Methodology for the Use of Regional Planning Models to Assess Impact of Various Congestion Pricing Strategies Sub-network Extraction A sub-network focusing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Using value-of-time distributions in auto assignment to forecast effects of road pricing schemes with non-additive charges Leonid Engelson & Dirk van Amelsfort.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER White Papers on Congestion Mitigation Strategies New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission November 20, 2007.
The role of volume-delay functions in forecast and evaluation of congestion charging schemes Application to Stockholm Leonid Engelson and Dirk van Amelsfort.
ARC’s Strategic Thoroughfare Plan Bridging the Gap from Travel Demand Model to Micro-Simulation GPA Conference Fall 2012 Presented By: David Pickworth,
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
TRANSPORT MODELLING Lecture 4 TRANSPORT MODELLING Lecture 4 26-Sep-08 Transport Modelling Microsimulation Software.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
15 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, New Jersey Joyoung Lee, New Jersey Institute of Technology Byungkyu Brian Park, University.
Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.
Congestion Mitigation: Options for Evaluation New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission January 10, 2008.
Transportation Planning and Modeling Transportation planning is a field involved with the evaluation, assessment, design and siting of transportation facilities.
Humber Bridge Review Results from the HUMBER ESTUARY TRANSPORT MODEL.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. An Integrated Travel Demand, Mesoscopic and Microscopic.
An Empirical Comparison of Microscopic and Mesoscopic Traffic Simulation Paradigms Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Qi Yang Caliper Corporation 14.
A Calibration Procedure for Microscopic Traffic Simulation Lianyu Chu, University of California, Irvine Henry Liu, Utah State University Jun-Seok Oh, Western.
Transportation Operations Group Toward a Consistent and Robust Integrated Multi-Resolution Modeling Approach for Traffic Analysis May 17-21, 2009 Jeff.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Validate - A Nationwide Dynamic Travel Demand Model for Germany Peter Vortisch, Volker Waßmuth, PTV AG, Germany.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,
Seoul Development Institute Building a TDM Impact Analysis System for the Introduction of a Short-Term Congestion Management Program in Seoul Jin-Ki Eom,
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
Using Traffic Models as a Tool When Creating Noise Maps - Methods used in the EU project QCity Pia Sundbergh Div. for Transport and Localisation Analysis.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Incorporating Pricing Strategies US Department of Transportation Incorporating.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 7, 2013.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
Assessment of Urban Transportation Networks by integrating Transportation Planning and Operational Methods /Tools Presentation by: Sabbir Saiyed, P.Eng.
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
Congestion Pricing I. Introduction II. Need and purpose of multimodal system Traffic gridlock reflects an imbalance between road supply and road demand.
April 2010 Scott Smith Volpe Center / RITA / U.S. DOT Transportation Border Working Group Meeting Boston, MA An Integrated Regional Planning / Microsimulation.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
Comparing Dynamic Traffic Assignment Approaches for Planning
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Behavioral Micro-Simulation 1 Jose Holguin-Veras, Ph.D., P.E. William H. Hart Professor VREF’s Center of Excellence for Sustainable Urban Freight Systems.
On the Evaluation of Incentive Structures to Implement Off-Hour Deliveries 1 Felipe Aros-Vera Researcher Jose Holguin-Veras, Ph.D., P.E.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
DR O.S ABIOLA DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA. CVE 505 HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I.
Siemens Traffic Controls Ltd ITSE99/Standards 1 Traffic Management and Control Workshop on Research and Technological Development for Information Society.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Www-civil.monash.edu.au/its Institute of Transport Studies National Urban Transport Modelling Workshop, 5 March 2008 Travel Demand Management Geoff Rose.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
1 Fine Tuning Mathematical Models for Toll Applications Dr. A. Mekky, P.Eng., A. Tai, M. Khan Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Canada.
A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks Qi Yang Caliper Corporation TRB Planning Application Conference Houston, May 20, 2009.
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Oct. 29 th, 2014.
The Stockholm trials – Emme/2 as a tool for designing a congestion charges system 1.The trials and the congestion charges system 2.Observed effects 3.Transportation.
Transportation Forecasting The Four Step Model. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate.
Analysis of the IH 35 Corridor Through the Austin Metropolitan Area TRB Planning Applications Conference Jeff Shelton Karen Lorenzini Alex Valdez Tom Williams.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
The London Congestion Charge Past, present and future… Lauren Sager Weinstein Chief of Staff, Finance and Planning Transport for London.
Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Modifications to the City’s plan New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission December 17, 2007.
September 2008What’s coming in Aimsun: New features and model developments 1 Hybrid Mesoscopic-Microscopic Traffic Simulation Framework Alex Torday, Jordi.
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Presentation transcript:

Methodology for the Use of Regional Planning Models to Assess Impact of Various Congestion Pricing Strategies Sub-network Extraction A sub-network focusing on Manhattan and surrounding area is extracted from the RPM and calibrated for detailed analysis. The sub-network can be run to produce independent results of the congestion pricing program, such as changes to link speeds or travel times, as well as to test other pricing measures such as dynamic pricing. NYBPM’s extracted sub-network runs compatibly in the mesoscopic modeling tool Transmodeler, which can perform highway assignment as well as test dynamic pricing. Figure 3: Extracted Sub-network for Static and Dynamic Pricing Sub-network Extraction A sub-network focusing on Manhattan and surrounding area is extracted from the RPM and calibrated for detailed analysis. The sub-network can be run to produce independent results of the congestion pricing program, such as changes to link speeds or travel times, as well as to test other pricing measures such as dynamic pricing. NYBPM’s extracted sub-network runs compatibly in the mesoscopic modeling tool Transmodeler, which can perform highway assignment as well as test dynamic pricing. Figure 3: Extracted Sub-network for Static and Dynamic Pricing Evaluation Short-term: Changes to highway network when only the highway assignment module is re-run – observe changes to vehicles using tolled facilities and congestion reduction inside the charging zone. Long-term: Full model is re-run to include effects to trips generated and mode choice, as well as effects on highway network – observe changes to demands as well as greater congestion reductions. Short-term Results – Static Pricing Net toll revenues are calculated and compared against the tax revenue lost from off-hour delivery incentives. Figure 5: Net Annual Toll Revenue – Manhattan Crossings Congestion effects are measured from the pricing scenario compared to the base-case. Table 2: Travel Time Change When Existing Tolls are Doubled Short-term Results – Dynamic Pricing Figure 6: Average Hourly Toll Rates Figure 7: No. of Vehicles Changing Paths Due to Dynamic Pricing Evaluation Short-term: Changes to highway network when only the highway assignment module is re-run – observe changes to vehicles using tolled facilities and congestion reduction inside the charging zone. Long-term: Full model is re-run to include effects to trips generated and mode choice, as well as effects on highway network – observe changes to demands as well as greater congestion reductions. Short-term Results – Static Pricing Net toll revenues are calculated and compared against the tax revenue lost from off-hour delivery incentives. Figure 5: Net Annual Toll Revenue – Manhattan Crossings Congestion effects are measured from the pricing scenario compared to the base-case. Table 2: Travel Time Change When Existing Tolls are Doubled Short-term Results – Dynamic Pricing Figure 6: Average Hourly Toll Rates Figure 7: No. of Vehicles Changing Paths Due to Dynamic Pricing Introduction Congestion pricing was studied as part of a study on shifting commercial vehicle deliveries to the off-peak hours. The study estimated percentages of freight vehicle shifting to off-hours due to tax incentives given to businesses receiving their deliveries in the off-hours. Congestion pricing was studied in conjunction with the off-hour delivery program to generate revenue to cover the cost of tax incentives provided, as well as to offer an additional incentive to switch to the off-hours. A methodology is developed for the use of Regional Planning Models to quantify network-wide effects of various congestion pricing scenarios, using the New York metropolitan area as an example by charging a fee to enter the island of Manhattan. NYMTC's macroscopic regional planning model, New York Best Practice Model (NYBPM), as well as an extracted sub-network running in a mesoscopic modeling tool, are used to test static and dynamic pricing scenarios, including a number of sub-scenarios varying the pricing strategies employed for both. Introduction Congestion pricing was studied as part of a study on shifting commercial vehicle deliveries to the off-peak hours. The study estimated percentages of freight vehicle shifting to off-hours due to tax incentives given to businesses receiving their deliveries in the off-hours. Congestion pricing was studied in conjunction with the off-hour delivery program to generate revenue to cover the cost of tax incentives provided, as well as to offer an additional incentive to switch to the off-hours. A methodology is developed for the use of Regional Planning Models to quantify network-wide effects of various congestion pricing scenarios, using the New York metropolitan area as an example by charging a fee to enter the island of Manhattan. NYMTC's macroscopic regional planning model, New York Best Practice Model (NYBPM), as well as an extracted sub-network running in a mesoscopic modeling tool, are used to test static and dynamic pricing scenarios, including a number of sub-scenarios varying the pricing strategies employed for both. Methodology Congestion pricing is tested by increasing tolls on links entering a cordoned area in a regional planning model (RPM) and evaluating changes to travel patterns, mode choice, and highway network congestion. Scenarios Static pricing can be implemented in the macroscopic full regional model to study congestion and revenues from the shift scenarios. A sub-network can be extracted from the full highway network to run in a mesoscopic or microscopic tool, to test both static and dynamic pricing. Sub-scenarios Various pricing schemes an be tested in each of the network scenarios, including time-of-day pricing, vehicle class-based pricing, and full dynamic pricing. Evaluation Running only the highway assignment module in the RPM after increasing/adding tolls to enter the cordon area offers short-term results on changes to routes, number of vehicles using tolled facilities, and congestion. Re-running the entire RPM (trip generation, distribution, mode choice, assignment) allows users to shift travel patters and modes, and presents a long-term effects of the pricing initiative. Both the short-term and long-term demands and networks can be extracted from the RPM to use with the mesocopic or microscopic modeling tools. Pricing Scenarios and Networks Methodology Congestion pricing is tested by increasing tolls on links entering a cordoned area in a regional planning model (RPM) and evaluating changes to travel patterns, mode choice, and highway network congestion. Scenarios Static pricing can be implemented in the macroscopic full regional model to study congestion and revenues from the shift scenarios. A sub-network can be extracted from the full highway network to run in a mesoscopic or microscopic tool, to test both static and dynamic pricing. Sub-scenarios Various pricing schemes an be tested in each of the network scenarios, including time-of-day pricing, vehicle class-based pricing, and full dynamic pricing. Evaluation Running only the highway assignment module in the RPM after increasing/adding tolls to enter the cordon area offers short-term results on changes to routes, number of vehicles using tolled facilities, and congestion. Re-running the entire RPM (trip generation, distribution, mode choice, assignment) allows users to shift travel patters and modes, and presents a long-term effects of the pricing initiative. Both the short-term and long-term demands and networks can be extracted from the RPM to use with the mesocopic or microscopic modeling tools. Pricing Scenarios and Networks Case Study – New York (Manhattan) Regional Planning Model (RPM) New York Best Practice Model (NYBPM) used to test pricing for entering Manhattan – Runs in TransCAD Figure 1: NYBPM Highway Network Case Study – New York (Manhattan) Regional Planning Model (RPM) New York Best Practice Model (NYBPM) used to test pricing for entering Manhattan – Runs in TransCAD Figure 1: NYBPM Highway Network Kaan Ozbay a, Satish Ukkusuri b, Jose Holguin-Veras c, Shri Iyer a, Ender Faruk Morgul a a Rutgers Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory, Rutgers University, b Purdue University, c Rensselear Polytechnic Institute Dynamic Pricing Real-time traffic conditions are taken into account for determining the toll rate: travel speed, occupancy, and traffic delays. Parameters are measured in real-time and the toll rates are updated within short time intervals. Users are informed of the current toll rates and allowed to choose their route. Toll rates determined in the mesoscopic model based on the occupancy of the tolled facility, and updated every five minutes: Figure 4: Dynamic Toll Rates by Vehicle Class Dynamic Pricing Real-time traffic conditions are taken into account for determining the toll rate: travel speed, occupancy, and traffic delays. Parameters are measured in real-time and the toll rates are updated within short time intervals. Users are informed of the current toll rates and allowed to choose their route. Toll rates determined in the mesoscopic model based on the occupancy of the tolled facility, and updated every five minutes: Figure 4: Dynamic Toll Rates by Vehicle Class ScenarioNetworkPricingEvaluation 1Full RPM NetworkStaticShort-term 2Full RPM NetworkStaticLong-term 3Extracted Sub-networkStaticShort- & Long-term 4Extracted Sub-networkDynamicShort- & Long-term Cordon Area (Manhattan) Static Pricing Fixed charge (or increased toll) to enter Manhattan during the peak daytime hours (6am – 7pm). Vehicles starting and staying within the cordon area face no charge. Modeled by increasing the toll value for links crossing the cordon line currently having tolls, or increased the fixed cost of links crossing the cordon boundary that are currently free. Cordon Points Manhattan Island has a fixed number of entry points in the highway network (20) making congestion/cordon/value pricing implementation simple. 7 of the 20 crossings are currently tolled (including all three from New Jersey. Sub-scenarios increased tolls at existing 7 tolled facilities, all 20 crossings (true cordon pricing), or only the 3 crossings from New Jersey. Other plans include congestion pricing for only the lower-half of the island – fixed costs of links crossing the cordon line are increased. Tolls can change only by fixed time periods dictated by the model (e.g. AM Peak, Midday, PM Peak, Night). Figure 2: Manhattan Crossings Static Pricing Fixed charge (or increased toll) to enter Manhattan during the peak daytime hours (6am – 7pm). Vehicles starting and staying within the cordon area face no charge. Modeled by increasing the toll value for links crossing the cordon line currently having tolls, or increased the fixed cost of links crossing the cordon boundary that are currently free. Cordon Points Manhattan Island has a fixed number of entry points in the highway network (20) making congestion/cordon/value pricing implementation simple. 7 of the 20 crossings are currently tolled (including all three from New Jersey. Sub-scenarios increased tolls at existing 7 tolled facilities, all 20 crossings (true cordon pricing), or only the 3 crossings from New Jersey. Other plans include congestion pricing for only the lower-half of the island – fixed costs of links crossing the cordon line are increased. Tolls can change only by fixed time periods dictated by the model (e.g. AM Peak, Midday, PM Peak, Night). Figure 2: Manhattan Crossings Entering ManhattanAM PeakMiddayPM Peak Free Links+19.17%+25.03%+15.92% Tolled Links-0.06%-0.01%-0.67%