FRS Technology Assessment Step 2 – Common Traffic Scenarios Phil Platt, Nikos Fistas AGCFG 3/WGC11 18-19 September 2006, Brussels European Organisation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Investigation framework for L-band FCS EMC compatibility analysis
Advertisements

EUROCAE WG 73: UAS integration Elements for the European Commission UAS panel Presentation at Workshop 2 UAS insertion into airspace Gérard Mardiné (SAFRAN-Sagem)
European Commission: Environment Directorate General Slide: 1 ECCP Aviation Working Group Mandate and draft work programme Directorate C – Air and Chemicals.
Primary Radar in ATC ITU Radar Seminar Poul Erik Jørgensen DAS ATS HMI Manager 24. September 2005.
1 PRESENT USE AND PERSPECTIVE FOR CIVIL PRIMARY SURVEILLANCE RADAR IN EUROPE Eurocontrol, C. Pelmoine, Spectrum Management Domain.
Wiktor Sęga, Office of Electronic Communications, Poland
Future Communications Infrastructure – An update
Steve Zaidman, AAF-1 George Sakai, ASR-1 Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC September 16, 2003 There are no benefits to compromising safety…only.
ICAO Seminar on Aeronautical spectrum management (Cairo, 7 – 17 June 2006) SAFIRE Spectrum and Frequency Information Resource (presented by Eurocontrol)
U.S. Plans for ADS-B Briefing for
Flexible Airborne Architecture
FIXED SATELLITE SERVICE and UAS (22 September 2010)
NASA A/G Communications Technology Assessment Study First Order Analysis of Required Bandwidth for the Next-Generation Aeronautical Data Link March 14,
Don Willis Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC March 30, 2004 There are no benefits to compromising safety…only dire consequences Assessment.
N AVISAT Middle East & Africa. 16 September ) NAVISAT System description 2) NAVISAT and worldwide estimated spectrum requirements for AMS(R)S 3)
Overview of Continental En-route Navigation Specifications
DESIGN OF A SPECIFIC CDMA SYSTEM FOR AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL APPLICATIONS UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID.
The Cost Of Spectrum How Will Aviation Pay John Mettrop DAP.
NextGen and Its Impact on Performance Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System ICAO Montreal, Quebec, Canada March 26-30, 2007 Victoria.
SATELLITE DATA LINK SYSTEM (SDLS)
1 Study into IPS Suitability for Air-Ground ATM Communication Carsten Underbjerg, Ericsson Member of Helios Study Consortium European Organisation for.
A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N Future Communications Study Technology Assessment Team: Suggested Phase III Activities Presented at ICAO ACP.
United States of America (USA) Plans for ADS-B Briefing for Seminar on Implementation of Data Link and SATCOM Communications November 2003 Bangkok,
VDL Mode 4 Performance Simulator (DLS enhancements) presented by EUROCONTROL Montreal, 26 October 2004.
1 PHARE Operational Scenarios J-P. Nicolaon, Operational Task Force Chairman EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
GENSPACE Air Traffic Management
NexSAT SG#7 9 th March 2006 Future Communications Infrastructure Jacky Pouzet Communication Domain manager European Organisation for the Safety of Air.
UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW A Comprehensive Approach to ATM Incorporating Autonomous Aircraft ATM Research Group University of Glasgow.
Assessment of Aero-BGAN Study Status NexSAT Steering Group 31st May 2005.
B-VHF Final Project Results – Brussels – 19. September 2006 Page: 1 Air Ground Communication Focus Group Meeting Brussels, 19. September 2006 B-VHF – Final.
Future Communications Roadmap
March 8th and 9th 2006 AGCFG / NEXSAT Meetings Toulouse 1 SATCOM FOR ATM ESA Initiative to promote an ATM dedicated Satcom.
Service Technique de la Navigation Aérienne NexSAT: Mission Hypothesis 20 may, 2003 STNA/31 ATM issues at horizon 2015 over ECAC Capacity: - VHF spectrum.
NexSAT NexSAT Steering Group Meeting - 8 June 2004 © 2004 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) 1 Welcome to the 4th meeting.
CARE ASAS Validation Framework System Performance Metrics 10th October 2002 M F (Mike) Sharples.
The EMERALD RTD Plan and the ASAS Validation Framework R P (Bill) Booth 10 October 2002.
One Sky for Europe EUROCONTROL © 2002 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) Page 1 FAA/Eurocontrol Technical Interchange.
Federal Aviation Administration International Flight Inspection Symposium June 24, 2008 James H. Washington Vice President, Acquisition and Business Services.
The internet. Background Created in 1969, connected computers at UCLA, Stanford Research Institute, U. of Utah, and UC at Santa Barbara With an estimated.
GROUND BASED AUGMENTATION SYSTEM System Overview Christophe DEHAYNAIN Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile FRANCE.
Architecture and institutional issues for AeroMACS.
Mission Trajectory Step 1 From planning to deployment.
ASAS TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, Malmö ASAS-TN Implementation Strategy Plan Tony Henley BAE SYSTEMS.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-40/PIA-4 Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application.
EC-ECC WORKSHOP ON WRC-15 ESOA Brussels, 10 December
Air traffic increases steadily over the years that lead to the increase of flights through the Poles, oceans and regions with reduced radar coverage.
Quick start in SEAMCAT European Communications Office Jean-Philippe Kermoal (ECO) December 2009 EUROPEAN COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Nansensgade 19 DK-1366 Copenhagen.
Prof. dr. sc. Ivan Markežić
CARE/ASAS Validation Framework Guidelines & Case Studies Mark Watson NATS.
Slide 1 July 2004 – FALBALA/WP5/FOR3/D – CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, Sofréavia & UoG WP2 Current situation analysis – Aircraft perspective Philippe Louyot (CENA)
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-84 Initial Capability for Ground-based Cooperative Surveillance SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi.
International Civil Aviation Organization Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP) – Framework for global planning H. Sudarshan SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi -WP/7 Workshop.
Projects EMERALD and EMERTA EMERALD WP5 The Specific case of ASAS/ADS-B.
What Is Multilateration Triangulation System Uses Aircraft Transponder Multiple Ground Receivers Central Computer Calculates & Displays Aircraft Position.
182a_N00FEB23_DG 1 Local Area Augmentation System CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS Alaska Regional Briefing Anchorage October 1, 2002.
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
Airspace 1 st LT Zouhar Jakub 12 th September 2014.
ENAV S.p.A. 1 AENA / ENAV / DFS / LFV ASAS Thematic Network Workshop Malmoe, ASAS /ADS-B: SAMPLE ANSPs STRATGIES & EXPECTATIONS.
Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 29 March RNA and RNAV and RNP Strategy in Japan Yoshiki Imawaka Director.
Terminal Airspace Traffic Complexity Fedja Netjasov University of Belgrade Faculty of Traffic and Transport Engineering Division of Airports and Air Traffic.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
ICAO Seminar on Aeronautical spectrum management (Cairo, 7 – 17 June 2006) SAFIRE Spectrum and Frequency Information Resource (presented by Eurocontrol)
Introduction of TBO within OptiFrame
Module 5. Functions and protocols of surveillance systems Topic 5. 4
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/7
EUROCONTROL SURVEILLANCE STRATEGY
Future Communications Infrastructure – An update
ICAO Seminar on Aeronautical spectrum management (Cairo, 7 – 17 June 2006) SAFIRE Spectrum and Frequency Information Resource (presented by Eurocontrol)
Communications Operating Concept & Requirements (COCR)
Soren Dissing - EUROCONTROL
Presentation transcript:

FRS Technology Assessment Step 2 – Common Traffic Scenarios Phil Platt, Nikos Fistas AGCFG 3/WGC September 2006, Brussels European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation

Content Communication requirements Need for common set of scenarios Definition of test volumes Characteristics of the scenarios Application of the scenarios Next steps

Communication Requirements The communication requirements are defined by 4 basic characteristics coverage area numbers of aircraft communication traffic (ATS and AOC) The COCR provides information on requirements using service volumes which are based on sectors Phase 1 - size as today Phase times sector size of today

Common scenarios for technology assessment The coverage volume of specific technologies is dependent on their characteristics frequency band modulation data rate transmitter power/receiver sensitivity ….. The requirements has to be defined in such a way that the technology can be assessed a set of scenarios are being developed for use in the technology assessment they can be used in the most relevant way for each technology Aimed at meeting Phase 2 requirements

Basic Test Volumes Initial set are based on 3 basic geometrical test volumes have been defined from the COCR for high density worse case situation in Phase FL245 – FL45055NM x 55NM3D rectangleENR ft – FL24549NM x 49NM3D rectangleTMA 260 – 5000ft10NM diameterCylinderAirport Volume (nm 3 )Height RangeDimensionsShapeService Volume

Additional Test Volumes The COCR service volumes are based on operational sectors variety of shapes and densities not necessarily matched to technology capability The need to evaluate how a technology would be implemented in larger volumes as these affect infrastructure choices and/or spectrum needs Therefore additional test volumes are being created for Larger TMA type test volumes Larger ENR type test volumes Whole of ECAC - based on likely terrestrial coverage

Sets of test volumes 5000ft Ground TV2.1 TV2.2 Ground 5000ft FL245 49NM 75NM 10NM Airport TMA FL245 FL450 TV3.1TV3.2 TV3.3 55NM 100NM 200NM Ground ENR

ECAC test volume

The ECAC test volume has been defined as the sectors likely to be in coverage of a terrestrial system en route sectors TMA sectors Total PIAC derived from SAAM

Air/Air Test Volume COCR defines 3 ranges for a/a broadcast - 5NM, 60NM and 200NM

Traffic Scenarios For each test volume, a traffic scenario is being developed giving: Number of aircraft in the test volume (derived from SAAM data) Capacity requirements Uplink and downlink ATS and AOC capacity requirements per aircraft in respect of: Air-Ground addressed transactions Air-Air addressed transactions Air-Ground broadcast transactions Air-Air broadcast transactions COCR does not identify requirements for a/a addressed or a/g broadcast

Sharing of Traffic Scenarios An Excel file is being created containing the key parameters that will define the set of scenarios The file format is being defined but will include aircraft numbers communication requirements - a/g, a/a - addressed and broadcast - in the test volumes The file will be made available to support assessment of technologies

Next steps Completion of the parameters for the set of test volumes calculation of communications requirements in large volumes Distribution of the file for technology assessment file planned to be completed by early-October