Matakuliah: D0762 – Ekonomi Teknik Tahun: 2009 Benefit Cost Ratio Course Outline 8.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rate of Return Multiple Alternatives Lecture slides to accompany
Advertisements

Engineering Economy Practice Problems
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Incremental Analysis Lecture No. 28 Chapter 7 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2006.
Lecture 7 Evaluating a Single Project PW, FW, AW IRR
State University of New York WARNING All rights reserved. No part of the course materials used in the instruction of this course may be reproduced in any.
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project and Comparing Alternatives
Exam 4 Practice Problems Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E.
Other Analysis Techniques
Capital Budgeting Evaluation Technique Pertemuan 7-10 Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
COMPARING ALTERNATIVES
1 By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CE ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS IN CONSTRUCTION CHP 7 -Benefit/Cost.
Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008 © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Lecture slides to accompany Basics.
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 17 Economic Analysis in the Public Sector Framework of Benefit- Cost Analysis Valuation of Benefits.
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 7 Present Worth Analysis Describing Project Cash Flows Initial Project Screening Method Present Worth.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives Lecture No.18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics.
Lecture No. 54 Chapter 16 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5th edition, © 2010.
EVALUATING PROJECTS WITH THE BENEFIT / COST RATIO METHOD
Evaluating Projects with Benefit/Cost Ratio Method
Benefit/Cost Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Comparing Alternatives with Rate of Return
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 9-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
1 Internal Rate of Return Internal Rate of Return (IRR): The interest rate i* at which NPW = 0 Note: This is the same as finding the roots of a polynomial.
Rate of Return Analysis: Multiple Alternatives Consider the following: You have $20,000 to invest in either alternative A or alternative B. Your MARR is.
Matakuliah: D0762 – Ekonomi Teknik Tahun: 2009 RATE OF RETURN ANALYSIS Course Outline 7.
Lectures in Engineering Economy Prof. Corrado lo Storto DIEG, Dept. of Economics and Engineering Management School of Engineering, University of Naples.
Comparing Projects Using Time Value of Money
The second objective today is to evaluate correctly capital investment alternatives when the time value of money is a key influence.
CHAPTER 11 EVALUATING PROJECTS WITH THE BENEFIT / COST RATIO METHOD $$$ $
First step is to identify cash flows as either benefits, disbenefits, or costs Benefits(B)--Advantages to the people Disbenefts--Disadvantages to the people.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 9-1 Developed.
Present Worth Analysis Chapter 5 Types of Economic Alternatives Mutually Exclusive Alternatives: –Only one of the viable projects can be selected. –The.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 6-1 Developed.
Lecture No. 26 Chapter 7 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5 th edition, © 2010.
MIE Class #5 Manufacturing & Engineering Economics Concerns and Questions Concerns and Questions Quick Recap of Previous ClassQuick Recap of Previous.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill All Rights Reserved 9-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 9 Benefit/Cost.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 5-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
Annual Worth Analysis An alternative to Present Worth (PW) and Future Worth (FW) analysis is Annual Worth (AW) analysis. Annual worth analysis will select.
Rate of Return Analysis Chapter 7: Newnan, Eschenbach, and Lavelle Dr. Hurley’s AGB 555 Course.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Incremental Analysis Lecture No.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 9 Authored by: Dr. Don.
L:21 Incremental Analysis ECON 320 Engineering Economics Mahmut Ali GOKCE Industrial Systems Engineering Computer Sciences.
0 Corporate Finance Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Seventh Edition 6 Chapter Six Some Alternative Investment Rules.
Matakuliah: D0762 – Ekonomi Teknik Tahun: 2009 Annual Worth Analysis Course Outline 5.
Construction Accounting & Financial Management, 3/e Steven Peterson © 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All Rights.
Lecture No.18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5 th edition, © 2010.
Chapter 5 Present-Worth Analysis. 2 Loan versus Project Cash Flows Initial Project Screening Methods Present-Worth Analysis Methods to Compare Mutually.
8-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 8 Rate of Return Multiple Alternatives © 2012 by.
Matakuliah: D0762 – Ekonomi Teknik Tahun: 2009 Selection Analysis Method Course Outline 9.
1 Incremental Analysis A technique or approach that can be used with NPW, EAW, and later with IRR and Cost/Benefit to determine if an incremental expenditure.
Economic Analysis in the Public Sector Benefit/Cost Analysis.
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Benefit Cost Analysis and Public Sector Economics
Annual Worth Analysis An alternative to Present Worth (PW) and Future Worth (FW) analysis is Annual Worth (AW) analysis. Annual worth analysis will select.
Chapter 5 PROJECT EVALUATION METHOD
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 7 Present Worth Analysis
Construction Engineering 221 Economic Analysis
Chapter 5 PROJECT EVALUATION METHOD
Chapter 10: Evaluating Projects with the Benefit-Cost Ratio Method
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
CTC 475 Review Evaluating alternatives Ranking Method (PW, AW, FW)
Annual Worth Analysis An alternative to Present Worth (PW) and Future Worth (FW) analysis is Annual Worth (AW) analysis. Annual worth analysis will select.
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
OUTLINE Questions? News? New homework due Wednesday
OUTLINE Questions? News? New homework due Wednesday
Presentation transcript:

Matakuliah: D0762 – Ekonomi Teknik Tahun: 2009 Benefit Cost Ratio Course Outline 8

Outline 2 Definition Benefit Cost Ratio for Single Project Alternative Selection B/C selection from multiple alternatives

Definition Benefit Cost Ratio is a method for selecting alternatives for public works project. B/C method of analysis is based on the ratio of the benefits to costs associated with a particular project First steps : determine which of the elements are benefits, disbenefits, and costs 3

What is Public Project? Public Sector is owned by the citizens Public Sector Projects provide needed services at ‘no profit’ Facts… Generally large investment size Long life span (30-50 years) Revenues are used to cover future cost 4 KGA-Spr09®Reserved

Terminology Costs: estimated expenditures for operations, maintenance, and construction -- Government Benefits: economic advantages experienced by the owners -- Public Disbenefits: expected undesirable consequences to the owners -- Public Note: defining the benefit and disbenefit are not as easy as one two three for some public sectors Discount rate: interest rate for public sector projects

KGA-Spr09®Reserved Be Consistent! Select a viewpoint prior determining costs, benefits, and disbenefits and stick with one only! The Do-Nothing option! Several viewpoints: Citizen Economic development Job creation/retention, etc

Conventional B/C Ratio - Single Project Calculated as follows B/C = = B/C = = = Decision Criteria If B/C ≥ 1, then … accept the alternative at the discounted rate Otherwise, … not acceptable however it can still be funded for other reasons… NOTE In B/C analyses, costs are not preceded by a minus sign Salvage values are subtracted from costs Disbenefits are generally subtracted from benefits 7 benefits –disbenefits Costs B-D C PW(B-D) PW(C) AW(B-D) AW(C) FW(B-D) FW(C)

KGA-Spr09®Reserved Modified B/C For Single Project Conventional B/C Modified B/C Benefit and Cost difference measure of worth B – C, if (B-C) ≥ 0, accept the project and vice versa

KGA-Spr09®Reserved Alternative Selection: B/C Incremental Analysis Given: ≥ 2 mutually exclusive alternatives Steps… Estimate total equivalent costs for all alternatives Rank the alternatives from low to high based upon total costs in the denominator of the ratio Calculate the incremental cost (ΔC) for the larger-cost alternative Calculate the total benefits and disbenefits for both alternatives – incremental benefits (ΔB) for the larger-cost alternative  Δ(B-D) Calculate ΔB/C ratio Accept the higher cost alternative if ΔB/C ≥1

KGA-Spr09®Reserved B/C Incremental Analysis for Multiple Alternatives Given ≥ 3 mutually exclusive alternatives, must select one Conduct pairwise ΔB/C Selection rule: choose the largest-cost alternative after justfied by incremental B/C ≥1 Note: any alternatives that have an overall B/C <1.0 can be eliminated immediately and no need not to be considered in the incremental analysis

KGA-Spr09®Reserved Independent Projects As long as the budget is unlimited, Compare each alternative with DN Choose all that have B/C ≥ 1 If the budget is limited, Use optimization methodology (capital budgeting)

KGA-Spr09®Reserved Example … (Example 9.1) The Wartol Foundation, a nonprofit educational research organization, is contemplating an investment of $1.5 million in grants to develop new ways to teach people the rudiments of a profession. The grants will extend over a 10-year period and will create an estimated savings of $500,000 per year in faculty salaries, student tuition and fees, and other expenses. The foundation uses a rate of return of 6% per year on all grant awards. Since the new program will be in addition to ongoing activities, an estimated $200,000 per year will be removed from other program funding to support this educational research. To make this program successful, a $50,000-per- year operating expense will be incurred by the foundation from its regular M&O budget. Use the following analysis methods to determine if the program is justified over a 10-year period: (a) conventional B/C, (b) modified B/C, (c) (B-C) Analysis

KGA-Spr09®Reserved Example …(Cont’d) AW, PW, or FW? Use the one with… Conventional B/C B/C = (500k – 200k)/(203,805+50k) = 1.18, thus… Modified B/C B/C = (500k – 200k – 50k)/203,805 = 1.23, thus… Benefit and Cost Difference B-C = (500k – 200k) – (203,805+50k) = $46,195, thus…

KGA-Spr09®Reserved Another One… (Example 9.3) Two routes are under consideration for a new interstate highway segment. The northerly route N would be located about 5 km from the central business district and would require longer travel distances by local commuter traffic. The southerly route S would pass directly through the downtown area, and, although its construction cost would be higher, it would reduce the travel time and distance for local commuters. Assume that the costs for the two routes are as follows: If the roads are assumed to last 30 years with no salvage value, which route should be selected on the basis of B/C analysis using an interest rate of 5%/ year? Route NRoute S Initial cost, $10,000,00015,000,000 Maintenance cost/year, $35,00055,000 Road-user cost/year, $450,000200,000

KGA-Spr09®Reserved Another One…(Cont’d) AW, PW, or FW? Use the one with… AW N = $685,500 and AW S = $1,030,750 Incremental cost value = $345,250/year Incremental benefit = $250,000/year B/C ratio = $250,000/$345,250 =.724 thus…

KGA-Spr09®Reserved Example (Example 9.4) Consider the four mutually exclusive alternatives, apply incremental B/C analysis to select the best alternative for a MARR = 10% per year. Use a PW analysis LocationABCD Building cost, $-200, , , ,000 Annual cash flow, $22,00035,00019,50042,000 Life, years30

KGA-Spr09®Reserved Example Find the PW of the cash flows … Eliminate those with B/C <1, why? Start performing incremental analysis … B to A Incremental cost = 75,000 Incremental benefit = 122,551  incremental B/C ratio = 1.63 Choose? D to B Incremental cost = 75,000 Incremental benefit = 65,989  incremental B/C ratio =.88 Choose?

KGA-Spr09®Reserved (Example 9.6) Six different sites are into consideration as possible location to construct a dam. If MARR of 6% per year is required and dam life is infinite for analysis purposes, select the one best location using the B/C method SiteConstruction Cost, $ (millions)Annual Income, $ A6350k B8420k C3125k D10400k E5350k F11700k Choose E

Spreadsheet Example Alternative routes are being considered by the local highway district for a new bypass. Route A, costing $4000,000 to local business. Route B, costing $6, can provide $1000,000 in annual benefits. The annual cost of maintenance is $ for A and $ for B. If the life of each road is 20 years and an interest rate of 8% per year is used, which alternative should be selected on the basis of a conventional B/C analysis? 19

Solution 20