T.E.E.G.S Transportation, Emergency, and Environmental GIS Services Matt Smith Project Manager Lauren Bender GIS Analyst Amanda Magera GIS Analyst Aaron.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vegetative Risk Management Plan Template Details for Development by Section.
Advertisements

Mass Burial Sites for Marion County, Indiana Spanish flu victims’ burial, North River, Labrador, Canada 1918.
Potential Sites for Transit-Oriented Development in San Diego Katie Lemmon UP 206 A Final Project March 14, 2011.
Claire DeVaughan U.S. Geological Survey NSDI Partnership Office Austin, Texas COGNA October 20, 2004 Integrating Local Data Sets into The National Map.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003.
Nonmotorized Regional System Plan 1 3 rd Technical Task Force meeting Regional Nonmotorized Transportation System Plan Thursday April 3 rd 2014 Steer Davies.
Sidewalk Inventory of Seguin, Texas A Wellness and Lifetime Knowledge Project (WALK ) Data Sources TIPHER (client), Chamber of Commerce, Seguin Police.
Collaboration Opportunities Urban Foresters & Emergency Managers Urban Tree Risk Management & Vegetation Risk Management.
Raster Based GIS Analysis
Land Use Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit: The Boston Silver Line Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for.
Introduction to GIS Ghassan Mikati, Ph.D GIS Expert.
January 30, 2006Site Selection - IAP 2006 Site Selection – Making Spatial Decisions Using GIS IAP 20061/30/06.
Low-Density Urbanization and Southern California Critical Habitats Steven Guerry UP206a Final Project Winter 2011.
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
GIS and GPS in Agriculture Agricultural Facilities Design & Fabrication c 5 B.
“Flood monitoring and mapping for Emergency Response in San Antonio-Texas” Part I by Silvana Alcoz Source photo Term.
L. Guilliams, C. Pennington, G. Shreve Sidewalk Inventory City of Seguin, Texas Wellness and Lifetime Knowledge WALK.
Preparing Data for Analysis and Analyzing Spatial Data/ Geoprocessing Class 11 GISG 110.
Socio-Economic Benefits of Austin’s Tree Canopy Final report presented by: Kyle Fuchshuber (Project Manager) Jerad Laxson (Asst. Project Manager) Megan.
Rachel Cavin, Manager James Dodds, Assistant Manager Taylor Dorn, GIS Analyst Kyler McNew, GIS Analyst Cartographic Modeling of Sidewalk Location Selection.
CYCL e TROPOLIS Analyzing america’s no.1 bike city cort eidem crp 551 : july 2011 cort eidem crp 551 : july 2011.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Richmond Highway Transit Center Feasibility Study Briefing with the Fairfax County Transportation.
Rachel Cavin, Manager James Dodds, Assistant Manager Taylor Dorn, GIS Analyst Kyler McNew, GIS Analyst Final Report Cartographic Modeling of Sidewalk Location.
Lone Star Members Project Manager: Bob Armentrout Assistant Manager: Nina Castillo Web Designer: Daniel Roberts Analysts: Cade Colston, Mehs Ess, Linda.
GIS Modeling for Primary Stroke Center Development Anna Kate Sokol, M.U.P. Sr. GIS Specialist City of South Bend, IN.
Identifying Vulnerable Populations to Hurricanes in the city of Tampa, Florida Dr. Jennifer Collins and Dustin Hinkel Department of Geography, The University.
ACWQ Austin Canopy & Water Quality Progress Report: Austin Tree-Canopy Resource, Phase II Spring 2012, Geography 4427, Texas State University April 2,
AUSTIN, TX AN ANALYSIS OF GROWTH AND DRIVING FACTORS.
Network Screening 1 Module 3 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho.
DeWitt County Emergency Response Handbook 1 of 14 Project Manager: Robert Gannon Assistant Project Manager: Matt Ahrens GIS Analyst: George Caracostis.
GIS and GPS in Logistics, Planning and Management Systems c 10 D.
Travel Speed Study of Urban Streets Using GPS &GIS Tom E. Sellsted City of Yakima, Washington Information Systems and Traffic.
Socio-Economic Benefits of Austin’s Tree Canopy Progress report presented by: Kyle Fuchshuber (Project Manager) Jerad Laxson (Asst. Project Manager) Megan.
People commuting to UW suffer delays, congestion using both public and private transportation. We propose a park & ride system with express shuttle service.
An Analysis of 2000 IH-35 Traffic Composition and Reassignment Solutions Performed by: Manager: Caleb Kraenzel Assistant Manager: Georgia Appleman Webmaster/Analyst:
San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building Department Jeff Legato Mapping and Graphics Specialist
T.E.E.G.S Transportation, Emergency, and Environmental GIS Services Matt Smith Project Manager Lauren Bender GIS Analyst Amanda Magera GIS Analyst Aaron.
Site Suitability for Lake Overholser Cassi Poor CRP 551.
DEVELOPMENT OF FIRE RESPONSE ZONES USING NETWORK ROUTING TO DETERMINE SERVICE AREAS AND RESPONSE TREES Alex Smith Capstone Peer Review Presentation October.
Accessibility and Feasibility of Recreational and Fitness Facilities in Ames GIS-CRP 551 Final Project Yang Bai.
Vital Signs 11: Development and Results of Sustainability Indicators 1 Presentation to NNIP Columbus, Ohio June 21, 2013 Matthew Kachura Research Associate.
San Marcos Flooding EAGLE Project Manager Justine Williams Assistant Manager Joshua Bridges Web Master Alexander Nankervis GIS Analysts David Smith David.
Road Erosion Potential Town of New Paltz Ulster County State of New York.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Developing Customer Oriented Transit Performance Measures National Transit GIS Conference.
Introduction to Sugar Access
When you begin a project, a reference data layer is placed on the map first. This initial layer(s) is called the base map. There are different types of.
Conclusion BACKGROUND Since the basis of this analysis is not based on the skill of the offender, but rather, an inherent dependence on environmental and.
San Marcos Fire Station Location Analysis Andrea Nieto, Bryan Heisinger, Nadine Oliver Matthew Mitchell.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
Nuclear Power Plant Site Exploration By: Spencer Livermore Blake Costa Nate Dillow Charlie Nystrom Ryan Brunner.
Mapping of Traffic Conditions at Downtown Thessaloniki with the Help of GPS Technology P. D. Savvaidis and K. Lakakis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,
WFM 6202: Remote Sensing and GIS in Water Management © Dr. Akm Saiful IslamDr. Akm Saiful Islam WFM 6202: Remote Sensing and GIS in Water Management Dr.
Land cover change in the Travis county GIS in Water Resources Fall 2015 University of Texas at austin Julie C Faure.
RIVERSTONE CONNECTION STUDY Task Force Meeting #4 June 19, 2013.
Girvin Road Improvements (Atlantic Blvd. to Wonderwood Dr.) Public Information Meeting March 3, 2016.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment.
Urban Tree Risk Management A Comprehensive Framework Part II Mississippi Urban Forest Council Urban Forestry and Green Infrastructure Conference Mississippi.
Spatial analysis for neighborhood accessibility GIS Water Resources Anna Okola.
Planning Commission Meeting July 30, Presentation Outline  Project Purpose, Background and Schedule  Overview of Community Input  Overview of.
 Connect the Coastside Presentation Half Moon Bay City Council Briefing March 15,
DeWitt County Emergency Response Handbook 1 of 9 Project Manager: Robert Gannon Assistant Project Manager: Matt Ahrens GIS Analyst: George Caracostis.
Austin Tree Planting Prioritization
Members Cliff Walden- Manager Ty Wolosin- Assistant Manager
Staging Areas Utilizing Urban Tree Risk Index (UTRI) GIS Tool
Neighborhood Planning Area
Research Question Study Area = Twin Cities 7 County Metro
Risk-Based Prioritization for Investigating Illicit Discharges Along TxDOT ROW Prepared by: G.O.A.T. – Geographers of Austin Texas INTRODUCTION MAPS METHODS.
Wildfire Evacuation Analysis in the Travis County WUI
Presentation transcript:

T.E.E.G.S Transportation, Emergency, and Environmental GIS Services Matt Smith Project Manager Lauren Bender GIS Analyst Amanda Magera GIS Analyst Aaron Gore GIS Analyst Rank-Ordering Proactive Tree Maintenance for Emergency Response Routing for the City of Austin Urban Forestry Program

Austin Parks and Recreation Department  The City of Austin Parks and Recreation Department wishes to be proactive and not reactive in the identification and subsequent removal of potential tree hazards from the city of Austin’s roadways. The identification and removal of potential tree hazards will help optimize the cities tree removal services and clear potential hazards for emergency service vehicles.

Purpose  Generate a comprehensive tree hazard inventory  A ranking system will be used to highlight areas with the greatest threat potential in order to prioritize preventative tree maintenance  T.E.E.G.S. will accomplish this by utilizing a GIS to analyze the existing tree shade index and identifying areas of high tree density which intersect or overlay with emergency service routes

Scope City of AustinCity Limits

Data Data Created by TEEGS LayerSource Emergency Service Locations (Points of Origin)Google Earth Destination PointsGoogle Earth Top 150 Population PointsCensus Bureau Census Blocks Road NetworkCity of Austin Streets Layer Street PolygonsCity of Austin Streets Layer Street AnalysisCity of Austin Streets Layer and Street Polygon Layer Data Obtained by TEEGS LayerSource StreetsCity of Austin HospitalsCity of Austin Parks and HydrologyCity of Austin Tree Canopy CoverUrban Forestry Program Austin City LimitsCAPCOG Travis CountyCAPCOG Census BlocksCensus Bureau

Methodology  Identify APD, AFD, EMS, and Schools  Google: “what’s here”  Project latitude and longitude coordinates  Create Emergency Services Layer  Merge APD, AFD, and EMS  67 total  Identify Population Points  Census Blocks with 2.5 miles of city limits  Block Centroid  Top 150 points within City Limits (top 1%)

Origin and Destination Points

Methodology  Create Street Polygons  Buffer along street center lines  Clip to provided polygon street layer  Identify Tree Shade Percentage  Identify tree shade cover over street polygon layer  Dissolve by street segment  Tree shade/total = percentage

Tree Shade Percentage

Methodology  Create Destination Layer  Merge population points, schools, and hospitals  Schools were used as a secondary population measure  Create Emergency Service Route Frequency Layer  Point to Point route (model)  Turn into feature  Merge all routes  Run frequency by segment  Join to streets layer

Route Frequency

Methodology  Create Final Ranking Analysis Layer  Join tree shade layer to road network with Emergency Services Frequency  Multiply frequency by canopy cover percentage  Rank by output  Top 5 segments labeled as most critical  Create Relative Ranking  Multiplied the frequency and the canopy cover  Divided that by the highest final score  Then multiplied by 100

Results

 After completing our analysis we were returned with very interesting results.  Many road segments returned very little or no Relative Rank.  Our findings were largely concentrated in 3 particular areas in Austin. These areas included; 1. The Shoal Creek Area  This area is located in the area around Shoal Creek between Enfield and 24 th Street.  It contains 7 of our top 25 road segments, as well as 5 of our top 7.  Windsor Road is the most critical part of this area; this road contains the 1 st, 2 nd, and 5 th highest ranked segments in Austin.

Results

2. Barton Springs and South 1 st Street  This area is located just east of S. Lamar Boulevard and continues uninterrupted on Barton Springs until it’s intersection with South 1 st Street, continuing south from here until the Texas School for the Deaf.  This area includes the 4 th highest ranked road segment in Austin, as well as 3 additional road segments all returning a relative rank of at least 22.

Results

3. Downtown and the University of Texas  The area of Cesar Chavez located between Congress and Trinity contains our 3 rd highest ranked road segment. In addition to this it has 3 highly ranked segments on Cesar Chavez as well as Congress.  Further north of here on Guadalupe (the Drag) there is another concentration of highly ranked road segments.

Results

Implications  City of Austin Urban Forestry Program will be able to identify which road segments pose the greatest threat to the smooth operation of emergency service responses  The city can create a schedule of tree maintenance

Implications  The ranking system created through this project can be used to prioritize streets for clearing in order to allow emergency services to perform rescue services in the aftermath of a large storm  The Route Frequency data can also be used with updated tree shade data to update the ranking systems

Implications  Other cities can use this project as a model for similar studies in their own community.  A similar ranking system can help other cities to mitigate the hazards associated with a green city  A similar project may also be a way to support a plan for more tree planting in the city

Questions