis Antoniou (1), Rozenn Wagner (1), Søren M. Pedersen (1), Uwe Paulsen (1), Helge A. Madsen.
Wind power Part 2: Resource Assesment San Jose State University FX Rongère February 2009.
A METHODOLOGY FOR ESTIMATING WIND FARM PRODUCTION THROUGH CFD CODES. DESCRIPTION AND VALIDATION Daniel Cabezón, Ignacio Martí CENER, National Renewable.
Estimating the Optimal Location of a New Wind Farm based on Geospatial Information System Data Dec Chungwook Sim.
Treatments and methods to manipulate stand structure suitable for fuel reduction.
UPWIND, Aerodynamics and aero-elasticity
Experience of Modelling Forested Complex Terrain Peter Stuart, Ian Hunter & Nicola Atkinson 30 th October 2009.
Upflow correction method EWEA Power Curve Working Group London, 2015 December.
Modelling the impact of wakes on power output at Nysted and Horns Rev R.J. Barthelmie, Indiana University USA/Risoe DTU DK K. Hansen, DTU Denmark S.T.
Mattias Mohr, Johan Arnqvist, Hans Bergström Uppsala University (Sweden) Simulating wind and turbulence profiles in and above a forest canopy using the.
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
Resource Analysis. Objectives of Resource Assessment Discussion The subject of the second part of the analysis is to dig more deeply into some of the.
Thermo-aero Dynamic Analysis of Wind Turbines P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Development of Characteristic Design Variables.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Complete Energetic Analysis of Tidal Power Extraction Elizabeth Brasseale February 17, 2016 Masters Defense Advised by Mitsuhiro Kawase.
Upflow correction method
Turbulence and Heterogeneous Wind
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
Wind Turbines.
P = 0.5  v A Wind Energy Potential 3 P power, Watts
Wind Micrositing Where to put it.
Assessment of wind power resource in Belgrade region
The application of an atmospheric boundary layer to evaluate truck aerodynamics in CFD “A solution for a real-world engineering problem” Ir. Niek van.
National Forest Inventory for Great Britain
E. Dellwik, A. Papettaa, J. Arnqvist, M. Nielsena and T. J. Larsena
Ebba Dellwik, Duncan Heathfield, Barry Gardiner
Wind Energy Potential in Europe: 2020 – 2030
Layout Optimisation Brings Step Change in Wind Farm Yield
Micrositing for Wind Turbines
Presentation transcript:

Accounting for tree growth in resource assessment: A case study using the VENTOS code on Kyle wind farm Presenter: Oisin BRADY (VENTEC) Contributors: Anabel Gammidge (AMEC Wind) J.L. Palma, F.A. Castro (CEsA-FEUP)

Summary Who are we Overview of VENTOS The site Method Results Conclusions

Who we are VENTEC-THALES –wind resource consultancy –Specialisation in complex terrain –Analysis of operational projects AMEC Wind Energy –UK-based developer, subsidiary of AMEC plc. –42 MW installed –1500 MW under development CEsA ( CENTRE FOR WIND ENERGY AND ATMOSPHERIC FLOWS ) –Porto University Engineering department –Developed VENTOS code since 1992 –Ongoing research Stand 149d

Overview of VENTOS CFD code –Terrain following grid –Fixed-constant k-e turbulence model Canopy extension to boundary layer treatment –Based on work by Svensson and Haagkvist Modification of k-e turbulence equations Models momentum sink and added turbulence –Developed in collaboration with RES –Validation Excellent results (windspeed, turbulence) with large areas of forest Not so good with narrow strips (windbreaks)

Kyle Forest Scotland – southern uplands 100 turbines over 110 km 2 90% forest cover –Tree heights critical to model –Foliage density also required –Detailed GIS data with tree heights and species provided

Tree heights

Method Significant wind directions identified Calculations run for 2005 –Results compared to measured –Modelled speedup between two mast locations within 2% of measured Re-run for 2017 Results normalised to undisturbed upstream location

Results In 2017 –wind speeds increase 2% to 7%. –Turbulence intensity decreases on average by 4% to 13% –Area of recirculation appears due to growth of plot of trees –Able to modify felling plan based on impact on individual turbines

Conclusions Energy yield for a site near forest will change over time! Forest management can potentially improve performance, without wholesale clearance Understanding of the effect of trees on turbine output is greatly improved using VENTOS