APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Advertisements

Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
National Survey of Student Engagement Department of Institutional Research and Planning December 2006.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
The College of Education We develop educational leaders who create tomorrow’s opportunities.
NSSE When?Spring, 2008 Who?Freshmen and Seniors random sample How?Electronic and Snail mail follow up Respondents?30% response rate 26% freshmen.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2002.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
Student Engagement at Northeastern Illinois Analysis and Use of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2009.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
NSSE 2005: Student Perceptions of Enriching Educational Experiences Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 18, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
BEAMS – Using NSSE Data: Understanding the Benchmark Reports.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
 NSSE Results Austin Peay State University.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
Faculty Senate Pat Hulsebosch, Office of Academic Quality 11/17/08.
2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Most & Least Frequent Activities.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Dissertation Findings
NSSE Results for Faculty
The University of Texas-Pan American
The University of Texas-Pan American
Director, Institutional Research
GGC and Student Engagement
Faculty In-Service Week
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness

NSSE 2009 Benchmark Comparisons

NSSE Indicators of Effective Educational Practice Level of Academic Challenge Active & Collaborative Learning Enriching Educational Experiences Student – Faculty Interaction Supportive Campus Environment

Level of Academic Challenge  Preparing for class  Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings  Number of written papers or reports & their length  Coursework emphasizes:  Analysis of the basic elements of an idea, experience or theory  Synthesis and organizing of ideas, information, or experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationships  Making of judgments about the value of information, arguments, or methods  Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations  Working harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations  Campus environment emphasizes: Spending significant amount of time studying and on academic work.

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) APSU and Peers

Active and Collaborative Learning  Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions  Made a class presentation  Worked with other students on projects during class  Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments  Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary)  Participated in a community-based project (e.g., service learning) as part of a regular course  Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

Benchmark 2 Active & Collaborative Learning (ACL)

Student-Faculty Interaction  Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor  Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor  Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class  Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student-life activities, etc.)  Received prompt written or oral feedback from faculty on your academic performance  Worked on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements

Benchmark 3 Student-Faculty Interaction (SFI)

Enriching Educational Experiences  Participating in co-curricular activities  Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment  Community service or volunteer work  Foreign language coursework / Study abroad  Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project/thesis, etc.)  Serious conversations with students of different religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values  Serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity than your own  Using electronic medium (e.g., listserv, chat group, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment  Campus environment encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds  Participate in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together

Benchmark 4 Enriching Educational Experiences (EEE)

Supportive Campus Environment  Campus environment  Provides the support you need to help you succeed academically  Helps you cope with your non-academic responsibilities  Provides the support you need to thrive socially  Quality of relationships  With other students  With Faculty members  With administrative personnel and offices

Benchmark 5 Supportive Campus Environment (SCE)

Details, Details, Details

NSSE 2009 Survey Population and Respondents  3,798 APSU students were invited to participate, 1,019 responded (27%)  Peers  28% for THEC Peer Institutions  33% for Carnegie Class

Comparison between APSU Students & NSSE Respondents

Contact Information NSSE Web site National Survey of Student Engagement Center for Postsecondary Research Indiana University Bloomington Phone: APSU Contact with NSSE: Patty Mulkeen