Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KT for TT – Ensuring Technology- based R&D matters to Stakeholders
Advertisements

Relating research to practice Heather King Department of Education King’s College London.
National Center for Accessible Transportation Intercity Transportation Provider Views: Are We Ready to Provide Safe and Dignified Services to All? Michael.
Acknowledgements Funding Partners:University at Buffalo (UB) & National Disability Authority (NDA Project Mentors:Prof. Joe Lane (UB), Dr. Ger Craddock(CEUD/NDA)
Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in Mind Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in.
Contextualized Knowledge Translation Packages for Technology Transfer and Product Development ATIA Orlando, Florida January 2012 James A. Leahy Center.
1 Program Management. 2 Characteristics of a Successful Continuing Education Leader   Creative   Proactive   Change Oriented   Flexible   Quality.
5/24/ Planning an enterprise Drupal CMS at Princeton University.
Overview of Technology Transfer Process RERC on Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Achieving Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Implications for Evaluation Presenter: Vathsala I. Stone University at Buffalo/
1 Improving Data Quality through Two Dimensional Surveying: the Kano Method Stephen M. Bauer PhD, & Vathsala I. Stone PhD RERC on Technology Transfer,
TTO Role in University / Corporate Partnership
IASCE Conference Athlone October 7 th & 8 th 2004 Responsive Evaluation. Working with Stakeholders: A review of the Open Training College Quality Assurance.
How to Translate Knowledge in Three States: Discovery, Invention, Innovation Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
Innovation in Universal Design “Universal integration of research, education, innovation and enterprise at DIT GrangeGorman” Joseph P. Lane, University.
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
Interviewers training, ScoPeO evaluation(Country), (date) Module 1: Present the project and study.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Centre for Research Excellence in Primary Oral health Care A/Prof David Brennan Dr Len Crocombe Prof Kaye Roberts-Thomson A/Prof Tony Barnett Prof Linda.
SPECA Regional Workshop on Disability Statistics: Dec 13-15, 2006 Purposes of Disability Statistics Jennifer Madans and Barbara Altman National Center.
Winning your next proposal: “Buzz Tactics” to increase the chances of success Joseph Lane, Jennifer Flagg, James Leahy Center on Knowledge Translation.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
1 The National Fund NATIONAL EVALUATION The First Five Years Navjeet Singh Deputy Director National Fund for Workforce Solutions
Best Practices in Technology Transfer Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
SYSTEMS LTD. Orlando Moreno NICE Systems Project Management Certification Program.
UNICEF’s work and planned activities for the production of data on children with disabilities Claudia Cappa, Data and Analytics Section, UNICEF, NY.
 Your promise to your customers.  Expectations of the academic library (Resources and services)
Mathematics and Science Partnerships, Title II, Part B, NCLB.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT University.
PRIMARY MARKET RESEARCH Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Technology Transfer Training Module #4.
11 Building an Effective Peer Support Program: A Proven Volunteer Model Far-Reaching Benefits of a Successful Peer Mentor Program September 24, :15.
SERC,London, July 071 FIT FOR PURPOSE Board development for Social Enterprise Chris Mason and Maureen Royce LJMU.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer School.
VoIP Solutions Summit Focus on Disability Access Issues Cary Barbin RERC on Telecommunications Access Gallaudet University.
Massachusetts Community Colleges & Workforce Development Transformation Agenda Planning for Coordinated Job Placement OSCC and Community College Regional.
Analytic Tools: Ensuring industry relevance for university-based R&D projects intending transfer. Joseph P. Lane & James Condron Center on Knowledge Translation.
Bridging the Evidence Gap: Level Of Knowledge Use Survey - LOKUS as a Validated Instrument Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for.
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
The KT4TT Knowledge Base: Steps and Supporting Evidence to Improve Your Process! Webcast sponsored by SEDL September 29, 2010, 2:00 pm (Central) / 3:00.
Is One Minute Madness?? Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
What are my next steps? Incorporating universal design into your own work and advocating for accessibility in your own institution NISE Net Universal Design.
ANSI HSSP Workshop December 1, 2004 Shaumburg, Illinois Access to Emergency Communications for People with Disabilities Judy Harkins Technology Access.
Practical Library Assessment Stephen Spohn. About me Academic libraries University of Maryland - George Mason University - Northern Essex Community.
Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
The Social Model for A/T Technology Transfer – AAATE 2010 “From Problem Identification to Social Validation: An Operational Model” Joseph P. Lane,
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Translating New Knowledge from Technology Based Research Projects: an End-of-Grant Intervention Evaluation Study. Rationale and Methods Vathsala I. Stone.
People with IDD Receiving LTSS while Living in the Home of a Family Member or in their Own Home With or Without Medicaid Waiver Funding 2006 to 2015, United.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States
Joseph P. Lane, University at Buffalo
Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT.
Joseph P. Lane & James Condron
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit.
Best Practices in Technology Transfer
Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement
AEA Annual Meeting , Nov , 2009 Achieving Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Implications for Evaluation Presenter: Vathsala I. Stone.
RESNA 2018 Annual Conference
Knowledge Translation Across RERC Activities
Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Reconciling Government Policies and Programs with Public Expectations: The Case of Innovation in AT Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Knowledge Utility results from Rigor in Methods & Relevance in Content
The Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model: Orienting Scholar “Technology Grantees” to Best Practices in Transfer & Commercialization Joseph P. Lane, Director.
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Presentation transcript:

Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University at Buffalo

Voice of the Customer Overview of Paper Key Points Resources

Key Point 1  You MUST understand your customer’s needs!  Manufacturers and service providers  Customer = End User/Consumer  R&D staff/ academics  Customer = Manufacturer  Academics can bring end user/consumer needs to a manufacturer, but the information must meet the manufacturer’s own needs.

Example Glucose Meter Specifications

Meeting the Manufacturer’s Needs

Key Point 2  Use methods recognized as rigorous by industry standards Problematic ApproachRigorous Approach Single focus groupMultiple groups End users onlyInclude other stakeholders Inexperienced moderatorTrained knowledgeable moderator Inadequate facilitiesAccessible, state-of-the-art facilities Lengthy reportTop line summary, concise function listing, appendices

Resources Primary Market Research Training Module –Sampling and recruitment –Focus groups –Surveys –Outsourcing considerations Evaluation Resource Guide –Basic concepts –Case studies –Sample Instruments

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This is a presentation of the Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, which is funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education under grant #H133A The opinions contained in this presentation are those of the grantee, and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Education.

Thank you! Any Questions?