Environment Canada, Meteorological Service of Canada, 1 Meteorological Research Branch 2 Environmental & Emergency Response Div. A.Lemonsu 1, A. Leroux.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 GLOBAL LEGEND GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002.
Advertisements

SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT Translating satellite images into meaningful geospatial information: The data fusion approach Mr. Amit A. Kokje PhD candidate, School.
Page 1 of 50 Optimization of Artificial Neural Networks in Remote Sensing Data Analysis Tiegeng Ren Dept. of Natural Resource Science in URI (401)
VEGETATION MAPPING FOR LANDFIRE National Implementation.
Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data for Targeting and Evaluating Implementation of Best Management Practices within the Wister Lake Watershed, Oklahoma.
Aude Lemonsu, A. Leroux, N. Benbouta, S. Bélair, J. Mailhot.
Characteristics, uses, and sources Introduction to DEMs.
Environment Canada, Meteorological Service of Canada, S. Bélair, A. Lemonsu, L. Tong, J. Mailhot CRTI Project # RD.
A Fully Automated Approach to Classifying Urban Land Use and Cover from LiDAR, Multi-spectral Imagery, and Ancillary Data Jason Parent Qian Lei University.
Use of Remote Sensing and GIS in Agriculture and Related Disciplines
03/06/2015 Modelling of regional CO2 balance Tiina Markkanen with Tuula Aalto, Tea Thum, Jouni Susiluoto and Niina Puttonen.
GIS-Data Sources Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.
VALIDATION OF REMOTE SENSING CLASSIFICATIONS: a case of Balans classification Markus Törmä.
Climates at (Very) Small Scales ENVS
Global Monitoring of Large Reservoir Storage from Satellite Remote Sensing Huilin Gao 1, Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1, Charon Birkett 2 1 Dept. of Civil and.
Update of the National Biomass and Carbon Dataset 2000 using ALOS PALSAR L-band data Josef Kellndorfer, Wayne Walker, Oliver Cartus The Woods Hole Research.
An Object-oriented Classification Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level Weiqi Zhou, Austin Troy& Morgan Grove University.
Vegetation Continuous Fields and the new Land Water Mask Mark Carroll John Townshend Rob Sohlberg Charlene DiMiceli Department of Geography University.
Land Cover Classification, Deforestation Patterns Analysis and Field Survey - Deforestation Patterns Analysis of the Baekdudaegan Mountain Range.
Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results M.A. Friedl a,*, D.K. McIver a, J.C.F. Hodges a, X.Y. Zhang a, D. Muchoney b, A.H. Strahler.
CRTI Project # RD GENERAL OVERVIEW OF MSC’s CONTRIBUTION to CRTI COMPONENT 2 Stéphane Bélair Jocelyn Mailhot.
Urban Land-Cover Classification for Mesoscale Atmospheric Modeling Alexandre Leroux.
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Geography 403 Guest Lecture: Urban Remote Sensing Rama Prasada Mohapatra PhD Candidate Department of Geography Spring.
Remote Sensing of Urban Landscape Lecture 11 November 10, 2004.
Using spectral data to discriminate land cover types.
Land Processes Group, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL Response of Atmospheric Model Predictions at Different Grid Resolutions Maudood.
BUILDING EXTRACTION AND POPULATION MAPPING USING HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGES Serkan Ural, Ejaz Hussain, Jie Shan, Associate Professor Presented at the Indiana.
Regional GEM 15 km OPERATIONAL 48-h RUN (00 or 12 UTC) EVENT GEM-LAM 2.5 km GEM-LAM 1 km MC2-LAM 250 m T+5 T+12 T-1 T-3 36-h run 15-h run 6-h run Microscale.
Thematic Workshop on Standardization and Exchange of Land Use and Cover Information Wednesday, April 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois.
Funded by CRTI Project # RD The current meteorological models can be run at high resolutions reaching a few hundreds of meters. Since the cities.
Summer Session 09 August Tips for the Final Exam Make sure your answers clear, without convoluted language. Read questions carefully – are you answering.
Aude Lemonsu, S. Bélair, J. Mailhot. Urban canopy models are physically-based models parameterizing radiative, energetic and turbulent exchanges between.
Remote Sensing Classification Systems
Crop Area Estimation for Bundi Tahsil of Rajasthan using Remote Sensing and GIS Technique Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya Chitrakoot.
Jeopardy Mapping Skills Topographic maps Climate Factors Landform Regions Vegetation Regions Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Data Update IGOL: Rome September 13-15, 2004 Doug Muchoney USGS.
Spectral classification of WorldView-2 multi-angle sequence Atlanta city-model derived from a WorldView-2 multi-sequence acquisition N. Longbotham, C.
Urban Land-Cover Classification for Mesoscale Atmospheric Modeling Alexandre Leroux, M.Sc., Ing.
An Adaptive Management Model for the Red River Basin of the North.
North American Carbon Program Sub-pixel Analysis of a 1-km Resolution Land-Water Mask Source of Data: The North American sub-pixel water mask product is.
Terra Launched December 18, 1999
Land Cover Characterization Program National Mapping Division EROS Data CenterU. S. Geological Survey The National Land Cover Dataset of the Multi- Resolution.
What is a map? Civil Drafting?
FSU Jena – Department of Earth Observation CREATION OF LARGE AREA FOREST BIOMASS MAPS FOR NE CHINA USING ERS-1/2 TANDEM COHERENCE Oliver Cartus (1), Christiane.
Inclusion of the TEB urban canopy model in GEM and MC2 for atmospheric modeling at city scale Aude Lemonsu Remerciements : Stéphane Bélair, Jocelyn Mailhot,
Scaling Up Above Ground Live Biomass From Plot Data to Amazon Landscape Sassan S. Saatchi NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.
LiDAR Remote Sensing of Forest Vegetation Ryan Anderson, Bruce Cook, and Paul Bolstad University of Minnesota.
BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative sites Used for classification (training data), information.
Urban Land-Cover Classification for Mesoscale Atmospheric Modeling Alexandre Leroux Aude Lemonsu.
IT Geostat Population Grid 2011 Raffaella Chiocchini – Stefano Mugnoli Istat – Italian National Institute of Statistic Luca Congedo – Michele Munafò ISPRA.
Remote Sensing Unsupervised Image Classification.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
Citation: Moskal, L. M., D. M. Styers, J. Richardson and M. Halabisky, Seattle Hyperspatial Land use/land cover (LULC) from LiDAR and Near Infrared.
REMOTE SENSING DATA Markus Törmä Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Helsinki University of Technology
LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE IN BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS Maryia Bakhtsiyarava FNRM 5262.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Markus Erhard European Environment Agency (EEA) 1. Introduction:
Using vegetation indices (NDVI) to study vegetation
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
Meso-scale Model's Results
Predicting species distributions for New England invasives
Incorporating Ancillary Data for Classification
DEPT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY MAY 03, 2004
The Fundamentals of Mapping
Pilot studies on the provision of harmonized land use/land cover statistics: Synergies between LUCAS and the national systems Norway Erik Engelien Division.
Pan-European Assessment of Riparian Zones
Image Information Extraction
Land Cover and Land Use Statistics
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
Presentation transcript:

Environment Canada, Meteorological Service of Canada, 1 Meteorological Research Branch 2 Environmental & Emergency Response Div. A.Lemonsu 1, A. Leroux 2, S. Bélair 1, S. Trudel 2 and J. Mailhot 1 CRTI Project # RD

An urban canopy parameterization was recently implemented in the GEM and MC2 Canadian mesoscale models GEM and MC2 currently use a 1 km global classification including 1 urban class imported from DCW (Danko, 1992) Specific urban cover classifications are required in order to describe the spatial distribution and spatial variability of urban areas Scientific Context Objective Develop a general methodology to provide new urban land- use land-cover classifications for major Canadian cities (extended to North American cities)

The methodology is based on a joint analysis of remote sensing data and digital elevation models in order to take both surface characteristics and building height into account Mesoscale urban modeling applications (and possibly future applications to weather forecasting) require: Free of charge or low cost data Data covering large urban areas Data available for major North American cities Possibility of future updates General Approach

Data Sources CityDataSpatial Res.Date OKC ASTER L1B15 m NED (for US)1/3 arc-sec SRTM-DEM (for the world)1 arc-sec MTL Landsat-730 m + 15 m (Pan) CDED1 (for Canada)1:50,000 SRTM-DEM (for the world)3 arc-sec VAN ASTER L1B15 m CDED1 (for Canada)1:50,000 SRTM-DEM (for the world)3 arc-sec Classifications were produced for Oklahoma City (OK, US), Montreal (QC, Canada) and Vancouver (BC, Canada) NEDNational Elevation Dataset SRTMShuttle Radar Topography Mission CDEDCanadian Digital Elevation Data

15-m building height database SRTM-DEM minus NED/CDED1 Elevation for built-up pixels General Methodology 15-m unsupervised classification ASTER/Landsat-7 40 built and vegetated simple elements regrouped in 11 simple elements/criteria 1-Excluded covers 2-Water 3-Trees 4-Low vegetation 5-Grass 6-Soil and rocks 7-Roof 8-Concrete 9-Asphalt 10-Veg/built 1 11-Veg/built 2 60-m LULC classification 1-Excluded 2-Water 3-Soils 4-Crops 5-Short grass 6-Mixed forest 7-Mixed shrubs 1-High buildings 2-Mid-heigh buildings 3-Low buildings 4-Very low buildings 5-Industrial areas 6-Sparse buildings 7-Roads and parkings 8-Road mix 9-Dense residential 10-Mid-density residential 11-Low-density residential 12-Mix nature and built 60-m aggregation of classification criteria 1- Excluded covers 2- Water 3- Trees 4- Low vegetation 5- Grass 6- Soil and rocks 7- Roof 8- Concrete 9- Asphalt 10- Veg/built Veg/built 2 12-Built 13-Built2 14-Height Decision tree

Unsupervised classification Excluded Water Trees Low vegetation Grass Soil and rocks Roof Concrete Asphalt Veg/built 1 Veg/built 2 OKC ASTER image N

Building heights Bald Earth’s topography provided by NED (US) and CDED1 (Canada) Total elevation provided by SRTM-DEM Height of roughness elements estimated from: SRTM-DEM minus NED SRTM-DEM minus CDED1 Building heights estimated by considering only built-up pixels Offset correction Threshold of 3 m applied to minimum building heights OKC SRTM-DEM minus NED N

15-m building height database SRTM-DEM minus NED/CDED1 Elevation for built-up pixels General Methodology 15-m unsupervised classification ASTER/Landsat-7 40 built and vegetated simple elements regrouped in 11 simple elements/criteria 1-Excluded covers 2-Water 3-Trees 4-Low vegetation 5-Grass 6-Soil and rocks 7-Roof 8-Concrete 9-Asphalt 10-Veg/built 1 11-Veg/built 2 60-m LULC classification 1-Excluded 2-Water 3-Soils 4-Crops 5-Short grass 6-Mixed forest 7-Mixed shrubs 1-High buildings 2-Mid-heigh buildings 3-Low buildings 4-Very low buildings 5-Industrial areas 6-Sparse buildings 7-Roads and parkings 8-Road mix 9-Dense residential 10-Mid-density residential 11-Low-density residential 12-Mix nature and built 60-m aggregation of classification criteria 1- Excluded covers 2- Water 3- Trees 4- Low vegetation 5- Grass 6- Soil and rocks 7- Roof 8- Concrete 9- Asphalt 10- Veg/built Veg/built 2 12-Built 13-Built2 14-Height Decision tree

DECIDUOUS BROADLEAF TREES SHORT GRASS AND FORBS LONG GRASS CROPS MIXED WOOD FOREST VEGETATION CLASSES LAND/SEA MASK WATER<80% BUILT>10% WATER ROADS >80% VEGETATION BUILT2 >20% ELEVATION >20 m ROADS AND PARKINGS ELEVATION >30 m ELEVATION >10 m HIGH BUILDINGS MID-HIGH BUILDINGS LOW BUILDINGS VERY LOW BUILDINGS RESID + MIX >40% ELEVATION >30 m HIGH BUILDINGS ELEVATION >20 m MID-HIGH BUILDINGS ELEVATION >10 m LOW BUILDINGS BUILT2>20% BUILT>45% VERY LOW BUILDINGS ROAD BORDERS BUILT >70% BUILT >70% BUILT2 >20% BUILT >40% ELEV>10 m BUILT2>20% ELEV>10 m BUILT2>20% SPARSE BUILDINGS LOW VEG+ GRASS>60% DENSE RESIDENTIAL MID-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ELEVATION >20 m ROAD BORDERS ELEVATION >30 m ELEVATION >10 m HIGH BUILDINGS MID-HIGH BUILDINGS LOW BUILDINGS VERY LOW BUILDINGS SPARSE BUILDINGS ROAD BORDERS LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BUILT & NATURE MIX ROOF>20%

Urban classification OKC 60-m resolution classification N High buildings Mid-high buildings Low buildings Very low buildings Sparse buildings Industrial areas Roads and parkings Road mix Dense residential Mid-density residential Low-density residential Mix of nature and built Soils Crops Short grass Mixed forest Mixed shurbs Water Excluded

NN Montreal 60-m resolution classification Vancouver 60-m resolution classification High buildings Mid-high buildings Low buildings Very low buildings Sparse buildings Industrial areas Roads and parkings Road mix Dense residential Mid-density residential Low-density residential Mix of nature and built Zoom

Interest of the methodology  Limited number of data sources  Large availability of the databases  Time processing of about 1 week  General and robust approach applicable to any Canadian city (can be extended to North American cities) Urban classifications  Horizontal resolution adapted to meso-gamma-scale modeling  Good identification of the major urban landscapes  Number of urban classes allowing a satisfying representation of urban cover variability Conclusions

New approach based on analysis of the vector National Topographic DataBase (NTDB):  Cover of the entire Canada  High resolution: scale of 1:50000 and 1:  Large number of urban features  No manual processing/correction  No interpretation Future works Montreal, NTDB Example of urban features Roads Bridges Highways Rails Sparse buildings Buildings Residential areas Vegetation Golf Water