What Faculty Want Roger C. Schonfeld Ithaka Research www.ithaka.org/research ICOLC Montreal, Quebec April 24, 2007 www.ithaka.org/research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ithaka A Systemwide View of Library Collections Brian Lavoie, OCLC Research Roger C. Schonfeld, Ithaka CNI Spring Task Force Meeting April 5, 2005.
Advertisements

Why self-archive? Elizabeth Harbord Head of Collection Management.
Scholarly Communication through ETDs: Perspectives from Developing Countries Kamani Perera Regional Centre for Strategic Studies, Sri Lanka
Shared Services: Preserving Library Collections Roger C. Schonfeld Manager of Research Ithaka S+R July 1, 2010 JISC-CNI Edinburgh.
Lorcan Dempsey OCLC Big Heads – Heads of Technical Services of Large Research Libraries ALA 2013 Chicago 28 June things about
New Service Models. Why? Simply put: we cant do all you tell us you want and need Service and collection models that defined excellence in academic libraries.
Helping Information Services Organizations Meet the Needs of Scholars by Understanding Their Changing Attitudes and Practices Kevin Guthrie Ithaka May.
Caren Milloy, Head of Projects, JISC Collections OAPEN-NL #oapenuk.
University of Sydney – Academic Forum – 13 April 2005 John Shipp University Librarian THE FUTURE OF THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY CHANGES IN SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION.
Strategy and Leadership in the Transition away from Print Roger C. Schonfeld Ithaka Library Assessment Conference August 4, 2008.
California State University faculty librarians: What are our beliefs and actions with regard to scholarly publishing and presentations? Pam Howard California.
The Future Ain’t What It Used To Be UKSG Conference 2004 and Exhibition Manchester, UK 29 March 2004.
What Do Faculty Think of Electronic Resources? Findings from the 2003 Academic Research Resources Study CNI Task Force Meeting Alexandria, Virginia April.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Measuring (and Increasing) the Value of Academic Libraries Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Case Studies in New Models of Collaboration: CANADA’S UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES Carole Moore Chief Librarian, University of Toronto Chief Librarian, University.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Beyond Usage: Measuring Library Outcomes and Value Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
Strategic Planning Definitions Tennessee Board of Regents.
Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2012 Roger C. Schonfeld April 23, 2013 | ASERL.
Scholarly communication is an umbrella term used to describe the process of academics, scholars and researchers sharing and publishing their research.
Our Format Transitions Roger C.
TAMU 2012 Enrollment Undergrads40,100 Graduates9,600 Professional527 Faculty3,810 TAMU HSC 2012 Enrollment Undergrads206 Graduates959 Professional1,121.
Report for ALA Planning Retreat Sept 11, 2009 – Sept 13, 2009.
Bruce Heterick, Director of Library Relationswww.jstor.org CONCERT 2004 Taipei, Taiwan November 11, 2004.
Japanese Studies in the United States: Continuities and Opportunities Patricia G. Steinhoff.
#watitis2014 ONTARIO LIBRARY RESEARCH CLOUD: BUILDING A PROVINCE-WIDE RESEARCH CLOUD FOR ONTARIO’S ACADEMIC LIBRARIES.
Swapan Deoghuria Scientist-II, Computer Centre Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science Kolkata , INDIA URL:
Overview While is largely assumed librarians are closely monitoring the needs of their constituencies as a part of the collection management decision-making.
Findings from the US Faculty Survey 2012 Deanna Marcum New Jersey Library Association | June 5, 2013.
Barbara B. Moran SILS UNC-Chapel Hill Preparing Librarians to Work in 21st Century Libraries AMICAL Conference April, 2011.
UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management University of California, San Francisco October 2004 Scholarly Communication – Impact on Libraries.
Librarian Perceptions of the Function of the Academic Library: Summer-Fall 2006 Kevin Guthrie Roger C. Schonfeld December 4, 2006.
What Do Faculty Think of the Changing Environment? Kevin Guthrie Roger C. Schonfeld April 17, 2007.
E-books: a snapshot from the UK Dr Hazel Woodward University Librarian, Cranfield University, Chair, JISC E-Books Working Group G ö teborg University,
Embracing Change Oliver Pesch Chief Strategist, E-Resources EBSCO Information Services.
1 Open Access & Shades of Gre Open Access & Shades of Grey Open Access Increases Visibility of Grey Literature Providing an Essential Complement to Peer-Reviewed.
Open Access The Lingo, The History, The Basics, and Why Should We Care.
Primoz Juznic, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia 1 Using a decision grid process to evaluate library collections on the way to post-print times Primoz.
Caren Milloy, Ellen Collins & Graham #oapenuk.
What Do Faculty Favor?: Local Implementation of the Ithaka Faculty Survey in Illinois Paula Dempsey, DePaul University Susan Searing, University of Illinois.
Meeting the Challenges of Institutional Repositories: How Campuses Select and Prioritize Digital Asset Management Projects Stacy Nowicki, Kalamazoo College.
Faculty Survey 2009: The Format Transition for Scholarly Works Ross Housewright ALA Annual /26/2010.
Pat Thibodeau Duke University.  Brief case study – the Duke library  How did libraries end up here  Response – emotional, political, strategic  Collection.
Shruthi(s) II M.Sc(CS) msccomputerscience.com. Introduction Digital Libraries have become the source of information sharing across the globe for education,
SUPPORTING THE HE RESEARCHER Cardiff University 11 th May 2006 Janet Wilkinson Head of Higher Education “Helping people advance knowledge to enrich lives”
Digital Preservation Ontario Consortium of University Libraries (OCUL) Caitlin Tillman OCUL IR Chair With notes from Kathy Scardellato, OCUL Executive.
The Transition to Electronic-Only Format: Costs and Considerations UKSG April 5, 2006 Roger C. Schonfeld Ithaka.
Every library and librarian supports development LIBRARY COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT Prepared by: Hala Marzouka.
Liaison Futures: View from a University Librarian Anne R. Kenney ARL Liaison Librarian Institute June 2015.
1 WHAT’S IN A NAME? DEFINING OUR PROFESSION AN ADMINISTRATOR’S PERSPECTIVE James G. Neal ACRL/New York 15 November 2002.
Collection Development in the Sciences Julia Gelfand, UCI STELLA, January 2010 Julia Gelfand, UCI STELLA, January
Digital repositories and scientific communication challenge Radovan Vrana Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,
MORE THAN MEETS THE “I” Helping your scholar-practitioners demonstrate impact in the academy & beyond Rosie Croft, Royal Roads University Kathleen Reed,
USE PATTERN OF ELECTRONIC JOURNALS BY FACULTY MEMEBRS IN K.L.UNIVERSITY LIBRARY: A STUDY Smt. K. Usha Rani Librarian K L University, Vaddeswaram Guntur,
Portico’s “d-collections” preservation service Stephanie Orphan Positive trends in sustainability? Emerging approaches to archiving commercial databases.
Greater Visibility, Greater Access QSpace QSpace Queen’s University Research & Learning Repository.
Future Directions for Scholarly Publishing at the University of California Catherine H. Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of.
Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.
Background for the Library-IT Task Force #2 – Ithaka Faculty Survey Pat Burns Interim Dean, CSU libraries and VP for IT 10/2/ Library-IT Task Force.
Sarah Beaubien Grand Valley State University MLA Academic, May 2013.
The R EPOSITORY AS P UBLISHER OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN A DUAL ROLE BEN HOCKENBERRY SYSTEMS LIBRARIAN | ST. JOHN FISHER COLLEGE.
Digital Library Development: Springboard to State-Wide Access Barbara I. Dewey Dean of Libraries University of Tennessee.
SCURL SCS/GreenGlass Update Andrew Hall Sales Manager, UKI.
Institutional Repositories and Disciplinary Repositories: The IR Horizon Stacy Righini, Social Science Research Network.
Electronic Resources Collection Development Policy : Need and Challenges.
Emphasize “scholarly” and “universities” to distinguish TDL from other efforts. A digital infrastructure for the scholarly activities of Texas universities.
Libraries, Archives, Museums Working Together to Create and Sustain Open Knowledge in the Humanities Lyrasis Annual Member Meeting October 17,
ITHAKA S + R Faculty Survey:
What Do Faculty Think of Electronic Resources
Manager of Research, Ithaka
Presentation transcript:

What Faculty Want Roger C. Schonfeld Ithaka Research ICOLC Montreal, Quebec April 24,

Questions for Discussion How Faculty Members Value the Library As new options develop, the environment is becoming increasingly competitive for libraries. Should they manage a strategic retreat from the gateway function or develop a strategic response? The Future of Books Few librarians or faculty members view e-books as being fundamentally transformative. Will they be proved right? Preservation and Archiving Everyone agrees this is essential, and yet faculty are confused; how can librarians provide desperately needed leadership for preservation? Repositories How should repositories be managed if they are primarily used to store and disseminate local knowledge assets? How can groups of libraries tackle each of these priorities more effectively than individual libraries acting on their own?

How Faculty Members Value the Library Perceived dependence on the library is in decline. The buyer function is most highly valued. This pattern holds across almost all stratifications of faculty members. Is this the function to which the library adds most value?

Valuation of the Library by Discipline There are noticeable disciplinary differences in sources of value. The value of the library’s gateway function is perceived to be in steep decline among scientists and economists. As new options develop, the environment is becoming increasingly competitive for libraries. How can they thrive in this marketplace?

The Future of Books E-books are ill-used by faculty and rarely important to them, and few expect them to become so in five years’ time. There is widespread skepticism among faculty members and librarians that e-books can fully replace print versions (with notable disciplinary variation). Many librarians view e-book licensing as a very important function. Are they responding to faculty demand, anticipating it, or focusing on students?

Preservation and Archiving The perceived importance of hard- copies and of their preservation are in decline everywhere. Both faculty members and librarians have become more focused on preservation of electronic materials. There is consistent confusion among faculty; how can librarians provide desperately needed leadership for preservation? How should this shift be managed strategically, to avoid some of the challenges that arose from the massive reformatting of newspaper collections?

Repositories Repositories are far more common at universities than at colleges, although there is widespread interest in them. Their main use is for images and special collections, and cross- institutional sharing is important. The objective is to control and preserve the institution’s intellectual assets and locally- generated knowledge. How should repositories be managed and when should they be managed on a cross- institutional basis?

Questions for Discussion How Faculty Members Value the Library As new options develop, the environment is becoming increasingly competitive for libraries. Should they manage a strategic retreat from the gateway function or develop a strategic response? The Future of Books Few librarians or faculty members view e-books as being fundamentally transformative. Will they be proved right? Preservation and Archiving Everyone agrees this is essential, and yet faculty are confused; how can librarians provide desperately needed leadership for preservation? Repositories How should repositories be managed if they are primarily used to store and disseminate local knowledge assets? How can groups of libraries tackle each of these priorities more effectively than individual libraries acting on their own?

What Faculty Want Roger C. Schonfeld (212)

The Transition to an Electronic-Only Environment Faculty are becoming prepared for the cancellation of print versions to allow exclusive reliance on e-journals, but are less ready to see backfiles discarded. Future opportunities to contemplate strategic responses will continue to vary tremendously by discipline. A strategic approach is urgently needed, both on the campus level and across the community, to ensure that this transition proceeds effectively and securely.

Preferences for Academic Journals Maximizing the impact of their work is the most important feature of a scholarly communications system for scholars themselves. Disciplines differ to some degree on the specifics, but the “impact” generalization holds true for all. How can we best design a system that responds to authors’ understandable desire to maximize impact?