WIPO-UPOV SYMPOSIUM October 25, 2002UPOV. Rolf Jördens Vice Secretary-General UPOV LEGAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS LEADING TO THIS SYMPOSIUM: UPOVS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measures Necessary for the Balanced Co-Existence of Patents and Plant Breeders‘ Rights - From a European Perspective – Joseph Straus, Munich WIPO-UPOV.
Advertisements

Creating a Research Use Exemption that Better Fulfills the Patent Bargain Katherine J. Strandburg DePaul University College of Law (2004 Wisconsin L. Rev.)
Dubai Conference May 2004 Molengraaff Institute Center for Intellectual Property Law (CIER) 2 OVERVIEW Domain Concepts Methodologies Problematic Issues.
Access to and Use of Traditional Knowledge A view from industry Bo Hammer Jensen.
25 October 2002Geneva1 Plant variety rights - The Breeders Exemption Tim Roberts © 2002.
Ato221 - WIPO-UPOV Symp. on IPRs in Plant Biotech., Gva, Article 27.3(b) of the TRIPS Agreement 3.Members may also exclude from patentability:
IRRI: The Experience of an International Public Research Institute.
Creating, Protecting, and Using Crop Biotechnologies Worldwide in an Era of Intellectual Property Philip G Pardey Professor of Science and Technology Policy.
Agrobiodiversity and Intellectual Property Rights: Selected Issues under the FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
Actions Developing in Countries Accessing the WTO System Vung Tau, February 2006 “US – Brazil Compulsory licensing.
Interface between patent and sui generis systems of protection of plant varieties The 1978 UPOV Act does not allow both systems to be applied to the same.
Convention on Biological Diversity, Traditional Knowledge and the TRIPS Agreement Yovana Reyes Tagle University of Helsinki.
IPRs in Plant Breeding a live debate Niels Louwaars Director Plantum.
1 International Workshop on seed Session: Intellectual Property Rights in Seed Sector Ben Rivoire Technical/ Regional Officer, UPOV Antalya, Turkey December.
The patentability of biotechnological inventions: The European Commission’s second 16c report Paul Van den Bulck Partner at Ulys Law Firm (Brussels) Lecturer.
India’s Plant Protection Issues Srividhya Ragavan Associate Professor of Law University of Oklahoma Law Center.
Climate change, agriculture & intellectual property rights.
Protecting Our Food But Leaving Our Harvest? Srividhya Ragavan University of Oklahoma Law Center.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
TRIPS obligations and flexibilities regarding life forms and plant varieties, and the effects of FTAs By Chee Yoke Ling Third World Network Asian Regional.
Exception to rules on free trade Need to strike a balance between free trade and other values. Member can justify measures incompatible with WTO Agreements.
THE PROTECTION OF PLANT VARITIES AND FARMERS’ RIGHTS ACT 2001 – INDIA Objectives: –-Protection of the rights of farmers for their contribution made at.
Seminar IP and Creative SMEs WIPO, May 26, 2010 IP reforms: a need for horizontal fair use? Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird &
SAREE AONGSOMWANG Foundation for Consumers, Thailand.
Udo von Kröcher 1 Enforcement of Plant Variety Rights in the Agricultural Sector in Germany Udo von Kröcher Bundessortenamt (Federal Plant Variety Office)
The Relationship between TRIPS and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) - State of play in the TRIPS Council - WTO Symposium on Trade and Sustainable.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
Genetic Resources Policy and Intellectual Property I. Ownership and control of genetic resources II. Movement of genetic resources III. Intellectual Property.
Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights FAO Regional Workshop on WTO Accession Damascus, October 2008 Hamish Smith Agriculture and.
Durban, South Africa January 29 to 31, 2013 Topic 17: Research and Regulatory Review Exception Regional Seminar for Certain African Countries on the Implementation.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 24, 2009 Class 8 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (WTO TRIPS); Global Problem of Patent Protection for.
© A. Kur IP in Transition – Proposals for Amendment of TRIPS Annette Kur, MPI Munich.
UNCTAD/CD-TFT 1 Basic Features of the Multilateral Systems of Patents and Regulatory Test Data Development Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights Hanoi.
Case 428/08 Monsanto v Cefetra e.a THE FUTURE OF BIOTECH PATENT PROTECTION IN EUROPE What every biotech patent practitioner should know John J. Allen.
Global Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights on Plant Genetic Resources Bonwoo Koo International Food Policy Research Institute International Seminar.
Regional Dialogue on EPAs, IP and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries Dialogue organised by ICTSD, ENDA Tiers Monde & QUNO Saly (Dakar), Senegal,
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
American University Washington, 10 June 2014 Marrakesh Treaty – Ceiling or Window to Open Sky? Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird.
CUTS International Capacity Building Training Programme on Advance IPR, WTO-Related Issues and Patent Writing April 28-May 02, 2008, Jaipur TRIPS – Article.
1 WIPO-KIPO-KIPA IP Panorama Business School, October 6 to 10, 2008 IP Strategies in Standards Setting Tomoko Miyamoto Senior Counsellor, Patent Law Section.
Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Session 7: IPRs II: How Intellectual Property Rights Can Affect the Daily.
Press clipping and other information services: Legal analysis and perspectives By Loreto Corredoira y Alfonso Professor Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Current trends in EPA negotiations in relation to IPRs Fleur Claessens.
Session 9: Cross-Cutting Issues. Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources  To describe the key cross-cutting.
Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Objectives of Day Four 1.To discuss and understand how intellectual property.
Reform(aliz)ing Copyright BCLT, April 18-19, 2013 Three Steps Towards Formalities Prof. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The Hague.
Respuestas a Nuevas Demandas Tecnológicas: Agroindustria 1.Discuss the meaning of sui generis protection of plant varieties (UPOV is one such system) 2.Outline.
PATENTS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS Presented By: Navdeep World Trade Organization.
Law and Policy of Relevance for the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Objectives of Session 6 To discuss the meaning of sui generis protection.
Position paper of APSA on IPR in plant breeding and Co- existence of Plant Breeder’s Rights and Patents DR ARVIND KAPUR.
E XTENDED C OLLECTIVE L ICENSING : DIFFERENT MODELS AMONG S CANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES AND LONG TERM PRACTICES OF STATES Warsaw, March 16, 2016 Johan Axhamn,
Intellectual Property and Public Policy: Application of Flexibilities in the International IP and Trade system --Limitation and Exceptions for Education.
Copyright Vs Patent Software authors lost their rights Benjamin Henrion Knowright2008 Krakow, 19 September 2008.
Dialogue on Competition Policy and Intellectual Property *
Overview of presentation
Exception to rules on free trade
Susy Frankel Victoria University of Wellington New Zealand
IP Protection under the WTO
Department Of Commerce
Sub-Regional Meeting for ASEAN Countries on the Marrakesh Treaty and the Production and Exchange of Accessible Books by the World Intellectual Property.
ECOWAS/ENDA/QUNO Dialogue SALY(DAKAR) Senegal May
Christoph Spennemann, Legal Expert
ACCESS TO PROTECTED WORKS: LIMITS OF PERMITTED USE
Legal Regime and Technology Transfer of Intellectual Property Rights
Studio Legale Sena e Tarchini
1999 MOSAICC 2001 CBD BONN GUIDELINES
TRIPS Art. 27.3(b) and Agriculture
Comparative L&Es in Copyright Singapore, 22 July Copyright L&Es Treaty
Presentation transcript:

WIPO-UPOV SYMPOSIUM October 25, 2002UPOV

Rolf Jördens Vice Secretary-General UPOV LEGAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS LEADING TO THIS SYMPOSIUM: UPOVS PERSPECTIVE WIPO-UPOV SYMPOSIUM October 25, 2002UPOV

INTRODUCTION §Importance of modern biotechnology in plant breeding §IPR protection is independent from commercialization procedures §Issues resulting from the differences between the scope and the exceptions of the patent and breeders rights systemsUPOV

UPOV

§acts done privately and for non-commercial purposes §acts done for experimental purposes and §acts done for the purpose of breeding other varieties (breeders exemptionUPOV Exceptions to the breeders right

§Article 30 of the TRIPS Agreement states that: Members may provide limited exceptions to the exclusive rights conferred by a patent, provided that such exceptions do not unreasonably conflict with a normal exploitation of the patent and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the patent owner, taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties. §Open multilateral treaties in the field of patents do not provide for the extent to which those limited exceptions may be permitted §Necessary to refer to national or regional patent legislation and to relevant jurisprudenceUPOV Exceptions to the rights conferred by a patent

§EDV concept maintains the access of all varieties for breeding §EDV does provide a mechanism to ensure a suitable reward for plant breedersUPOV Balancing the reward to the respective rights holders (essentially derived varieties)

§purpose of the patent is to protect the developer of the genetic element §purpose of the plant breeders right is to protect the developer of the unique combination of plant germplasm forming the variety §exercise of breeders exemption constrained due to lack of similar provision in patent systemUPOV The ability to exercise the breeders exemption in the case of varieties containing patented inventions

§Article 7 and 8(2) of the TRIPS Agreement §State could be able to implement Article 30 in a way that protects the breeders exemptionUPOV PROVISIONS WITHIN THE TRIPS AGREEMENT WHICH MIGHT ALLOW THE PRESERVATION OF THE BREEDERS EXEMPTION

§rapid progress in the development of genetic engineering §increasing number of plant varieties will contain patented inventions §practical consequence: breeders exemption could be lost or greatly weakenedUPOV CONCLUDING REMARKS §how the breeders exemption could be preserved ? §a burning issue

UPOV