Part 4: Corrective Actions Lisa Olsen Specialist Adviser, NZ Standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Checking & Corrective Action
Advertisements

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
Listeria Monitoring & Testing in RTE seafood plants
Complying with FSMA: What a cashew exporter to the U.S. needs to do.
Listeria in the Dairy and Cold-Smoked Salmon Industries Presented by Rebecca Robertson October 9, 2008.
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download, adapt, and distribute this.
1 MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (ERT 455) HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEM Munira Mohamed Nazari School.
Prerequisite Programme Training Guide
BRC Storage & Distribution Safety and Quality Management System Training Guide
ENERGETIC MATERIALS Co. Root Cause Analysis Guidelines 1.
Quality control of raw materials In-process control
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points
External Defibrillators: Recalls, Inspections, and the Quality System Regulation Melissa Torres Office of Compliance December 15, 2010.
Objectives Objectives: Food safety management systems
QC/QA Mary Malarkey Director, Division of Case Management Office of Compliance and Biologics Quality Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research March.
Chapter 10 Verification Procedures. Objective In this module, you will learn: u How to define verification u What functions are part of HACCP plan verification.
The Quality Management System
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Role of Testing to Ensure FSMA and Global Safety Compliance for Functional Food and Dietary Ingredients Douglas L. Marshall, Ph.D., CFS Chief Scientific.

Listeria Summit - Washington, DC November RISK MANAGEMENT Current FSIS Activities Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office of Policy and Program Development.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
HACCP Training Guide
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Corrective Action.
BRC Food Safety Quality Management System Training Guide
Listeria Guidance – Part 1 Sally Hasell. Purpose of Guide 1 1.Gives an overview of the issues – why controls are needed and why this need is becoming.
Project co-financed by European Union Project co- financed by Asean European Committee for Standardization Implementing Agency 1 Module 13 GMP Workshop.
Visit us at E mail: Tele: www.globalmanagergroup.com.
Understanding ISO 22000:2005 TCISys.com.
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
Support Programs version 2 March 2010 Cleaning and Sanitation
Control Program for Listeria monocytogenes ©2006 Department of Food Science - College of Agricultural Sciences at Penn State University Penn State is committed.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
9 - 2 Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point 9 - The HACCP Philosophy 3 Prevented Eliminated Reduced to safe levels If significant biological, chemical,
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part II.
1 FSIS Notice Notice of Reassesment for E. Coli O157:H7 Control And Completion of Checklist for all beef operations.
Lessons Learned from the Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein Incident Jenny Scott FDA CFSAN Office of Food Safety.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Implementation into Child Nutrition Programs
Good Operating Practice. The importance of GOP General Listeria -specific GOP Specific food GOP These are in addition to the guidance available on the.
Project management Topic 7 Controls. What is a control? Decision making activities – Planning – Monitor progress – Compare achievement with plan – Detect.
Listeria Surveillance, Decision Making, and Corrective Actions at Retail Carrie Rigdon, PhD Rapid Response Team Supervisor Dairy & Food Inspection Division.
 This notice provides new instructions to Enforcement Investigations and Analysis Officers (EIAOs) and Public Health Veterinarians who were trained in.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
USDA Public Meeting; Control of E. coli O157:H7
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
Environmental Control and Developing a Science-based Monitoring Program Richard L. Friedman, M.S. FDA/CDER.
Experiences with Controlling Listeria monocytogenes in Ready- to-Eat Food Processes W. Payton Pruett, Jr., Ph.D. ConAgra Refrigerated Foods USDA Listeria.
Chapter 9 Corrective Actions. Objective In this module, you will learn: u The definition of corrective actions u Procedures for corrective action, and.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
Targeted Food Safety Assessments Barb Masters OFW Law September 2015.
Laboratory equipment Dr. W. Huisman Cairo, November 21th 2012.
George E. Detsis Manager, Analytical Services Program United States Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security Office of Sustainability.
© Food – a fact of life 2009 Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) HACCP is a system which looks for and prevents potential problems before they.
Chapter 10 Verification Procedures.
Author: Nurul Azyyati Sabri
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP).
The Risk Assessment in the Food Industry
PREPARATION FOR GMP INSPECTION
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Food Production Systems
A Road Map to Food Safety
Chapter 10 Verification Procedures.
Chapter 4: Food Hazard Analysis
GMP Inspection Process
H A C C P HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS 1 December 2018
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Presentation transcript:

Part 4: Corrective Actions Lisa Olsen Specialist Adviser, NZ Standards

What should you get from this guide? A clearer understanding of MAF’s expectations if there is a Listeria contamination event Information which can be used to develop your LMP and help you prepare for a contamination event

Contaminated product means product that testing has shown to be contaminated with L. monocytogenes. At risk product means all batches of product that are potentially contaminated with L. monocytogenes Contamination event is when Listeria and/or L. mono are detected on product contact surfaces and/or in product during routine monitoring, surveys or an illness investigation. Definitions

How might you receive a Listeria Notification? Routine environmental monitoring Routine product testing Customer sampling Regulatory surveys Illness investigations

Corrective Actions Halt processing Isolate affected equipment and areas Notify verifier, Food Act Officer or MAF within one working day of notification

Corrective Actions Retrieve or recall contaminated and at risk product Identify and hold contaminated and at risk product

Investigate Cause of Contamination Inspect contaminated process area(s) and equipment Carry out investigative environmental sampling to identify any environmental contamination source

Investigative environmental sampling Commence within 1 working day of receiving notification Explore all possible areas of contamination rather than focus on small areas Review environmental results from other areas to identify areas that may require reassessment of controls Testing at higher level should continue until source of contamination identified Thoroughly clean and sanitise once sampling completed

Investigate cause of Contamination Review supporting system and processing records Sample raw and in-process materials There is a good chance that more than one thing is the source of problem – it is quite likely to be a combination of things – keep an open mind

Clean and sanitise In a high proportion of cases where Listeria contamination occurs there have been problems with the cleaning and sanitising programme A person with the appropriate level of expertise should be involved in any review of the programme.

Intensive Microbiological Sampling Programme Testing of at risk product and product contact surfaces at a higher frequency than routine microbiological monitoring Purpose: identify any at risk product that may have been contaminated at time of L. mono detection test at risk product and product contact surfaces once processing resumes.

What product could be at risk? Last clear test from routine monitoring Lab result – L. monocytogenes detected on a sample taken at day 0 Routine monitoring, positive L. monocytogenes Previously processed product Days P P PP PC P PC P PC P PC P P P P P Samples P = product sample PC = product contact surface sample 4

Testing at risk product: around time of the contamination event What product could be considered at risk? since last not-detected result for Listeria species on same processing line on same day or day before the positive result between taking the positive sample and notification of Lm on processing lines close to contaminated line processed under abnormal conditions e.g. failure at a CCP

How can you narrow the range of at risk product? Process and supporting system records results from past testing results from environmental investigation (if available) knowledge of process flow and production schedules

At risk product: around time of contamination event PCS positive: sample size per batch of at risk product Product positive: sample size per batch of at risk product Sample typeLow riskMedium riskHigh risk Product n=5 Sample typeLow riskMedium riskHigh risk Product n=5n=30n=60

Testing once processing resumes Use results of investigation to date to narrow the range of at risk product Sample at risk product during processing based on random times or hourly Sample product and product contact surfaces at the same time For product with a short shelf life testing may need to occur on trial batches

Testing of at risk product and PCS once processing resumes PCS positive: sample size per batch of at risk product Product positive: sample size per batch of at risk product Sample typeLow riskMedium riskHigh risk Product n=5 PCS n=5 Sample typeLow riskMedium riskHigh risk Product n=5n=30n=60 PCS n=5

Intensive Microbiological Verification Commences after 3 days of “not-detected” for Listeria at intensive sampling size Continue for 4 days to give confidence that Listeria has been controlled Minimum suggested sample sizes given If a positive returned, resume intensive sampling

Continued Detections? Response to be escalated Usually indicate bigger more persistent problems Halt processing on the contaminated line(s) Engage external expert to review actions and assist in resolution Where processing continues, all affected product at risk Consider expanded recall Continue investigation into cause

Sample sizes Suggestions only but justification expected where smaller sample sizes taken As number of samples decrease, chance of accepting an unacceptable product batch increases. Costs involved in sampling and testing weighed against impact of making an incorrect decision Regulator to be involved in decisions on sample size

Micro Testing For product that will not support the growth of Listeria and that has a limit of 100 cfu/g, having the laboratory enumerate the Listeria could be used to assist in determining product disposition Lm may be further differentiated to help to determine whether the same or a new type of Lm is contaminating product contact surfaces and/or the product. By comparing the different DNA patterns you can see if: there is a recurring ‘house’ Lm which will have established itself in a niche or harbourage site or there are different DNA fingerprints of Lm it suggests that contamination is being introduced, e.g. from the external environment, ingredients, equipment, personnel.

Corrective Actions Dispose of contaminated and at risk product Prevention of recurrence and review of LMP after the event Documentation, records and reporting

Thank you