New Users of MidYIS and Yellis Ian Sanderson

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using CEM Data in Practice: Feedback from CEM Secondary Assessments
Advertisements

The MidYIS Test.
Introduction to CEM and the Baseline Tests
Peter Finlayson Quality improvement Officer February 2013.
Interpreting and Using ePIPS(P3,5,7) Feedback Glasgow 13 th February 2013.
NEW USERS OF ALIS WORKSHOP JUNE 2011 London Conference Geoff Davies.
An Introduction to CEM Secondary Monitoring Systems Assessment for Excellence S1/S2 Baseline Assessment (MidYIS) & S2 Curriculum-based.
Yr 12 Parents Forum: ALIS data West Island School November 2012.
Experienced Users of MidYIS and Yellis Ian Sanderson
 Cognitive  Ability  Testing  Objective testing – independently marked and interpreted by an outside agency  Completed online with both auditory.
Neil Defty, Secondary Systems Programme Manager New Developments from CEM Bristol, April 2011.
St Mary’s CBGS Value Added How can we effectively measure pupil progression at each Key Stage?
Introduction to Value-Added Data Dr Robert Clark.
Interpreting Feedback from Baseline tests- Whole School and Individual Student Data CEM CONFERENCE EXETER Geoff Davies Day 1 Session 2 27 th February 2013.
Using MidYIS to inform Teaching & Learning
Advanced Users – MidYIS, Yellis & ALIS
Secondary Information Systems
Pat Preedy has worked with CEM since 1992 and was part of the team that developed the baseline assessments.
Secondary Information Systems
M.Greenaway. Analysing Data.
Neil Defty, Secondary Systems Programme Manager New Developments from CEM London, January 2011.
Data for Monitoring Target Setting and Reporting
Introduction to CEM and Computer Adaptive Assessments
Omm OFMDFM Signature Project Improving Literacy and Numeracy Induction Training 7-11 October 2013 Day 2 Post-Primary.
Using Alis Predictive Data Dr Robert Clark Alis Project Manager.
Yr 7 Parents Forum: Introduction to MidYIS West Island School October 2013.
Interpreting Feedback from Baseline Tests – Predictive Data Course: CEM Information Systems for Beginners and New Users Day 1 Session 3 Wednesday 17 th.
CEM Data and Self-Evaluation Dr Robert Clark ALIS Project Manager.
Using data from the whole school Perspective CEM CONFERENCE EXETER Geoff Davies Day 2 Final session 28 th February 2013.
Yr 12 Parents Forum: ALIS data West Island School October 2013 Mike Williams (Data Development Leader)
The Delivering Social Change Signature Project Planning effective intervention.
My Value Added Journey. Heads of Department s SEN Department Pastoral Teams Individual Students A Data Rich Environment SMT Midyis GL Exam Yellis Tracking.
Baseline testing in Reporting and Assessment Patrick Moore – Head of Assessment and Reporting.
Monitoring Schools Using CEM Data David Tickner Deputy Head Newcastle School for Boys.
The use of CEM data for teachers of pupils with Specific Learning Difficulties.
CEM Conference 8 June 2011 Using CEM data: Convincing colleagues, pupils & parents.
Introduction to CEM Secondary Pre-16 Information Systems Neil Defty Secondary Systems Programme Manager.
Working with Colleagues, Parents and Students Course: Using CEM Data in Practice Day 2 Session 3 Thursday 28 th February 2013 Rob Smith: CEM Inset Provider.
Introduction to CEM Secondary Pre-16 Information Systems Nicola Forster & Neil Defty Secondary Systems Programme Managers London, June 2011.
Neil Defty, Secondary Systems Programme Manager, CEM November An Introduction to CEM Secondary Monitoring Systems MidYIS (S1.
CEM (NZ) Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring College of Education Dr John Boereboom Director Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring (CEM) University of Canterbury.
Running a School on Data: the role of Value-Added Data Course: Using CEM data in Practice Day 2 Session 4 Wed 30 th May 2012 Peter Hendry: CEM Consultant.
Using CEM Data for Self-Evaluation and Improvement Running Your School on Data 7 th June 2011
Monitoring Achievement and Progress in Independent Schools Running Your School on Data January 2011 Peter Hendry: CEM Consultant
Data for Target Setting and Monitoring Course: Using CEM data in Practice Day 2 Session 3 Wed 30 th May 2012 Peter Hendry: CEM Consultant
Interpreting Feedback from Baseline Tests - Whole School & Individual Student Data Course: CEM Information Systems for Beginners and New Users Day 1 Session.
CEM (NZ) Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring College of Education Dr John Boereboom Director Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring (CEM) University of Canterbury.
An introduction to SEN Data analysis The Research and Evaluation Unit.
Making the most of Assessment Data in the Secondary Years Dr Robert Clark.
CEM (NZ) Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring College of Education Dr John Boereboom Director Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring (CEM) University of Canterbury.
Feedback from CEM Assessments: Individual Pupil Records & Predictions Belfast, March 6 th 2013 Neil Defty Business & Development Manager CEM
Objectives To explore the data analyses that are available in RAISEonline and how they can be used to identify differences in progression rates To consider.
SOSCA Assessments at end S2
CEM (NZ) Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring College of Education
Target Setting at KS3 and KS4
Governors’ Update RaiseOnline & Fischer Family Trust
CEM (NZ) Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring College of Education
Y7 DATA.
English and Maths Strategy (overview)
Let’s Demystify Progress 8
Performance Measures 2016 and beyond
Experienced Users of Alis
Introduction to CEM Secondary Pre-16 Information Systems
The MidYIS Test.
Proposal for changes to KS3 Monitoring and Reporting
Understanding Progress 8
Course: CEM Information Systems for Beginners and New Users
Using CEM data for T and L
Target Setting and Monitoring
3rd-5th Year Grade Card Changes
Presentation transcript:

New Users of MidYIS and Yellis Ian Sanderson

CEM Centre Projects MidYIS  Year 7 Yellis  Year 10  Year 11 (feedback) ALIS  Year 12  Year 13 (feedback)

How to establish the projects? 1. Have a clear vision of how the information can be used for the benefit of your pupils. 2. Have a clear implementation plan and timescale. 3. Colleagues must want to use the information because it illuminates the Teaching & Learning process. 4. Commitment to on-going refreshers and training. 5. Make the information available through MIS and/or school network. 6. Support and leadership from SMT.

Aims for Information Use Pupils Potential on entry Learning strengths & weaknesses GCSE optionsTarget Setting Departments GCSE Value- Added A-level Value- Added Departmental Review Attitudinal Cultural Capital Attitudes to school/education Experience of school Whole- School Where are we now? Target SettingInitiativesMarketing

Questions about Yr 7/10 What’s the likely potential of our pupils? What are their individual learning strengths and weaknesses? What’s the cohort like as a whole?

Standardised scores and Bands Standardised scores D C B A

2011 VocabularyMathsNon-VerbalSkillsOverall ScoreBandScoreBandScoreBandScoreBand ScoreBand Pupil 01122A125A116A107B 126A Pupil 02105B110A127A95C 108B Pupil 03105B93C110B89D 99C Pupil 0491C116A130A115A 103B Pupil 05111A144A122A103B 129A Pupil 06107B112A85D97C 109B Pupil 07115A106B100C86D 112A Pupil 08141A137A132A135A 143A Pupil 09104B92C105B109B 98C Pupil 1099C119A114A99C 109B Pupil 11108B126A130A140A 118A Pupil 12106B123A120A105B 116A Pupil 13103B96C103B104B 99C Pupil 14108B110B112A108B 110A Pupil 1595C104B103B122A 99C

Bands, percentiles, standardised scores… Standardised scores D C B A Percentiles: Top 50% of the sample Top 5% of the sample

Top of confidence limit Bottom of confidence limit

Explanations? Someone who’s just much better at Maths than Vocabulary. English as a second language. Has ability, but doesn’t read. Stand. Score: 119 Band: A Percentile: 90 Stanine: 8 Stand. Score: 90 Band: C Percentile: 26 Stanine: 4

Questions for GCSE What subjects should I take? What sort of grade should I be aiming for in each subject?

Yellis Chances Graph for Band B in Maths a)You are predicted to achieve a grade B. b)You will probably have to work very hard to get an A. c)Because your Yellis score is towards the top of this band, you should start by looking towards the top of the chart to set your target. d)There’s very little chance of you getting an A*. e)Don’t relax, because 31% of last year’s GCSE candidates got a C grade or less in your ability band. f)It doesn’t matter if your work has been on the A/A* boundary this year; this graph shows you’ve got no realistic chance of an A*.

Questions for GCSE value- added What’s the overall picture (more blobs below or above the line)? Which grades represent good/poor value-added? What’s the picture for each ability band? Who are the outlying individuals and why? What’s the longer-term trend? Has what we have done made a difference? What could we do that will make a difference?

Band A ≥ 62% Band B 50% Band C 39% Band D <39%

Subject A

Subject B

Summary Vision Implementation Plan Need for Information On-going Training Availability of Data Leadership