Statistics for nMRCGP Jo Kirkcaldy. Curriculum Condensed Knowledge Incidence and prevalence Specificity and sensitivity Positive and negative predictive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to assess an abstract
Advertisements

PP (Study Design) for 2nd Year
1 Case-Control Study Design Two groups are selected, one of people with the disease (cases), and the other of people with the same general characteristics.
What Happens to the Performance of a Diagnostic Test when the Disease Prevalence and the Cut-Point Change? Pathological scores Healthy scores Healthy population.
TUTORIAL SCREENING Dr. Salwa Tayel, Dr. A. Almazam, Dr Afzal Mahmood
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Harm and Etiology.
Extension Article by Dr Tim Kenny
Introduction to Critical Appraisal : Quantitative Research
CRITICAL APPRAISAL Dr. Cristina Ana Stoian Resident Journal Club
Interpreting Basic Statistics
Epidemiology in Medicine Sandra Rodriguez Internal Medicine TTUHSC.
Ghassan Fraij EBM Board Review 6/8/2009. Epidemiologic Measures ► Measures of disease occurrence:  Risk (the likelihood that and individual will contract.
Baye’s Rule and Medical Screening Tests. Baye’s Rule Baye’s Rule is used in medicine and epidemiology to calculate the probability that an individual.
Statistics By Z S Chaudry. Why do I need to know about statistics ? Tested in AKT To understand Journal articles and research papers.
Statistics for Health Care
EPIDEMIOLOGY Why is it so damn confusing?. Disease or Outcome Exposure ab cd n.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
Diagnosis Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and.
Absolute, Relative and Attributable Risks. Outcomes or differences that we are interested in:  Differences in means or proportions  Odds ratio (OR)
Statistics in Screening/Diagnosis
 Mean: true average  Median: middle number once ranked  Mode: most repetitive  Range : difference between largest and smallest.
Stats Tutorial. Is My Coin Fair? Assume it is no different from others (null hypothesis) When will you no longer accept this assumption?
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 14 Screening and Prevention of Illnesses and Injuries: Research Methods.
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
Statistics for Health Care Biostatistics. Phases of a Full Clinical Trial Phase I – the trial takes place after the development of a therapy and is designed.
Evidence Based Practice in Psychology – Lecture 3 May 31, 2007.
Understanding real research 4. Randomised controlled trials.
Statistics. Statistics = everything you need to know, but continually want to forget!!!!
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
CRITICAL READING ST HELIER VTS 2008 RCGP Curriculum Core Statement Domain 3 AS.
MEASURES OF TEST ACCURACY AND ASSOCIATIONS DR ODIFE, U.B SR, EDM DIVISION.
Likelihood 2005/5/22. Likelihood  probability I am likelihood I am probability.
Literature Appraisal Effectiveness of Therapy. Measures of treatment effect Statistical significance Odds ratio Relative risk Absolute risk reduction.
Chris and Abbie’s Vital Statistics. It’s actually quite dull!!! But......It is quite easy if you think it through. Arghhh Statistics...
Stats Facts Mark Halloran. Diagnostic Stats Disease present Disease absent TOTALS Test positive aba+b Test negative cdc+d TOTALSa+cb+da+b+c+d.
Statistics for the board September 14 th 2007 Jean-Sebastien Rachoin MD.
Screening Puja Myles
Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
Practical application. Population A ELISA test is applied to a million people where 1% are infected with HIV. Of the million people, 10,000 would be infected.
Topic 6 Probability Modified from the notes of Professor A. Kuk P&G pp
Organization of statistical research. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and.
Risks & Odds Professor Kate O’Donnell. When talking about the chance of something happening, e.g. death, hip fracture, we can talk about: risk and relative.
BIOSTATISTICS Lecture 2. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and creating methods.
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
Doing Analyses on Binary Outcome. From November 14 th Dr Sainani talked about how the math works for binomial data.
PTP 560 Research Methods Week 12 Thomas Ruediger, PT.
Biostatistics Board Review Parul Chaudhri, DO Family Medicine Faculty Development Fellow, UPMC St Margaret March 5, 2016.
Risk Different ways of assessing it. Objectives Be able to define and calculate: Absolute risk (reduction) Relative risk (reduction) Number needed to.
What are the Chances Dr? Nick Pendleton. Can I have a Prostate Check? ?
2 3 انواع مطالعات توصيفي (Descriptive) تحليلي (Analytic) مداخله اي (Interventional) مشاهده اي ( Observational ) كارآزمايي باليني كارآزمايي اجتماعي كارآزمايي.
Diagnostic studies Adrian Boyle.
…it’s really interesting
Communicating Risk.
DR.FATIMA ALKHALEDY M.B.Ch.B;F.I.C.M.S/C.M
An Idiots Guide to Statistics Curriculum 3.6
Question 1 A new ‘Super test’ claims to have a superb capability to diagnose disease X. Its sensitivity is 99% and specificity is 90%. Which of the following.
Class session 7 Screening, validity, reliability
NAPLEX preparation: Biostatistics
Prospective Cohort Study (Click or press Enter to follow animation)
Refining Probability Test Informations Vahid Ashoorion MD. ,MSc,
Dr. Hannah Jordan Lecturer in Public Health ScHARR
remember to round it to whole numbers
کارگاه تکميلی کشوری تربيت مربی آموزش طب مبتنی بر شواهد
Figure 1. Table for calculating the accuracy of a diagnostic test.
Patricia Butterfield & Naomi Chaytor October 18th, 2017
1 Information Mastery Skills Calculating RR, RRR, ARR and NNTs A. Bornstein, MD, FACC Assistant Professor of Medicine Weil Cornell Medical College New.
ASPIRE CLASS 6: Interpreting Results and Writing an Abstract
Positive predictive value of screening tests
How to assess an abstract
Basic statistics.
Presentation transcript:

Statistics for nMRCGP Jo Kirkcaldy

Curriculum Condensed Knowledge Incidence and prevalence Specificity and sensitivity Positive and negative predictive values Absolute risk and absolute risk reduction Relative risk and relative risk reduction NNT and NNH Odds and odds ratio Hazard ratios

Incidence and Prevalence Incidence – The number of new cases of a disease/condition occuring in a population over a given time period Prevalence – The number of existing cases of a disease/condition in a population at a specific point in time

Specificity and sensitivity Relevance is in screening and diagnostic tests Sensitivity = true positive rate – i.e. chance of a positive test result for people with the disease Specificity = true negative rate – i.e. chance of a negative test result for people without the disease.

Sensitivity and specificity DiseaseNo disease Total Test +veaba+b Test -vecdc+d Totala+cb+da+b+c+d Sensitivity = a/a+c (x100) Specificity = d/b+d (x100)

Positive and negative predictive values Measure screening performance (i.e post test probability) Positive predictive value – Chance of disease for person with positive test result Negative predictive value – Chance of no disease for person with negative test result

PPV and NPV PPV = a/a+b NPV = d/c+d DiseaseNo disease Total Test+veaba+b Test -vecdc+d Totala+cb+da+b+c+d

Risk Used in prospective studies Absolute risk – chance of developing disease/death over a set time period Relative risk - compares chance of developing disease/death in two groups e.g. with and without treatment over set time period

DeathsSurvivalTotal Control New drug Total Absolute risk of death for condition = 53/199 = (x 100) Relative risk of death(risk ratio) = 21/100/32/99 = 0.21/0.323 = 0.65 Relative risk reduction = = 0.35 = 35%

NNT and NNH Related to risk Calculate how many patients need to save one life/harm one person

DeathsSurvivalTotal Control New drug Total NNT = 1/risk difference (=ARR) Risk difference = 32/99- 21/100 = = NNT = 1/0.113 = 9 Need to treat nine people to save one life

Odds and odds ratio DeathsSurvivalTotal Control New drug Total Used in retrospective studies Odds of death – control = 32/99/67/99= – drug = 21/100/79/100= Odds ratio = 0.266/0.478 = 0.55

Hazard ratios Reflects time survived to an invent i.e. survival data. Complicated log calculation but essentially calculates ratio of rates at which an event happens. E.g if 1000 patients have an MI and 500 are thrombolysed hazard ratios could be used to describe the time to death in each group.

Curriculum Condensed Knowledge Incidence and prevalence Specificity and sensitivity Positive and negative predictive values Absolute risk and absolute risk reduction Relative risk and relative risk reduction NNT and NNH Odds and odds ratio Hazard ratios

Further useful references ‘How to read a paper’ Trish Greenhalgh – pubilshed in serial form in BMJ or available as a book.