Ag Water Summit 2008 Sponsors San Diego County Farm Bureau California Avocado Commission Grangetto’s Farm & Garden Supply Shuster Oil Cushman & Wakefield,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Borrego Valley Borrego Valley Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Integrated Regional Water Management Planning.
Advertisements

Help Needed in Washington DC Proposal for ICCA Board Consideration.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-
2012 State Board of Directors Orientation “Its good business to do business with an AGC member”
Public Workshop Implementation and Enforcement of Nutrient TMDLs for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake CA Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water.
WILLIAMSON ACT AND AGRICULTURAL CONTRACTS WILLIAMSON ACT AND AGRICULTURAL CONTRACTS Fresno County Board of Supervisors February 26, 2008.
Legislative Audit and Implementation of 2014 House Bill No. 560.
Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program Regional Board, Coalitions, and Landowner/Operators “What is this program about and where is it going?”
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
1 Williamson Act Public Information Meeting March 6, 2006.
Monitoring Agriculture – Strategy and Results Margie Read, REAII Senior Environmental Scientist Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program California Central Valley.
1 Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program (ILRP) Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program (ILRP) Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June 11-13, 2013 Kings Beach, CA Presented.
1 Overview of Draft Eastern San Joaquin River Watershed Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Joe Karkoski Program Manager.
Irrigated Lands Program Update – Sacramento River Conservation Forum Bruce Houdesheldt Director Regulatory Affairs Northern California Water Association.
{Your District Name Here} District Small MS4/Municipal Storm Water Update {Date Here}
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Water School June 20, 2013 Loretta M. Bates, Ph.D. University of California Cooperative Extension San Diego County.
Report On SRA Fire Prevention Programs Board of Forestry and Fire Protection June 2014.
Lake Springfield Watershed Nutrient Management Project February 11, 2015.
Developing a Waste Water Discharge Fee Programme in Sri Lanka Kolitha Himal Muthukuda Arachchi Deputy Director General, Pollution Control Central Environmental.
East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition Parry Klassen Executive Director Merced River.
East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition Parry Klassen Executive Director Merced River 1.
New Ag Waiver for the San Diego Region (including Temecula Valley) Water Quality Workshop Rancho California Water District November 6, 2008 Presented by.
Ag Water Metering Program Since 2004, over 11,500 water meters have been placed in all counties south of the Fall line. Data from these meters is being.
Training Module 3. What You’ll Learn In This Module Conservation Districts’ State and Federal partners Districts’ non-profit partners Other organizations.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Next Steps: Agriculture Conservation, Productivity, and Transfers Workgroup Urban Water Institute Conference.
1 A Regional Approach to Research/Monitoring in Southern California Chris Crompton County of Orange National Monitoring Conference May 10, 2006.
Regional GIS Councils. Overview State GIS Council CIRGIS Channel Islands Regional GIS Collaborative CCJDC Central Coast Joint Data Committee CGIA California.
Agriculture in Southern California Eric Larson Executive Director San Diego County Farm Bureau.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Paper to Electronic The Electronic Self Monitoring Report System (eSMR)
Local Government Assistance Phase II Storm Water Rule Erie County Department of Environment & Planning.
Stanislaus County Food Processing By-Product Summit Best Practices for Recycling Fruit, Nut & Vegetable By-Products Wednesday, December 15, 2004.
Los Angeles River Watershed
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region Current Agricultural Regulations & Proposed Conditional Waiver for Ag Dischargers (CWAD)
Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Credit Trading Program
FISCAL YEAR Discussion on Mid-Year Budget Adjustment: SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY DELTA ACTIVITIES 1 Tom Gau, Interim Director San Joaquin County Department.
Environmental Stewardship Program. Objectives Keep growers informed Promote the industry’s environmental stewardship efforts Advance efforts in sustainability.
What are some ways to reduce the risks to public health in drinking water from Salinas Valley? Andrew Mims Nitrates In Groundwater Presentation ENSTU 300.
Crossing the Barrier: Integrating GIS beyond the Land Records Arena Ken Curry Land Records Coordinator Land Records Department Trempealeau County Greg.
DRAFT PHASE II STORMWATER PERMIT New Requirements Terri Fashing - MCSTOPPP Manager Wendy Atkins – City of Sonoma Stormwater Coordinator With assistance.
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board - March 16, 2006 Total Maximum Daily Loads for Trash.
Cooperative Agricultural Monitoring on California’s Central Coast: An Integrated, Innovative Approach Karen Worcester, Staff Environmental Scientist Alison.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Asian Pacific American Legal Center Presentation to California’s Citizens Redistricting Commission February 26, 2011 PRESENTED BY: EUGENE LEE Voting Rights.
Stormwater Management William Taylor New Hampshire Wastewater Control Association June 13, 2013.
Asif A. Maan, PhD Environmental Program Manager II California Department of Food and Agriculture.
Proposed MMWD Rate Restructure MCOE District Business Officials November 4, 2015.
BAY DELTA CONSERVATION PLAN SEPTEMBER SUISUN BAY SACRAMENTO STOCKTON STATE & FEDERAL PUMPING PLANTS Getting Oriented – The Delta.
Available Funding North/South Lahontan Colorado River Basin Sacramento River Mountain Counties Tulare/Kern San Diego Santa Ana Los Angeles Central Coast.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
Central Valley Salinity Coalition Developing a Salt and Nutrient Management Plan for the Central Valley.
By Will Holoman. University of North Carolina – Wilmington - B.A. in Environmental Science – Marine Science Emphasis University of Utah - B.S. in Civil.
CALIFORNIA WATER ISSUES Survey of Wine Institute Advocacy Efforts Wine Institute Board of Directors Meeting – March 8, 2016 Tim Schmelzer, Director of.
Central Valley Salinity/Nutrient Management Planning Through CV- SALTS Multi-State Salinity Coalition Annual Summit 2/19/2010.
Stormwater 101 History of the Clean Water Act MARCH 22, 2016 WEST COVINA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
California Medical Group Management Association CAMGMA Ron Anderson President, CAMGMA.
Briefing regarding the new State General Stormwater Pollution Control Permit.
Inaugural Extension Council Conference
California Institute for Behavioral Health Solutions:
Agriculture Initial Inspections Update
Lower Rio Grande Valley Stormwater Conference
“Working with Grape Growers in the Lake Erie Watershed”
PROPOSITION November Water Bond Act
Water Use Reporting for Agricultural Irrigation Use in Arkansas
Salt/Nutrient Management Plans
Proposed Agricultural General Order for Bard Valley Regional Board WORKSHOP May 15, 2019 Logan Raub, Env. Sci.
Presentation transcript:

Ag Water Summit 2008 Sponsors San Diego County Farm Bureau California Avocado Commission Grangetto’s Farm & Garden Supply Shuster Oil Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. Eco Farms Avocado American Ag Credit San Diego Region Irrigated Lands Group

Water Monitoring Mandate Waiver #4 adopted Nov by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board: “No later than December 31, 2010, agricultural and nursery operations must form or join a monitoring group.” “No later than December 31, 2010, agricultural and nursery operations must form or join a monitoring group.” “No later than January 1, 2011, operators of agricultural and nursery operations must file a Notice of Intent, as an individual operation or as part of a monitoring group.” “No later than January 1, 2011, operators of agricultural and nursery operations must file a Notice of Intent, as an individual operation or as part of a monitoring group.” Monitoring group participants may share costs Monitoring group participants may share costs

Who Must Comply The Regional Water Quality Control Board defines an “operation” as any individual or entity that expects gross receipts from farming operations this year, or in any of the next five years, of $1000 or more

Path to Monitoring Mandate 1969 Birth of Clean Water movement in U.S Birth of Clean Water movement in U.S Calif. adopts Water Quality Control Act 1969 Calif. adopts Water Quality Control Act 1972 Congress passes Clean Water Act 1972 Congress passes Clean Water Act 1983 Agriculture granted waiver as “non-point” 1983 Agriculture granted waiver as “non-point” 1988 Non-point sources added to CWA 1988 Non-point sources added to CWA 1999 Waivers given strict conditions 1999 Waivers given strict conditions 2002 Waiver adds BMPs and nursery inspections 2002 Waiver adds BMPs and nursery inspections 2007 Waiver requires monitoring 2007 Waiver requires monitoring

Creation of SDRILG San Diego County Farm Bureau Board of Directors took action on June 5, 2008 to form a monitoring group that would give members access to the “join a monitoring group” option as prescribed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego County Farm Bureau Board of Directors took action on June 5, 2008 to form a monitoring group that would give members access to the “join a monitoring group” option as prescribed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board

Joining the SDRILG Farm Bureau membership Farm Bureau membership Fill out application Fill out application Pay one-time entry fee Pay one-time entry fee Provide additional information as required Provide additional information as required Parcel numbers, parcel sizes, irrigated acres Parcel numbers, parcel sizes, irrigated acres Parcel owner or operator Parcel owner or operator Crops grown Crops grown Site-specific BMPs Site-specific BMPs Pay annual acreage fee that will be established Pay annual acreage fee that will be established

Why Farm Bureau Membership? Membership is not required to comply Membership is not required to comply Anyone can form a monitoring group Anyone can form a monitoring group Opportunity for individual compliance Opportunity for individual compliance Farm Bureau’s responsibility is providing services to its dues-paying members Farm Bureau’s responsibility is providing services to its dues-paying members Farm Bureau brings advantages to the group Farm Bureau brings advantages to the group Leadership in place Leadership in place Experience Experience Staffing Staffing Facilities Facilities Access to legal assistance Access to legal assistance

One-time Entry Fee $100 per acre capped at $500 if paid by Dec. 31, 2008 $100 per acre capped at $500 if paid by Dec. 31, 2008 $150 per acre capped at $750 if paid between Jan. 1, 2009 and June 30, 2009 $150 per acre capped at $750 if paid between Jan. 1, 2009 and June 30, 2009 $200 per acre capped at $1000 if paid between July 1, 2009 and close of group $200 per acre capped at $1000 if paid between July 1, 2009 and close of group

Covering On-going Costs Annual acreage fee Annual acreage fee Directly proportional to size of operation Directly proportional to size of operation Fees may vary based on intensity of use Fees may vary based on intensity of use The larger the group, the further costs can be spread The larger the group, the further costs can be spread Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group charges $8/acre/year on 73,000 acres to cover annual $585,000 budget Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group charges $8/acre/year on 73,000 acres to cover annual $585,000 budget

We Are Not Alone So. SLO and Santa Barbara Counties Agricultural Watershed Coalition So. SLO and Santa Barbara Counties Agricultural Watershed Coalition Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group Ventura County Agricultural Irrigated Lands Group Yolo County Educational Foundation Yolo County Educational Foundation Lake County Irrigated Agricultural Lands Lake County Irrigated Agricultural Lands Nursery Growers Assoc. (Los Angeles) Nursery Growers Assoc. (Los Angeles) California Rice Commission California Rice Commission Goose Lake Water Quality Coalition Goose Lake Water Quality Coalition Sacramento Valley Water Quality Coalition Sacramento Valley Water Quality Coalition Westland's Water District Westland's Water District San Joaquin and Delta Water Quality Coalition San Joaquin and Delta Water Quality Coalition San Joaquin Westside Coalition San Joaquin Westside Coalition South San Joaquin Valley Coalition South San Joaquin Valley Coalition East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition

In Addition to Joining Group Follow best management practices to minimize or eliminate discharge of pollutants Follow best management practices to minimize or eliminate discharge of pollutants Conduct and record annual self assessments Conduct and record annual self assessments 2 hours of water quality management training annually 2 hours of water quality management training annually Maintain records pertaining to water quality management efforts Maintain records pertaining to water quality management efforts

What SDRILG Will Do Help participants meet record keeping and educational mandates Help participants meet record keeping and educational mandates Submit all required information on behalf of participants Submit all required information on behalf of participants Interface with Regional Board Interface with Regional Board Work with selected third-party firm to establish monitoring program Work with selected third-party firm to establish monitoring program Submit monitoring test results Submit monitoring test results Make certain all reporting deadlines are met Make certain all reporting deadlines are met Keep participants informed Keep participants informed

Why Now? Monitoring mandate moved up 2 years Monitoring mandate moved up 2 years Outreach to as many as 5000 farm sites Outreach to as many as 5000 farm sites Incorporate as 501(c)(3) organization Incorporate as 501(c)(3) organization Create database and capture data on all participants Create database and capture data on all participants Apply for Prop 84 funding Apply for Prop 84 funding Develop GIS mapping program Develop GIS mapping program Retain monitoring firm Retain monitoring firm Develop testing methodology Develop testing methodology Meet Jan. 1, 2011 mandate to file Notice of Intent Meet Jan. 1, 2011 mandate to file Notice of Intent

If You Do it Alone Jan. 1, file Notice of Intent Jan. 1, file Notice of Intent March 31, begin development of Monitoring and Reporting Program Plan ($7200*) March 31, begin development of Monitoring and Reporting Program Plan ($7200*) March 31, 2011 – begin development of Quality Assurance Project Plan ($7200*) March 31, 2011 – begin development of Quality Assurance Project Plan ($7200*) Jan. 1, 2012 – Submit Monitoring Program Report that shows plans will meet standards ($3600*) Jan. 1, 2012 – Submit Monitoring Program Report that shows plans will meet standards ($3600*) Dec. 31, 2012 – file first test report ($2075*) Dec. 31, 2012 – file first test report ($2075*) *Cost estimate by Regional Board

Monitoring and Testing Representative sites will be selected in each watershed that contains SDRILG participants Representative sites will be selected in each watershed that contains SDRILG participants Wet and dry season flows will be sampled Wet and dry season flows will be sampled Samples will be tested for: Samples will be tested for: Nutrients Nutrients Bacteria Bacteria Agricultural chemicals Agricultural chemicals Excessive pollutants will likely result in an awareness and education program to reduce contaminants Excessive pollutants will likely result in an awareness and education program to reduce contaminants

Monitoring Sites

Questions?