North Carolina White Oak River Basin Plan December 19, 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In coordination with FEMA Kickoff Meeting Riverside County, CA May 27, 2010.
Advertisements

Flood Map Modernization in North Dakota North Dakota State Water Commission FLOOD MAP MODERNIZATION.
Scoping the North Carolina Cooperating Technical State Project Ed Curtis, P.E., CFM, North Carolina Division of Emergency Management Jerry Sparks, P.E.,
Alabama’s Floodplain Management Program Tom Littlepage Alabama Office of Water Resources.
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Cooperating Technical State.
FEMA Update: Flood Map Modernization and Risk MAP Presented on behalf of FEMA by David I. Maurstad, PBS&J.
Update on Use of Hazus for FEMA Risk MAP Flood Risk Products Shane Parson – RAMPP PTS (URS)
Update on Hazus AAL Study and Data
Risk MAP and Discovery FEMA Region [#], [WATERSHED NAME] Watershed Discovery Meetings [DATE]
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Flood Risk Mapping Project Identifying the Risk Editorial Board Meeting [COMMUNITY NAME] Flood Risk Mapping Project.
Understanding Advisory Base Flood Elevations (ABFEs) Understanding Advisory Information and the Implications for Your Home December 2012.
In coordination with FEMA Scoping Meeting Lake County, California February 19, 2010.
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Flood Mitigation Section South Carolina Map Modernization Initiative Update Pee Dee GIS Users Group Meeting.
Risk Map Early Demonstration Project Lackawanna County, PA CCO Meeting September 13, 2011.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #3 December 12, 2000.
NC Floodplain Mapping Program North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Becoming a Cooperating Technical State.
Session 131 Hazard Mapping and Modeling Supporting Emergency Response Operations using GIS and Modeling.
Proven People... Proven Technology... Proven Results Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel Management Module Katherine Hermann, CFM, Dewberry Ken Logsdon,
NC LiDAR ( ) Success in other States – (Zsolt Nagy – AECOM) 1.What was the business driver for NC LiDAR? 2.What was the coordination approach?
Utilizing a Basinwide Approach for the North Carolina Flood Mapping Program John Dorman, Program Director, NC CTS Flood Mapping Program Gib Jones, P.E.,
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Cape Fear River Basin LIDAR data have been used to create digital contours and topographic maps. 1.A Digital Elevation Model.
North Carolina Neuse River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings April 23, 24, and 25, 2001.
Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps. What is a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and how do I use it?* A FIRM is a map created by the NFIP for floodplain.
CHAPTER 3 MAPS AND MAP CHANGES
Creating Depth Grid from a DFIRM FEMA Region VIII Mitigation GIS Team Wednesday, February 13, 2013.
Flood Risk Review Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Using Digital Flood Hazard Data in the National Flood Insurance Program FGDC Coordination Working Group Scott McAfee Paul Rooney April 5 th, 2005.
Mitigation. Hazard Mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and their property from hazards and their.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #6 March 20, 2001.
Creating Value … … Delivering Solutions Modeling 72-Miles of the Mississippi on a 2-Mile Budget Mohamed A. Bagha, P.E., CFM Dong Nguyen, P.E., CFM Pradeepa.
Proposed Benefit Assessment District Overview Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority (TRLIA) TRLIA.ORG March 10,
FLOOD STUDY Rockland County, NY
Advisory Base Flood Elevations: What Your Community Needs to Know Information for Floodplain Managers and Local Officials.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #9 June 19, 2001.
FLOOD STUDY Oswego County, NY FEMA REGION II February 7, 2011.
Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program
1 US Army Engineer Research and Development Center FEMA REGION III COASTAL MAPPING PROJECT May 19, 2011 Coastal Analyses and Outreach Robin Danforth, FEMA.
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and Map Modernization History and Overview Bill Massey and Sam Crampton Dewberry South Florida Water Management.
FEMA UPDATED FLOODPLAIN MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division August 5, 2008 FEMA UPDATED FLOODPLAIN MAPS Public Works Department.
Watershed Management Program Topographic Information Watershed Evaluation Watershed Management Plan Implementation of Best Management Practices Maintenance.
Back Creek Floodplain SEPTEMBER 2, Why are we here Introductions Almost 300 parcels affected by revised flood study of Back Creek Outline ◦History.
National Weather Service Flood Inundation Mapping A New Way A New Wayof Looking at Flooding Diane Cooper Hydrologic Services Program Manager NWS - Southern.
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center COASTAL OUTREACH ADVISORY TEAM Kick-off Meeting November 19, 2010 FEMA Region III Coastal Mapping Project.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #7 April 17, 2001.
Office for Information Resources GIS Services Flood Map Modernization and the Tennessee Base Mapping Program Dennis Pedersen, Director F&A, OIR – GIS Services.
Flood Map Modernization Flood Map Modernization Mapping the Risk Editorial Board Meeting October 2005 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLOOD MAP MODERNIZATION V
Flood Map Modernization Flood Map Modernization Mapping the Risk Editorial Board Meeting [date] V [COMMUNITY NAME] FLOOD MAP MODERNIZATION.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #4 January 16, 2001.
Risk MAP and Discovery FEMA Region [#], [WATERSHED NAME] Watershed Information Exchange Sessions [DATES]
A Total Water Resource A division of Hayes, Seay, Mattern & Mattern, Inc. North Carolina Floodplain Mapping State of North Carolina North Carolina Floodplain.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #5 February 13, 2001.
North Carolina Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings January 30 and 31, 2001.
Flood Map Modernization and North Dakota Julie Prescott, ND Map Modernization Coordinator North Dakota State Water Commission And Brian Fischer, CFM, GIS.
FEMA’s Risk MAP Coastal Updates – An Overview Jonathan E. Westcott, P.E. ASFPM 2012 National Conference San Antonio, TX Session D.8.
North Carolina Pasquotank River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings May 17 and 18, 2001.
The Story of Floodplain Remapping in Springfield, Missouri.
Passaic County, NJ Initial Coordination Meeting FEMA Region II Mitigation Division October 6th, :00-11:00.
In coordination with FEMA Kickoff Meeting Ventura County, CA April 29, 2010.
1-Day of 2-D How Are The Results Of Hydraulic Models Used To Manage Floodplain Development Under The NFIP? Eric Simmons, FEMA Region IX.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting October 17, 2000.
FLOOD STUDY Burlington County, NJ FEMA REGION II November 29, 2010.
December 16 th, 2009 Presented by Jennifer DiLorenzo, M.S., CFM Sustainable Coastal Community Liaison Developed in Cooperation with the ASFPM 1 Floodplain.
Development of a High-Resolution Flood Inundation Model of Charles City, Iowa Nathan Young Associate Research Engineer Larry Weber.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Huntington District Floodplain Management Services Dan Bailey, CFM Huntington District August 2012.
Flood Hazard Area, Flood Insurance and Stormwater Management
North Carolina Lumber River Basin Plan
Risk MAP & the Little River Basin
<<County Name>> <<Date>>
Presentation transcript:

North Carolina White Oak River Basin Plan December 19, 2000

North Carolina Cooperating Technical State Flood Mapping Program Overview

Purposes of the NFIP 1. Make flood insurance available 2. Identify floodplain areas and flood risk zones 3. Provide framework for a community’s floodplain management ordinances

u With up-to-date flood hazard data: l Map users can make prudent siting, design, and flood insurance purchase decisions l Communities can administer sound floodplain management programs Importance of Updated Flood Hazard Information

North Carolina’s Flood Mapping Program u Program established to implement the Cooperating Technical State (CTS) Partnership with FEMA, signed September 15, 2000 u Ownership and responsibility for Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) delegated to State

Why North Carolina Is Undertaking This Project u State’s vulnerability to hurricanes and flooding l 14 federally declared disasters since 1989 l Hurricane Floyd damages = $3.5 billion l 4,117 uninsured/under-insured homes destroyed as result of Hurricane Floyd u Accurate, up-to-date flood hazard information crucial to protect lives and property

Why North Carolina Is Undertaking This Project u Hurricane Floyd revealed flood hazard data and map limitations u Age of North Carolina FIRMS l 55% at least 10 years old l 75% at least 5 years old u FEMA’s mapping budget is finite l North Carolina receives only one updated flood study for one county per year u Many counties and communities lack resources to take on this responsibility

Program Components u Developing flood hazard studies through community mapping needs analysis (Scoping) u Acquiring high-resolution topographic data and accurate Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) u Conducting engineering studies u Generating countywide digital FIRMs (DFIRMs) u Designing and implementing state-of-the-art, dynamic IT infrastructure u Supporting real-time flood forecasting and inundation mapping capability

Digital FIRM = Flood Data Base + Topography +

Funding for this Program u In August 2000, North Carolina General Assembly approved funding for first six river basins ($23 million) u FEMA has contributed $6 million, as well as in-kind professional services u North Carolina is also working with other Federal partners to secure additional funding

Benefits of North Carolina’s CTS Program u Current, accurate data for sound siting and design decisions u Better floodplain management to reduce long-term flood losses u Updated data to alert at-risk property owners of the need for flood insurance u Faster, less expensive FIRM updates

Benefits of North Carolina’s CTS Program u Digital format to allow: l More efficient, precise flood risk determinations l Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis and planning l Online access 24 hours a day u DEMs will be useful for almost any engineering or planning application

White Oak River Basin u Located in the southern coastal plain of North Carolina u Includes 4 separate river drainage systems (New, North, White Oak, Newport Rivers and tributaries) u Comprised of portions of 4 counties and 14 municipalities

Scoping Phase for White Oak River Basin The Scoping Phase determines: u What areas are floodprone and need flood hazard data developed u What methods will be used to generate flood hazard data u How the data will be presented on FIRMs

Scoping Phase for White Oak River Basin u Research/inventory all available elevation, flood hazard, and digital base map data u Assess existing flood hazard data on effective FIRMs u Determine appropriate technical method for developing up-to-date flood hazard data and establish priority level u Five Steps of Scoping Phase

Step 1 — Initial Research and Community Coordination u State held “kickoff” meeting with county and local floodplain administrators u Obtained community mapping needs u Effective Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and FIRM information was researched u Post-Hurricane Floyd data was evaluated u Research and mapping needs were entered into GIS-enabled scoping database

Step 2 — Initial Scoping Meetings u State held meetings with each county to present research results and discuss flood mapping needs u Input gathered from communities on proposed study priorities and analysis methods u Identified potential resources of local GIS base map data

Step 3 — Draft Basin Plan u Plan for developing updated flood hazard data and countywide DFIRMs u Comprised of results from research and county and community input u Includes listing of flooding sources to be updated within the basin, technical methods, and projected schedule

Step 4 — Final Scoping Meeting THIS IS WHERE WE ARE TODAY! u All impacted counties and communities invited u Draft White Oak River Basin plan presented u Provides final opportunity for input

Step 5 — Final Basin Plan u Draft Basin Plan will be revised following the Final Scoping Meeting u Watershed Concepts, Inc., will develop proposals for the State u White Oak River Basin Plan will be finalized and distributed to impacted counties and communities u Production phase will then begin

North Carolina White Oak Basin Meeting Q UESTIONS ON THE SCOPING PHASE ? ? ? ? ? ?

Draft White Oak River Basin Plan u Summarizes scoping phase u Outlines how base maps and topography will be acquired u Proposes engineering methods by which each flooding source reach will be studied u Describes the process and schedule for completing the map production

Base Maps u Countywide Digital FIRM Production will be based on the following: l U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Digital Orthophoto Quadrangles (DOQs), based on 1998 Aerial Photography l Local GIS data for streams, political boundaries, and roads may be used to supplement the DOQs

Topographic Data u Will be acquired using airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) u Will be acquired during the Winter flying season u Will produce an equivalent to a approximately 2-foot contour interval map in floodplains u Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) will be generated to be used for modeling

Recommended Study Areas u Five study options: l Detailed study (riverine) l Detailed study (coastal) l Redelineate using updated topographic data l Approximate study l Use current effective information (not selected for any areas)

Detailed Study — Riverine u This method requires the following: l DEMs l Field surveys u Channel bathymetry u Bridge/culvert opening geometry u Channel and floodplain characteristics l Detailed Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses u 10%, 2%, 1%, and 0.2% annual chance flood elevations and boundaries identified (Zone AE) u Floodways delineated

Areas to be Studied in Detail

Detailed Study — Coastal u This method produces the following: l Floodplain mapping for areas along open coast and embayments l Designations as Zones AE or VE No detailed coastal studies are proposed

Redelineation u This method requires the following: l DEMs l Effective FIS flood elevations Proposed for all areas currently shown on effective FIRM as Zone AE or VE and not being restudied

Approximate Study u This method requires the following: l DEMs l Delineation of 1% annual chance floodplain boundaries using approximate methods l Does not include collection/use of field- collected topographic data or bridge/culvert data Proposed for all areas currently shown on effective FIRM as Zone A and not being restudied in detail.

Use of Effective Information u This method involves no new analyses or floodplain mapping u Effective FIS and FIRM data is digitized and fitted to updated base map This method is not anticipated to be used for any communities in the White Oak River Basin

Variations from Community- Identified Needs & Priorities u Necessary to deviate from community- identified needs and priorities due to: l Conflicting needs and priorities identified by contiguous communities sharing a flooding source l Less dense development u In these instances, the State used a quantitative ranking system to determine methods

Digital FIRMs u Digital FIRMs will be produced in a countywide format u Will depict all flood hazard data u FIRM panels will be consistent with USGS DOQ tiling scheme

Schedule for FIRM Production

Community Review and Due Process u Preliminary FIRMs provided when White Oak River Basin Study is complete u 90-day appeal period u Preliminary Countywide FIRMs provided when adjacent basin studies are complete u All appeals evaluated and resolved u Final Effective FIRMs provided and made available by the State on its Information Management System

Community Review and Due Process u Many counties and communities will need to update their floodplain management ordinances u Communities will be given a 6-month period to do so u NCDEM and FEMA will coordinate this effort with affected communities

North Carolina White Oak Basin Meeting Q UESTIONS ON THE DRAFT BASIN PLAN ? ? ? ? ? ?