Even-even nuclei odd-even nuclei odd-odd nuclei 3.1 The interacting boson-fermion model.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spectroscopy at the Particle Threshold H. Lenske 1.
Advertisements

Valence shell excitations in even-even spherical nuclei within microscopic model Ch. Stoyanov Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Sofia,
Isomer Spectroscopy in Near-Spherical Nuclei Lecture at the ‘School cum Workshop on Yrast and Near-Yrast Spectroscopy’ IIT Roorkee, October 2009 Paddy.
Electromagnetic Properties of
Generalized pairing models, Saclay, June 2005 Generalized models of pairing in non-degenerate orbits J. Dukelsky, IEM, Madrid, Spain D.D. Warner, Daresbury,
Nuclear Collective Dynamics II, Istanbul, July 2004 Symmetry Approach to Nuclear Collective Motion II P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Symmetry and dynamical.
IBA – An Introduction and Overview Basic Ideas, underpinnings, Group Theory, basic predictions.
Microscopic time-dependent analysis of neutrons transfers at low-energy nuclear reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei V.V. Samarin.
Structure of odd-odd nuclei in the interacting boson fermion-fermion model 3.
Nucleon-pair transfer-intensities nuclear shape-phase transitions
Semi-magic seniority isomers and the effective interactions
(An outgrowth of our studies of shape/phase transitions and empirical signatures for them) A) An enhanced link between nuclear masses and structure B)
The IBA The Interacting Boson Approximation Model Preliminary review of collective behavior in nuclei Collective models, and why the IBA Basic ideas about.
IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The nuclear shell model P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Context and assumptions of the model Symmetries of.
1 TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06 Electron capture branching ratios for the nuclear matrix elements in double-beta decay using TITAN ◆ Nuclear matrix elements.
Outline  Simple comments on regularities of many-body systems under random interactions  Number of spin I states for single-j configuration  J-pairing.
NSDD Workshop, Trieste, February 2006 Nuclear Structure (II) Collective models P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France.
Statistical properties of nuclei: beyond the mean field Yoram Alhassid (Yale University) Introduction Beyond the mean field: correlations via fluctuations.
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
Odd nuclei and Shape Phase Transitions: the role of the unpaired fermion PRC 72, (2005); PRC 76, (2007); PRC 78, (2008); PRC 79,
fermions c j N bosons A nucleons valence nucleonsN nucleon pairs L = 0 and 2 pairs s,d  even-even nuclei 2.2 The Interacting Boson Approximation A.
Rotation and alignment of high-j orbitls in transfermium nuclei Dr. Xiao-tao He College of Material Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics.
1 New formulation of the Interacting Boson Model and the structure of exotic nuclei 10 th International Spring Seminar on Nuclear Physics Vietri sul Mare,
Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic How the world, with all its apparent complexity and diversity can be.
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
Shape phase transition in neutron-rich even-even light nuclei with Z=20-28 H.B.Bai X.W.Li H.F.Dong W.C.Cao Department of Physics, Chifeng University, Chifeng.
原子核配对壳模型的相关研究 Yanan Luo( 罗延安 ), Lei Li( 李磊 ) School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin Yu Zhang( 张宇 ), Feng Pan( 潘峰 ) Department of Physics, Liaoning.
The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.
Isospin and mixed symmetry structure in 26 Mg DONG Hong-Fei, BAI Hong-Bo LÜ Li-Jun, Department of Physics, Chifeng university.
Nuclear Models Nuclear force is not yet fully understood.
Breakup effects of weakly bound nuclei on the fusion reactions C.J. Lin, H.Q. Zhang, F. Yang, Z.H. Liu, X.K. Wu, P. Zhou, C.L. Zhang, G.L. Zhang, G.P.
Coupling of (deformed) core and weakly bound neutron M. Kimura (Hokkaido Univ.)
Regular structure of atomic nuclei in the presence of random interactions.
Spontaneous symmetry breaking and rotational bands S. Frauendorf Department of Physics University of Notre Dame.
Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten. Outline Introduction, survey of data – what nuclei do Independent particle model and residual interactions.
IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The interacting boson model P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Dynamical symmetries of the IBM Neutrons, protons.
Partial dynamical symmetries in Bose-Fermi systems* Jan Jolie, Institute for Nuclear Physics, University of Cologne What are dynamical symmetries? Illustration.
NSDD Workshop, Trieste, February 2006 Nuclear Structure (I) Single-particle models P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France.
Shell Model with residual interactions – mostly 2-particle systems Start with 2-particle system, that is a nucleus „doubly magic + 2“ Consider two identical.
ShuangQuan Zhang School of Physics, Peking University Static chirality and chiral vibration of atomic nucleus in particle rotor model.
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
K. P. Drumev Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Quantum Phase Transitions (QPT) in Finite Nuclei R. F. Casten June 21, 2010, CERN/ISOLDE.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Shell model Notes: 1. The shell model is most useful when applied to closed-shell.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Extreme independent particle model!!! Does the core really remain inert?
Partial Dynamical Symmetry in Odd-Mass Nuclei A. Leviatan Racah Institute of Physics The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel P. Van Isacker, J. Jolie,
July 29-30, 2010, Dresden 1 Forbidden Beta Transitions in Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Kazuo Muto Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Some (more) High(ish)-Spin Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics Univesity of Surrey Guildford, UK Lecture 2 Low-energy.
MICROSCOPIC CALCULATION OF SYMMETRY PROJECTED NUCLEAR LEVEL DENSITIES Kris Van Houcke Ghent University In collaboration with S. Rombouts, K. Heyde, Y.
Interacting boson model s-bosons (l=0) d-bosons (l=2) Interpretation: “nucleon pairs with l = 0, 2” “quanta of collective excitations” Dynamical algebra:
Exactly Solvable gl(m/n) Bose-Fermi Systems Feng Pan, Lianrong Dai, and J. P. Draayer Liaoning Normal Univ. Dalian China Recent Advances in Quantum.
Correlations in Structure among Observables and Enhanced Proton-Neutron Interactions R.Burcu ÇAKIRLI Istanbul University International Workshop "Shapes.
The i 13/2 Proton and j 15/2 Neutron Orbital and the SD Band in A~190 Region Xiao-tao He En-guang Zhao En-guang Zhao Institute of Theoretical Physics,
Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei.
Shifts in neutron single- particle states outside N=82 S.J.Freeman, B.P.Kay, J.P.Schiffer, J.A.Clark, C.Deibel, A.Heinz, A.Parikh, P.D.Parker, K.E.Rehm.
Quantum Phase Transition from Spherical to γ-unstable for Bose-Fermi System Mahmut Böyükata Kırıkkale University Turkey collabration with Padova–Sevilla.
How do nuclei rotate? 3. The rotating mean field.
Nordita Workshop on chiral bands /04/2015 Multiple chiral bands associated with the same strongly asymmetric many- particle nucleon configuration.
Few-Body Models of Light Nuclei The 8th APCTP-BLTP JINR Joint Workshop June 29 – July 4, 2014, Jeju, Korea S. N. Ershov.
Pairing Evidence for pairing, what is pairing, why pairing exists, consequences of pairing – pairing gap, quasi-particles, etc. For now, until we see what.
Nature of Mixed-Symmetry 2 + States in 94 Mo from High-Resolution Electron and Proton Scattering and Line Shape of the First Excited 1/2 + State in 9 Be.
超重原子核的结构 孙 扬 上海交通大学 合作者:清华大学 龙桂鲁, F. Al-Khudair 中国原子能研究院 陈永寿,高早春 济南,山东大学, 2008 年 9 月 20 日.
Quantum shape transitions in the shapes of atomic nuclei. J. Jolie, Universität zu Köln.
Determining Reduced Transition Probabilities for 152 ≤ A ≤ 248 Nuclei using Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA-1) Model By Dr. Sardool Singh Ghumman.
Yu Zhang(张宇), Feng Pan(潘峰)
Ch. Stoyanov Two-Phonon Mixed-Symmetry States in the Domain N=52
Structure and dynamics from the time-dependent Hartree-Fock model
Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten
Isospin Symmetry test on the semimagic 44Cr
Kazuo MUTO Tokyo Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

even-even nuclei odd-even nuclei odd-odd nuclei 3.1 The interacting boson-fermion model

s,d,a j N bosons 1 fermion e-o nucleus s,d N+1 bosons  IBFA e-e nucleus  fermions c j M valence nucleons A nucleons L = 0 and 2 pairs nucleon pairs A. Arima, F. Iachello, T. Otsuka, O. Scholten, I Talmi Odd-A nuclei: the interacting boson-fermion approximation 

and

H B the IBM-1 Hamiltonian the single particle Hamiltonian with the energies  j. the boson-fermion interaction The most general hamiltonian contains much too many parameter and is replaced by a simpler one based on shell model considerations and BCS.

It has three terms

BCS calculation gives: quasiparticle energies E j and occupation numbers u j and v j as a function of  j and . O. Scholten PhD + ODDA code mit the excitation energy of the first 2+ state in the corresponding semimagical nucleus we now have n single particle energies, the gap  and three parameters + six for the boson part.

Example: odd Rhodium isotopes (J.Jolie et al. Nucl.Phys. A438 (1985)15 H B from fit of Pd isotopes by Van Isacker et al.  =+  =-  =1.5 MeV

N s,d bosons: U(6) symmetry for model space 36 generators N s,d bosons+ j fermion: U B (6)xU F (2j+1) Bose-Fermi symmetry 36 boson generators + (2j+1) 2 fermion generators, which both couple to integer total spin and fullfil the standard Lie algebra conditions. 3.2 Bose-Fermi symmetries

Bose-Fermi symmetries Two types of Bose-Fermi symmetries: spinor and pseudo spin types Spinor type: uses isomorphism between bosonic and fermionic groups Spin(3): SO B (3) ~ SU F (2) Spin(5): SO B (5) ~ Sp F (4) Spin(6): SO B (6) ~ SU F (4) Exemple: SO(6) core and j=3/2 fermion Balantekin, Bars, Iachello, Nucl. Phys. A370 (1981) 284. U B (6)xU F (4)  SO B (6)xSU F (4)  Spin(6)  Spin(5)  Spin(3) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ [N] [1] (  1,  2 ) J H= A’ C 2 [SO B (6)] + A C 2 [Spin(6)] + B C 2 [Spin(5)]+ C C 2 [Spin(3)] E = A’ (  (  +4)) + A(  1 (  1 +4) +  2 (  2 +2) +  3 2 ) + B(  1 (  1 +3) +  2 (  2 +1)) + CJ(J+1)

Pseudo Spin type: uses pseudo-spins to couple bosonic and fermionic groups Example: j= 1/2, 3/2, 5/2 for a fermion: P. Van Isacker, A. Frank, H.Z. Sun, Ann. Phys. A370 (1981) 284. U B (6)xU F (12)  U B (6)xU F (6)xU F (2)  U B+F (5)xU F (2)...  U B+F (6)xU F (2)  SU B+F (3)xU F (2)...  SO B+F (3)xU F (2)  Spin (3)  SO B+F (6)xU F (2)... H= B 0 + A 1 C 2 [U B+F (6)] + A C 1 [U B+F (5)] + A´ C 2 [U B+F (5)] + B C 2 [SO B+F (6)] + C C 2 [SO B+F (5)] + D C 2 [SU B+F (3)] + E C 2 [SO B+F (3)] + F Spin(3) L=2 L=0 1/2 3/2 5/2 L=2 L=0 x x L=2 x S= 1/2 U B (6) x U F (12)  U B (6) x U F (6) x U F (2) This hamiltonian has analytic solutions, but also describes transitional situations.

Example: the SO(6) limit H= B 0 + A 1 C 2 [U B+F (6)] + B C 2 [SO B+F (6)] + C C 2 [SO B+F (5)] + EC 2 [SO B+F (3)] + FSpin(3) E= A(N 1 (N 1 +5)+ N 2 (N 2 +3)) + B(  1 (  1 +4)+  2 (  2 +2)) + C(  1 (  1 +3)+  2 (  2 +1)) +EL(L+1) + F J(J+1)

Can we connect atomic nuclei using supersymmetry?  s,d,a j fermions c j s,d N+1 bosons N bosons 1 fermion M valence nucleons A nucleons  IBFA L = 0 und 2 pairs Nucleon pairs e-e nucleus odd-A nucleus SUSY a j b l F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 672

(6+ 2j+1) 2 generators of bosonic or fermionic type Supersymmetrie: U(6/2j+1) symmetry Note: graded Lie algebras U(6/m) are no Lie algebras. Their generators fullfil a mixture of commutation and anticommutation relations! By removing the mixed generators one finds that the Bose-Fermi symmetry is always a subalgebra of the graded Lie algebra:

[N}[N} [N][N] [N-1]x[1] x[1] <N><N> <N><N> (0) (1) (2) (1/2,1/2) (3/2,1/2) (5/2,1/2) 3/2 + 1/2 + 5/2 + 7/2 + U(6/4)  U B (6)xU F (4)  SO B (6)xSU F (4)  Spin(6)  Spin(5)  Spin(3) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ [ N } [N] [1 m ] (  1,  2 ) J In the case of a dynamical supersymmetry the same parameter set describes states in both nuclei.

E = A’ (  (  +4)) + A(  1 (  1 +4) +  2 (  2 +2) +  3 2 )+ B(  1 (  1 +3) +  2 (  2 +1)) + CJ(J+1) d 3/2 s 1/2 h 13/2 d 5/2 g 7/2 191 Ir 190 Os A’=-18.3 keV, A= keV, B= 32.3 keV, C= 9.5 keV 

H = B 0 + A 1 C 2 [U B+F (6)] + B C 2 [SO B+F (6)] + C C 2 [SO B+F (5)] + D C 2 [SO B+F (3)] + E C 2 [Spin(3)] E = B 0 + A (  1 (  1 +6) +  2 (  2 +4)) + B (  1 (  1 +4) +  2 (  2 +2)) + C (  1 (  1 +3) +  2 (  2 +1)) + D L(L+1) + E J(J+1) f 5/2 p 1/2 i 13/2 h 9/2 f 7/2 p 3/2 SO(6) limit and j = 1/2, 3/2, 5/2 Example: SO(6) limit of U(6/12)

E o-e = A (  1 (  1 +6) +  2 (  2 +4)) + B (  1 (  1 +4) +  2 (  2 +2)) + C (  1 (  1 +3) +  2 (  2 +1)) + D L(L+1) + E J(J+1) E e-e = A  (  +6) + B (  1 (  1 +4) +  2 (  2 +2)) + C (  1 (  1 +3) +  2 (  2 +1)) + (D+E) L(L+1) 3.5 A case study: 195 Pt and the SO(6) Limit of U(6/12) A. Mauthofer et al., Phys. Rev. C 34 (1986) 1958.

Electromagnetic transition rates B(E2) values B(M1) values

One particle transfer reactions (pick-up): New results for 195 Pt Angular distribitions: Spectroscopic strenghts:

Q3D Spectrometer at accelerator laboratory (TUM-LMU Garching ) /.. Q3D Spectrometer Particle detector

196 Pt (p,d) Fribourg/Bonn/Munich Detailed studies of 195 Pt and 196 Au were performed in parallel The angular distributions reveal the parity and orbital angular momentum of the transferred neutron. Model space relevant information. The spin cannot be uniquely determined. p: 1/2 or 3/2 f: 5/2 or 7/2

Pt (d,t) 196 Pt Unique spin assignments can be obtained from polarised transfer. Then the cross sections become sensitive to the orientation of the spin of the transferred particle. lj 195 Pt jj with  =(-1) l

New result for 195 Pt A =46.7, B+B´= C= 52.3, D = 5.6 E = 3.4 (keV) A. Metz, Y. Eisermann, A. Gollwitzer, R. Hertenberger, B.D. Valnion, G. Graw,J. Jolie, Phys. Rev. C61 (2000)

Comparison of the transfer strenghts with theory Microscopic transfer operator: J. Barea, C.E. Alonso, J.M. Arias, J. Jolie Phys. Rev. C71 (2005)

3.5 Supersymmetry without dynamical symmetry U(6/12)  U B (6)xU F (12)  U B (6)xU F (6)xU F (2)  U B+F (6)xU F (2)  U B+F (5)xU F (2)...  SU B+F (3)xU F (2)...  SO B+F (3)xU F (2)  Spin (3)  SO B+F (6)xU F (2)... H= B 0 + A 1 C 2 [U B+F (6)] + A C 1 [U B+F (5)] + A ´C 2 [U B+F (5)] + B C 2 [SO B+F (6)] + C C 2 [SO B+F (5)] + D C 2 [SU B+F (3)] + E C 2 [SO B+F (3)] + F Spin(3) This hamiltonian has analytic solutions, but also describes transitional situations, in even-even and odd-A nuclei. Example: The Ru-Rh isotopes A. Frank, P. Van Isacker, D.D. Warner Phys. Lett. B197(1987)474 H= (7N-42) C 2 [U B+F (6)] + (841-54N) C 1 [U B+F (5)] C 2 [SO B+F (6)] C 2 [SO B+F (5)] -9.5 C 2 [SO B+F (3)] + 15 Spin(3) (all in keV)

Even-even Ru Odd proton Rh

Proton pick-up reactions on Palladium isotopes: 1/2 3/2 5/2

Phase transitions in odd-A nuclei: changing single particle orbits, AND finding a simple hamiltonian Partial solution: use the U(6/12) supersymmetry U(6/12): U(5), O(6) and SU(3) limits + j=1/2,3/2,5/2 An extension of the Casten triangle for odd-A nuclei was proposed: D.D. Warner, P. Van Isacker, J. Jolie, A.M. Bruce, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985)1365. Here we apply the very simple Hamiltonian with the quadrupole operator of U B+F (6). P. Van Isacker, A.Frank, H.Z. Sun, Ann. of Phys. 157 (1984) 183.

SU(3)-SU(3) with 10 bosons and one fermion  (J= 1/2 states) (J= 0 + states)  A phase transition at as expected. Groundstate energies in SU(3) to SU(3) transitions.

0 +- states 1/2 - states  Similar for the U(5)-SU(3) first order phase transition

The extended Casten triangle for odd-A nuclei becomes: Fig 1 J. Jolie, S. Heinze, P. Van Isacker, R.F. Casten, Phys. Rev. C 70 (2004) (R).

But is everything so normal and expected?   No crossings except at symmetries. Additional crossings occur! 

L 1/2 J Conserved quantities allow real crossings  

But there is even more to the story !  

Applications to real nuclei: there are no symmetry related constraints needed are dominant j = 1/2,3/2, 5/2 orbits D.D. Warner, P. Van Isacker, J. Jolie, A.M. Bruce, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985)1365. W,Pt Ru,Rh A. Frank, P. Van Isacker, D.D. Warner, Phys. Lett. B197 (1987)474. Se,As A. Algora et al.Z. f. Phys. A352 (1995) 25

Odd- neutron nuclei in the W-Pt region J. Jolie, S. Heinze, P. Van Isacker, R.F. Casten, Phys. Rev. C 70 (2004) (R). a= -47 keV A= 52 keV B=3.4 keV