Guidelines for NHANES Research Proposal Submission by Natalie Dupree Margaret McDowell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to write a study protocol Hanne-Merete Eriksen (based on Epiet 2004)
Advertisements

Is it Research?. Is It Research? 2 Elements –The project involves a systematic investigation –The design (meaning goal, purpose, or intent) of the investigation.
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
How to Prepare for a FTCA Site Visit Office Hours
Survey Design Steps in Conducting a survey.  There are two basic steps for conducting a survey  Design and Planning  Data Collection.
Chapter 13 Survey Designs
Midterm Review Evaluation & Research Concepts Proposals & Research Design Measurement Sampling Survey methods.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Survey Designs EDUC 640- Dr. William M. Bauer
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Format of a Research Proposal Being Neat Evaluating the Studies You Read Planning the Actual Research.
Supporting Statement Outline. A.JUSTIFICATION 1.Need for the Information Collection: – Describe the information collection activity under review. – Explain.
Introduction to Proposal Writing Proposal Development Team Office of Research & Sponsored Projects (ORSP) September 30, 2009.
Tool for Assessing Statistical Capacity (TASC) The development of TASC was sponsored by United States Agency for International Development.
Preparing a Successful SHRM Foundation Grant Application Lynn McFarland, Ph.D. August 23, 2012.
ACS Update and ACS 2006 Content Test Susan Schechter Chief, American Community Survey Office SDC/BIDC and FSCPE Joint Session March 26, 2007.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Research Design & the Research Proposal Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches Dr. Mary Alberici PY550 Research Methods and Statistics.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Resource Development for Tobacco Control José L. Castro International Union Against Tuberculosis.
FUNDING A PROJECT STEPS IN DEVELOPING A PROPOSAL.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Tour of the Website Tatiana Louis, MS National Center for Health Statistics.
Is Your Research Ethical? The application of Research Ethics Guidelines to Regional Health Authority Research Dr Alan Katz Need to Know: June 9, 2003.
Evaluating a Research Report
Part II: Planning Your Research Project Module Six: Proposal Development RESEARCH PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1.
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
 The IRB application  The Review Process  Summary of Protocol  Appendixes  Informed Consent  Recruiting materials  Research Instruments  Other.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Part 2 Labor Market Information Produced in Collaboration between World Bank Institute and the.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Global IE Network Support Sebastian Martinez Jennifer Sturdy Survey Coordinator July 2008.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM Office Location: 1350 N. Vine Ave. (one block west of Cherry Ave. & three blocks north of Speedway) PO Box Phone:
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
Best reference starting point for student newbies grity/irb/upload/IW-Preparing-an-IRB- Submission-FINAL.pdf.
Get Your "Party" Started: Establishing a Successful Third-party Evaluation Martha Thurlow, Ph.D. & Vitaliy Shyyan, Ph.D.—National Center on Educational.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Reducing Non-Response Section B 1.
New sources – administrative registers Genovefa RUŽIĆ.
Preparing national HES Manuals. What is the function of the national HES manual Documents the entire survey process Planning Field work Laboratory procedures.
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. Writing a Research Proposal.
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center.
Proposed strategies for future National Health Exam Survey.
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
MICS Data Processing Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Processing Workshop Overview of the MICS Process.
Senta Baker Sharon Moran IU Human Subjects Office Human Subjects Office IRB Submissions and KC Demostration School of Music November 13, 2015.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Clifford Johnson, Director U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics.
Protecting Human Subjects in Research A Primer on Understanding the Scope, Purpose, and Process of the Kaplan University IRB Prepared by the Office of.
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
Grant Writing: Specific Considerations in Clinical Studies Ravi Retnakaran MD MSc FRCPC Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, Mount Sinai Hospital University.
Quantitative research Meeting 7. Research method is the most concrete and specific part of the proposal.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. Chapter 13 Writing a Research Proposal.
Introduction to NCHS Rob Weinzimer, Special Assistant for Outreach Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics.
Developing a proposal Dónal O’Mathúna, PhD Senior Lecturer in Ethics, Decision-Making & Evidence
AHIMA’s Commission on Certification for Health Informatics and Information Management (CCHIIM) Test Development Process Jo Santos, RHIA Senior Manager,
PLANNING FOR QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION Day 2 - Session 4.
Overview Introduction to marketing research Research design Data collection Data analysis Reporting results.
Review of proposed outline for handbook
Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University
Leigh E. Tenkku, PhD, MPH Department of Family and Community Medicine
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Format of a Research Proposal Being Neat
Application for research Ethical Approval in Practice
UNODC-UNECE Manual on Victimization Surveys: Content
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Format of a Research Proposal Being Neat
Presentation transcript:

Guidelines for NHANES Research Proposal Submission by Natalie Dupree Margaret McDowell

Objectives To provide a brief overview of NHANES To describe the planning process for NHANES To provide collaborators with information about the research proposal preparation process

Goals of NHANES Study the relationship of diet, nutrition and health Explore emerging public health issues Establish a national probability sample of genetic material for future research

NHANES sample design Continuous data collection beginning in 1999 Multi-stage probability sample Annual national sample of 7,000 interviewed and 5,000 examined persons Estimates of population subgroups require two or more years of data

NCHS NHANES Program Staff Planning Branch Operations Branch Information Management Branch Analysis Branch

Planning Branch Activities Review current survey content Coordinate NHANES Research Consortium activities Prepare proposal guidelines Solicit proposals Coordinate review and evaluation of proposals Decisions

Considerations for topic selection and inclusion Safe, non-invasive procedures Proven methodology Prevalence of 5% or more Feasible in NHANES environment Funding available

Proposal evaluation criteria Methods clearly stated Public health significance documented Participant burden Data uses outlined Target group(s) identified Data relevant across other NHANES topics Confidentiality and disclosure issues addressed

Analytic issues related to planning survey content Cross-sectional design w/capability for longitudinal follow-up Validated methods and data collection instruments used. Ideally, a link between interview and examination content Minimum 2-year data collection cycle

Examples of Proposal Topics New questionnaire content Modify existing questionnaire content New examination component (e.g., nasal swab, dermatology exam) Lab analyte

What is the collaborator’s role in the survey planning process? Subject matter expertise and technical support QA/QC evaluation of data during collection Participation in NHANES field staff training Funding support

Confidentiality and subject protection issues Assurances for privacy, confidentiality,and safety of subjects Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval of protocol and survey materials Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval- especially respondent burden issues

NHANES planning timelines Pilot testing (if needed): 1+ years prior to data collection Synchronize w/survey’s 2 year data collection cycles (’05-’06, ’07-’08, etc.) MEC configuration lead time Survey information system and database preparation: ~6 months lead time

Research Proposal Guidelines for NHANES Letter of Intent Initial NHANES Program response Full proposal submission Evaluation panel review

Letter of intent Name of project Statement of public health significance Target age/gender group(s) Research objectives Summary of methodology Questionnaire vs. exam If questions – where to administer

Estimating Costs Questionnaires: Guidelines provided (cost per minute, cost to modify CAPI) Examination costs: Exam time, staff time, per sample domain Data processing and preparation costs CDC costs NHANES Survey Costs: sampling, instrumentation, training, and reporting

NHANES Resources and points of contact NHANES website NHANES proposal guidelines and planning documents Evaluation criteria NHANES Listserv NHANES Consortium

NHANES Website Overview of NHANES Questionnaires and survey components Data products and reports MEC virtual tour NHANES guidelines (future posting)

Summary Learn about the Survey Follow guidelines and instructions Select appropriate topics and target groups Link interview and exam components Identify funding Address human subjects issues