GEF Activities for Assessment and Monitoring for Sustainable Land Management Dr. Maryam Niamir-Fuller Principal Technical Advisor UNDP-GEF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intergovernmental Consultation on Strengthening the Scientific Base of the United Nations Environment Programme
Advertisements

1 The AU-ECA-AfDB Land Policy Initiative Progress Made & Way Forward Joan Kagwanja UNECA Land Governance in Support of the MDGs: Responding to New Challenges.
Analysis of the Agriculture-Environment Nexus
Biodiversity Land Degradation Climate Change Chemicals International Waters Sustainable Forest Management Sustainable Cities Food Security Fisheries Forests.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
International Waters and Land degradation replenishment in GEF 4 (including fees and SGP) Total IW - $355 million for OP 8, 9,10 RBEC IW target - $26,700.
Ecosystem-based adaptation helps to build the resilience of natural habitat and communities to climate change impacts and thereby reduce their vulnerability.
The TerrAfrica/GEF Strategic Investment Programme for Sustainable Land Management in Sub-Saharan Africa (SIP) Presented by Samuel Wedderburn Prepared by.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
United Nations Development Programme
Global Environment Facility GEF approach to synergistic action on global environment issues Espoo, Finland, July 2 – 3, 2003.
UNFCCC Workshops on Synergies and Cooperation with other Conventions Espoo, Finland, 2-4 July 2003 Biological Diversity Perspectives David Cooper, CBD.
UNCCD COP10 Decisions on Collaboration with the GEF GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop 8 to10 May 2012 Antigua and Barbuda.
Water Scarce Ecosystems A proposal for a UNCCD Policy Framework May
Dr. Howard Nelson Biodiversity Specialist Ministry of Planning, Housing and the Environment Trinidad and Tobago.
Environment and Energy Community of Practice meeting, Bratislava, 24 – 26 September, 2007 LAND DEGRADATION.
WHAT IS THE GEF? History and Structure GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Tbilisi, Georgia June 22-24, 2015.
Cross-cutting areas of Capacity Building and Adaptation UNDP Workshop for NIS Environmental Focal Points June 2004.
Biodiversity Land Degradation Climate Change Chemicals International Waters Sustainable Forest Management Sustainable Cities Food Security Fisheries Forests.
Advice/activities related to adaptation to the Global Environment Facility Habiba Gitay Visiting Fellow, Australian National University Vice Chair, STAP.
OPPORTUNITIES AND NEW DIRECTIONS THE GLOBAL MECHANISM’S COMPLEMENTARY ROLE WITH GEF: OPPORTUNITIES AND NEW DIRECTIONS Presentation to the GEF Expanded.
The AIACC Project Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change in Multiple Regions & Sectors UNFCCC Workshop Bonn 9 June 2003.
GEF IN TAJIKISTAN Dr. Neimatullo SAFAROV CBD and CPB National Focal Point Republic of Tajikistan.
Adaptation knowledge needs and response under the UNFCCC process Adaptation Knowledge Day V Session 1: Knowledge Gaps Bonn, Germany 09 June 2014 Rojina.
SESSION 2: Making the case for public investment in SLM.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop July 19 – 21, 2011 Monrovia, Liberia.
Ian Gray Natural Resources Forest Financing in Small Island Developing States Nadi, Fiji July 23 – 27, 2012 Opportunities for Forest Finance in GEF-5.
Enabling the rural poor to overcome poverty The Rural Poor Transforming livelihoods in the drylands.
MAPUTO, MOZAMBIQUE August 2, What is STAP? In 1994, the GEF Instrument sets up STAP – “UNEP shall establish, in consultation with UNDP and the World.
GEF-6 Programming Directions in Natural Resources Management
GEF 6 Programming Directions GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Tbilisi, Georgia June 22-24, 2015.
+ The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel (STAP) of the Global Environment Facility (GEF) GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, D.C. January 2015.
GEF Biodiversity Portfolio & Strategic Priorities for GEF-3 Kanta Kumari Biodiversity Program Manager Global Environment Facility.
Summary of concept TerrAfrica Executive Committee Meeting September 2005 GEF Strategic Investment Program for Sustainable Land Management in sub-Saharan.
Institutional Structure of the GEF William Ehlers, Head, External Affairs Team American University Seminar April 9, 2012 Washington, DC.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
Institutional Structure of the GEF GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop September 2011 Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Mohamed Bakarr Senior Environmental Specialist GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC January 17 – 19, 2012 GEF Strategies, Activities and Accomplishment:
Strategic Programmatic Approach Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points East and South Africa June 2008, Windhoek, Namibia.
Presented at UNCCD COP12, Ankara, Turkey by the Land Degradation Focal Area Team Global Environment Facility GEF-6 Programming Update & UNCCD Enabling.
CCD COP Rio Pavilion Special Event 15 October 2015 Chizuru Aoki GEF Secretariat Sustainable Development Goals and Synergy.
Presented at UNCCD COP12, Ankara, Turkey by the Land Degradation Focal Area Team Global Environment Facility Land Degradation Focal Area & SDGs.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop April 5 – 7, 2011 Da Lat, Vietnam.
The AIACC Project Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change Neil Leary, AIACC Science Director AIACC Regional Workshop for Latin America.
St. John’s, Antigua May What is STAP? In 1994, the GEF Instrument sets up STAP – “UNEP shall establish, in consultation with UNDP and the World.
Overall Objective of the Programmatic Approach To secure larger-scale and sustained impact on the global environment through integrating global environmental.
LADA Assistance to the CACILM CMPF Support Project Sustainable Land Management Information System LADA Project Steering Committee Meeting and Technical.
Ian Gray Natural Resources GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC January 17 – 19, 2012 How To Prepare Multi-Focal Area Projects SFM/REDD+ Projects.
GEF Familiarization Seminar 2012 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop July 6 – 9, 2011 Dakar, Senegal.
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel to the Global Environment Facility The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel of the Global Environment Facility.
Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel to the Global Environment Facility The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel of the Global Environment Facility.
Institute for Global Environmental Strategies Regional collaboration on drought early warning systems in Asia International Workshop on Drought Assessment.
Agroforestry Science: Tackling Key Global Development Challenges Presentation at Virginia Tech 16 July 2008 Dennis Garrity Director General.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
GEF-6 Programming Directions in Natural Resources Management
Faustine Zoveda FLR Mechanism, FAO San Juan, Porto Rico – 6 June 2017
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation
Community based Natural Resource Management: Impacts and Lessons Learned from Southern Africa Mike McGahuey and Bob Winterbottom USAID/FRAME May 7,
Institutional Structure of the GEF
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation
Institutional Structure of the GEF
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Institutional Structure of the GEF
GEF-5 Focal Area Strategies
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation
Presentation transcript:

GEF Activities for Assessment and Monitoring for Sustainable Land Management Dr. Maryam Niamir-Fuller Principal Technical Advisor UNDP-GEF

Global Environment Facility (GEF) A multi-donor Trust Fund A multi-donor Trust Fund budget of US$ 3 billion budget of US$ 3 billion Available for projects that protect and enhance global environmental benefits Available for projects that protect and enhance global environmental benefits Implemented by UNDP, UNEP and WB Implemented by UNDP, UNEP and WB  With other executing agencies : FAO, IFAD, RDBs Scientific rigour assured by STAP (Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel) Scientific rigour assured by STAP (Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel) GEF is a financing mechanism of the UNCCD under the Focal Area of Land Degradation (desertification and deforestation) GEF is a financing mechanism of the UNCCD under the Focal Area of Land Degradation (desertification and deforestation)

Why should GEF Focus on Land Degradation ? It is the underlying cause of the breakdown of ecosystems integrity  affects ecosystem functions (cycles of carbon, nitrogen, water, etc) and services for human welfare  affects global processes Wind erosion and dust storms Micro- and meso-level impacts on cloud formation and rainfall patterns Carbon emissions (e.g. fires), sequestration (e.g. agroforestry) and sinks (e.g. grasslands) affects global carbon cycle freshwater flow regimes Even ocean temperatures ?

Affects other global goods, such as biological diversity and international waters is the leading cause of poverty and vulnerability of populations and livelihoods is, together with its consequences, mostly preventable but also difficult to reverse once it happens

GEF and Land Degradation GEF focuses on sustainable land management in three production landscapes : agricultural land, grazing lands, and production forests Programmatic Objective: To protect, restore and enhance ecosystem integrity, stability, functions and services, while enhancing sustainable livelihoods, through :  Demonstration of dissemination of sustainable land management techniques, approaches and solutions  Removal of critical barriers to sustainable land management (legal and policy barriers; institutional and governance barriers; economic and financial barriers; social and behavioral barriers; technology and knowledge barriers) Strategic Objectives of the LD focal area:  I: Promoting systemic change towards SLM  II: Facilitate replication and upscaling of successful SLM practices  III: Generating and disseminating knowledge that addresses current and emergent issues in SLM  IV: Promoting cross focal area synergies and integrated approaches to natural resources management

GEF initiatives of relevance to DeSurvey Global soil organic carbon (UNEP) – research on SOM cycles and trends LADA (FAO/UNEP) – Livestock and Wildlife interactions in dryland Africa (UNEP/ILRI) World Initiative for Sustainable Pastoralism (UNDP) – research, advocacy Capacity building for Sustainable Land management (UNDP) – developing indicators for CB and mainstreaming (process issues) Knowledge from the Land (KM: Land) – UNDP coordinating inter- agency initiative

Knowledge from the Land - (KM:Land) Building a Community of Practice for the GEF Land Degradation Focal Area

KM:Land Overall Goals & Objectives Long term goal of KM:Land is to contribute to:  Enhancing ecosystem integrity, functions and services by encouraging the diffusion of best practices  Cross-fertilization of ideas, enhancing learning and capacity building  Increasing the opportunities for innovation in land degradation mitigation activities Objectives of KM:Land are:  to strengthen the capacity for adaptive management leading to enhanced effectiveness and impact on ecosystem integrity, stability, functions and services  to evaluate the impact and performance of the LD focal area

Three specific objectives 1. Portfolio and project-level indicators demonstrate global environmental benefits derived from actions on combating land degradation (consensus on 2-4 global indicators) 2. An expanded and coherent GEF LD portfolio is supported by a Learning Network linking GEF project stakeholders 3. A process is defined to establish a harmonized monitoring and evaluation system that supports adaptive management to maximize impacts of the GEF LD Focal Area

Knowledge from the Land KM:Land is a multi-UN agency initiative, coordinated by UNDP, and executed by UNU, and engaging: GEF, UNEP, FAO, IFAD, World Bank, Other partners are : UNCCD Secretariat, Global Mechanism, CIDA, Iceland, ….

FRAMEWORKDEVELOPMENT

Existing Frameworks - DPSIR State ImpactPressure Driving ForceResponse

GLOBAL REGIONAL LOCAL Human well-being and poverty reduction Basic Materials Health Good social relations Security Freedom of choice/action Direct drivers of change Changes in local land use Species changes Technology External input Resource consumption Climate change Natural drivers Indirect drivers of change Demographic Economic Sociopolitical Science & technology Cultural and religious Ecosystem Services Provisioning Regulating Cultural Supporting Long-term Short-term

GEF LD Framework Human well-being & Poverty reduction (basic materials, health, social relations, security, freedom) Pressure (Direct drivers) Response State Driving Force (Indirect drivers) Impact on Ecosystem Services (provisioning, regulating, cultural, supporting)

Using the Framework for Assessment

Indicator Selection Criteria CriterionDescription CredibleScientifically credible, at both global and local levels RobustBe relatively insensitive to expected source of interference Space-boundSensitive to changes in space Time-boundSensitive to changes within policy time frames MeasurableMeasurable in qualitative or quantitative terms Portable & UniversalBe repeatable and reproducible in different contexts Cost-effectiveBenefits should outweigh cost of usage, resource allocation CompatibleCompatible with indicators developed and used elsewhere Linked to managementLinked to specific management practice or interventions Scale of applicabilityProvide information at the right spatial and temporal scales

Support from STAP : three studies State of the knowledge on global impacts of Land Degradation (Stocking et.al.) Operationalizing the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Approach (Niemeijer et.al.) Trade-offs : global vs. global, and global vs local (CSIR)

LINKAGES & NEXT STEPS

Key Linkages Collaboration within GEF family  Indicator development and KM in other focal areas, particularly Biodiversity and International Waters  LADA responds to the need to strengthen support to land degradation assessment at international and national levels. identifies socio-economic and environmental benefits in terms of conservation of biodiversity and international waters, and sequestration of carbon. relevant to the process of development of indicators of project- level impacts and, to a lesser extent portfolio-level impacts. However, LADA only covers dryland ecosystems, and will not address the issues of global benefit from SLM per se, nor tackle the issue of attribution LADA and KM:Land are very complementary, and will share governance structures

Key Linkages KM:Land will actively seek broad linkages at regional, international and thematic levels to help create the community of practices Linkage with UN CCD processes  Facilitation of national reporting  CST’s program of work Benchmark & indicators (work of GOE) Best practices Assessments

Key Linkages Linkage with international networks  CGIAR-system wide networks  World Initiative for Sustainable Pastoralism  Collaborative Forest Partnership of the UNFF  EcoAGriculture  Interagency and Expert Group on MDG Indicators  CBD’s work on drylands, forests and agrobiodiversity  UN FCCC’s work on Adaptation to Climate change, and CDM

Exploring linkages between KM:Land and DeSurvey :  Expert consultations (phase 1)  Testing models and indicators in pilot sites and pilot projects (all phases)  Scenario development (phase 3)  Community of practice; sharing experiences (phase 2 and 3)  Presentations at CCD related events (all phases)

Thank you