Aviation Safety Reporting Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emergency COA Process Presented to: UAS All Users TELCON
Advertisements

Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
ASYCUDA Overview … a summary of the objectives of ASYCUDA implementation projects and features of the software for the Customs computer system.
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Presented to: COSCAP SA By: Aaron E. Wilkins III / Ajay Kumar Date: April 2011 FAAs Presence in South Asia An Overview of Technical Assistance Provided.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
1 Regulation. 2 Organisational separation 3 Functional Separation.
Captain Dan Maurino Flight Safety and Human Factors – ICAO
Normal Operations Data: Air Traffic Facility Evaluations and NOSS
AVIATION SAFETY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME
ICAO/ASPA Regional Seminar Mexico City, Mexico April 2007.
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
THE ROLE OF THE NTSB IN ATC INVESTIGATIONS Richard J. Wentworth National Resource Specialist (ATC) Operational Factors Division (AS-30)
ICAO AVIATION SAFETY PROGRAMMES
1 Air Traffic Quality Assurance Program The Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Gary D. Romero.
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance
1 ATS Evaluation Programs The Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Gary Romero.
ICAO State Safety Programme (SSP) Implementation Course
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
Module N° 7 – Introduction to SMS
Michigan Electronic Grants System Plus
ICAO Part 139 Review Aerodrome Certification Rule Design Proposal
Site Safety Plans PFN ME 35B.
Presented by: Guy Prescott Common Sense Safety, Inc. (530)
Workplace Occupational Health, Safety and Security
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
“The Honeywell Web-based Corrective Action Solution”
Additional Assurance Services: Other Information
FAA Office of Airports Airport Fuel Storage and Handling
Regulatory Landscape for Leased Federal Airports Archerfield Airport Community Aviation Consultation Group (AACACG) 2 November 2011 Helen Gannon Aviation.
Office for Human Research Protections 1 Updating the Common Rule Governing Human Subjects Research Protections Jerry Menikoff.
Air Transport Association of Canada A presentation by John McKenna ATAC President and CEO.
1 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Update of Interim Safety Improvement Planning Presentation to Board of Airport.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 20 Systems Operations and Support.
By: Nurhan Tan, NAS Planning & Integration Date: Sept. 16, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration ACA Association of California Airports Conference S. Lake.
ASO-8-1 Safety Excellence Is Global Mission Success.
Development of voluntary reporting system of aviation safety information in Japan Satoshi ISHIDA Aviation Safety and Security Promotion Division, JCAB.
Safety and Health Programs
Federal Transit Administration Office of Safety and Security FTA BUS SAFETY & SECURITY PROGRAM 18 th NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RURAL PUBLIC AND INTERCITY.
Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) Description and Processes Session 5 Presentation 1.
Safety Report Treatment of Safety-Critical Systems in Transport Airplanes Office of Research and Engineering.
Operational Hazard. Definition. An operational hazard is any condition, action, or set of circumstances that compromises the safety of Army aircraft,
An Introduction to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
Federal Aviation Administration Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the National Airspace System Coming soon to airspace near you…..UAS-101 Presented At: Pecora.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
Party Process The Party Process The Safety Board investigates more than 2,000 aviation accidents and incidents a year and about 500 rail, highway, marine.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
State Safety Inspections and Sponsor Expectations.
Data Governance 101. Agenda  Purpose  Presentation (Elijah J. Bell) Data Governance Data Policy Security Privacy Contracts  FERPA—The Law  Q & A.
Human Factors & Safety Management Systems Mike O’Leary Eddie Rogan.
Mr. Bob Hahn Associate Director, School of Aviation Safety Naval Aviation Schools Command NAS Pensacola MISHAP PREVENTION EDUCATION IN NAVAL AVIATION.
International Civil Aviation Organization Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives John Illson Air Navigation Bureau 25 May 2011.
Presented by Eliot Christian, USGS Accessibility, usability, and preservation of government information (Section 207 of the E-Government Act) April 28,
A Technology Partnership for the New Millennium Anne Harlan, Director William J. Hughes Technical Center 68th NASAO Annual Convention September 20, 1999.
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Presented to: North Florida Designated Pilot Examiners (DPE) By: Mark L. Laughridge, FAASTeam Program Manager Date: January 21, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration.
AFTERMATH AND ACTIONS TAKEN On 20 October 2004, the Transportation Safety Board of Canada issued Safety Advisory A (Verification of Cargo Weights)
Graphic showing EGPWS Activation
State Safety Inspections
Aviation Safety Reporting Program
AVIATION SAFETY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME
AIRLINE TRANSPORTATION AERO 4100 / 5100
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Where We Are OVERVIEW Lesson 1: Course Overview
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
Voluntary Safety Programs Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Aviation Safety Reporting Program Mark E. Blazy Program Manager FAA Office of System Safety mark.blazy@faa.gov

ASRP / ASRS History: In 1975 the NTSB recommended FAA create an incident reporting system for identifying unsafe operating conditions following the TWA B727 accident near Dulles International Airport, December 1, 1974. FAA established the Aviation Safety Reporting Program (ASRP) in April 1975. Four months later the FAA determined that an impartial “third party” without regulatory oversight should serve as the repository for safety reports. In August 1975 NASA was selected and tasked to develop and administer the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS)

ASRP/ASRS History On December 1, 1974, a TWA B-727 was inbound from the northwest to land at Dulles International Airport in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). The flight descended prematurely below the minimum safe instrument altitude striking the slope of Mount Weather, VA. All 92 passengers and crew on board were killed. Investigating the circumstances, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) discovered that the flight crew misinterpreted information on the approach chart. The NTSB then discovered that another airline made a similar premature descent some six weeks earlier—somehow avoiding the same fatal error. The earlier incident was reported within the company, but it was not disseminated to any other airlines for fear of enforcement action.

ASRP/ASRS History This incident served as a catalyst to create an incident reporting system. Since one of the primary missions of FAA is to promote aviation safety, the NSTB made an immediate recommendation for the FAA to create a reporting program designed to identify unsafe operating conditions. In 1975 the FAA instituted the Aviation Safety Reporting Program (ASRP), which was designed to encourage the identification and reporting of deficiencies and discrepancies in the National Airspace System (NAS). To encourage reporting, the ASRP provides limited immunity from certain types of enforcement action. Pilots, however, were uneasy and often times reluctant to report errors to a regulatory agency that could assess fines and revoke licenses. Understanding the reluctance to report deficiencies or hazards, the FAA determined that the effectiveness of the ASRP would be further enhanced if an objective, non-regulatory agency served as the repository for reported safety information. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) was selected as the independent agency.

ASRP/ASRS History In 1976, FAA and NASA entered into a Memorandum of Agreement where NASA would handle the collection, analysis, and de-identification of safety reports. Although NASA designed and, now administers the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS), the FAA provides the major funding for the ASRS to promote the continued use and operation of the system. NASA’s ASRS is a voluntary incident reporting system that is designed primarily to provide information to the FAA and the aviation community to assist in reaching the goal of reducing and ultimately eliminating unsafe conditions in the NAS. NASA’s system ensures the anonymity of the reporter.

FAA ASRP Primary Objective The primary objective: Obtain all possible information that might assist the FAA in evaluating and enhancing safety and security. ASRP: Based on free and unrestricted flow of information by all users of the airspace system.

FAA / NASA Interrelationship Grants Immunity Provides funding for NASA’s ASRS Uses ASRS data to enhance safety and security NASA: five primary functions 1. Receipt, de-identification, and processing of incident reports 2. Analysis and interpretation of incident data 3. Issue alert messages within a specified time period 4. Disseminate reports and other appropriate information 5. Conduct ASRS evaluations and reviews.

FAA / NASA Authority FAA NASA Title 14 C.F.R.FAR Part 91, Section 91.25 --ASRP Prohibition against use of reports for enforcement action. Federal Register, Vol 41, No. 74 – April 1976 Describes FAA and NASA use of ASRS Information. MOA/IA Outlines the roles and responsibilities of the FAA and NASA. NASA NASA is a non-regulatory agency. They have no authority to direct corrective action or to initiate enforcement action. NASA has sole authority Make return calls to any reporter without the requirement to inform the FAA of the information that may identify the reporter.

FAA ASRP Policy Grants limited immunity from FAA enforcement action This means that a person may receive a waiver of imposition of a sanction by the FAA. Anonymity is assured, in all respects, to the extent permitted by law. Exceptions to Immunity: The incident cannot have been deliberate, criminal, or resulted in an accident. The reporter cannot have been involved in enforcement action within the previous five years. The incident must be reported within 10 days.

ASRS Operations Reporting Forms: Reporters are encouraged to use NASA FORM 277. Other written reports may be used. ASRS Form 277: After the NASA review the top portion of the form is detached and returned to the reporter. Top portion of form: The only record of the incident report with the reporter's name. Should be maintained by the reporter. Reports: NASA will review, code, and enter information into database. Two analysts will examine each full-form report. Callbacks: The analyst will determine if a callback to the reporter for additional information is required.

Alert Messages Two categories of Alert Messages: Alert Bulletins (AB’s) and For Your Information (FYI) notices. NASA imparts safety alerts to the FAA and industry for investigation and/or corrective action. Alert Bulletins (AB): Early warning reports issued by NASA to inform the FAA, the NTSB, and the aviation industry of air, equipment, ground, or any other safety or security hazards. For Your Information (FYI) notices: Notices issued by NASA that inform the FAA and aviation industry of conditions that may be sufficient for hazards or indicate an adverse safety or security trends.

ASRS Operations Data Searches: Search Requests Structured Callbacks Processing of database searches and analyses for specific or general information. (e.g., wake turbulence, digital avionics hardware and software problems, TCAS II Incident, Airport Ramp Safety Incidents, and LAHSO). No costs associated. Timeframe: Approximately 3 weeks. Structured Callbacks A quantitative and qualitative research tool that can be used to describe inferential and descriptive statistics and data. NASA will, in conjunction with the specific requestor, develop methodologies and research questionnaires.

ASRS Operations Quick Responses: Topical Research: Detailed data research projects on specific subjects. Timeframe: Approximately 2-4 weeks. Topical Research: In-depth data collation performed over extended period frequently lasting several months or years. Comprehensive examination of operational safety issues.

NASA Publications Directline: Periodic publications (available on the internet) that contains technical information directed to specific groups or organizations in the aviation community. Callback: Not to be confused with NASA’s research criteria called Structured Callback. CALLBACK is a monthly safety bulletin (available on the internet) that includes excerpts of research studies and related aviation safety information.

ASRS Reports Report Intake -- Annual 1999: 34,831 1998: 34,348 1999: 34,831 1998: 34,348 1997: 32,875 1996: 32,322 Full Form Processing Annual 1999: 9,318 1998: 8,363 1997: 8,024 1996: 7,920 Full form is a comprehensive review of the submitted report.

Reporting Process Initial Screening Review Time Critical Reports Input Data Oracle FAA Alert Messages Response NASA issues safety alerts as Industry FAA/NASA Alert Teleconference

Reporter Breakdown by Category 1999 1998 Air Traffic Controller: 730 Air Traffic Controller: 844 Air Carrier: 23258 Air Carrier: 22802 Air Taxi: 1072 Air Taxi: 1308 General Aviation: 8023 General Aviation: 7866 Mechanics: 687 Mechanics: 436 Flight Attendants: 737 Flight Attendants: 662 Other: 324 Other: 430

ASRP/ASRS Today Original charter to identify deficiencies and discrepancies. Since 1976 over 460,00 reports filed. 57% of today’s reports identify risks and hazards. Continues to be the world’s largest and longest operating voluntary aviation incident reporting program. Graphical User Interface (GUI). ASRP outreach U.S. colleges and universities with avionics, aviation safety or other aviation related programs. Purpose: Greater understanding of the program and system

ASRS Data benefits Data used to identify; Possible causes of pilot and controller errors. This led, in part, to prevention strategies like; Crew resource Management (CRM) AC revision to improve decision making and coordination efforts. Help in the establishment of FAA/ARAC group for new autopilot airworthiness criteria. Aided FAA in ATC separation criteria for avoiding wake turbulence accidents and incidents. Airport ramp safety.

Response to Alerts FAA: Aids the FAA in mitigating risks, hazards, or deficiencies. Aids the FAA in conducting safety risk assessments, I.e., LAHSO and Runway Inclusions. ASRS data was used as pointers to the problem and used as examples to indicate possible factors involved. Extends to all FAA offices: Air traffic, flight standards, aviation security, etc. ASRS cannot be the only source for statistically meaningful analysis.

FAA / NASA Web Site FAA http://nasdac.faa.gov NASA Includes: Weather Study LAHSO Aviation Safety Data Accessibility Study NASA http://asrs.arc.nasa.gov Includes: Callback Publications Reporting Forms Immunity Provisions Cross-link to FAA Web Site for FAR’s, Airworthiness Directives, AIM, etc