MSS Interference Analysis for AeroMACS October 12, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GSM Receiver Key Parameters
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /533r0 Submission September 2002 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et alSlide 1 Preparation of PAR and 5 Criterion addressing Japans 4.9-5GHz.
1 IEEE MBWA Standard Project Contribution: C xx Date: May RF Performance Evaluation Criteria Dan Gal
Simulation and Evaluation of Various Block Assignments Evaluation of multiple carriers deployed in a channel block evaluation criteria section.
BR/TSD Accra 2005 BCD Workshop for the African Countries Working assumptions for the production of the draft plan 10 – 14 October 2005 Accra David Botha.
Aeronautical Mobile Airport Communications System (AeroMACS) Status Briefing Presentation to WG-W/4 Montreal, Canada Presented by: Brent Phillips; FAA.
1 Glenn Research Center ICAO ACP Working Group M Iridium Sub Group Overview Bob Kerczewski Mike Meza NASA Glenn Research Center Iridium AGC-FG and NexSAT-SG.
FIXED SATELLITE SERVICE and UAS (22 September 2010)
EUROCAE WG82: Airport Data Link System ACP WGW3 IP 8 Montreal, January 2010.
Direction générale de lAviation civile Ministère de l'Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement Direction des Services de la Navigation.
Feb 2004ICAO ACP WGF,1 WRC 2007 agenda item 1.6 Work plan for Additional aviation spectrum allocation for AM®S Presented by C. Pelmoine, EUROCONTROL.
ICAO was created in 1944 to promote the safe and orderly development of civil aviation in the world. A specialized agency of the United Nations, it sets.
The Air-ground VHF Communication System of Japan Teruaki Nagasawa Mobile Satellite Communication Division Telecommunications Bureau Ministry of Internal.
SATELLITE DATA LINK SYSTEM (SDLS)
Long Term Evolution LTE Long Term Evolution LTE Sanjeev Banzal Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Sanjeev Banzal Telecom Regulatory.
Noise Lecture 6.
Faculty of Computer Science & Engineering
UWB Channels – Capacity and Signaling Department 1, Cluster 4 Meeting Vienna, 1 April 2005 Erdal Arıkan Bilkent University.
Aeronautical Mobile Airport Communications System (AeroMACS) Status Briefing Presentation to WG-M/18 Montreal, Canada Presented by: Brent Phillips; FAA.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE DRAFT ICAO POSITION FOR THE INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION (ITU) WORLD RADIOCOMMUNICATION CONFERENCE 2015 (WRC-15) APAC.
Doc.: IEEE /042 Submission January 2001 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 DFS/TPC requirements and the Harmonized EN Mika Kasslin.
Doc.: IEEE /1062r2 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission May 11, 2011 Steve Jillings, SemtechSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
RF Fundamentals Lecture 3.
11th February 2000 BFWAtg(00)12. Structure of the presentation u Study objective and approach u BFWA characteristics u Interference analysis (worst case)
Multiple Access Techniques for wireless communication
Design MAN WLAN Onno W. Purbo Understanding.. WLAN Bandwidth Channels Propagation Designing the MAN Inserting Point to Point (P2P) Links.
Federal Aviation Administration Aeronautical Mobile Airport Communications System (AeroMACS) Status Briefing ACP WG-M, Bangkok, Thailand FAA/Brent Phillips.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0594r0 May 2015 Slide 1 60 GHz band Japanese Regulatory Update Date: 2015-May-xx Authors: Kazu Takahashi, Panasonic.
Summary of Path Loss in Propagation
Rapidly Deployable Radio Network 5.3 GHz Microstrip Patch Antennas
NSMA Conference Interference Temperature Round Table May 18, 2004 Les Wilding Cingular Wireless 5565 Glenridge Connector Atlanta, GA
ECE 5233 Satellite Communications
1 White Space requirements Gabor Bajko IETF 82 Taipei I-D: draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-01.
Sharing of FWA with other services in the 5GHz band C MHz Private Business System Unit Radiocommunications Agency.
Chapter 3 Radio Frequency Components, Measurements, and Mathematics
Frequency Sharing Study between FWA & FSS in the band MHz David Bryant Wireless Networks Presentation to UK W-LAN Advisory Group (Sharing &
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission Title: Link Budget for m Date Submitted: 5 March 2012.
Test 1: Co-channel interference at the mobile unit
Doc.: IEEE /1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /270 Submission September 2000 McFarland, Chesson, Atheros CommunicationsSlide 1 DFS/TPC Proposal Greg Chesson, Bill.
Design WLAN Politeknik Telkom Design WLAN Step to design WLAN : 1. Location Survey 2. Topology 3. Distance calculating 4. Antenna design 5. Towering.
Doc.: IEEE RR-02/036 Submission March 2002 Rebecca Chan, Industry CanadaSlide 1 Simulation on Aggregate Interference from Wireless Access Systems.
1) A binary transmission system uses a 8-bit word encoding system. Find the Bandwidth and the SNR dB of the system if the channel capacity is bps.
A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster, Arne Theil.
Copyright 2015 WiMAX Forum. All rights reserved AeroMACS Bandplan, User Community April 22, 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /12??r0 SubmissionSlide 0 IEEE 802 Plenary, Dallas, Tx RRTAG( ) meeting Consultation on Safety Related ITS 12 th November 2008.
Aero3G PROPOSED GENERIC MASKS FOR DA2GC Objective:
Additional aviation spectrum allocation for AM®S
RTCA MOPS for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Control and Non-Payload Communications (CNPC) C2 LINK ICAO Don Nellis 8/29/2016.
EARTH SEGMENT & SPACE LINK
UAS BLOS (satellite) Control and Non-Payload (CNPC) Communications
TRANSMISI LEWAT KABEL DAN TRANSMISI LEWAT RADIO
平成30年6月 March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Technical requirements of Japanese.
MSS Interference Analysis for AeroMACS
平成30年6月 November 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Technical requirements for 950MHz.
A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster,
LRTC 3.4 – 3.8 GHz Ericsson input PT1 XO 29 – 31/
WRC-12 A.I. 1.3 Eric ALLAIX DGAC-DSNA.
5G Micro Cell Deployment in Coexistence with Fixed Service
The Air-ground VHF Communication System of Japan
Active Beam MobiRake TDMA/OFDM Radio
平成30年12月 November 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Technical requirements for 950MHz.
Submission Title: Link Budget for m
doc.: n Jeff Gilbert Atheros Communications
doc.: n Jeff Gilbert Atheros Communications
April 24, Study Group 1 A Regulatory Framework for Use of TV Channels by Part 15 Devices John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
September 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2002
International Civil Aviation Organization
Preliminary GSC positions on WRC-19 agenda items 1.13 IMT
Presentation transcript:

MSS Interference Analysis for AeroMACS October 12, 2012

Introduction Working group was established by RTCA SC-223 Charter: Define a working method of specifying emissions from all expected AeroMACS future deployments that are compliant with ITU co-interference requirements, to establish 2- way link levels with the aircraft to ensure closure of the RF-link without adversely affecting the Global Star Satellite feeder links. The deliverable would be in the form of MOPS or SARPS requirements and a technical report delivered to an ICAO technical group via a working paper. 2

MSS Interference Analysis WG Participants FAA - Brent Phillips FAA - Mike Biggs DFS - Armin Schlereth ECTL - Nikos Fistas INDRA – Antonio Correas Uson SINTE - Jan Eric Hakegard NASA - Jeff Wilson NASA - Rafael Apaza Harris - Art Ahrens ITT Exelis - Bruce Eckstein ITT Exelis - Natalie Zelkin ITT Exelis – Ward Hall 3

Analysis Method Very large and Large size airports > US categories: XL/Large/OEP (Qty 35) > Europe categories: Very Large/Large (Qty 50) > Model parameters > Horizon-omni base station pattern > 2x transmitter PA power > All AeroMACS channels* are used Medium size airports US category: Class C (Qty 123) > Europe category: Medium (Qty 50) > Model parameters > Horizon-omni base station pattern > 1x transmitter PA power > AeroMACS channel use factor Small size airports > All other airports in Openflights database. > Model parameters > Base station sector directional antennas > Sectors pointed in random directions > 1x transmitter PA power > AeroMACS channel use factor All airports world-wide are included in the analysis > Non-US and Europe airports found to not to contribute significantly to N. Atlantic interference hotspot 4 The analysis method was driven by the European study [1] of number of sectors required at an airport (e.g., if the number of sectors was greater than 11 (number of channels in ) then a pseudo-omni was assumed as a given channel would be used in more than one direction) [1] WA4 Airport Capacity & Coverage An AeroMACS channel is the 5 MHz-wide bandwidth transmitted by a base station sector that consists of 512 sub-carriers

Analysis Conditions and Assumptions Effective isotropic Radiated Power (EiRP) is the sector transmit power at the antenna input plus antenna gain Maximum allowable EiRP in a base station sector shall be the sum of both transmit power amplifiers (PAs) in a 2-channel MIMO system Base Station Sector patterns are defined to be ITU-R F reference patterns with 120˚ 3dB beamwidth toward the Horizon Zero base station pattern down-tilt Scaling assumptions: > A factor for occupied number of channels per airport category > 22 channels used for large airports > 6 of 11 channels for medium airports > 1 of 11 channels for small airports > Apply a 50% power reduction to small airports MSS interference analysis completed by NASA using Visualyze software 5

6 Recommended gain mask

7

Draft Limits Table Airport Category Definitions – Based on ICAO airspace definitions 8 Airport category Maximum number of channels at an airport Maximum total radiated power at an airport channel, mW Maximum Allowable EiRP per Base Station Sector, dBm +22 dBm (300 mw) maximum sector PA power +15 dBi peak sector antenna gain 0˚ (Horizon) to +1.5˚ Elev. +1.5˚ to 7.5˚ (linear decrease) +7.5˚ to 27.5˚ (linear decrease) +27.5˚ to Zenith (linear decrease) Large to 3434 to 2222 to -1 Medium to 3434 to 2222 to -1 Small to 3131 to 1919 to -4

Recommendations 9 The ACP WG is invited to consider using the provided information as the basis of ICAO SARPs spectrum requirements for AeroMACS.