FEDERAL CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Overview of Key Provisions of House and Senate Bills for Industrial Energy Users John Clancy Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. 780.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STATE CLIMATE POLICY OPTIONS Meeting of the Illinois Climate Change Advisory Group Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle St., Room C500 Chicago,
Advertisements

EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
EDDIE TERRILL AIR QUALITY DIVISION DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AUGUST 21, 2014 EPA’s 111(d) Clean Power Plan Rule: A DEQ Perspective.
Corbin Devlin McLennan Ross LLP October 19, 2007 ALBERTA’S CLIMATE: A Comparison to Canada’s Approach to Managing Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
California GHG policy and implications for the power sector APEX Sydney Conference October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin, PhD.
Federal Cap-and-Trade Policy: Overview of Design Options Ray Hammarlund, KCC Energy Programs Division Director Presentation to Kansas Energy Council Greenhouse.
1.  What is a Renewable Energy Credit (REC)?  What are they used for?  Who uses them?  How is REC ownership tracked?  What is the Renewable Portfolio.
Federal Initiatives Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2008 vs. Bingaman-Specter Low Carbon Economy Act Presented By: Jennifer Knorr April 8, 2008.
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Carbon Footprint / Life Cycle Analysis September 29, 2009.
Environmental Sustainability in the Extractive Industry: The Case for Climate Change Mitigation Dr Uwem E. Ite.
Oregon Climate Change Regulatory Activities and Policy Initiatives Bill Drumheller -- Oregon Department of Energy University of Oregon School of Law Climate.
National Energy/Climate Bills How does the legislative process work? What bills are currently being considered? What are the pros and cons of each? Who.
Climate and Energy Policies that Threaten Manufacturing Competitiveness Paul Cicio President Industrial Energy Consumers of America October, 2008.
Climate Change... Risks and Opportunities Taylor Davis John Deere Public Affairs Worldwide October 16, 2007.
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional.
Introduction to Climate Change: - global warming - basis steps in a clean development project - connection of CDM with European Trading Scheme Wim Maaskant.
Carbon markets An international tool for cost-effective GHG mitigation.
CLEAN ENERGY TO PROMOTE CLEAN AIR & IMPROVE ELECTRICITY PRICE STABILITY Alden Hathaway, ERT Debra Jacobson, GWU Law School April 6, 2006.
The voice and choice of public gas National Gas Policy and the Stimulus Impact John Erickson American Public Gas Association August 25, 2009.
Agriculture Industry Views on Climate Legislation and Markets David Miller Chief Science Officer AgraGate Climate Credits Corp & Director of Research Iowa.
How the State of California Can Play A Greater Role in Addressing Global Warming Leonard Robinson – Chief Deputy Director California Department of Toxic.
Utility Perspective on Climate Change Frank Prager January 22, 2008 Frank Prager January 22, 2008.
New Mexico’s Climate Change Initiative Jim Norton New Mexico Environment Department.
Regulatory Approaches to Address U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rebecca Stanfield Shriver Center Climate Change Symposium September 30, 2009.
Overview of Carbon Markets and US Federal Proposals to Regulate GHGs American College of Construction Lawyers and Princeton University Joint Symposium.
Overview of CPUC/CEC Proposed Decision: Recommendations for the Electricity Industry September 2008 Nancy Ryan Chief of Staff, Office of Commissioner Peevey.
C2es.org. 2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory,
1 Cap and Trade for Regulating Greenhouse Gases Presented by Scott Murtishaw Advisor to President Peevey, CPUC NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Francisco June.
Cap & Trade. Cap & Trade (Cap) A cap commits a region or country to limits on greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and then reduces those limits over time.
1 Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy THE IMPACT OF A CARBON CONTROL PROGRAM ON LOW-INCOME CONSUMERS Joel Eisenberg ORNL
Energy Sustainability in a Carbon Constrained World George A. Williams Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
Andy Engel and Andy Cook The Hamilton Consulting Group Hamilton-consulting.com.
Federal Climate Change Legislation – Charlotte Chamber September 22, 2009 Mike Stroben Director, EHS Policy.
California Cap on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Market-Based Compliance Mechanisms Edie Chang California Air Resources Board September 2015 California.
Overview of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) David Farnsworth, Esq. Staff Attorney, Vermont Public Service Board.
Reid Harvey U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chief, Climate Economics Branch Climate Change Division 6 th Forestry and Agriculture GHG Modeling Forum.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative RGGI John Marschilok, P.E. Environmental Engineer Department New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Department of the Environment Reducing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A State’s Perspective Renee Fizer, Climate Change Division-MDE.
Washington State: Climate Initiative
1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Seventh Floor Washington, DC (202) Millenium Tower 719 Second Avenue, Suite 1150 Seattle, Washington
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
EU Emissions Trading. Context European Climate Change Programme (ECCP) European Climate Change Programme (ECCP) Directive on Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
California Public Utilities Commission CPUC Climate Change Activities Paul Clanon Executive Director August 28, 2007 Presentation to the Senate Energy,
Standards and Certification – A must in the Green World Andrew Nourafshan Progam Analyst Center for Resource Solutions Green Trade Network Summit September.
California to Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia and Beyond? Can Subnational Arrangements Fill the Gap? Professor Sharon Mascher Faculty of Law, University.
2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory, reporting.
Regulatory Platforms for CO2 trading regulation Last Week Discussion of Agencies, Purpose and How Operate that may be in charge of Carbon Trading at the.
Charlotte Chamber U. S. CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Mike Stroben November 11, 2009.
11 AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan Progress Report October 21, 2010 California Air Resources Board.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Change picture on Slide Master It’s Not Easy Being Green: What’s Up on Warming in Washington? Virginia Bar Association July 25, 2009 PRESENTED BY Peter.
1 Proposed Final Opinion on GHG Strategies in the Energy Sectors Key Findings and Recommendations October 16, 2008.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE REGULATION FOR THE MANDATORY REPORTING OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS California Air Resources Board California Air Resources Board.
AB 32 Update December 6, Outline Cap and Trade Program 2013 Update to Scoping Plan Looking ahead to
Greenhouse Gas Initiatives: progress and perspective Sandra Meier Environmental Energy Alliance of New York.
Linkages Workshop November 14/ Outline Alberta context Regulatory framework Compliance options Carbon connections.
State and Regional GHG Initiatives What are the individual states doing to mitigate GHG emissions? What are the common elements? and regional differences?
S A L T L A K E C I T Y | L A S V E G A S | R E N O | P A R S O N S B E H L E L A W. C O M Update on Western Climate Initiative Options for Reducing GHG.
Policy Options The basic climate change policy approaches under consideration for the United States are: 1) Cap and Trade: A market based system where.
Policy Options The basic climate change policy approaches under consideration for the United States are: 1) Cap and Trade: A market based system where.
CURRENT STATUS AND ISSUES OF THE KOREAN EMISSION TRADING SCHEME
Policy Options The basic climate change policy approaches under consideration for the United States are: 1) Cap and Trade: A market based system where.
Recent Cap and Trade Programs: EU ETS and RGGI
Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture
Carbon Offset Markets and Utah’s Opportunity
Canada’s Regulatory Framework for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Ontario’s New System to Price Industrial Pollution Emissions Performances Standards (EPS) March 15, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

FEDERAL CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Overview of Key Provisions of House and Senate Bills for Industrial Energy Users John Clancy Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. 780 North Water Street, Milwaukee

Overview Status of House and Senate Bills. Cap-and-trade and offset provisions. Renewable energy and energy efficiency standards. Costs and opportunities associated with Bills.

House Bill Markey-Waxman Bill. “American Clean Energy and Security Act.” Comprehensive bill that includes: –Federal RPS. –Cap-and-trade/offsets. –State energy and energy efficiency programs. –Smart grid provisions, building efficiency, transportation provisions, etc. Passed House on June 26, 2009 ( ).

Senate Bill “American Clean Energy Leadership Act.” Does not include carbon cap-and- trade/offset provisions. Senators Boxer and Kerry plan to release comprehensive bill at end of September.

Cap-and-Trade House bill caps emissions from covered entities. Reduces cap to: –97% of 2005 levels by –83% of 2005 levels by –58% of 2005 levels by –17% of 2005 levels by EPA projects allowances to cost $13/ton in 2015 and $16/ton in 2020.

Covered Entities Electricity generators (2012). Refiners and importers of petroleum- based and other specified liquid fuels (2012). Fluorinated gas manufacturers and nitrogen trifluoride emitters (2012). Specified industrial sources (2014). Natural gas LDCs (2016).

Covered Industrial Sources Any stationary source in listed categories. Any stationary source in listed categories of chemical and petrochemical sector that in 2008 or subsequent year emits 25,000 or more tons of CO 2 equivalent. Any stationary source that produces ethanol, ferroalloys, glass, hydrogen, iron or steel, lead, zinc, or processes food or manufactures pulp and paper, and emits 25,000 tons of CO 2 equivalent or more in 2008 or subsequent year.

Covered Boilers Any fossil fuel-fired combustion device (such as a boiler) or grouping of such devices that: –Is all or part of an industrial source not specified in the prior slide. –Has emitted 25,000 or more tons of CO 2 equivalent in 2008 or any subsequent year.

Performance Standards EPA is to publish an inventory of categories of stationary sources that individually had uncapped emissions greater than 10,000 tons, and that in aggregate emitted at least 20% of the uncapped GHG emissions. EPA is to promulgate standards for these sources. The marginal cost of implementing these standards is supposed to be below the projected allowance prices.

Distribution of Allowances Approximately 30% for the benefit of consumers of local electricity distribution companies, whose rates are regulated by states or other entities ( – 43.75%; – 38.9%; – 35%; goes to zero by 2030). Requires half of the allowances to be distributed based on historic emissions and half based on retail sales. Prohibits an LDC from receiving allowances whose value exceeds its direct and indirect costs of compliance.

Distribution of Allowances continued Approximately 9% ( ) of allowances allocated for the benefit of consumers to local natural gas distribution companies, whose rates are regulated by states or other entities, based on average deliveries. Up to 15% of allowances distributed to “trade- vulnerable” industries (5% energy/carbon intensity and 15% trade-intensity). Additional allowances allocated to states (for state energy/energy efficiency programs), to merchant coal generators, carbon capture, refineries, adaptation, etc.

Offsets Offsets integrity advisory board to be established to provide EPA recommendations regarding offset categories and requirements. Because of time needed to set up EPA offset program, bill allows for early offset supply. Early offset credits available for projects that began after January 1, 2001 and resulted in reductions or avoidance of emissions during the time period from January 1, 2009 until three years after enactment of bill or date offset regulations are promulgated under bill, whichever comes first.

Key Issue with Early Offsets Projects have to be credited under a voluntary GHG emission reduction program that EPA determines. –Was established by state/tribal law prior to January 1, –Results in permanent, additional, verifiable, and enforceable reductions. –Requires that reductions be verified by a state regulatory agency or accredited third party. –Requires credits be registered in a publicly-accessible registry with individual serial numbers for each credit. Concern that Wisconsin’s Voluntary Emission Reduction Registry may not qualify. Can petition to add new programs, but need to be as stringent as other state/tribal programs.

Renewable Energy Standards House Bill calls for 6% RPS in 2012, increasing to 20% by 2020 through Senate Bill calls for 3% RPS in 2011, increasing to 15% by 2021 through Both Bills allow energy efficiency improvements to count. –House Bill: Up to 25% of RPS, with ability for state Governor to petition for up to 40%. –Senate Bill: Up to 26.67% of RPS requirement.

Ability of Users to Help Meet Energy Efficiency Portion Energy users can “sell” their efficiency gains to utilities. Efficiency gains measured against “business-as-usual” projections. These projections call for adjustment to account for changes in weather, level of production, and building area.

Concerns with Energy Efficiency Provisions Limitation of sales to in-state electric suppliers. Language that appears to potentially give all credit for efficiency measures to utilities for measures that achieve through ratepayer-funded efficiency programs, such as Focus on Energy.

Questions? Thank you