PHDSC session Readiness of public health information systems to support Meaningful Use of EHRs through health information exchanges.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange

Advertisements

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.

R OAD M AP TO M EANINGFUL U SE. What is Meaningful Use in the Hospital?

Stage 1 Meaningful Use & Reportable Lab Results

Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.

Local Health Department Perspective Electronic Medical Record Software and Health Information Exchanges Kathleen Cook Information & Fiscal Manager, Lincoln-Lancaster.

Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.

Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.

Moderator: Kenneth L Stewart – Angelo State University Panelists – Annette Sobel – Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Billy U. Philips, Jr. –

Review of CMS Meaningful Use NPRM and ONC Standards and Certification IFR: Implications for Public Health Call # 2 - February 8, 2010 Presenter: Steven.

Sanjeev Tandon, MD, MS Public Health and Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services Public.

Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,

Linette T Scott, MD, MPH Chief Medical Information Officer, DHCS “Population Health” HIMSS NCal Educational Program, Sacramento, CA| February 4, 2014.

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Minnesota Law and Health Information Exchange Oversight Activities James I. Golden, PhD State Government Health IT Coordinator Director, Health Policy.

August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.

A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.

Riki Merrick, APHL Anna Orlova, PhD, PHDSC Lise Stevens, FDA Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, MBA – CDC CSTE Conference June 5 th, 2012 The findings and conclusions.

HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.

Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.

Kevin Larsen MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator of Health IT Improving Outcomes with HIT ASCO Oct

Lab Results Data Exchange Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.

Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems Unit 8-2 System Selection- Software and Certification Component 8/Unit 2 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum.

Achieving Meaningful Use – A FQHC Approach Andres Gutierrez, CIO Family Health Centers of San Diego September 24, 2010.

Public Health Data Element Standardization - A Framework for Modeling Data Elements Used for Public Health Case Reporting Case Reporting Standardization.

NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.

A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.

Mel Borkan June 18, 2010 Meaningful Use and Ohio Medicaid.

Universal Adoption of the EHR What is Meaningful Use and why should it be important to me?

HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup: Initial Reactions Dixie Baker, SAIC Steven Findlay, Consumers Union June 23, 2009.

Proposed S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative 1 Challenge There is a lack of harmonized activities to enable electronic data exchange between clinical.

Chapter 2 Standards for Electronic Health Records McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Public Health Data Standards Consortium

Medicaid HIT Program Jon Barley, Ph.D., Chief Bureau of Health Services Research Office of Ohio Health Plans

State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.

Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.

HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.

Page 0 10/19/2015 Welcome to the VMCoP Meeting July 21st, 2009.

Page 0 10/19/201510/19/2015 Meaningful Use of Health IT: Laboratory Data Capturing and Reporting Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, MBA CDC, PHITPO.

Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.

Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.

Public Health Data Standards Consortium

HIT Policy Committee Adoption/Certification Workgroup Comments on NPRM, IFR Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Retired Marc Probst, Co-Chair Intermountain Healthcare.

Component 8 Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems Unit 2 System Selection – Software and Certification This material was developed by Duke.

June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.

Component 3-Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Unit 15-Overview/ Introduction to the EHR This material was developed by The University.

Syndromic Surveillance Data Submission EHR & MU for HIM Professionals Resource Patient Management System.

HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.

Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)

The Public Health Laboratory Perspective: readiness to support “meaningful use” PHDSC Annual Meeting November 12th 2009 Mary Shaffran, MPA Senior Director,

Health Information Technology EHR Meaningful Use Milestones for HIT Funding Michele Madison

Terminology in Health Care and Public Health Settings Unit 15 Overview / Introduction to the EHR.

HIT Standards Committee Overview and Progress Report March 17, 2010.

HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard University February 24, 2010.

Page 0 12/26/2015 Welcome to the VMCoP Meeting August 17th, 2010.

HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report on Gaps and Next Steps Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard Medical School.

S&I FRAMEWORK PROPOSED INITIATIVE SUMMARIES Dr. Douglas Fridsma Office of Interoperability and Standards December 10, 2010.

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Updates eHealth Services and Support September 24, 2014 Today’s presenter: Nicole Bennett, Provider Enrollment and Verification.

Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.

Proposed S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative 1 Challenge -There is a lack of harmonized activities to enable electronic data exchange between clinical.

Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.

HIT Standards Committee Clinical Quality Workgroup: Progress Report Janet Corrigan Floyd Eisenberg National Quality Forum August 20, 2009.

Implementation of National Standards (LOINC, SNOMED) for Electronic Reporting of Laboratory Results: BioSense Experience Nikolay Lipskiy 1, DrPH, MS, MBA;

Moving Toward HITECH Healthcare EHR Adoption at the Dawn of a New Era

NAACCR Data Standards Activities to Achieve Interoperability Ken Gerlach, Chair NAACCR Interoperability Ad Hoc Committee June 12, NAACCR Annual.

Pharmacy Health Information Technology Collaborative Date: April 28, 2016 Presenter:Shelly Spiro, RPh, FASCP Pharmacy HIT Collaborative Executive Director.

HIT Policy Committee Health Information Exchange Workgroup Comments on Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) and Interim Final Rule (IFR) Deven McGraw,

Public Health IT Unit 3: Interoperability Standards in Public Health IT Welcome to Public Health IT, Unit 3. This unit discusses interoperability standards.

Electronic Health Information Systems

Presentation transcript:

PHDSC session Readiness of public health information systems to support Meaningful Use of EHRs through health information exchanges

Laboratory Reporting to Public Health Steven C. Macdonald PhD, MPH Washington State Dept. of Health Council of State & Territorial Epidemiologists

August 2009 HIT Policy Committee recommendations Improve quality, safety, efficiency, & reduce health disparities Engage patients and families Improve care coordination Improve population & public health Ensure adequate privacy & security protections for personal health information

Readiness of public health information systems to support Meaningful Use Interoperability –Capability to receive ELR, immunization and syndromic data –Capability to send alerts and queries Capacity for data management –Scaling up for increased volume of reports –Increased data dissemination expectations Capacity for clinical decision support –Current immunization schedules

ELR recommendations for 2011 Hospitals objective “Capability to provide electronic submission of reportable lab results to public health agencies and actual submission where it can be received” Performance measure “% reportable lab results submitted electronically”

ELR Challenges Condition selection Methods for testing “Capability” Methods for identifying reportable lab results which were not submitted electronically Methods for monitoring hospital compliance

Condition selection for performance measures All reportable conditions separately for each state/jurisdiction Roughly 70 conditions on the CSTE Nationally Notifiable Conditions list Subset of the NNC list where the conditions are reportable by labs in all 50 states –Further subset to conditions where testing is routinely done in hospital labs?

Methods for testing “Capability” Define "Capability to provide electronic submission" for those instances where no "actual submission" is indicated during the defined period –Small hospital –Rare condition Development of test protocols –Pilot before implementation?

Calculation of performance measure Methods for identifying reportable lab results which were not submitted electronically –necessary to calculate “% reportable lab results submitted electronically” –hospital EHR performance test ? Rely on state health agencies to document the proportion of results for reportable conditions that came from any given hospital as ELR reports vs. paper reports or by telephone ?

Methods for monitoring hospital compliance Attestation ? CMS “verification” using existing auditing mechanisms –Audit team could examine code mapping tables (e.g., local code to LOINC) –Audit team could supervise capability and performance testing State laboratory quality assurance certification bodies

HL7 Standards HL7 Version Implementation Guide: Electronic Laboratory Reporting To Public Health (US Realm), Release 1 Related standards –HL7 Version Implementation Guide: Orders and Observations; Interoperability Laboratory Result Reporting to EHR (US Realm), Release 1 –NAACCR Pathology Laboratory Electronic Reporting V3.0 (HL7 V Implementation Guidelines) –HL7 Version Implementation Guide: eSurveillance; Microbiology Transactions (US Realm), Release 1

CSTE ELR Workgroup Annual survey since 2004