9/26/11HFT soft meeting, BNL1 Chain analysis fz file MuDst.root minimc.root geant.root event.root McEvent.root StMiniMcMaker StAssociationMaker : STAR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ozgur Ates Hampton University HUGS 2009-JLAB TREK Experiment “Tracking and Baseline Design”
Advertisements

Outline  motivations  methods: ITS: TPC+ITS(-1 layer) tracks SPD: SPD standalone  tracklets  strategy with data  conclusions Studi di Efficienza dell’ITS.
Combined tracking based on MIP. Proposal Marian Ivanov.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
B triggering Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa Consorzio CMS Italia Firenze 7 Sept
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
October 20th, 2006 A. Mazzacane 1 4 th Concept Software First Results.
ALICE HLT High Speed Tracking and Vertexing Real-Time 2010 Conference Lisboa, May 25, 2010 Sergey Gorbunov 1,2 1 Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies,
X.Dong, USTC/LBNL Feb. 20th, 04, STAR Collaboration Meeting 1 TOF Software Progress Xin Dong, for TOF Group  TOF detectors in Run IV  Online software.
The LiC Detector Toy M. Valentan, M. Regler, R. Frühwirth Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna InputSimulation ReconstructionOutput.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
STAR StiVmc V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
SVX Software Overview Sasha Lebedev VTX meeting 09/07/ SVX Software web page:
Performance requirements High-Level Key Performance Parameters (KPP) The high-level KPPs cannot be directly measured without beam. The capability to achieve.
HFT + TOF: Heavy Flavor Physics Yifei Zhang University of Science & Technology of China Lawrence Berkeley National Lab TOF Workshop, Hangzhou, April,
Charmed Meson Measurement using Silicon Detectors (SVT+SSD) in Au+Au Collisions at 200GeV in STAR Experiment at RHIC Jaiby Joseph Kent State University.
20 June 2005Sonja Hillertp. 1 A M J J A S O N D J F M FY 05 / 06 FY 06 / 07 FY 07 / 08FY 08 / 09FY 09 / GEANT work 1.2 charge generation.
GlueX Software Status April 28, 2006 David Lawrence, JLab.
David N. Brown Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Representing the BaBar Collaboration The BaBar Mini  BaBar  BaBar’s Data Formats  Design of the Mini 
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
Event Generator Event Generators Information needed Event Generator Information Event Kinematic Information Generated Event Structure – generated particles.
Event Data History David Adams BNL Atlas Software Week December 2001.
Datasets on the GRID David Adams PPDG All Hands Meeting Catalogs and Datasets session June 11, 2003 BNL.
Andreas Morsch, CERN EP/AIP CHEP 2003 Simulation in ALICE Andreas Morsch For the ALICE Offline Project 2003 Conference for Computing in High Energy and.
D0 analysis update with (  Vertex) code MIT 8 July 2009 BNL: Y. Fisyak, V. Perevoztchikov Kent : J. Bouchet, J. Joseph, S. Margetis, J. Vanfossen Nantes:
STAR Software Walk-Through. Doing analysis in a large collaboration: Overview The experiment: – Collider runs for many weeks every year. – A lot of data.
Y.Fisyak, BNL - STAR Upgrade workshop, 12/2/ Integrated Tracker – STAR tracking framework of the future update on  status and  perspective IT(TF)
Update Chris Rogers, Analysis PC, 13/07/06. State of the “Accelerator” Simulation Field model now fully implemented in revised MICE scheme Sanity checking.
1 Request for MuDst revision Y.Fisyak, 03/05/08 S&C meeting.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
STAR STAR VMC tracker V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
Simulations for CBM CBM-India Meeting, Jammu, 12 February 2008 V. Friese
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
ITTF Status STAR Analysis Meeting Dec 5, 04 Claude Pruneau Wayne State University.
ALICE Offline Week, CERN, Andrea Dainese 1 Primary vertex with TPC-only tracks Andrea Dainese INFN Legnaro Motivation: TPC stand-alone analyses.
Integrated Tracker (progress, status, plans) Y. Fisyak.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
Year -2 topics simulations needs for these Barbara Jacak March 2, 2001.
HLT/AliRoot integration C.Cheshkov, P.Hristov 2/06/2005 ALICE Offline Week.
10/25/11update BFC with pixl patch1 Update on the simulation with pixl patches BFC chain was working with TPC+full PiXL but crashes when I used patches.
5/9/111 Update on TMVA J. Bouchet. 5/9/112 What changed background and signal have increased statistic to recall, signal are (Kpi) pairs taken from single.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
1 Fast Pixel Simulation Howard Wieman, Xiangming Sun Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
BESIII Track Extrapolation & Matching Wang Liangliang EPC IHEP.
David Adams ATLAS Datasets for the Grid and for ATLAS David Adams BNL September 24, 2003 ATLAS Software Workshop Database Session CERN.
D0 analysis in HFT era with (  Vertex) code LBL May 12, 2010 BNL: Y. Fisyak, V. Perevoztchikov [A. Kisel (guest)] Kent : J. Bouchet, J. Joseph, S. Margetis,
IITF and UPCs UPC Specific Requirements Processing  0 analysis e + e - analysis (by Vladimir Morozov) Conclusions Spencer Klein.
STAR SVT Self Alignment V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
STAR Simulation. Status and plans V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
Sti primary track puzzle Yuri Fisyak. Charge dependent relative difference in primary track transverse momentum between Sti (.dev) and TpT On STAR collaboration.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
BES III Software: Beta Release Plan Weidong Li 19 th October 2005.
21/5/03J.E Campagne Opera Framework: Status Report.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
HYDRA Framework. Setup of software environment Setup of software environment Using the documentation Using the documentation How to compile a program.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
Y. Fisyak1, I. Kisel2, I. Kulakov2, J. Lauret1, M. Zyzak2
Software Overview S. Margetis Kent State University HFT CD0 Review.
STAR coll. Meeting, March 26-31, BNL
W→τν Note & Tau candidates in first data
Distribution of MC Information
Physics with the HFT prototype?
STAR Geometry and Detectors
PIXEL patch efficiency
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Presentation transcript:

9/26/11HFT soft meeting, BNL1 Chain analysis fz file MuDst.root minimc.root geant.root event.root McEvent.root StMiniMcMaker StAssociationMaker : STAR makers matched reconstructed data and simulated data. StRecTree Private maker Uses event.root to make recTree containing vertex and matched track information. rectree.root Single track and pairs analysis shown in CD0-1-R were done using this structure. User_analysis.root Analysis should use STAR framework using minimc.root (for DCA resolution,.etc.. ) and MuDst (real data).  Does the minimc.root contains all the information needed for our analysis ?  If not, proposal to modify (without breaking its scheme) the current minimc tree with our needs.

9/26/11HFT soft meeting, BNL2 StMiniMcTree structure StMiniMcTree Global variable: Event Primary vertex … Track collections Matched Pairs Splitted Pairs MatGlobal Pairs McTrack Pairs Merged Pairs Contam Pairs Ghosts Pairs 1.All track collections have the same tree structure. 2.For analysis we are using mostly the matchedPairs collection.

9/26/11HFT soft meeting, BNL3 MiniMcTree structure Event level :  Reconstructed primary vertex position and geant primary vertex position.  Multiplicity, number of tracks, event id. Track level (for both the MonteCarlo track and the reconstructed track) :  Kinematic : Pt,Pz,η,φ  Geant information : particle geant id, particle parent geant id, start and stop points. Number of hits in detector used during tracking :  TPC, SSD  PIXEL, IST  TOF information : NTOF hits, TOF Tray Id, TOF module, TOF local hits, TOF pathLength.  (  )means (not) in common in RecTree

9/26/11HFT soft meeting, BNL4 MiniMcTree structure (cont’) The DCA is also needed for analysis 1.in minimc: 1.dcaXYPr, dcaZPr,dcaXYPrMcV,dcaZPrMcV are saved : DCA of primary tracks wrt the reconstructed and MC primary vertex 2.The same for global track  We should make sure that it corresponds to DCA filled in MuDst tree. 2.in rectree : 1.DCAXYPr (DCA in transverse plan wrt the reconstructed primary vertex) and DCAZPr (DCA along Z) are reconstructed (the same is saved also wrt the MC primary vertex)  We should also make sure that studies done minimc reproduce the results done with RecTree.

9/26/11HFT soft meeting, BNL5 Answer to question 4) Then propose what info might be saved in minimc  currently : Minimc has only information about reconstructed track (daughters tracks) : Its start and stop point. For evaluation of secondary vertex, we need the stop point of the parent. This information is saved in geant.root  To avoid multiple loops over different files to recover this information, we would like this information in the minimc tree.  We need the PIXEL and IST hits in the minimc tree done in private code but should check the results. issue : code crashes in DEV (bug #2137) because of StIstHitLoader  We need the TOF information Not only related to HFT.

9/26/11HFT soft meeting, BNL6 Answer to question 5) Then propose some kind of structure for HFT (initial proposal)  Kalman secondary vertex for pairs analysis.  Should be directly integrated in a general output tree containing event,vertex, track information that all users can use. (according to their analysis).  That means to have a code in /offline/users/HFT (or any official place) where MuDst (real data) are processed to add the secondary vertex information.

9/26/11HFT soft meeting, BNL7 end

9/26/11HFT soft meeting, BNL8 What is needed for secondary vertex fit using Kalman 1.KFParticle.h, Mvertex.h, MTrack.h  (in CVS) 2.Primary vertex position and its error  3.Tracks information : 1.DCA :  requires StDcaGeometry.h and THelixTrack.h ( in CVS )  dcaXYPr and dcaZPr (saved in minimc.root) are not enough to rebuild the full track. 2.Covariance matrix (5x5)  There is an array of track errors in minimc but it’s only an array of 5 elements, so it might correspond to the diagonal terms 