POETRY UNIT TEST ANALYSIS 6 TH GRADE VISIONS – MS. ROKETENETZ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mastery Learning Compare and contrast direct instruction and mastery learning. Developed by W. Huitt (1998)
Advertisements

Strategies for Improving Reading Comprehension
Kansas Performance Teaching Portfolio
Analysis of frequency counts with Chi square
Writing Program Assessment Report Fall 2002 through Spring 2004 Laurence Musgrove Writing Program Director Department of English and Foreign Languages.
Georgia Modification Research Study Spring 2006 Sharron Hunt Melissa Fincher.
Standardized Test Scores Common Representations for Parents and Students.
Comprehensive Assessment System Webinar #6 December 14, 2011.
11/08/ Individualisation-Standardisation 11/08/
Developing Higher Level Thinking and Mathematical Reasoning.
Understanding the TEKS Assignment 2 Verbs in TEKS Verbs in TEKS Pay close attention to Verbs in the TEKS Bloom’s Taxonomy.
AN EVALUATION OF THE EIGHTH GRADE ALGEBRA PROGRAM IN GRAND BLANC COMMUNITY SCHOOLS 8 th Grade Algebra 1A.
Classroom Instruction That Works
Determining Essential Learnings or Essential Outcomes September 14, 2010.
Classroom Assessment: Concepts and Applications Chapter 5: Summative Assessments.
Grade 10 MCAS OPEN RESPONSE QUESTION SPRING 2001 Exam, #40
Active Engagement In Lecture Person A states his/her understanding of what has been said, then elaborates. Person B agrees or disagrees with the interpretation,
PU515 – Applied Biostatistics Dana Colbert-Wheeler, MHA, MCHES
Interactive Notebook AP Biology - Zeiher. What are Interactive Notebooks?  Known as IANS  A student note taking process to record information in a personal.
What’s My Noun? Adjective/Noun next Taking the Fear out of Math © Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved Quantities vs. Numbers.
Poetry Assessment Analysis & Critique Krissa Loretto EDUC 340 Spring 2014.
Measures of Central Tendency Sixth Grade Mathematics
An explanation of standards based grading in science this year.
ESTIMATES AND SAMPLE SIZES
Joanna Chappell Results of a unit test for an 8 th -grade French II class.
Ms. Lemons General Chemistry Syllabus and Class Guidelines.
1. Go to Assign Assist Assess Student Guide to Assignments in Conference School 2. Go to the Log in page. 3. If.
110/10/2015Slide 1 The homework problems on comparing central tendency and variability extend our focus on central tendency and variability to a comparison.
Overview to Common Formative Assessments (CFAs) Adapted from The Leadership and Learning Center Presented by Jane Cook & Madeline Negron For Windham Public.
Ms. Moury Mr. Stefanacci co-teach period 6 16 th year teaching in the district. 15 years as a Special Education/Remedial Reading/English teacher at the.
HOW DO I USE THINKGATE? Presented By: Mercy Aycart From: South Miami Senior High Data have no meaning…meaning is imposed.
Write To Learn Stephanie Needham J Glenn Edwards Elementary/ Lee County Schools April 25, A Race to the Top Initiative.
Reliability vs. Validity.  Reliability  the consistency of your measurement, or the degree to which an instrument measures the same way each time it.
20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30.
1 Time for a Quiz Going Over the Quiz 1. Instruments used to assess students must be both valid and reliable. Define each term: validity.
Warm-up Ch. 2 Review Day 2 Fill in the table below using the data on IQ scores. Remember Chebyshev’s Rule: and use the Rule or Normalcdf for.
New Zealand Diploma in Business National External Moderation Reports Tertiary Assessment & Moderation.
Assessment and Testing
The ACE Strategy Week 2: Administer and Evaluate Pre-test Cluster Cycle 2 Goal: By the end of the cycle, 78% of students in grades 3-5 will increase their.
Seeing with Bar Graphs Unit Portfolio Presentation Pat Collofello.
Extra! Extra! Read all about it!.  Reading is key to learning new vocabulary.  The more you read, the more words you become familiar with.  As you.
Teacher Directed Instruction. Use for teaching basic facts, knowledge, and skills (examples): New tasks Alphabetizing Unfamiliar material Science equations.
+ Results from Othello Test Catherine Strycharz Test Analysis.
KLA - ISLN Updates January Introducing the Content Specialists.
End of Key Stage 1 Assessments Tuesday 1 st April pm.
Collaborative Grouping 6-12 Math Teachers. Workshop Outcomes Participants will gain effective strategies for forming and facilitating a classroom culture.
The definition of table of specification. Table of specification is a chart that provides graphic representations of a related to the content of a course.
Changes to assessment and reporting of children’s attainment Monday 12 th October A guide for Parents.
Planning for Assessment Blooms Taxonomy. TAXONOMIES A taxonomy may be defined as a system of classification.
Research Brief Allan Hendershot EDE 4942 April 22, 2015.
Testing & Measurement  Criterion-Referenced Tests.  Pre-tests  Post-tests  Norm-Referenced Tests.
Dr. Marciano B. Melchor University of Ha’il, KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA May 2013.
Learning Analytics How can I identify and help my struggling students sooner rather than later? How can I see which concepts students struggle with in.
CHAPTER 3: Practical Measurement Concepts
Interpreting and Using the ACT Aspire Interim Results
Individual Science project
Grade distribution and testing summary
Comparing Assessments in adult education and training
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
MDCPS’ Division of Social Sciences Using Data to Drive Instruction
Propensity Score Matching Makes Program Evaluation Easy
Introduction to Statistics
Analyzing our Reading Data 3 – 5
# (-3) #2. -5 – 6 # # Bell Ringer.
Taking Note of CCSD Resources
HOMEWORK 8 PhD Course.
# (-3) #2. -5 – 6 # # Bell Ringer.
Cold War Review- 1st day back from spring break
Week 14 More Data Collection Techniques Chapter 5
EDUC 2130 Quiz #10 W. Huitt.
Presentation transcript:

POETRY UNIT TEST ANALYSIS 6 TH GRADE VISIONS – MS. ROKETENETZ

GRADE DISTRIBUTION FIRST PERIODFOURTH PERIOD

GRADE DISTRIBUTION CONTINUED 1 ST PERIOD Mean: 83.6% Median: 83% Mode: 82% 4 TH PERIOD Mean: 87.6% Median: 91% Mode: 91%

1. 100% 2. 98% % % 5. 94% % 7. 90% % 9. 98% % % % % TEST ITEM ANALYSIS % % % % % % % 21. Item Thrown Out % % % % % % % % (1/3) – Mode Points Given % (3/4) – Mode Points Given % (2/2) – Mode Points Given % (2/3) – Mode Points Given % (1/2) – Mode Points Given 90% or Greater Answered Correctly65% or Greater Answered Incorrectly Green InkRed Ink

TABLE OF SPECIFICATIONS

STUDENT #1, JANE*  Jane was chosen for the analysis because she was normally maintains the highest grade in the class out of the female students. I wanted to analyze what questions she missed because she did not receive the highest grade in the class.  Grade: 95%  Questions Missed on Part 1 (True/False): 0  Questions Missed on Part 2 (Matching): 0  Questions Missed on Part 1 (Select Response): 1 - #25 ~ Analysis  Questions Missed on Part 1 (Supply Response): 1 - #33 (1/2 PTS) ~ Comprehension

STUDENT #2, JOHN*  John was chosen for the analysis because he normally maintains the highest grade in the class out of the male students. I wanted to analyze what questions he missed in comparison to Jane.  Grade: 90%  Questions Missed on Part 1 (True/False): 0  Questions Missed on Part 2 (Matching): 0  Questions Missed on Part 1 (Select Response): 2 - #16 & #25 ~ Application & Analysis  Questions Missed on Part 1 (Supply Response): 2 - #30 (3/4 PTS) ~ Knowledge #31 (1/2 PTS) ~ Comprehension The only question they both missed was #25. More students missed this question than any other question.

RELIABILITY  Question #21 had 2 answers  The test was given the week after spring break. The unit was split with two weeks of poetry being taught before spring break and a week of poetry being taught spring break. Since I did not add in a day of review (I did give the students a study guide but we did not review it) the students did not remember a couple of key things we already learned about earlier on in the unit.  Students were confused about having to analyze two separate poems for questions because there was not a line drawn between the two poems. There should have been a more clearly defined division between the two poems.

VALIDITY  Since my test was created before my poetry unit was taught, the test has a relatively high degree of content validity. The only question that had a relatively low degree of content validity was question 29. I assumed that the students already new what a Haiku was, so I did not teach it as in- depth as I should have.  The test also has a relatively high degree of construct validity. The test covered all the ILOs I focused on throughout my instruction of the poetry unit.  When analyzing the predictive validity of the test, I assumed students who had better grades in the class and turned all of their assignments in would get a better grade, however, those factors seemed to vary by student.

SUMMARY  Overall, my instruction was effective. Most of my students did well on the test. All of my Visions classes had a “B” average.  Next time I will not make assumptions on what the students do and do not know about forms of poetry. Since I believed the students were already familiar with Haikus I only covered them briefly. If a student missed that day of instruction then they would have missed that question on the test.  Before my collaboration class took the test I did a day of review with them. I believed that the Visions students did not need a day of review, however, after looking at the results of the test they would have done better on the test after a day of review.  Next time I teach a poetry unit I need to do more poem to poem comparisons. The students struggled with questions because we did not cover how to compare and contrast poetry.