© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC turbulence and Cb hazard verification Recent results and future plans Dr Philip G Gill WAFSOPSG 7/14, 30 th April 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High Resolution studies
Advertisements

Verification of Probabilistic Forecast J.P. Céron – Direction de la Climatologie S. Mason - IRI.
GOES: Geostationary Orbiting Environmental Satellite Satellite (~36,000 km altitude) period ( 24 hours for each orbit) Always above same location. Must.
Weather Forecasting This chapter discusses: 1.Various weather forecasting methods, their tools, and forecasting accuracy and skill 2.Images for the forecasting.
JMA Takayuki MATSUMURA (Forecast Department, JMA) C Asia Air Survey co., ltd New Forecast Technologies for Disaster Prevention and Mitigation 1.
AMDAR – The aircraft data source
© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC CAT verification Objective verification of GRIB CAT forecasts Dr Philip G Gill, WAFC Science Meeting, Washington, 20.
© Crown copyright Met Office Use of GRIB hazard forecasts in flight planning Bob Lunnon, Aviation Outcomes Manager, Met Office WAFS Science meeting, Washington,
Larry Burch, WAFC Washington Nigel Gait, WAFC London
GRIB Visualization of data
© Crown copyright Met Office Scientific background and content of new gridded products Bob Lunnon, Aviation Outcomes Manager, Met Office WAFS Workshop.
15th Septmeber 2009 Chart 0 WAFS Workshop – Paris 2009 MET Services, Hans-Rudi Sonnabend Application of WAFS Products Hans-Rudi Sonnabend Lufthansa System.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no LAMEPS – Limited area ensemble forecasting in Norway, using targeted EPS Marit Helene Jensen, Inger-Lise Frogner,
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Seasonal forecasting activities at the Met Office Long-range Forecasting Group, Hadley Centre Presenter: Richard Graham ECMWF.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no TEPS/LAMEPS at met.no Marit Helene Jensen, Inger-Lise Frogner, Hilde Haakenstad and Ole Vignes.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Presentation to ECMWF Forecast Product User Meeting 16th June 2005.
ECMWF Slide 1Met Op training course – Reading, March 2004 Forecast verification: probabilistic aspects Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Slide 1 ECMWF Training Course - The Global Observing System - 06/2013 The Satellite Global Observing System Stephen English 1.A brief introduction to the.
Slide 1ECMWF forecast User Meeting -- Reading, June 2006 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Operational Use of ECMWF products at the Met Office: Current practice, Verification and Ideas for the future Tim Hewson 17th June 2005 © Crown copyright.
Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Page 1 © Crown copyright 2005 ECMWF User Meeting, June 2006 Developments in the Use of Short and Medium-Range Ensembles at the Met Office Ken Mylne.
ECMWF MetTraining Course- Data Assimilation and use of satellite data (3 May 2005) The Global Observing System Overview of data sources Data coverage Data.
Rainfall estimation for food security in Africa, using the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) satellite. Robin Chadwick.
Robin Hogan Julien Delanoe University of Reading Remote sensing of ice clouds from space.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Carol Roadnight, Peter Clark Met Office, JCMM Halliwell Representing convection in convective scale NWP models : An idealised.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Jet Stream Compression Turbulence Mountain wave Icing IFR ceiling and visibility CWSU Products MIS CWA PIREPS Questions and Comments Created 9/14/2008.
Future Radar and Satellite Technology Daniel C. Miller National Weather Service Columbia, SC.
U.S. Turbulence Program Update
Regional Models Lake Victoria Model Prepared by C. Tubbs, P. Davies, Met Office UK Revised, delivered by P. Chen, WMO Secretariat SWFDP-Eastern Africa.
METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES FOR LOW LEVEL FLIGHTS IN ROMANIA
WAFS Workshop on the Use and Visualization of Gridded SIGWX Forecasts September 2009.
© Crown copyright Met Office Verification of forecasts of Cbs Bob Lunnon, Aviation Outcomes Manager, Met Office WAFS Science meeting, Washington, April.
1 Verification of wave forecast models Martin Holt Jim Gunson Damian Holmes-Bell.
12-2 Conditional Probability Obj: To be able to find conditional probabilities and use formulas and tree diagrams.
Translating verification experience from meteorology to space weather Suzy Bingham ESWW splinter session, Thurs. 20 th Nov.
Verification of WAFS Global Icing Products Jennifer Mahoney 1 and Sean Madine 1,2 1 NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory 2 Cooperative Institute for Research.
Verification has been undertaken for the 3 month Summer period (30/05/12 – 06/09/12) using forecasts and observations at all 205 UK civil and defence aerodromes.
FAA International Activities
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Severe turbulence cases NOMEK Aviation requirements ICAO Annex 3 – “The objective of meteorological service for international air navigation shall.
Requirements from KENDA on the verification NetCDF feedback files: -produced by analysis system (LETKF) and ‘stat’ utility ((to.
© Crown copyright Met Office Probabilistic turbulence forecasts from ensemble models and verification Philip Gill and Piers Buchanan NCAR Aviation Turbulence.
 Rapidly developing convection is a known source of CIT  Satellite derived cloud top infrared (IR) cooling rate, overshooting tops (OT)/enhanced-V and.
61 st IHC, New Orleans, LA Verification of the Monte Carlo Tropical Cyclone Wind Speed Probabilities: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update John A.
Jon Trueblood (Dordt College) Timothy Sliwinski (FSU) Dr. Amy McGovern David John Gagne (OU) Dr. John Williams Dr. Jennifer Abernethy (NCAR) Image Courtesy:
An Update on the FAA’s EDR Reporting Program Larry Cornman National Center for Atmospheric Research.
© Crown copyright Met Office GA Met provision, UK Met Office Jonathan Dutton, Operations Centre, Met Office, UK.
© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC CAT verification Objective verification of GRIB CAT forecasts Dr Philip G Gill, WAFS Workshop on the use and visualisation.
5.32 Estimating regions of tropopause folding and clear-air turbulence with the GOES water vapor channel Tony Wimmers, Wayne Feltz Cooperative Institute.
MeteoExpert workstation.Visualization of new gridded forecasts MeteoExpert workstation. Visualization of new gridded forecasts.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 Met Office Verification -status Clive Wilson, Presented by Mike Bush at EWGLAM Meeting October 8- 11, 2007.
Aviation Products Derived from GOES Satellite Data Gary P. Ellrod Office of Research and Applications (NOAA/NESDIS) Camp Springs, MD.
Page 1© Crown copyright Modelling the stable boundary layer and the role of land surface heterogeneity Anne McCabe, Bob Beare, Andy Brown EMS 2005.
1) Verification of individual predictors Development of improved turbulence forecasts for aviation Debi Turp © Crown copyright Met Office and the Met Office.
1 GOES-R AWG Aviation Team: Tropopause Folding Turbulence Product (TFTP) June 14, 2011 Presented By: Anthony Wimmers SSEC/CIMSS University of Wisconsin.
Gridded WAFS Icing Verification System Matt Strahan WAFC Washintgon.
Methodology n Step 1: Identify MOG (EDR ≥ 0.25) observations at cruising altitude (≥ FL250). n Step 2: Account for ascending/descending flights by filtering.
Interactions: atmosphere EG2234 Earth Observation.
SIGMA: Diagnosis and Nowcasting of In-flight Icing – Improving Aircrew Awareness Through FLYSAFE Christine Le Bot Agathe Drouin Christian Pagé.
Tony Wimmers, Wayne Feltz
EG2234 Earth Observation Weather Forecasting.
Turbulence-Related Products Robert Sharman NCAR/RAP
Industry Update on Turbulence
Quantitative verification of cloud fraction forecasts
Increasing Adoption of Weather & Turbulence Observations
The FAA Aviation Weather Research Program’s
Can we distinguish wet years from dry years?
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece
Presentation transcript:

© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC turbulence and Cb hazard verification Recent results and future plans Dr Philip G Gill WAFSOPSG 7/14, 30 th April 2013

© Crown copyright Met Office Contents This presentation covers the following areas Introduction Turbulence verification Cb verification Future plans Questions and answers

© Crown copyright Met Office Introduction Turbulence and Cb are a major cause of aviation incidents Turbulence and Cb hazard forecasting are part of the World Area Forecast Centre (WAFC) service provided by WAFC London and WAFC Washington Forecasts currently produced both by forecasters – Significant Weather Chart (SIGWX) and from gridded model output Objective verification was set up in 2009 Forecasts are global but verification is currently limited Photos © P Gill

© Crown copyright Met Office Objective turbulence verification

© Crown copyright Met Office Verification Objective verification of gridded clear air turbulence (CAT) forecasts Verification by severity of turbulence (eg. moderate or greater) Verify against automated aircraft observations from the Global Aircraft Data Set (GADS) Restricted to cruise level (above 28, 000 ft) to limit unwanted effects on observations of manoeuvring at lower levels

© Crown copyright Met Office Global Aircraft Data Set Fleet of Boeing aircraft Global coverage, but flights mainly over northern hemisphere Automated aircraft observations available every 4 seconds January 2009 Good coverage of N Atlantic, US and Europe Poor coverage of E Asia/Pacific region and southern hemisphere – need more observations

© Crown copyright Met Office Turbulence observations Pilot Reports (PIREPS) are issued by pilots when turbulence is encountered – useful additional information but are subjective, aircraft specific, temporal and spatial errors, no routine null reports AMDAR are automated reports from aircraft but are not regular and can differ between aircraft Derived Equivalent Vertical Gust (DEVG) - Indicator of turbulence derived from automated in-situ flight data: vertical acceleration, aircraft mass, altitude and airspeed Eddy Dissipation Rate (EDR) also a measurement of turbulence derived from automated in-situ data – ICAO standard At present access to EDR data limited to US – DEVG only option for wider coverage

© Crown copyright Met Office Verification methodology Aircraft track within time window Turbulent event Turbulence forecast field Ellrod TI1

© Crown copyright Met Office Forecast assessment Turbulent/non turbulent event defined on 10min aircraft track ~120km - approx grid size Forecast turbulent event – CAT potential >= Threshold Observed (moderate or greater) turbulent event - DEVG>=4.5m/s Construct 2x2 contingency tables for each threshold Sum entries in contingency tables over the verification period Turbulence observed No turbulence observed Turbulence forecast HitFalse alarm No turbulence forecast MissCorrect rejection 2x2 contingency table

Forecast skill Contingency tables can be used for various probability thresholds to produce a reliability table From the reliability table various scores can be calculated The skill of the forecast at discriminating between events and non-events can be measured using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) by plotting hit rate against false alarm rate The curve from a probabilistic forecast and single point from a deterministic forecast can be compared. Line of no skillPerfect forecast Area under curve measures skill

© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC CAT verification Robert Coulson

Latest results – mean CAT Acceptable hit rates? Acceptable false alarm rates? Area of interest could be measured by partial area under ROC curve

Latest results – max CAT

Latitudinal variation 50N to 90N 20S to 20N 20N to 50N 50S to 20S Good performance from above 20N

Summary of CAT verification Blending process continues to produce both consistent and skilful turbulence forecasts. Some variation in skill by latitude with best performance in the mid latitudes. Rolling 12-month results produced monthly since June 2012.

© Crown copyright Met Office WAFC Cb verification Teresa Hughes

Cb verification Verification against lightning strikes (SFERICS) from Met Office ATDnet Gridded SFERICS field produced using observations at +/- 30 minutes from forecast validity time T+24 forecast verified from all four model runs

ATDnet Domain

Latest results

Latitudinal variation 50N to 80N20N to 50N 20S to 20N40S to 20S

Summary of Cb verification Blending process continues to produce both consistent and skilful Cb forecasts. Some variation in skill by latitude Rolling 12-month results produced quarterly since June 2012.

© Crown copyright Met Office Future verification plans

Improving turbulence verification Switch from DEVG to EDR ICAO standard Forecasting and observing EDR Source more EDR observations from other airlines to increase the area of coverage Increase coverage to fill gaps in current GADS database

Improving Cb verification Extend verification against lightning reports by outside of the ATDnet domain Source additional lightning reports outside [80N, 40S, 100W, 80E] Use geostationary satellite data in addition to lightning data MSG [60N, 60S] Overshooting convection product (work underway) New satellites over America (GOES-R) and East Asia (Himawari-8) Verify Cb cloud top height and Cb extent

MSG - the European Geostationary Imager Scans Africa, Europe, Middle East and Atlantic every 15 minutes 3/1 km spatial resolution at 0° N, 0° E 12 channels (different wavelengths) Meteosat-10 operational, Meteosat-8,-9 backup

Severe convection product Data from Meteosat Second Generation Calculated from the visible and infrared channels. Generated every 15 mins. Current product over Europe identifies area where severe convection is occurring (day-time only) New overshooting convection product will identify intense convective areas with overshooting cloud tops. Could be merged with lightning data from ATDnet Could be merged later with Meteosat third generation lightning data

Cloud top height product Data from Meteosat Second Generation Calculated from the infrared channels at wavelengths of 10.8, 12.0 and 13.4 microns. Generated every 15 mins Covers Europe, Atlantic, Africa Extend to global coverage following GOES-R and Himawari-8 satellite launches (~ 2015) Mask with Cb product

Verification – all forecasts Verify probabilistic forecasts using suitable metrics Forecast skill – ROC (partial area under curve?) Reliability diagram Value – relative economic value measure Publish verification results – plots and contingency tables Breakdown into WMO regions Forecast ranges T+12, T+24, T+36 Rolling 12-month scores Geostationary satellite data limited to 60N, 60S. Polar orbiter data could supplement this if necessary.

Timescales 2013/14 Preliminary work on satellite data specifications Routine CAT and Cb verification published by WMO region. 2014/15 Include satellite data in Cb verification Develop Cb cloud top height verification Move to using EDR in turbulence verification 2015/16 Expand coverage of Cb verification using new satellite data over East Asia (Himawari-8) 2016/17 Expand coverage of Cb verification using new satellite data over America (GOES-R)

© Crown copyright Met Office Questions & answers