Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Atmospheric Mercury Measurements and Modeling at the Grand Bay.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling Atmospheric Mercury Deposition to the Sounds and Other Water Bodies O. Russell Bullock, Jr. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (On assignment to the.
Advertisements

Tekran ® Automated Mercury Speciation F.H. Schaedlich 1, Robert K. Stevens 2, D.R. Schneeberger 2, Eric Prestbo 3, Steve Lindberg 4, Gerald Keeler 5 F.H.
Air pollution concentration modeling by gis in riyadh
1 Source-attribution for atmospheric mercury deposition: Where does the mercury in mercury deposition come from? Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory.
Atmospheric Mercury Research Mark Cohen Air Resources Laboratory ARL Laboratory Review May 3-5, 2011.
N emissions and the changing landscape of air quality Rob Pinder US EPA Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
Shannon Capps April 22, Mercury cycling From
Atmospheric Mercury Modeling Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) College Park, MD, USA Meeting with John Sherwell, Power Plant Research.
The Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland Materials assembled for a discussion.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.
Mercury in the Great Lakes Region Sponsored by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation’s Environment, Economy and Trade and Pollutants and Health.
Evaluating the HYSPLIT-Hg Atmospheric Mercury Model Using Ambient Monitoring Data Mark Cohen 1, Winston Luke 1, Paul Kelley 1, Fantine Ngan 1, Richard.
Atmospheric Mercury Measurements and Modeling at NOAA’s Air Resources Laboratory Mark Cohen, Winston Luke, Paul Kelley, Roland Draxler, Fantine Ngan, and.
Wet Deposition of Mercury In The U.S. Results from the NADP Mercury Deposition Network, David Gay Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL,
Atmospheric Mercury Deposition to the Great Lakes A Multi-Year Study Supported by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Principal Investigator: Dr. Mark.
(work funded through the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative)
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
Grand Bay Mercury Intensive, Data and Planning Meeting, Jan 24, 2011, Georgia Tech University Forecast and Hindcast Modeling in the Grand Bay Mercury Intensive.
Trends in the Wet and Dry Deposition of Nitrogen and Sulfur Species
Simulations of Atmospheric Mercury with the NOAA HYSPLIT Model Mark Cohen, Roland Draxler, Winston Luke, Paul Kelley, and Richard Artz NOAA Air Resources.
Continuous measurements of the atmospheric concentrations of Reactive Gaseous Mercury (RGM), Fine Particulate Mercury (FPM) and Gaseous Elemental Mercury.
Modeling the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury to the Great Lakes Mark Cohen, Roland Draxler, Hang Lei, Richard Artz NOAA Air Resources Laboratory.
EPA PBT MONITORING WORKSHOP A NOAA PERSPECTIVE? Richard S. Artz and Jawed Hameedi National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Silver Spring, Maryland.
NOAA’s Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring in the Gulf of Mexico Region [April 2007 summary] This summary is updated periodically, and the current version is.
Trans-Pacific Chemical Transport of Mercury: Sensitivity Analysis on Asian Emission Contribution to Mercury Deposition in North America Using CMAQ-Hg C.-J.
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF GAS/PARTICLE MASS TRANSFER TREATMENTS FOR 3-D AEROSOL SIMULATION AND FORECAST Xiaoming Hu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State.
O. Russell Bullock, Jr. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division (in partnership with the U.S. Environmental.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Atmospheric Fate and Transport of Mercury Lake Ontario Contaminant Monitoring & Research Workshop Planning for the 2008 Cooperative Monitoring Year - Contaminants.
Grand Bay Episode March 6, 2007 March 6March 7. March 6.
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Inter-Tribal Environmental Council (ITEC) Clean Air Projects
Global Modeling of Mercury in the Atmosphere using the GEOS-CHEM model Noelle Eckley, Rokjin Park, Daniel Jacob 30 January 2004.
Thanks to David Diner, David Nelson and Yang Chen (JPL) and Ralph Kahn (NASA/Goddard) Research funded by NSF and EPA Overview of the 2002 North American.
Air Quality & Traffic August 25, 2015.
Modeling the Atmospheric Deposition of Mercury to Lake Champlain (from Anthropogenic Sources in the U.S. and Canada) Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources.
Mercury Dry Deposition
EANET activities and the applicability to model development Kazuhide Matsuda ADORC.
Mercury Measurement Programs within NOAA/ARL Steve Brooks, Mark Cohen, Tilden Meyers, Paul Kelley, Winston Luke NOAA/Air Resources Laboratory NOAA/Air.
1 Modeling the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland Mercury Workshop, Great.
 Great Lakes Areas of Concern  U.S. urban areas (pink shading)  Large U.S./Canadian 2005 point sources of mercury Type of Emissions Source coal-fired.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
Impacts of Cumulus Transport and Spatial Resolution on the Simulated Long-Range Transport and Source-Receptor Relationship T.Y. Lee, J.B. Lee and S.Y.
Using HYSPLIT to Understand Source-Receptor Relationships: Some Examples HYSPLIT Training NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Jun 2-4, 2009 Silver Spring, MD,
Point Source Deposition of Mercury in Northern Florida ”A Tale of 2B (or not 2B)” Kathleen J. Gosnell William M. Landing Jane Caffrey.
Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland
Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI Aerosol Modeling: Performance Evaluation & Future Year Simulations Talat Odman Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI.
The Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury to the Great Lakes Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland Collection.
Canaan Valley Institute-NOAA Beltsville EPA-NOAA Three sites committed to speciated mercury ambient concentration measurement network Grand Bay NOAA NOAA.
Why do we need atmospheric models?  to get comprehensive source attribution information...we don’t just want to know how much is depositing at any given.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
Atmospheric mercury measurements in the Gulf of Mexico and mid-Atlantic regions: Early results from an emerging monitoring network Winston Luke, Mark Cohen,
ARL Mercury Measurements in the mid-Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Regions: Status and Update Winston Luke, Paul Kelley, Mark Cohen NOAA/Air Resources Laboratory.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Source-apportionment for atmospheric mercury deposition: Where does the mercury in mercury deposition come from? Mark Cohen, Roland Draxler, and Richard.
2002 U.S. data from USEPA National Emissions Inventory (NEI); 2002 Canadian data from Environment Canada; 1999 Mexican data from inventory prepared by.
UNEP Global Partnership on Mercury Air Transport and Fate Research - Canadian Contribution - Grace Howland Environment Canada, Chemicals Management Division.
Atmospheric Mercury Measurements Winston Luke NOAA/Air Resources Laboratory June 22, 2016.
NOAA’s Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring in the Gulf of Mexico Region January 17,
NESCAUM MAC Meeting May 16 and 17, 2006 Newport, RI Mercury Trends Network (MTN) Is it MDN? Is it NADP? Is it USDA? Is it BLM? Is it F&WS Is it NPS? Is.
Simulating the Atmospheric Fate and Transport of Air Toxics with the NOAA HYSPLIT Model (with Particular Attention to Dioxin and Mercury) Mark Cohen NOAA.
ARL Contributions to the WMO Atmospheric Deposition Program Richard S. Artz NOAA Air Resources Laboratory June 22, 2016.
UNEP Global Partnership for Mercury Air Transport and Fate Research: U
Chemical histories of pollutant plumes in East Asia:
Air Transport and Fate Research Partnership Meeting,
Presentation transcript:

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Atmospheric Mercury Measurements and Modeling at the Grand Bay NERR Mark Cohen, Winston Luke, Paul Kelley, Roland Draxler, Fantine Ngan, and Richard Artz NOAA Air Resources Lab, Silver Spring, Maryland _____________________ Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum May 10-12, 2010 Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, FL

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Four Collaborative Comprehensive Atmospheric Mercury Measurement Sites Part of AMNet, an emerging inter-agency speciated mercury ambient concentration measurement network Grand Bay with Grand Bay NERR, USEPA, Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality, and Jackson State University Canaan Valley with Canaan Valley Inst. and Univ. of Maryland Appalachian Lab Allegheny Portage with Canaan Valley Institute and National Park Service Beltsville with USEPA, Univ. of Maryland, and MD DNR Type of Source coal-fired power plants other fuel combustion waste incineration metallurgical manufacturing & other 2002 Mercury Emissions data from USEPA, Envr. Canada, and CEC (kg/yr) – – – –3500

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Grand Bay NERR site often sees Gulf of Mexico air masses, but is potentially influenced by several regional mercury emissions sources Barry Holcim Cement NOAA Grand Bay NERR Hg site Weeks Bay OLF Molino Pace Ellyson Watson AL24 AL02 Crist Pascagoula MSW incin haz waste incin Daniel Mobile Bay Mobile Pascagoula MississippiAlabama NOAA SEARCH USGS UWF/FSU MDN Monitoring Site coal-fired power plant waste incinerator manufacturing metallurgical other fuel combustion type of source total atmospheric mercury emissions (kg/yr, 1999 EPA NEI) – 50 Pensacola MS 22 where the wind comes from that we see at Grand Bay paper manuf

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring Station at the Grand Bay NERR view from top of the tower mercury and trace gas monitoring tower (10 meters)

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Some of the instrumentation inside the trailer at the Grand Bay NERR site

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Measurements began in 2006 and the site has evolved over time : site selection Jan 2008: NO/NO y added Feb 2007: Meteorological measurements added 2010: MS DEP adds comprehensive suite of wet deposition measurements with funding from USEPA Jan 2010: Black Carbon added Oct 2007: Move to “coastal” site near Pavillion; 2 nd Tekran speciated Hg measurement suite added Sept 2006: Speciated Hg, SO 2, O 3, and CO measurements begin at “inland” site Summer 2010: Field Intensive (being planned) Aug 21 – Oct 5, 2008: site shut down due to threat of hurricanes

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Atmospheric mercury measurements are very challenging “Hmmm… maybe better if the tower goes vertical?”

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida The people who are making the measurements Winston Luke Principal Investigator, NOAA Air Resources Lab Paul Kelley Instrument engineer, data acquisition and management, NOAA Air Resources Lab Jake Walker Site Operator, Grand Bay NERR

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Current Atmospheric Measurements of Ambient Air Concentrations and Meteorological Data Elemental mercury (two instruments) Fine particulate mercury (two instruments) Reactive gaseous mercury (two instruments) Sulfur dioxide Ozone Carbon Monoxide Nitrogen Oxides (NO, NOy) Aerosol Black Carbon Wind speed, Wind Direction Temperature, Relative Humidity Precipitation Amount “Speciated” Atmospheric Mercury Concentrations Trace gases and other measurements to help understand and interpret mercury data Meteorological Data

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Wet Deposition Measurements added in 2010 by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Protection (Henry Folmar, Becky Comyns, others), with funding from the USEPA Precipitation Continuous digital measurement of precipitation amount Major Ions pH, SO 4 -2, NO 3 -, PO 4 -3, Cl -, NH 4 +, Ca +2, Mg +2, K +, Na + Weekly measurements of concentrations in precipitation (NADP-NTN) Total Mercury Weekly measurements of concentration in precipitation (NADP-MDN) Methyl Mercury Monthly measurements of concentration in precipitation (composite) Selected Trace Metals As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni, Se, Zn Weekly measurements of concentrations in precipitation (MDN Heavy Metal Protocol)

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Example of Ambient Concentration Measurements at the Grand Bay site The two sets of speciated mercury measurements generally track each other well Sometimes we see relatively pronounced peaks in one or more forms of mercury (in this example, RGM)

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida With two speciation units, can get continuous data and can also carry out methodological experiments  PINK data points: two systems were configured identically, to allow only particles less than 2.5 microns to be analyzed  BLUE data points: System 2 was altered to allow particles up to 10 microns to be analyzed  Results suggest that there may be as much mercury in the coarse (sea salt) aerosol fraction as in the fine fraction.

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Grand Bay Field Intensive Scheduled for July-Aug 2010 Ground-Based Measurements (ongoing) mercury, trace gas, black carbon, met data Winston Luke and Paul Kelley (NOAA ARL), Jake Walker (Grand Bay NERR) (ongoing) wet deposition: major ions, mercury, methyl-Hg, trace metals Will try to switch to event-based during intensive Mississippi State Dept of Env Protection/EPA Jake Walker (Grand Bay NERR) ambient concentrations of BrO at the surface via Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry (and possibly other Br compounds, e.g., Br2, BrCl, and HOBr Greg Huey (Georgia Tech) isotopic mercury analysis of event-based precipitation and aerosols Bill Landing, Flip Froelich (Florida State Univ) trace metal analysis of size-segregated aerosol Spring 2010 and possibly during intensive Mark Engle (USGS) Aircraft and Above Surface Measurements aircraft flights measuring concentrations of Hg 0 (Tekran), total and “speciated” RGM (coated/uncoated denuders), O 3, SO 2, and particle count Stephen Corda, John Muratore, & colleagues (Univ. of Tennessee Space Institute – UTSI) Hynes and Swartzendruber (Univ of Miami) Luke and Kelley (NOAA ARL) vertical distribution of O 3 and met data above the site (ozonesondes) Luke and Kelley (NOAA ARL) Jake Walker (Grand Bay NERR)

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Atmospheric Fate and Transport: Measurements and Modeling emissions of Hg(0), Hg(II), Hg(p) Hg from other sources: local, regional & more distant wet and dry deposition to the water surface  Enhanced oxidation of Hg(0) to RGM?  Enhanced deposition? Reactive halogens in marine boundary layer  Model evaluation?  Source attribution for deposition?  Want to provide deposition estimates to GOM ecosystem models Measurement of wet deposition Measurement of ambient air concentrations wet and dry deposition to the watershed

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida HYSPLIT-Hg -- a specially configured version of the HYSPLIT atmospheric fate and transport model  Puffs or particles emitted from a source  Chemistry, dispersion and deposition simulated  Puffs grow and split  Splitting can overwhelm computational resources

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida HYSPLIT-Hg now includes an integrated Eulerian grid  In HYSPLIT (4.9), puffs are “transferred” to an Eulerian grid after a specified time (e.g., 96 hrs)  the mercury in those puffs is simulated on that grid from then on…  Combines plume simulation in short- range with Eulerian simulation for long- range transport

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Initial Model Evaluation focusing on episodes  Can the model reproduce episodes of high measured mercury concentrations?  Can the model reproduce high mercury wet deposition episodes?

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Meteorological data: a critical model input  During model evaluation exercises, want to diagnose weaknesses in model physics and chemistry, without large influence of met data errors  Would like to examine trade-off between high-resolution and coarser met data sets, which are more routinely available  Dr. Venkata Dodla (JSU) and Dr. Fantine Ngan (NOAA ARL) are creating high resolution, ground- truthed met data sets for episodes in the region around the site (e.g., horizontal resolution of 4 km) Wind speed (shaded) & wind vector (arrows) on 5/6/08, 18 UTC (approx time of episode peak)

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Emissions data: a critical model input  In model evaluation, want to diagnose weaknesses in model without large influence of emissions errors  Need accurate, speciated emissions estimates for all sources impacting the site – for the time period of the episode  Need accurate emissions data for any assessment  We all need accurate emissions information.  How can we share what we already have, and improve the information where needed? Pascagoula MSW Incinerator shut down in Jan 2001, but still in 2002 NEI CRIST: New scrubber installed Dec 2009 will dramatically reduce RGM emissions Lowman reported dramatic drop in mercury emissions in 2008 TRI Brewton paper mill : Hg emissions in 2002 NEI, but do not appear in TRI IPSCO Steel: significant Hg emissions in 2002 NEI, but negligible emissions in 2008 TRI Large mercury emissions point sources from USEPA 2002 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) Grand Bay NERR site

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Collaboration with Jackson State University on atmospheric mercury modeling in the region  led by Shelton Swanier and Anjaneyulu Yerramilli, the director of the Trent Lott Geospatial and Visualization Center  Manuscript in preparation analyzing the May high-RGM episode at the site.  High-resolution met data (4 km) is being generated and utilized  ALSO: JSU Professor Jerzy Leszczynski and colleagues are carrying out computational chemistry estimates of atmospherically relevant reactions of mercury Manuscript in Preparation

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida (Evolving) Atmospheric Chemical Reaction Scheme for Mercury  Complete?  Accurate?  Concentrations of Reactants?  What is RGM?

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida HYSPLIT Training

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida  Jake Walker, Mark Woodrey, Glen Ruple (Grand Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve)  Shelton Swanier, Jerzy Lesczcynski, Yerramilli Anjaneyulu, Venkatesh Dodla, Hari Dasari, & others (Jackson State Univ.)  Steve Brooks (NOAA ATDD and Canann Valley Institute)  Glenn Rolph, Barbara Stunder, Ariel Stein, Steve Fine (NOAA Air Resources Laboratory)  David Schmeltz, Tim Sharac, Rick Haeuber, Sam Napolitano (US EPA Clean Air Markets Division)  Gary Matlock, Russell Callender, Jawed Hameedi (NOAA NOS Nat’l Centers for Coastal Ocean Science)  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service -- Grand Bay National Wildlife Refuge Acknowledgements

Site Collaborators / Co-locators Ambient Air MeasurementsPrecipitation Dry Deposition Other M ercury Speciation SO 2 O3O3 NO/NO y CO Carbon black Major Ions (NTN) Mercury (MDN) Trace Metals Surrogate Surface Throughfall Meteorology Beltsville (MD)  PI = Winston Luke (NOAA)  EPA Clean Air Markets Division  Univ of Maryland  Maryland DNR  MACTEC  USGS Grand Bay (MS)  PI = Winston Luke (NOAA)  Grand Bay NERR  MS Dept Envr Quality  U.S. EPA  U.S. Fish & Wildlife Agency Canaan Valley (WV)  PI = Steve Brooks(CVI/NOAA  Canaan Valley Institute  Univ Md Frostburg Appalachian Lab  USGS Allegheny Portage (PA)  PI = Steve Brooks (CVI/NOAA)  Canaan Valley Institute  Pennsylvania DEP  National Park Service NOAA-led measurement Co-located measurement Summary of NOAA ARL Mercury Measurement Sites

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Where in the world is Bill Landing?

Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida We may be able to measure atmospheric impacts at the site from the BP / DEEPWATER HORIZON oil spill Wind Rose estimated for the Grand Bay NERR site, for the months of May and June, from