Heckscher-Ohlin; 1 To demonstrate the Heckscher-Ohlin (HO) result we will use some of the earlier results, in particular Factor Price Equalization First,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tariff, general equilibrium
Advertisements

4 Trade and Resources: The Heckscher-Ohlin Model 1 Heckscher-Ohlin
CHAPTER 5; FACTOR PRICES
Classic Trade Theory Ricardian Model - Technological Comparative Advantage: Basic 2 Good Ricardian model (Feenstra, Chapter 1) Continuum of Goods [Dornbush,
International Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy, Ch. 7;  Charles van Marrewijk, Figure 7.1 Bertil Ohlin ( )
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Appendix 4.1 Alternate Proofs of Selected HO Theorems.
Eastwood's ECO 486 Notes Everything you need to know about isocosts and isoquants to prove HO, Stolper-Samuelson, and Rybczynski theorems. Isocost lines,
The Gains from Trade: A General Equilibrium View Between a good and a bad economist this constitutes the whole difference–the one takes account of the.
A’s offer curve We have seen how to derive an ‘offer curve’, showing combinations of exports offered in exchange for imports at different price levels.
The Basis for Trade: Factor Endowments and the Heckscher-Ohlin Model
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 2 countries; A and B Comparative advantage (technology differences)
Slide th Sept Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc.  Resources and Output How is the allocation of resources determined? –Given the relative.
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 Heckscher-Ohlin To demonstrate the Heckscher-Ohlin (HO) result.
Other Assumptions: two countries, two factors, two products; perfect competition in all markets; Free trade; Factors of production are available in fixed.
Chapter 4 Resources, Comparative Advantage and Income Distribution
International Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy, Ch. 8;  Charles van Marrewijk, Figure 8.1 James Meade ( )
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Theorem
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 X = 10 X = 14 Constant returns to scale 7 21 Suppose 5 labor.
The Heckscher-Ohlin Model
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 We will use the Edgeworth-Bowley box and results from factor.
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Theorem
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 FPE and Stolper-Samuelson; tool: Lerner diagram Let’s look at.
Chapter 4 -- HO Model INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, ECO 486
Lectures in Macroeconomics- Charles W. Upton Comparative Advantage.
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 Derivation of the offer curve X Y 0 p x /p y 2 Take an economy.
HECKSCHER-OHLIN THEORY  What determines comparative advantage?  What are the effects of international trade on the earnings of factors of production?
Factor Endowments and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory
Resources and Trade: The Heckscher-Ohlin Model
1 Dr. Bill W. S. Hung 2 Neoclassical Trade Theory: The Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem Basic Assumptions: 1. Two countries, two goods, two factors -- 2x2x2 mode.
The Heckscher-Ohlin Model Udayan Roy October 2009.
1 HO Model – Factor Proportions INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, ECO 486 Bertil Ohlin Eli F. Heckscher,
Introduction Neo-classical economics General structure of the neo-classical model Production functions Cost minimization Impact of wage rate and rental.
An Introduction to International Economics
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model Factor Proportions Theory.
Introduction Rybczynski The Edgeworth Box The contract curve The distribution of labor and capital Application: Russian immigrants in Israel Conclusions.
Prof. Dr. Volker Clausen Universität Duisburg-Essen Campus Essen 1 Ricardo, David (1817): On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London.
An entrepeneur who wants to maximize profits can solve this problem in two steps: 1. Minize production costs for any given output level 2. Using the outcome.
New Classical Theories of International Trade
NEOCLASSICAL TRADE THEORY
Unit 1: Trade Theory Heckscher-Ohlin Model 2/3/2012.
Chapter III: HO Model Lectured by: Mr. SOK Chanrithy.
Comparative Advantage and Trade Chapter 3. 2 countries; A and B Comparative advantage (technology differences) David Ricardo; International trade based.
Relationship between international factors movement and international trade.
Supplementary notes Chapter 4.
International Economic Relations Econ 548 Summer 2007 William J. Polley Department of Economics College of Business and Technology Western Illinois University.
Note sparse e grafici sul modello di Heckscher e Ohlin Luca De Benedictis.
1 Chapter 3 -- Classical Model INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, ECO 486 Display your name card.
Introduction Heckscher - Ohlin Demand The production possibility frontier Structure of the equilibrium Autarky equilibrium International trade equilibrium.
University of Papua New Guinea International Economics Lecture 6: Trade Models III – The Heckscher-Ohlin Model.
Slides prepared by Thomas Bishop Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Resources, Comparative Advantage, and Income Distribution.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 The Heckscher- Ohlin Model.
International Economics Tenth Edition
We will use the Edgeworth-Bowley box and results from factor price equalization (FPE) to derive Rybczynski’s theorem It applies to the effect of an increase.
Trade and Resources The Heckscher-Ohlin model Dr. Petre Badulescu.
University of Papua New Guinea International Economics Lecture 12 - Revision Lecture: Trade Models.
CHAPTER 1; THE WORLD ECONOMY
Factor endowments and the Heckscher-Ohlin theory
Study Unit 4.
Factor Endowments Theory and Heckscher-Ohlin Model
FPE and Stolper-Samuelson; tool: Lerner diagram, 1
The Stolper-Samuelson Theorem:
The Production Possibility Frontier (Fixed Proportions)
Chapter 6: Factor abundance and trade
Rybczynski We will use the Edgeworth-Bowley box and results from factor price equalization (FPE) to derive Rybczynski’s theorem It applies to the effect.
The Heckscher-Ohlin Model
Derivation of the offer curve, 1
Tariff, general equilibrium; 1
Comparative advantage (technology differences); 1
Presentation transcript:

Heckscher-Ohlin; 1 To demonstrate the Heckscher-Ohlin (HO) result we will use some of the earlier results, in particular Factor Price Equalization First, note that if 2 countries start to trade this equalizes the prices of the 2 final goods in the 2 countries. According to FPE under identical technologies and CRS this equalizes the rewards for the 2 inputs, the wage w for labor and the rental r for capital, in the 2 countries. That, in turn, implies that the capital-intensity with which the 2 goods X and Y are produced are identical in the 2 countries (FPE) and the Rybczynski (Ryb) theorem. It is the of the four basic results that requires only identical homothetic preferences According to Ryb. the country with (rel.) more capital produces (rel.) more of the (rel.) capital-intensive good; say country A has more capital, less labor and good X is (rel.) more capital-intensive  Charles van Marrewijk

Here is the green ppf of country B, it produces at point B p 0 X (cap int) Y (lab int) B BpBp Country A has more capital and less labor, so we can trace first the Capital and then the Labor Ryb-line to arrive at country A’s production point A p more capital less labor more capital ApAp Or we could take the other route and first trace the Labor and then the Capital Ryb-line The end result is obviously the same.  Charles van Marrewijk Heckscher-Ohlin; 2

This is where the assumption of identical homothetic preferences comes in Through country A’s production point A p we can also draw a ppf. B BpBp At the int. eq. trade prices for goods X and Y the income line is tangent for country A at A p and for country B at B p A Both countries consume somewhere along their own income line, however the ratio with which goods X and Y are consumed is the same  Charles van Marrewijk Heckscher-Ohlin; 3 ApAp 0 Y (lab int) X (cap int) Study Guide Figure 8

Naturally, to be an international equilibrium the trade triangles have to match (reciprocally) If we know country B’s consumption point B c along its income line, extending a line from the origin through B c determines country A’s consumption point A c along its income line. This can only occur if the consumption ratio is in between A p and B p (as drawn) BpBp 0 ApAp BcBc AcAc  Charles van Marrewijk Heckscher-Ohlin; 4 Y (lab int) X (cap int)

Since the consumption ratio is in between A p and B p country B, which has relatively more labor than country A, exports good Y, which uses labor relatively intensively. BpBp 0 X ApAp BcBc AcAc The reverse holds for country A (it has rel. more capital and exports good X which uses capital rel. intensively). According to the HO result a country exports the good which makes intensive use of its abundant factor of production  Charles van Marrewijk Heckscher-Ohlin; 5 Y (lab int) X (cap int)