Calibration Overview – August 31, 2004 J. Fishman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topic 8. Gamma Camera (II)
Advertisements

Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Dante Nakazawa with Prof. Juan Collar
Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
Design and Experimental Considerations for Multi-stage Laser Driven Particle Accelerator at 1μm Driving Wavelength Y.Y. Lin( 林元堯), A.C. Chiang (蔣安忠), Y.C.
Terrestrial Gamma-Ray Flashes (TGFs) Observed with Fermi-GBM G. J. Fishman 1, M. S. Briggs 2, and V. Connaughton 2 -for the GBM TGF Team 1 NASA-Marshall.
Friday 28 th April Review of the aims and recommendations from the workshop L. Rinolfi.
Coherent Radiation from High-Current Electron Beams of a Linear Accelerator and Its Applications S. Okuda ISIR, Osaka Univ Research Institute.
An Advanced Linear Accelerator Facility for Microelectronic Dose Rate Studies P.E. Sokol and S.Y.Lee Indiana University.
Design and Performance Expectation of ALPHA accelerator S.Y. Lee, IU 2/26/ Introduction 2. Possible CIS re-build and parameters 3. Issues in the.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
GLAST LAT Project July 19, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/17 Science Verification Analysis and Calibration GLAST Large Area Telescope Eduardo do Couto e Silva.
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 1 LET Performance Requirements Presenter: Richard Mewaldt
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
Lecture 2-Building a Detector George K. Parks Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Gamma Spectroscopy HPT TVAN Technical Training
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
experimental platform
Design on Target and Moderator of X- band Compact Electron Linac Neutron Source for Short Pulsed Neutrons Kazuhiro Tagi.
PAIR SPECTROMETER DEVELOPMENT IN HALL D PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T OUTLINE : PS Goals PS Goals PrimEx Experience PrimEx Experience Design Details Design.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Spectrum if all energy is captured in detector. Allows identification.
Material Gamma Ray Astronomy at MPE For further information contact Helmut Steinle, MPE – NaIBGO component22 keV122 keV1.275 MeV4.4 MeV.
GLAST LAT ProjectIntegration and Test CDR Peer Review, March 28, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 8 - Page 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Peer.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.
Linac e+ source for ILC, CLIC, SuperB, … Vitaly Yakimenko, Igor Pogorelsky November 17, 2008 BNL.
Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL)- 1 - GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 GBM Simulation and Instrument Response R. Marc Kippen Space and Atmospheric.
Setup for hypernuclear gamma-ray spectroscopy at J-PARC K.Shirotori Tohoku Univ. Japan for the Hyperball-J collaboration J-PARC E13 hypernuclear  -ray.
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
S. De Santis “Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal Profile in a Storage Ring by Non-Linear Laser Mixing” - BIW 2004 May, 5th Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR, October 2, 2001 E. do Couto e Silva1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
Source flux accuracy from BLC analysis A. Strong MPE June 2002.
05/05/2004Cyrille Thomas DIAMOND Storage Ring Optical and X-ray Diagnostics.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration November 23, Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST) Kevin Grady, Project Manager Steven Ritz,
MEASUREMENT Of γ-RAY ENERGY SPECTRA BY A SCINTILLATION COUNTER
Development of a Gamma-Ray Beam Profile Monitor for the High-Intensity Gamma-Ray Source Thomas Regier, Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University.
Free-Electron Laser at the TESLA Test Facility More than 50 institutes from 12 countries are involved in the TESLA Project The TESLA Collaboration: Three.
PULSE LASER WIRE Laser pulse storage in an optical cavity as a beam monitor & an X-ray source Kaori Takezawa Kyoto Univ. 2nd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project.
Monte Carlo Simulation Study of In-orbit Background for the Soft Gamma-ray Detector onboard ASTRO-H Mizuno T., Hiragi K., Fukazawa Y., Umeki Y. (Hiroshima.
MICOS a CHERNE collaboration in applied research involving industry François Tondeur, Lara Marwaha, Isabelle Gerardy, Jonathan Baré ISIB José Rodenas,
Determination of activity of 51 Cr source on gamma radiation measurements V.V.Gorbachev, V.N.Gavrin, T.V.Ibragimova, A.V.Kalikhov, Yu.M.Malyshkin,A.A.Shikhin.
Compact X-ray & Emittance Measurement by Laser Compton Scattering Zhi Zhao Jan. 31, 2014.
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 In the figure: Photoelectric suppressed. Single Compton (effect of crystal dimensions).
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
Automatic Machine Review Dec 2015 MAX IV Storage Rings Automation Pedro F. Tavares.
A. Bross MICE CM17 February MuCool RF Program 805 and 201 MHz Studies.
Lecture 3-Building a Detector (cont’d) George K. Parks Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Observation of cosmic gamma-ray bursts and solar flares in the ''RELEC'' experiment on the ''VERNOV'' satellite.
GLAST User’s Committee Meeting– 1 – June 6-7, 2005 GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM) Chip Meegan NASA/MSFC.
For further information, please contact: Purpose of Calibration: - provide performance verification of the GBM detectors. - provide benchmark.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation June 27, 2005Larry Kepko - Data ProcessingPage 1 CRaTER Characterization Data Products & Production.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
GLAST GLAST Burst Monitor Charles Meegan Principal Investigator NASA MSFC Steve Elrod Project Manager NASA MSFC
Lessons Learned From the First Operation of the LCLS for Users Presented by Josef Frisch For the LCLS March 14, 2010.
AFAD 2014 Synchrotron Status of Compact X-ray Source at LUCX Kazuyuki Sakaue Waseda University Laser Undulator Compact X-ray source.
Sep. 22, 2011 Seoul National University Jae Keum Lee KIMS Background 1 China-Korea Workshop 2011 September 22-23, 2011.
SL_THOMSON C. Vaccarezza on behalf of the SL_Thomson team.
Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor
–11.03 Hawaii Multi bunch acceleration on LUCX system Ⅰ. LUCX project Ⅱ. Simulation results for Compton scattering Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading.
Report (2) on JPARC/MLF-12B025 Gd(n,  ) experiment TIT, Jan.13, 2014 For MLF-12B025 Collaboration (Okayama and JAEA): Outline 1.Motivation.
g beam test of the Liquid Xe calorimeter for the MEG experiment
The HXMT in-flight calibration plan Shaolin XIONG, Shijie ZHENG, Liming SONG On behalf of HXMT SGS team Institue of High Energy Physics, China 11th.
LET Performance Requirements Presenter: Richard Mewaldt
Liquid Xenon Detector for the MEG Experiment
VEPP-2000 plans for the study of the nucleon form factors
HE instrument and in-orbit performance
Integration and Test Organization Chart
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Presentation transcript:

Calibration Overview – August 31, 2004 J. Fishman

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50)- 2 - GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 Calibration Plan of the GBM  GBM-MPE-PL-1-1, issue date: Dec 2003 >> GBM-PLAN-1016, Baselined at CDR  By Jerry Fishman and Giselher Lichti  Purpose Outlines the plans for the calibration of the NaI and BGO detectors Outlines the plans for the calibration of the NaI and BGO detectors Flight Det. Calib. Performed at three places: MPE, NSSTC and Spectrum Astro Flight Det. Calib. Performed at three places: MPE, NSSTC and Spectrum Astro Ancillary, Off-line Measurements at Low and High Energies Ancillary, Off-line Measurements at Low and High Energies Generation of detector response matrices (DRMs) for NaIs and BGOs Generation of detector response matrices (DRMs) for NaIs and BGOs Verification of detector-module requirements Verification of detector-module requirements Comprehensive Detector Calibrations at MPE : Part I : Comprehensive Detector Calibrations at MPE : >TP100 (NaI), TP110 (BGO) & TP 120 (Mag. Suscept.) Low Energy X-ray Calibrations with NaI Flight Spare Detector at the PUMA or BESSY X-ray Facility at MPE - TP 101 (NaI) Part II: Low Energy X-ray Calibrations with NaI Flight Spare Detector at the PUMA or BESSY X-ray Facility at MPE - TP 101 (NaI) Long/Short calibration (TP630/635) (– these are really verifications) Part III,IV: Long/Short calibration (TP630/635) (– these are really verifications) Aliveness test (TP105/115) Part V: Aliveness test (TP105/115) Spacecraft Radioactive Source Survey (TP805) Part VI: Spacecraft Radioactive Source Survey (TP805) High-Energy Tests with the BGO Flight Spare Detector (TP111) Part VII: High-Energy Tests with the BGO Flight Spare Detector (TP111)

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50)- 3 - GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 Detector-level Calibrations 1. Channel-Energy Relation & Energy Resolution at Different Energies (on-axis; covering the whole energy range) 1. Channel-Energy Relation & Energy Resolution at Different Energies (on-axis; covering the whole energy range) 2.- Angular Response – relative values of Efficiency vs. Energy 2.- Angular Response – relative values of Efficiency vs. Energy (Used to compare to Monte Carlo Detector Response Matrices, DRMs) (Used to compare to Monte Carlo Detector Response Matrices, DRMs) 3.- Angular Dependence of Energy-Channel Relationship and Energy Resolution (Performed at same time as #2, above) 3.- Angular Dependence of Energy-Channel Relationship and Energy Resolution (Performed at same time as #2, above) 4.- Rate-Dependence of #1 - over several rates, up to 10 5 cps 4.- Rate-Dependence of #1 - over several rates, up to 10 5 cps 5.- Temperature Dependence of #1, in operating temperature range 5.- Temperature Dependence of #1, in operating temperature range

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50)- 4 - GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 Detector Magnetic Susceptibility  GBM-PROC-TP120: In three orthogonal axes, +/- 1.5 gauss In three orthogonal axes, +/- 1.5 gauss Uses radioactive source to measure gain (Na-22) Uses radioactive source to measure gain (Na-22) Detailed Procedure outlined in GBM-MPE-PL-11, A. von Kienlin, July 2004 Detailed Procedure outlined in GBM-MPE-PL-11, A. von Kienlin, July 2004  Helmholtz coils in MFSA Ottobrunn facility, Germany  26 orientations planned

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50)- 5 - GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 Other Calibrations and Related Activities  Some Calibrations will be verified in Huntsville, after detector delivery and also at the S/C Facility after integration on the spacecraft (These are termed Long and Short Calibrations)  Scattering Measurements will be made at Spectrum Astro Post- integration to assess spacecraft scattering radiation into the detectors, see PLAN Source strengths ~5-10 mC. (Preliminary requirements have been given to Spectrum Astro)  The Low Energy Calibrations (~5-35 keV) have several options and are currently under discussion within the GBM team.  Some Limited Calibrations at a High-Energy Particle Accelerator (Perhaps a science model only) – Duke University is the baselined facility  It would be highly desirable to have a quick data run at Spectrum Astro using a portable van de Graff generator (ref. E. Bloom)

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50)- 6 - GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 NaI/BB - Spectra NaI Energy Calibration - Note linearity and low energy response

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50)- 7 - GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 Low Energy Calibration Sources IsotopeEnergy Am-24117, 60 keV Cd 10922, 88 keV Ba-13332, 81 keV Bi-2078, 12, 75 keV Co-5714 keV

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50)- 8 - GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 Low Energy Calibration – Additional Tests MPE is planning to perform a separate Low Energy Calibration on one or two non-flight NaI detectors (TP 101) at either PUMA facility at MPE or the BESSY facility in Berlin These tests will be done mainly to explore subtle non-linearities at low energies and across the Iodine k-edge

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50)- 9 - GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 Rate Dependence NaI Detector  - source BGO Detector  Measurement of rate dependence of Channel-Energy Relation Channel-Energy Relation Energy-Resolution Energy-Resolution  as a function of counting rate  2  NaI – detectors: (TP100-D) 109 Cd, increasing count rate in steps up to 100 kcps 109 Cd, increasing count rate in steps up to 100 kcps 22 Na, increasing count rate in steps up to 20 kcps 22 Na, increasing count rate in steps up to 20 kcps  1  BGO: (TP110 -D) 137 Cs and 24 Na 137 Cs and 24 Na Increasing count rate in steps up to 20 kcps Increasing count rate in steps up to 20 kcps  - source

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50) GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 Low Energy Tests - The PUMA X-ray Test Facility Low Energy Tests - The PUMA X-ray Test Facility  Vacuum system Length: 6 m  Main instrument chamber Length: 2 m Diameter: 1.6 m mbar Front door opens into class 10 clean room  Multi-target X-ray source produce a bunch of X-rays in the energy range 0.5 – 17 keV energy spread: natural line width Beam flux:  10 4 photons/(cm² s) Collimators system inside vacuum tube  Monitor counters silicon drift chamber detectors absolutely calibrated Accuracy for spectral flux density  2 %  GBM test with Puma (TP 101): FM NaI detectors (number: TBD) With flight-like thermal cover Energy range: 3 – 17 keV At different incidence angles

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50) GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 BGO - High energy tests  The Duke University Free-Electron Laser Facility (DFELF) will be used for the GBM High Energy Gamma-Ray Calibration at the high intensity gamma source location utilized for tests of the MPE Mega Project  calibrations will be performed at least six months prior to launch on the flight spare BGO detector  test for non-linearity and saturation effects in the BGO crystal and PMT  energy range: MeV

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50) GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 Beam Calibration of the MEGA Prototype (Medium Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy, 0.4 – 50 MeV) The High Energy Gamma-ray Source at the Free-Electron Laser Lab. (FELL) Duke University, Durham, NC

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50) GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 Storage Ring, Free Electron laser Inverse Compton Beam RF cavity wiggler mirror injection e - -bunch 1 e - -bunch 2 laser pulse 1  -ray beam

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50) GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 The High Intensity  -ray Source (HI  S) free electron laser storage ring linac  -ray vault collimator hut mirror wiggler

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50) GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 Verifications, not really Calibrations, in Plan #1016  Long Calibration (TP 635) Purpose: Check gain and resolution of all detectors Purpose: Check gain and resolution of all detectors before and after major tests, such as vibration, thermal-vacuum before and after major tests, such as vibration, thermal-vacuum before and after shipping of the detectors before and after shipping of the detectors will be performed at MPE, NSSTC and Spectrum Astro will be performed at MPE, NSSTC and Spectrum Astro  Short Calibration (TP 630) TP 635 with a sub-set of selected detectors TP 635 with a sub-set of selected detectors Can be performed at various phases of the integration Can be performed at various phases of the integration  Aliveness Test (NaI: TP105, BGO: TP115) natural background radiation will be used to ascertain that all detectors are functioning natural background radiation will be used to ascertain that all detectors are functioning

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50) GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 Calibration Summary I. Comprehensive Detector Calib. & Performance TP100 (NaI) TP110 (BGO) TP 120 (Mag. Suscept.) All Detectors, including spares MPE6 keV MeV Radioactive Sources (complete set) MPENSSTC II. Low Energy X-ray Calibrations TP101 NaI Detectors OnlyMPE (PUMA Facility at MPE) 3-40 keVX-ray Tube & Filters; Monochrometer MPENSSTC III. Short Calibration (Short Performance Verification) TP630 As NeededMPE, NSSTC, SpectrumAstro 32 keV – 1.3 MeV Radioactive Sources (sub-set) MPENSSTC IV. Long Calibration (Long Performance Verification) TP635 TP610 (High Rate) All Flight Detectors MPE & NSSTC, SpectrumAstro 6 keV MeV Radioactive Sources (complete set) MPENSSTC V. Aliveness Test TP105 (NaI) TP115 (BGO) All Flight Detectors MPE & NSSTC, SpectrumAstro Background Radiation only --MPENSSTC VI. Spacecraft Survey TP805 All Flight Detectors (on the spacecraft) SpectrumAstro32 keV – 1.3 MeV Radioactive Sources (Cs-137, Co-60 ~5mC) NSSTCMPE, Spectrum Astro VII. High-Energy Test TP 111 Non-Flight Detector-BGO only (Flight Spare Unit) Duke Univ. (DFEL Facility) MeVFree Electron Laser (Inverse Compton) tbdtbd- Dep. on schedule Test Procedure Development Cal. Element & TP Nos. Detectors/Type Location of T./C. Energy Range Sources Lead Others

Calibration Overview / J. Fishman (NASA/MSFC-SD50) GBM Calib. Review, August, 2004 On-Orbit Gain Stabilization System  Will use 511 keV Background line in an on-board software servo AGC system, similar to that used for BATSE  Expected detector count rates and s/w parameters can be derived from BATSE Spectroscopy Detector data  Improvements over BATSE on-orbit calibration: Better energy resolution Better energy resolution Better background subtraction Better background subtraction  50 min. integration vs. 5 min. for BATSE (Requirement: 2% gain stability over an orbit; various contributions to overall reqm’t)