Dave Corbus, Craig Hansen Presentation at Windpower 2005 Denver, CO May 15-18, 2005 Test Results from the Small Wind Research Turbine (SWRT) Test Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Wind turbines generate electric power from clean renewable sources. They must be robust and.
Advertisements

Dave Corbus, Dan Prascher Presentation at the 24 th ASME Wind Energy Symposium January 10-13, 2005 Analysis and Comparison of Test Results from the Small.
Wind Turbine Session 4.
CFD Simulation: MEXICO Rotor Wake
Delft University of Technology Aeroelastic Modeling and Comparison of Advanced Active Flap Control Concepts for Load Reduction on the Upwind.
ASME 2002, Reno, January VIBRATIONS OF A THREE-BLADED WIND TURBINE ROTOR DUE TO CLASSICAL FLUTTER Morten Hartvig Hansen Wind Energy Department Risø.
Lecture 30 November 4, 2013 ECEN 2060 Lecture 30 Fall 2013.
AeroAcoustics & Noise Control Laboratory, Seoul National University
A Comparison of Multi-Blade Coordinate Transformation and Direct Periodic Techniques for Wind Turbine Control Design Karl Stol Wind Energy Symposium AIAA.
Disturbance Accommodating Control of Floating Wind Turbines
Hazim Namik Department of Mechanical Engineering
Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Blade Load Estimations by a Load Database for an Implementation in SCADA Systems Master Thesis.
Deep Water Offshore Wind Energy By Paul D. Sclavounos Horns Rev Wind Farm (Denmark) - Rated Power 160 MW – Water Depth 10-15m.
WEATS O&M Issues Sandy Butterfield CEO Boulder Wind Power WEATS
Aeroelastic Stability and Control of Large Wind Turbines
The generics of wind turbine nacelle anemometry
Active Control Systems for Wind Turbines
Importance of advanced simulations of electrical system in wind turbines April 2010.
Design of Wind Turbines P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Selection of Optimal Geometrical & Kinematic Variables ….
Module 5.2 Wind Turbine Design (Continued)
W IND –2– H 2 O MECH 4010: Design I Group 12: Jeffrey Allen Daniel Barker Andrew Hildebrand Supervised by: Dr. Alex Kalamkarov Client: Dr. Graham Gagnon.
Wind Turbine Project Recap Wind Power & Blade Aerodynamics
March 2006 Development and Test of a 5 kW Wind Turbine for Modular Autonomous Supply Systems Berthold Hahn Paul Kühn Institut für Solare Energieversorgungstechnik.
Computational Modelling of Unsteady Rotor Effects Duncan McNae – PhD candidate Professor J Michael R Graham.
Design Process Supporting LWST 1.Deeper understanding of technical terms and issues 2.Linkage to enabling research projects and 3.Impact on design optimization.
Wind Modeling Studies by Dr. Xu at Tennessee State University
Where: I T = moment of inertia of turbine rotor.  T = angular shaft speed. T E = mechanical torque necessary to turn the generator. T A = aerodynamic.
Vertical Wind Energy Engineering Ian Duffett Jeff Perry Blaine Stockwood Jeremy Wiseman Design and Evaluation of a Twisted Savonius Wind Turbine.
Aerodynamics and Aeroelastics, WP 2
Smart Rotor Control of Wind Turbines Using Trailing Edge Flaps Matthew A. Lackner and Gijs van Kuik January 6, 2009 Technical University of Delft University.
Dynamically Variable Blade Geometry for Wind Energy
Recent and Future Research for Bird-like Flapping MAVs of NPU Prof. B.F.Song Aeronautics School of Northwestern Polytechnical University.
Innovation for Our Energy FutureNational Renewable Energy Laboratory 1 Gunjit Bir National Renewable Energy Laboratory 47 th AIAA Aerospace Meetings Orlando,
1 Rotor Design Approaches Michael S. Selig Associate Professor Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs Selig, Tangler, and Giguère August 2, 1999  NREL.
LOAD ALLEVIATION ON WIND TURBINE BLADES USING VARIABLE AIRFOIL GEOMETRY Thomas Buhl, Mac Gaunaa, Peter Bjørn Andersen and Christian Bak ADAPWING.
Wind Turbine Aerodynamics Section 2 – Power Control E-Learning UNESCO ENEA Casaccia - February Fabrizio Sardella.
Jason JonkmanSandy ButterfieldNeil Kelley Marshall BuhlGunjit BirBonnie Jonkman Pat MoriartyAlan WrightDaniel Laird 2006 Wind Program Peer Review May 10,
Period 1 presentation. The ruins of a Persian windmill.
REDUCTION OF TEETER ANGLE EXCURSIONS FOR A TWO-BLADED DOWNWIND ROTOR USING CYCLIC PITCH CONTROL Torben Juul Larsen, Helge Aagaard Madsen, Kenneth Thomsen,
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF WIND TURBINE AERODYNAMICS Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows The Analysis.
EWEC 2006, AthensMartin Geyler 1 Hardware-in-the-Loop Development and Testing of New Pitch Control Algorithms EWEC 2006 Athens Martin Geyler, Jochen Giebhardt,
EWEC 2007, MilanoMartin Geyler 1 Individual Blade Pitch Control Design for Load Reduction on Large Wind Turbines EWEC 2007 Milano, 7-10 May 2007 Martin.
HELICOIDAL VORTEX MODEL FOR WIND TURBINE AEROELASTIC SIMULATION Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine.
UPWIND, Aerodynamics and aero-elasticity
European Wind Energy Conference Milan, Italy May 7-11, 2007 Improving Wind Turbine Gearbox Reliability Walt Musial National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2009
Supervisor: Dr David Wood Co-Supervisor: Dr Curran Crawford
A Quantitative Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbines
WIND TURBINE CONTROL DESIGN TO REDUCE CAPITAL COSTS P. Jeff Darrow(Colorado School of Mines) Alan Wright(National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Kathryn.
Period 7.   The more curved side generates low air pressures, due to more surface area. While high pressure air, pushes on the other side of the design.
Power Plant Construction and QA/QC Section 8.3 – Wind Energy Technology Engineering Technology Division.
Bird Strike on Jet Fan. Introduction Modelling of Bird Strike using EUROPLEXUS Full Lagrangian Approach Bird modelled by SPH elements (porous gelatine.
Evan Gaertner University of Massachusetts, Amherst IGERT Seminar Series October 1st, 2015 Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Aerodynamics.
Advanced Controls Research Alan D. Wright Lee Fingersh Maureen Hand Jason Jonkman Gunjit Bir 2006 Wind Program Peer Review May 10, 2006.
WIND TURBINE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows The Analysis.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Aerodynamic Performance of a Small Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine J. Sol. Energy.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Numerical Simulation of the Aerodynamics of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines under.
Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration, Continued (IEA Task 30): Phase II Results of a Floating Semisubmersible Wind System EWEA Offshore Conference November.
SECTION 3 Components part 2. DIFFERENTIALS Adams/Driveline has two differential related components –Entire Differential Unit (Differential Assembly) ●
Model Reduction & Interface Modeling in Dynamic Substructuring Application to a Multi-Megawatt Wind Turbine MSc. Presentation Paul van der Valk.
Wind Turbine Control System
INVESTIGATION OF IDLING INSTABILITIES IN WIND TURBINE SIMULATIONS
Wind Turbine
Jordi Mazón1, Jose I. Rojas2 & David Olmeda2
Rotors in Complex Inflow, AVATAR, WP2
Dynamic Controllers for Wind Turbines
Anatomy of Modern Wind Turbines-1
QUANSER Flight Control Systems Design 2DOF Helicopter 3DOF Helicopter 3DOF Hover 3DOF Gyroscope Quanser Education Solutions Powered by.
Exploring the limits in Individual Pitch Control S. Kanev and T
Electric Machine Design Course
Presentation transcript:

Dave Corbus, Craig Hansen Presentation at Windpower 2005 Denver, CO May 15-18, 2005 Test Results from the Small Wind Research Turbine (SWRT) Test Project

2 SWRT Project SWRT Test Background SWRT Test Supply data for model validation of small furling wind turbines Increase understanding of furling and small wind turbine dynamics Further state-of-the- art test procedures for small wind turbines

3 SWRT Project SWRT Testing and Model Development SWRT Test Three different turbine configurations tested Most comprehensive small turbine test Upgrade FAST model to include furling Perform model comparisons between SWRT FAST and ADAMS models and FAST and SWRT Models often break down more for small turbine conditions In and out of stall more More yawed flow conditions Dynamically active turbine

4 SWRT Project SWRT Test Description Yaw slip rings and encoder Furl Sensor Sonic anemometer junction box Shaft sensor Flap and edge blade strain gages Tower leg load cell “washers” Rotor slip ring, encoder, and amplifiers

5 SWRT Project SWRT shaft sensor - first accurate small turbine thrust measurements  Measures Shaft 0/90 bending, torque, thrust on fixed frame  4 by 4 cross-talk matrix  Critical path load is the shaft bending from gyroscopic loads

6 SWRT Project Pre-testing Turbine Characterization Data for modeling included: –Tail assembly and main frame: Weight, Cg, bi- filar, moment of inertia about yaw axis –Magnet can Cg and moment of inertia –Tail damper properties –Exact turbine geometries –Blade modal test

7 SWRT Project Max and Mean Furl vs. Mean Wind Speed

8 SWRT Project Yaw Rate vs. Mean Wind Speed

9 SWRT Project Rotor Speed vs. Mean Wind Speed

10 SWRT Project Furl vs. Thrust

11 SWRT Project SWRT Furling Event – Time Series Plot

12 SWRT Project Furling and Center of Thrust

13 SWRT Project SWRT Test Configurations  All configurations tested with inverter load –Total of minute records  A few resistor load files taken for each configuration –Some scatter in rpm- torque curve from inverter controller hysteresis SWRT Configuration ABC Airfoil SH3052 SH3055 Lateral shim 4 degree none Swept Area/Rotor Diameter 26.4 m 2 / 5.8 m 35.3m 2 / 6.7 m Blade pitch

14 SWRT Project Furl vs. Wind Speed for Different Configurations

15 SWRT Project Thrust vs. Wind Speed for Different Configurations

16 SWRT Project Ratio of Tail/Met Wind Speed vs. Wind Speed

17 SWRT Project Power/Thrust Ratio for Configurations A and C

18 SWRT Project Furling and Inflow  Use sonic anemometer and meteorological data  Correlate inflow parameters and furling  Shows significance of vertical wind component and coherent turbulent kinetic energy

19 SWRT Project Furling and Richardson Number

20 SWRT Project - CoTKE and vertical gust variance for two files with same wind speed and different furl

21 SWRT Project SWRT Test & Simulation Models SWRT FAST Model  Extensive turbine properties provided by NREL  12 degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) used –Blade flexibility2 flap and 1 edge mode DOF per blade –Drivetrain1 variable generator speed DOF with torque-speed look-up table –Nacelle yaw 1 yaw DOF –Tail-furl 1 tail-furl DOF with nonlinear damper  Aerodynamics –Used dynamic stall and dynamic inflow options in AeroDyn –Original airfoil data based upon Selig wind tunnel tests Tapered tip section airfoil data based upon XFoil predictions by Tod Hanley –Airfoil data “tuned” after comparing with measured Cp-TSR data (very limited range)  Dynamics verified via comparisons with ADAMS

22 SWRT Project Model & Test Comparisons Configuration A Statistics (Inverter Load)

23 SWRT Project Model & Test Comparisons Configuration A Statistics (Cont’d.)

24 SWRT Project Model & Test Comparisons Configuration A Statistics (Cont’d.)

25 SWRT Project Model & Test Comparisons Configuration A Statistics (Cont’d.)

26 SWRT Project Model & Test Comparisons - Configuration B with Resistor Load - Mean wind speed 17.2 m/s

27 SWRT Project Model & Test Comparisons - Configuration B with Resistor Load - Mean wind speed 17.2 m/s

28 SWRT Project Model & Test Comparisons - Configuration B with Resistor Load - Mean wind speed 17.2 m/s

29 SWRT Project Model & Test Comparisons - Configuration B with Resistor Load - Mean wind speed 17.2 m/s

30 SWRT Project SWRT Summary  Most comprehensive small turbine test data set  Better understanding of small wind turbine dynamic behavior, including thrust and furling  SWRT test data and modeling effort will help make furling design efforts for small wind turbines easier, but furling remains a challenge!  Better test procedures for small turbine testing  Inflow analysis shows effects of turbulence  Fundamental shortcomings in aerodynamic modeling are the main reason for test data and model disagreements –3-D stall effects (i.e., rotational augmentation) –Uncertainties in skewed wake correction for yawed flow