TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Michael Brown Regional Science Coordinator ESD 105.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
URBAN ADVANTAGE CONTINUING TEACHER KICK-OFF WELCOME BACK!
Advertisements

Department of Mathematics and Science
I NSTRUCTIONAL S HIFTS IN M ATHEMATICS D EVELOPING P ERSEVERANCE & P ROBLEM -S OLVING S KILLS J’lene Cave Genevieve Silebi Shanon Cruz Jenny Kim.
 APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP Wendy Whitmer REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR NEWESD 101.
The Adventure Continues: Exploring the Next Generation Science Standards.
Northwest Science Leadership Network Welcome! Please have a seat where you like. Complete the probe “Science and Engineering Practices Implementation”
February 11, 2014 KINDERGARTEN SCIENCE: DAY 2. Paul Drummond Jennifer Gottlieb Science Consultants, MISD WELCOME!
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 2 Michael Brown Regional Science Coordinator ESD 105.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
Implications for Learning Sequences
Science Leadership Network Spring Welcome! Sign in Sign in Collect a TPEP Reflection sheet Collect a TPEP Reflection sheet Silence your cell phone.
Science Network Meeting October 23, 2014 Welcome!.
Major Outcomes of Science Instruction
Institute for Collaborative Research in Education, Assessment, and Teaching Environments for STEM NGSS Resources by CREATE for STEM Institute MSU licensed.
Writing and Argumentation in Elementary Science: Day 1
1 Welcome back!. Vision for Science Teaching and Learning 2 View free PDF from The National Academies Press at *Will also be posted.
Student-Centered Coaching Instructional Design and Assessment Presented by Diane Sweeney Author of: Student-Centered Coaching (Corwin, 2010), Student-
Supporting the CCSS in the Science Classroom through the Science and Engineering Practices of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) John Spiegel.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
CISIP Writing Framework Approaches to Teaching and Learning Science and Writing.
Common Core Mathematics, Common Core English/Language Arts, and Next Generation Science Standards. What’s the common thread?
Advancing Language Proficiency through Science and Engineering Practices Presented by: Michelle French Rita Starnes Brad Schleder.
The Four Strands of Scientific Proficiency Students who understand science:  Know, use, and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world  Generate.
I NSTRUCTIONAL S HIFTS IN M ATHEMATICS D EVELOPING P ERSEVERANCE & P ROBLEM -S OLVING S KILLS Shanon Cruz Jenny Kim Amber Hardy-Soto Kate Jenkins.
Engaging in Next Generation Science Standards. Amber Farthing Professional Learning and Program Assistance Coordinator, LASER Ellen Ebert Science Director,
Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Project SPELL: Sustainable Practices for English Language Learners April 6, 2014 Conference Supporting ELLs in NGSS Practices: Scientific Discourse and.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
Using Picture Books for Professional Development on NGSS Kirk Robbins October 26, 2013.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Winter 2015 Science Leadership Network NGSS 101 Part 2.
Middle/High School Model Exploration Kirk Brown and Lissa Gilmore
November 20, 2013 SECOND GRADE SCIENCE: DAY 1. Paul Drummond Jennifer Gottlieb Science Consultants, MISD WELCOME!
 APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP [name here] REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR [ESD here]
Welcome to NGSS Base Camp. Learning Targets 2 1.Understand the NGSS development process & timeline 2.Describe the 3 dimensional nature of a performance.
Science Leadership Network Fall
Welcome Science 5 and Science 6 Implementation Workshop.
EXAMINING THE MODULES: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES LT 2c. I can analyze the role of student-friendly learning targets, aligned assessment, and effective curriculum-
Science and Engineering Practices: Models and Argumentation “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
NGSS-Health Science August Connection to the Common Core.
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Session 2 Brian MacNevin Regional Science Coordinator Northwest Educational Service.
CER and Annotating Text District Learning Day August 6, 2015.
A Framework for K-12 Science Education Next Gen Science Common Core Math and ELA Helen Quinn
Next Generation Science Standards –
Middle School Model Selection Kirk Brown and Lissa Gilmore Science and STEM Integration/Innovation San Joaquin County Office of Education.
Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2015.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 2: Engaging in Rigorous CTE Lessons Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous CTE Teaching.
Click to edit Master title style Overview of the NGSS Framework.
Teacher Refresher Course Professional Learning Program Program 1 Learning Leaders: Jill Flack Maureen O’Rourke.
Science Leadership Network Winter Building Expertise with NGSS Innovations.
Welcome!  Please sign in and pick up your handouts  Find a seat that fits your needs  6 people per table to support the work we will do today.
Science Leadership Network Winter Building Expertise with NGSS Innovations.
Preparing for NGSS: Analyzing and Interpreting Data Add your information here:
Academic Language and Standards-Based Instruction Session 4 1/28/16.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
PRODUCTIVE DISCOURSE IN S-T-E-M CLASSROOMS AN AMBITIOUS TEACHING & LEARNING GOAL
AESM Summer 2015: Focusing on Science Considering the New Standards and Developing a Framework for Planning.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
Five Tools & Processes for NGSS Tool 3: Using the 5E instructional model to develop a conceptual flow.
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Craig Gabler Regional Science Coordinator ESD 113.
BILs Science Meeting April 21, 2016 Student Agency in Science BILs Science Meeting April 21, 2016 Student Agency in Science Office of Curriculum,Instruction,
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
1 Digging into the 2 nd Draft of the Next Generation Science Standards January 31, 2013 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant.
Module 1: Overview of the Framework for K–12 Science Education
From Conclusion writing to arguing from evidence
Kirk Robbins Next Generation Science Standards 101 Part 2: Digging into the Science & Engineering Practices.
Teaching Climate Science to Elementary School Students using the NGSS
Advancing Tools and Processes for Next Generation Science
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Presentation transcript:

TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Michael Brown Regional Science Coordinator ESD 105

GOALS  I understand an instructional model for engaging students in argument from evidence to colleagues.  I can employ strategies that will equitably engage all students in argumentation from evidence.  I understand how engaging in argumentation from evidence connects WA Conclusion Assessment Items with the Next Generation Science Standards.  I can craft a specific prompt that will help my students understand how to respond to a WA 2009 Conclusion assessment item.

OVERVIEW OF THE SERIES  Session 1: Focus on an instructional strategy for Engaging in Argument from Evidence. Craft a curriculum-specific prompt. Practice with scoring items using the state 2-point rubric.  Session 2: Score and analyze student work. Deepening pedagogical content knowledge for Engaging in Argument from Evidence with emphasis on discourse and writing scaffolds.  Session 3: Score and analyze student work. Creating CCSS ELA connections. Highlight equitable teaching practices. Optimize prompts for teacher’s materials.

AGENDA-TODAY’S JOURNEY Morning  Scoring Student Work  Supporting Student Reasoning through Discourse Afternoon  Comparing Constructing Explanations to Engaging in Argument From Evidence  Integrating Constructing Explanations and Argumentation into Instructional Practice

SCORING: LET’S CHECK OUR “CALIBRATION”

SCORING STUDENT WORK 1. Use the WA rubric to score your student work. 2. Record students’ scores on the “Class record sheet Conclusion Item” 3. Record any notes or thoughts about individual students’ performance in this task. 60 min

SCORING: HOW DID YOUR STUDENTS DO?

BREAK!

REFLECTING ON STUDENT RESPONSES  What changes do you observe in your students’ responses?  Where did you see evidence of reasoning in your student’s responses?

REFLECTING ON YOUR PRACTICE  What were some specific strategies that you tried, that you think helped students?  Based on your examination of the student work, how might you adjust your instruction to improve future performance?

TRANSITIONING TO THE NGSS Picture from Journal of A Learner, used without modification as per Terms of Creative Commons LicenseJournal of A Learner

WHAT’S DIFFERENT ABOUT NGSS? Physicist Helen Quinn talks the NGSS. 

TRANSITIONING TO THE NGSS: SUPPORTING STUDENT DISCOURSE How can having students talk about their science ideas support their ability to construct explanations? Picture by Jacob Chinn/BASIS Schools, used without modification as per Terms of Creative Commons License

Reserve this place for TFAST video #1

TRANSITIONING TO THE NGSS: SUPPORTING STUDENT DISCOURSE What did you observe about Giovanni’s initial explanation compared to his description later? What scaffolds or supports were present to help Giovanni describe the phenomena? What did the interviewer do to help Giovanni clarify his ideas?

TRANSITIONING TO THE NGSS: SUPPORTING CLASSROOM DISCOURSE What do students need to be able to have successful student-student discussion habits? Picture from Learn NC used without modification as per Terms of Creative Commons LicenseLearn NC

Reserve this place for TFAST video #2

TRANSITIONING TO THE NGSS: SUPPORTING CLASSROOM DISCOURSE What did you notice about how students were talking to each other? What kinds of opportunities were students provided to talk about their ideas? What scaffolds or routines were present in the classroom to support student to student conversations about sound waves?

TRANSITIONING TO THE NGSS: SUPPORTING CLASSROOM DISCOURSE What can we do to help students talk about their science ideas? Photo by Steve Silberman, used without modification as per Terms of Creative Commons License

Let’s think about how we can use classroom talk to support rigorous science learning! SUPPORTING CLASSROOM DISCOURSE: TEACHER QUESTIONING STRATEGIES

SCAFFOLDING STUDENT TO STUDENT DISCOURSE: TALK NORMS

SCAFFOLDING STUDENT TO STUDENT DISCOURSE: CONVERSATION STARTERS

LUNCH! WE RECONVENE AT 12:40!

SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES 1.Asking Questions(for science) and defining problems (for engineering) 2.Developing and using models 3.Planning and carrying out investigations 4.Analyzing and interpreting data 5.Using mathematics and computational thinking 6.Constructing explanations and designing solutions. 7.Engaging in argument from evidence 8.Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information

COMPARING CONSTRUCTING EXPLANATIONS AND ENGAGING IN ARGUMENT FROM EVIDENCE: INITIAL IDEAS Record your initial ideas about Practices #6 and 7

Focus Explore Reflect Apply COMPARING CONSTRUCTING EXPLANATIONS AND ENGAGING IN ARGUMENT FROM EVIDENCE: INITIAL IDEAS The Learning Cycle

COMPARING CONSTRUCTING SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATIONS AND ENGAGING IN ARGUMENT FROM EVIDENCE As you read, annotate the text with the following: √ = Got it. I know or understand this ! = This is really important information ? = I’d like clarification or elaboration of this material

READ, WALK, AND TALK 1.When you finish, choose a walking partner. 2.Take a 10 minute walk. 3.Each walking partner talks for 5 minutes about the article. 4.Incorporate a break into your walk. 5.Be prepared to share your ! or ? when you return. Copyright john spivey and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licencejohn spiveyreuseCreative Commons Licence

WE RESUME AT ……

COMPARING CONSTRUCTING SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATIONS AND ENGAGING IN ARGUMENT FROM EVIDENCE Compare and contrast the two “Condensed Practices” with an elbow buddy  What does the student do in each practice?  What should the teacher do? Add or revise information on your “Comparing” document.

GIVE ONE - GET ONE 1. On a post-it note, respond to the following: What is one key difference you can see between these two Science and Engineering Practices? 2. Take your card and find some one in the room; share your information and then exchange cards. NOTE: you leave with your partner’s card 3. Find another person to share with. 4. After two or three exchanges, return to your table group and share information on your last card. 5. Table groups will compare cards to identify themes and patterns.

REVISING INITIAL EXPLANATIONS/ CREATING A PUBLIC REPRESENTATION OF YOUR THINKING  Review the ideas you have on your “Comparing” sheet  With your table mates, create a “Box and T Chart” as a visual representation of your current thinking.

CONSTRUCTING SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATIONS AND ENGAGING IN ARGUMENT FROM EVIDENCE CHART YOUR IDEAS – BOX AND T Engaging in Argument From Evidence Constructing Explanations What do Teachers do? What do Students do? When do these occur in the Learning Cycle/ Five E Model? What do they have in common?

GALLERY WALK  Display your Box & T chart and take a “Gallery Walk”.  Look for patterns in the displayed information about the two practices.

FINAL REFLECTION  What patterns of information did you notice on the Box & T charts?  What ideas are your considering for your classroom?

GOALS  I understand an instructional model for engaging students in argument from evidence to colleagues.  I can employ strategies that will equitably engage all students in argumentation from evidence.  I understand how engaging in argumentation from evidence connects WA Conclusion Assessment Items with the Next Generation Science Standards.  I can craft a specific prompt that will help my students understand how to respond to a WA 2009 Conclusion assessment item.

EVALUATION Survey Item Clarifications: Question #4: Date of Workshop: March 6, 2015 Question #6: Choose: Transitioning to the NGSS – Day 3 Question #8: You may choose N/A for outcomes that do not apply to this event. Thank you! AESD Science Professional Development Reflection Survey Link:

TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Session 2 Michael Brown Regional Science Coordinator ESD 105

STAGES OF THE ‘GENERATE AN ARGUMENT’ INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY 1. Teacher Identifies the Task and Question2. Generate a Tentative Argument3. Argumentation Session4. The Reflective Discussion5. Final Written Argument

GUPPIES! Why do guppies sometimes look different?

MODEL- BASED INQUIR Y Big Idea: The relationship between biotic and abiotic factors of an ecosystem impacting natural selection & heredity in a species. Overarching Unit Question: Why do guppies sometime look different? Start and End Here: Big Idea & Overarching Question

Elicit students’ ideas, language, everyday experiences you can build on MODEL- BASED INQUIR Y Big Idea: The relationship between biotic and abiotic factors of an ecosystem impacting natural selection & heredity in a species. Overarching Unit Question: Why do guppies sometime look different?

Supporting Student Sense-Making over the course of a unit. All the activities, labs, readings, etc. within the unit of instruction that help explain the natural phenomena. Elicit students’ ideas, language, everyday experiences you can build on Big Idea: The relationship between biotic and abiotic factors of an ecosystem impacting natural selection & heredity in a species. Overarching Unit Question: Why do guppies sometime look different?

Press for evidence- based explanation. MODEL- BASED INQUIR Y Engage Students in Arguing from Evidence through Claims, Evidence Reasoning Support Student Sense-Making over the course of a unit. All the activities, labs, readings, etc. within the unit of instruction that help explain the natural phenomena. Elicit students’ ideas, language, and everyday experiences you can build on Big Idea: The relationship between biotic and abiotic factors of an ecosystem impacting natural selection & heredity in a species. Overarching Unit Question/Natural Phenomena: Why do guppies sometime look different?