Slideshow copyright: Director James Hanken Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA If any enquiries: please contact

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A) What is DNA Barcoding i) What are the barcoding regions and what are their properties that make them useful? [Richard Pyle, Bishop Museum, USA – amongst.
Advertisements

The noisome weeds which without profit suck The soil's fertility from wholesome flowers. - William Shakespeare, The Tragedy of King Richard II.
BARCODING LIFE, ILLUSTRATED Goals, Rationale, Results ppt v1
Robert Hanner, PhD Database Working Group Chair, CBOL Global Campaign Coordinator, FISH-BOL Associate Director, Canadian Barcode of Life Network Biodiversity.
PlantCollections A Community Solution An Institute of Museum and Library Services National Leadership Grant Building Digital Resources.
Aims to establish a catalogue of all organisms (10-30 million species) Ultimately a small portable hand held device will be used to identify samples using.
 DNA barcoding using the cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene will allow species identification within the genus Agrilus. This will allow the positive identification.
Catalogue of Life, Reading, UK, 29 March 2007 Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL): Linking Molecules to the Catalogue of Life David E. Schindel,
DNA Barcodes: Linking GenBank records to Museum Specimens David E. Schindel, Executive Secretary, CBOL Robert Hanner, University of Guelph.
Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes Fulgerator Paul Hebert, Erin Penton, John Burns,
All Birds Barcoding Initiative (ABBI) goal: create DNA barcode library for world birds.
Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes Fulgerator Paul Hebert, Erin Penton, John Burns,
Data Analysis Working Group, DIMACS, 26 Sept 2005 DNA Barcoding and the Consortium for the Barcode of Life David E. Schindel, Executive Secretary National.
DNA barcoding: a new diagnostic tool for rapid species recognition, identification, and discovery James Hanken Museum of Comparative Zoology Harvard University,
Topic : Phylogenetic Reconstruction I. Systematics = Science of biological diversity. Systematics uses taxonomy to reflect phylogeny (evolutionary history).
ABBI/FISH-BOL meeting, Buenos Aires, March 2007 Overview of DNA Barcoding David E. Schindel, Executive Secretary Consortium for the Barcode of Life National.
BioBarcode: a general DNA barcoding database and server platform for Asian biodiversity resources Jeongheui Lim Korean BioInformation Center Korea Research.
Dan Masiga Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Department International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya BARCODE Data Standard The.
Consortium for the Barcode of Life A rapid, cost-effective system for species identification David E. Schindel, Executive Secretary National Museum of.
Finding relationships and differences by bar-coding jellyfish species Dr. David Pontin.
Ann Bucklin 1, Robert M. Jennings 1, Brian D. Ortman 1, Lisa Nigro 1, C.J. Sweetman 1, Nancy J. Copley 2, and Peter H. Wiebe 2 1 Department of Marine Sciences,
Richard White Biodiversity Data. Outline Biodiversity: what is it? – Definitions: is biodiversity: A resource? Something which can be measured? How to.
DNA Barcoding Amy Driskell Laboratories of Analytical Biology
Scott Miller – SANBI, 7 April 2006 Overview of DNA Barcoding and the Barcode of Life Initiative Scott E. Miller, Chair, CBOL Executive Committee National.
DNA barcoding of fungi: a feasibility analysis Donal Hickey, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
At the frontline of publishing in systematic zoology: A presentation of ZooKeys Lyubomir Penev 1, Terry Erwin 2, Jeremy Miller 3 1 Pensoft Publishers,
Barcoding the Birds of the Palearctic Kevin C.R. Kerr University of Guelph Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Canada Collaborators: S. Birks, S. Rohwer,
The Evolutionary History of Biodiversity
Working group III: Infrastructure Needs Zooplankton collections Taxonomic Training CMarZ Network Website, Database & Species pages.
Field Work, Herbaria, Databases, Floras, and Monographs for Plant Systematics Spring 2014.
South/Central America Regional Meeting, Campinas, Brazil, 19 March 2007 Overview of Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) David E. Schindel, Executive.
Freek T. Bakker Nationaal Herbarium Nederland Wageningen University branch DNA barcoding: the CBOL perspective.
A platform for promoting partnerships in taxonomy Eastern Africa Barcode of Life workshop, Nairobi, October 2006 Richard Smith (Director, Secretariat)
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006 DNA Barcoding: An Emerging Global Standard for Species Identification Consortium for the Barcode of Life National Museum.
Progress since the February 2005 London DNA Barcode of Life Conference Scott Miller, Chair Consortium for the Barcode of Life Smithsonian Institution.
Aspects for Improving the ABBI Patricia Escalante Instituto de Biología UNAM AOU-Collections Committee member.
Session 4: The Convention on Biological Diversity Making Access Decisions.
Survey Priorities Discussion Group Participants: Wang Hao, Cristiano, Megan, Wiggy, Curtis, Simon, Henni, Kristen, Naamal, Matt, Lisa, Leeanne, Tom L.
Richard White Biodiversity Informatics. What is biodiversity informatics? The preceding project, among others, shows that the challenges facing biodiversity.
DNA barcoding: bane or boon (or both) for taxonomy? Donal A. Hickey, Concordia University, Montreal. Collaborators: Mehrdad Hajibabaei and Gregory Singer.
FISH SPECIES IDENTIFICATION AND BIODIVERSIFICATION IN ENUGU METROPOLIS RIVER BY DNA BACODING PRESENTED BY Chioma Nwakanma (PhD) Michael Okpara University.
Characterization, Inventory and Monitoring of trends in indigenous livestock Dr. E. D. Ilatsia D. N. Kamiti 23-Oct-15Animal Breeding and Genomics Group1.
National Science Foundation – 7 February 2006 Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) David E. Schindel, Executive Secretary National Museum of Natural.
Eastern Africa Regional Meeting, Nairobi, 18 October 2006 DNA Barcoding and the Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) Status in 2006, Ambitions for.
Patterns of divergent selection from combined DNA barcode and phenotypic data Tim Barraclough, Imperial College London.
Census of Marine Zooplankton CMarZ is a taxonomically comprehensive, global- scale census of marine zooplankton, to produce accurate and complete information.
Global Biodiversity Information Facility GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION FACILITY Meredith A. Lane CODATA/ERPANET Workshop: Scientific Data Selection &
From Small to Big… Gail Kampmeier Illinois Natural History Survey University of Illinois
DNA Barcoding and the Consortium for the Barcode of Life Katie Ferrell, Project Manager National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution
DNA Barcoding and the Consortium for the Barcode of Life Scott Miller Smithsonian Institution
Tephritid Barcoding Initiative
Linking Barcode Data to Multiple Users David E. Schindel, Executive Secretary National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution
Context: The Strategic Plan for Establishing the Network Integrated Biocollections Alliance Judith E. Skog, Office of the Assistant Director, Biological.
Fish -Nearly half of all vertebrates species : marine, freshwater species (Fish base) FISH-BOL(Fish Barcode of Life Initiative) -Establish.
40 th Coccidosis Conference and Workshop “Taxonomy (α and β) and Systematics of the Coccidia” John R. Barta and R. Scott Seville University of Guelph,
Integrative taxonomy Gustav Paulay Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida.
Integrative taxonomy Gustav Paulay Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida.
Evolution & Phylogeny. Evidence Used to Construct History Comparative Morphology of Living forms: Comparative Embryology: Comparative Molecular Biology:
Driving towards Impact through Development Goals Washington, DC 04/13/2011.
INTRODUCTION Use of DNA data in determining phylogenetic relationships is well established. DNA barcode approach to use.
UPDATE ACTIVITIES IN THE ASIA REGION NOCOURSE/ WORKSHOP/ MEETING VENUEDATE START DATE END DURATIONS (DAYS) SPONSORED 1 APPPC Workshop on System.
André Hoddevik, Project Director Enlargement of the PEPPOL-consortium 2009.
CNR ITB, Bari Section - BioInformatics and Genomics MOLECULAR BIODIVERSITY Barcode: A new challenge for Bioinformatics Cecilia Saccone Meeting FIRB 2005.
Hidden in Plain Sight: Analysis of Biodiversity
Introduction Conclusion References Aim of the work
The emerging role of molecular markers in coccidian speciation:
Gene-sequence analysis reveals at least three species hidden in Zausodes arenicolus Erin Easton November 13, 2008.
Benjamin Wooden, Nicolas Goossens, Yujin Hoshida, Scott L. Friedman 
Field Work, Herbaria, Databases, Floras,
Exploring Biodiversity for Solutions
Presentation transcript:

Slideshow copyright: Director James Hanken Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA If any enquiries: please contact Use only with permission from author!

DNA barcoding: a new diagnostic tool for rapid species recognition, identification, and discovery James Hanken Museum of Comparative Zoology Harvard University, USA

What is DNA barcoding? Definition: Derivation of a short DNA sequence(s) that enables species identification or recognition in a particular domain of life (eucaryotes). Focus to date—in animals—has been on a 658 base-pair (bp) fragment of the mitochondrial gene, cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI). The Barcode of Life Initiative (BOLI) would resolve barcodes for named species and use a barcoding approach to assess undescribed biological diversity. Very controversial!

What isn’t DNA barcoding? It is not intended to, in any way, supplant or invalidate existing taxonomic practice. It is not DNA-taxonomy; it does not equate species identity, formally or informally, with a particular DNA sequence. It is not intended to duplicate or compete with efforts to resolve deep phylogeny, e.g., Assembling the Tree of Life (ATOL).

“the role of any molecular diagnostic is to aid research, not to serve as an end in itself. Barcoding … is independent of questions as to whether individual taxa are species, what species are (or should be), and where they fit in a unified tree of life…. Barcoding is not an end in itself, but will boost the rate of discovery. The unique contribution of DNA barcoding to … taxonomy and systematics is a compressed timeline for the exploration and analysis of biodiversity.”

Recent chronology (2003) JanuaryHebert et al., in Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. February Tautz et al., in TREE, and related letters and commentary. March Banbury I at CSHL, Taxonomy and DNA. May Hebert et al., in Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. June More letters and commentary in TREE. Pennisi, in “Tree of Life” issue of Science; “It’s not research” (J. Rodman, NSF). September Stoeckle, in BioScience. Banbury II at CSHL, Taxonomy, DNA and the Barcode of Life. December Besansky et al., in Trends in Parasitology.

Potential applications 1) Facilitating identification and recognition of named (described) species: linking life history stages, genders; differentiating cryptic species; identifying gut contents; human disease vectors; agricultural pests; biosecurity (?). 2) Surveying and inventorying biodiversity; e.g., flagging potentially new (undescribed) species.

Linking life history stages, genders male C. fenyesi (parasitic in ant) female C. fenyesi (parasitic in cricket)

Differentiating cryptic species Astraptes fulgerator, skipper butterfly. Wide-ranging; southern U.S. to northern Argentina. In northwestern Costa Rica, comprises complex of 10 sympatric species that are distinct in DNA sequence (COI), larval coloration, food plants, and subtle morphological traits. D. Janzen, et al., submitted

Sympatric larvae of Astraptes fulgerator Food plant: Celtis iguanaea Food plant: Trigonia (2 species); larvae will starve if reared on plants used by other larval types.

Strengths Offers alternative taxonomic identification tool for situations in which morphology is inconclusive. Focus on one or a small number of genes provides greater efficiency of effort. Cost of DNA sequencing is dropping rapidly due to technical advances. Potential capacity for high throughput and processing large numbers of samples. Once reference database is established, can be applied by non-specialist.

Weaknesses Assumes intraspecific variation is negligible, or at least lower than interspecific values. No single gene will work for all taxa (e.g., COI is not appropriate for vascular plants, or even for some animals). Single-gene approach is less precise than using multiple genes; may introduce unacceptable error. Some of the most attractive aspects rely on future technology, e.g., handheld sequencer.

% Proportion of species pairs % n = 13,320 n = 17 Annelida, Arthropoda, Chordata, Mollusca, Echinodermata, Nematoda, Platyhelminthes Cnidaria (corals, anemones, jellyfish, sea pens, etc.) Between-species sequence divergence in COI (%)

COI sequence divergence among North American birds K2P (%)

Sequence data Barcoding must adhere to standards for specimen and data management Voucher specimens and electronic databases Digital images

Pilot projects 2) Possible targets: “All taxa”—primates, turtles, mosquitoes, tephritid fruitflies, birds, sphinx moths, salamanders, etc. Regional faunas, e.g., Gulf of Maine megafauna. Existing inventories, e.g., INBio and ACG (Costa Rica). 1) Goals and objectives: Validate barcoding approach, in general, and the use of COI, in particular (for animals); i.e., proof of principle. Assess feasibility of large-scale effort, e.g., identify bottlenecks, cost, logistic issues. 3) Would rely principally on museum specimens.

Barcoding must validate existing taxonomy before it can be offered as an identification tool, and especially before it can be used to discover new species. Pilot projects will utilize museum specimens. New inventory efforts will yield large numbers of vouchers, which must be properly accessioned, databased, and stored. Results will flag many new species requiring formal description. Additional burden on museums, herbaria, etc., but may also offer new sources of support. Role of museums (and impact) 

DNA barcoding is under way… See also Nature 426: 514 (4 Dec 2003)

and appeals to the biotech sector

Anticipated next steps (2004) January: Working group submits a grant proposal to found a coordinating Secretariat to develop a Barcode of Life Initiative (BOLI) based in Washington, DC; decision expected late March. May: Founding meeting of the BOLI Consortium (museums and herbaria) at U.S. Smithsonian Institution (NMNH). Late fall: First International Barcode of Life Conference; venue TBD.

The Barcode of Life Initiative needs broad international participation Please consider joining the consortium as an institutional member. Plan to attend the BOL conference in late For further information, please contact Scott Miller.