EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 1 Safety at Sea and Efficiency in Ports A European Project to Improve the Advanced Use of VTM EMBARC FARGIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BlackSea Region Meeting Varna Points raised by the EU Maritime Strategy of relevance for PlanCoast.
Advertisements

Safer lives, safer ships, cleaner seas Vessel Traffic Monitoring and Information System Directive 2002/059 Revising both UK SI and MSN 1784 Revising both.
Safer lives, safer ships, cleaner seas System Architecture Integrated Colin Brown E-Navigation.
Structure of dangerous goods Maritime Office in Gdynia.
Canadian Coast Guard Safety First, Service Always A National Institution in Service for Canadians May 5, 2003.
E-navigation, and IHO’s role IHO, Monaco, October 2014 John Erik Hagen, Regional Director NCA Coordinator of the completed IMO Correspondence Group on.
Irish Coast Guard Local Authority oil spill Contingency Plans.
RIS Directive October 11 th 2007 Annick Javor RIS Directive River Information Services.
HAZADR Strengthening common reaction capacity to fight sea pollution of oil, toxic and hazardous substances in Adriatic Sea Zadar County Zadar County area.
Coastal State Jurisdiction over Vessel-Source Pollution. Developments in the International Legal Framework.
Managing the Environmental Challenge 1 Gateway to Asia Conference November 2014.
Automatic Identification System
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
Satellite mapping of oil spills in the Black Sea D. Tarchi, A. Bernardini, G. Ferraro, S. Meyer-Roux, and K. Topouzelis European Commission - Joint Research.
IX Venice Regional Seapower Symposium of the Mediterranean and Black Sea Venice, 16 th -19 th October 2012 Interagency domain, challenges and opportunities:
1 October 28, 2010 CDR Stacey Mersel U.S. Coast Guard SECTOR New York Mid-Atlantic Coastal Ocean Observing Regional Association Panel #1: Maritime Safety.
Global Marine ProgrammeThe World Conservation Union Proactive environmental planning for emerging shipping routes in Arctic waters Julian Roberts Programme.
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g WORK PACKAGE 2- FINAL RESULTS WP2 Seminar / Baltic Master II Partner Search The 19th of Dec., 2007 Prepared by Jakub.
Prof. dr. F. Maes – Maritime Institute – Ghent University International Examples of Authorization for Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) Prof. dr. F. Maes UNESCO.
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES (NCOP) 24 OCTOBER 2007 BY MPATLISENG RAMAEMA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT.
KENYA PORTS AUTHORITY HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT
TOWARD EFFECTIVE OIL SPILL RESPONSE IN THE BULGARIAN SEA SPACES AND IN BLACK SEA REGION AS A WHOLE SPEAKER capt. Zhivko Petrov - Director of Directorate.
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g Workshop on future co-operation Kalmar, 12 June 2007 Prepared by Jakub Piotrowicz.
CETMEF Common Shore-Based e-Navigation Architecture
Particularly Sea-Sensitive Areas and Marine Protection Zones. A Controversial Issue that needs Interpretation Dr. Aristotelis B. Alexopoulos BCA College.
Rolf Zetterberg Swedish Maritime Safety Inspectorate Nordic Institute of Navigation e-Navigation Conference Oslo /17 Status of LRIT.
October 2009 Klaus Grensemann, Division WS 23 St. Petersburg 1 Development and Implementation of an Overall E-Navigation Strategy.
“SAFETY THROUGH QUALITY” Vessel Traffic Management and Information System on Romanian Danube ( Ro – RIS )
The IALA Vision for e-Navigation Nordic Navigation Conference Oslo 16 & 17 October 2007.
A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO S EA T RAFFIC M ANAGEMENT IN THE A RCTIC Per Setterberg, project manager MICE activity leader MONALISA.
19 october 2012 RIS in the Netherlands Ivo ten Broeke Cas Wilems.
UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes A unique framework for improved management of shared waters.
Edition 3 of The PIANC RIS guidelines Cas Willems (Chairman PIANC WG 125),
e-Navigation and it’s applicability to inland waterways
1 INDRIS Inland Navigation Demonstrator for River Information Services Cas Willems Transport Research Centre Ministry of Transport The Netherlands.
UPCOMING CHANGES TO CHAPTER II OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON STANDARDS OF TRAINING, CERTIFICATION AND TRAINING FOR SEAFARERS (STCW) By Capt I G Sangameswar.
Martitime Traffic Monitoring Baltic Master midterm conference Snekkersten October 2006 Łukasz Bibik, Maritime Office Gdynia.
FARGIS Seminar og Work Shop 16. – 17. mars 2004 Ved Reidar Kjennbakken.
1 The statistical approach for monitoring maritime safety used and developed by EMSA Béatrice Comby Project Officer - Production and development of maritime.
26/29 June - Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche UniSalento Room R 27 Judicial Training and research on EU crimes against environment and maritime pollution.
Maritime Navigation and Information Services (MarNavIS) Proposal for FP6.
CoRiNav Coastal River and Port Navigation A Research Proposal to meet DG Transport Task 2.3.1/12.
Maritime Navigation and Information Services MarNIS FP6 - Integrated Project C. Willems, C. Glansdorp.
Captain Robert Tremlett Infrastructure Communications Navigation (Light beacons, buoys, Terrestrial radio-navigation (including local GPS.
RIS Index – a tool for interoperable RIS services Róbert Rafael
Risk reduction and response scenarios BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.
Baltic Master WP2 Seminar Safe Transportation at Sea Kalmar, June,2006.
EfficienSea – Efficient, Safe and Sustainable Traffic at Sea TKI –toiminnan teemapäivä Kymenlaakson ammattikorkeakoulussa
MarNIS Maritime Navigation and Information Services FP6 - Integrated Project.
PIANC RIS Guidelines 2011 Edition 3 Smart Rivers Conference 2011 PIANC RIS working group Cas Willems.
1 GOFREP – an example of transnational cooperation in enhancing maritime safety and marine environment protection XII RS International Seminar St.Petersburg,
E-navigation – a global concept for safer, more secure, efficient and environmentally friendly maritime transport Finn Martin Vallersnes Senior Adviser.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 14 – Transport policy Bilateral screening:
MONTENEGRO Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 1 – Free movement of goods Bilateral screening:
Dabney P. Hegg Senior Professional Staff U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Centre for the Mediterranean Sea, Malta A REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR PREVENTION OF AND RESPONSE TO MARINE POLLUTION.
Klik for at redigere i master KLIK FOR AT REDIGERE MASTER This project has received funding from The European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation.
Group XX Members: Jessamyn Maban Renato N Ramos Jr.
Tim Wilkins Helsinki 7th March 2006
Eco-efficient innovations – to meet the challenges in quality shipping
Objectives Improve safety, efficiency of maritime transport and the protection of the environment; Improve efficiency and reliability of information flows;
SSN Graphical Interface (STIRES) and North Atlantic IMC
Legal Status of Seaports in the Republic of Slovenia
USCG Roles & Responsibilities During a Ship Fire
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
COASTAL STATE RESPONSIBILITY (IMO) – HYDROGRAPHY
3. SafeSeaNet A data exchange network and a standardisation of the main information available on ships (all flags) and their cargo Providing a clear picture.
Norwegian presentation on LRIT from a Coastal State perspective
Hydrographic Awareness and Its Economic Benefits
EU Maritime Policy and coastal flooding:
Presentation transcript:

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 1 Safety at Sea and Efficiency in Ports A European Project to Improve the Advanced Use of VTM EMBARC FARGIS conference Høvik Feb. 28th and March 1 st, 2005

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 2 EMBARC European Maritime study for Baseline and Advanced Regional and Coastal Traffic Management

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 3 EMBARC is geared to u Technologies for Maritime Administrations. u Transport efficiency for end- users.

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 4 Achievements of EMBARC: Validation of VTMIS Guidelines for storing AIS data The role of commercial users in VTMIS Practical implementation problems of AIS VTM at Sea Reporting High Risk Vessels Use of AIS networks for logistical players AIS and sensor fucion in a port AIS and calamity abatement in a port AIS and linear planning of traffic in a river Risk based nautical support in a port FSA at sea and assessment of oil abatement capabilities

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 5 Reporting in European waters VTM at sea and combination of MRCC with Vessel monitoring and Vessel Traffic Management Intervention convention and UNCLOS High Risk Vessels EMBARC’s contribution to Safety at Sea

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 6 CG3 CG1 CG2 A A B B Z Z Reporting and monitoring

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 7 EMBARC Reporting Precondition: All European SAR areas are one reporting area, with some exceptions such as Portugal and UK. All CGs have AIS monitoring system. If vessel is under coverage of AIS system no reports are made. If vessel is out of coverage and still in zone of responsibility vessel reports position at regular intervals How it works: Voyage from port A to Port B Vessel Z asks permission to leave port A to the VTSA VTSA gives permission to leave port Vessel Z starts moving VTSA reports to CG1 CG! Reports to all intermediate CGs and to final CG of Port B CG1 reports to SSN Vessel Z exceeds boundary from CG1 to CG2 CG1 reports that vessel Z has left to SSN CG2 reports that vessel Z has entered own zone to SSN Vessel Z exceeds boundary from CG2 to CG3 CG2 reports that vessel Z has left to SSN CG3 reports that vessel Z has entered own zone. CC3 reports to port of destination the ETA Vessel enters port of destination and reports to VTSB Vessel safely berthed and reports to VTSB VTSB reports to CG3 and to SSN the ATD V

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 8 The result is that: The master of the vessel only reports once The SAR authorities know what vessels to expect and they know the position of these vessels once they have reached the own area of responsibility. The same is valid for the monitoring authorities that also act as authorities for VTM at sea to implement possible measures according to the intervention convention. SSN knows when vessel change of SAR area since reports are gong to SSN. SSN is not heavily burdened since they globally know where vessels are and the national authorities know precisely where vessels are, using their coastal network.

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 9 VTM at SEA Based on: Support of the navigation of the vessel Reducing accidents and their consequences Enhance efficiency of movements Protect the environment Management of allocation of space through Interaction with the vessel

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 10 VTM Sea Centre AIS Coastal Monitoring network MRCC Vessels Lifeboats Heli’s RVTS Preventive HRV Enforcement, All vessels Remedial measures All vessels MAS Safe Havens ETV SSN Index server Pollution Abatement Rerouting Escort tug Dyn Mehra Stop vsls Littoral seas All AISvessels Outside VHF areas but still European waters All AIS vessels SATCOM

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 11 VTM in Ports Vessel Traffic Management VTM at seaVTM in Inland Waters CVTS Complete TI CRVTSPVTS Complete TI Coop & NonCoop System All VTS fuctions PRVTS Incompl TI Coop System Reduced VTS functions IVTS Complete TI Coop & NonCoop system All VTS functions IRVTS Incompl TI Coop System Reduced VTS functions Territ Sea Territ Sea High Seas High Seas

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 12 High Risk Vessels and how to distinguish them Risk/nm= Multiplication_factor(Accident Statistics)* Factor(PSC(black, grey and white list position)) *Factor(Weather(Location, time))* Factor(average casualty_rate(Location)*Unit of exposure(Location)* (Factor(oilpollution (distance to shore, pollution abatement strategy)+Factor PAR(location, weather, SAR resources)) Frequency Consequences

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 13 We expect that 20 % of the vessels may be responsible for 70 to 80% of the risk. Again 70 % of the risk is constituted by BF 6 and more. By taking measures we might reduce the risk of these vessels by 40% Pinpointing HRV is hence beneficial to risk. Are we able to do this?

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 14 In UNCLOS and related documents the following expressions are often used: Substantial discharges Significant pollution Major damage Pollution of the marine environment Art 220 UNCLOS indicates that the use of modern technology to detect HRVs may be used to: Predict extent of damage Management of risk if so identified

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 15 This requires that this article (220) may be amended so that the legal issues are parallel with technical developments: This can be done in two ways: Amend UNCLOS, (takes 10 years or more) Use the Precautionary principle and if a court finds that the precautions taken by a coastal State are reasonable and proportional then the coastal State may not be liable for economic damages to the vessel. Preventive easures by VTM at sea might become commonplace.

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 16 FSA to assess Oil abatement capabilities, and SAR resources

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 17

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 18

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 19

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 20

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 21

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 22

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 23

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 24

EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 25