Domestic Production Activities Deduction – Section 199 March 26, 2007 Pamela C. Beckey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 9 Analyzing Results Using The Income Statement
Advertisements

General tax landscape.
IRS Practice & Procedure: Research Credit
Contents Section 181: Section 199: Basics Qualified Production
1 Chapter 8. Consolidations – Lecture C12-Chp-08-1A-Consol-Tax-Acctg PPT Howard Godfrey, Ph.D., CPA Professor of Accounting Copyright Howard Godfrey,
The Corporate Laws Amendment Bill, B6/2006. © 2006 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Corporate Laws Amendment Bill, B6/2006 – 29 May 2006 Introduction Presenting.
© 2010 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Sustainable Business Australia Counting the beans - retro-fitted commercial buildings Chris Leach Partner, National Leader.
By Law Offices of Wayne D. Gerhold One Gateway Center, 18 th Floor Pittsburgh, PA (412)
Global Rewards Update Sandy Shurin Deloitte Tax LLP.
May 12, Accounting Day FAS 109 Update Presented by: Shelly McGuire.
Mind the Gap: Evaluating Internal Controls in Pharmaceutical Supply Chains across Sub-Saharan Africa AIDS 2012: July Julianna Kohler, Revathi Avasarala,
University of Connecticut April 17, Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Items to discuss… Introduction Deloitte Overview.
Pricing for value Tom Friedman, Principal Deloitte Consulting LLP Global Consulting Leaders Symposium December 5–7, 2007.
Audit Planning and Analytical Procedures Chapter 8.
Chapter Seven Consolidated Financial Statements – Ownership Patterns and Income Taxes Consolidated Financial Statements – Ownership Patterns and Income.
Auditing II Unit 1 : Audit Procedures Unit 2: Audit of Limited Companies Unit 3: Audit of Government Companies.
1 Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. The Case ABC Molecular Imaging is seeking an Investment Bank to advise them on the sale.
Financial structure, management, and IFRS Reporting Creating value for growth Presenter: John Robinson Partner.
Schedule UTP Update July  Required for corporations that:  Issue or are included in audited financial statements that report reserves (U.S. GAAP.
Export Marketing and Strategy Section II. Setting Up the Business.
IAS 16―Property, Plant & Equipment IFRS vs. GAAP AUDIT The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances.
A537 - Corporate & Partnership Tax Instructor: Dwight Drake LLM Corporate Tax Instructor: Dwight Drake Calculating the Entity’s Taxable Income Taxable.
Trade Across the Americas: Bolstering Security and Efficiency Supply Chain Risk Analytics May 2015.
Chapter 13 Prepared by Richard J. Campbell Copyright 2011, Wiley and Sons Auditing Human Resources Processes: Personnel and Payroll in Service Industries.
1 §1411, Passive Activities and Planning Opportunities AGC Financial Issues Forum January 2014.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 13 Retirement Savings and Deferred Compensation.
© 2010 PIASCIK & ASSOCIATES, P.C.. Tax Strategies EXPORT INCENTIVE – IC-DISC 10% of Qualifying Export Income Tax Free RESEARCH INCENTIVE – R&D Credit.
Module 22 Operations of Flow- Through Entities. Menu (1) 1. Definition of a flow-through entity 2. Reporting the operations of a flow-through entity 3.
Partnership Classification What motivates choice to incorporate/non- incorporate? –Applicable commercial law –Tax treatment –Investment and Business Preferences.
1 Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments -Recent Developments- Xiamen University – 18 February 2011 Josine van Wanrooij.
© 2015 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved. Mexican Tax Overview U.S. Mexico Chamber of Commerce Mexico as a Global Partner.
© 2012 Deloitte LLP. Private and confidential. FATCA Update for Individuals Alex Jones November 2013.
Recent Financial Products Developments Jeff Callender Partner Deloitte Tax LLC June 25, 2008.
Tax Transformation: What does it mean to you?
Global Risk Management Survey: Fifth Edition Key Findings
Utility Sector Tax Services NARUC Spring Meeting 2007 FIN 48 Select Topics Presenter: Charles A. Lenns Partner.
Planning an Audit The Audit Process consists of the following phases:
Practical Aspects Of Participating In The Ontario Power Markets CERT Conference Pat Concessi, Partner – Global Energy Markets May 31, 2005.
Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. BSA/AML Update Peter Fitzgerald Principal Deloitte & Touche LLP.
DoC NTIA Digital-to-Analog Converter Box Coupon Program NPRM Nicholas Van Dongen, Senior Manager Allen Hockenbury, Senior Manager November 14, 2006.
RSM McGladrey, Inc. and McGladrey & Pullen, LLP have an alternative practice structure. Though separate and independent legal entities, the two firms work.
Tax Update ∙ Midwest IASA ∙ Ankeny, IA ∙ September 17, 2015 Brandy Vannoy, CPA, Partner.
Mike Wyatt, Director State Public Sector Cyber Risk Services
IT Control Weaknesses, IT Governance and Firm Performance Discussant Comments Gary Baker, Partner, Deloitte & Touche LLP Saturday, October 13, 2007.
Form 1120F and Schedules M-3, H, I & P
2004 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar SOP 97-3 Department of Labor Special Fund Assessments September 13, 2004 Bill Stanfield, ACAS, MAAA.
Deloitte Forensic Forensic Technology Conference of Regulatory Officers - CORO November 2012.
Section 199: Planning and Compliance Considerations for High Technology 22 nd Annual SJSU—TEI High Technology Tax Institute Section 199: Planning and Compliance.
1 Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. The Case ABC Automotive Products has selected you to advise them on the sale of their.
Analyzing Results Using The Income Statement Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: V Operational Tata Hidang II Tahun: 2010.
CPA Australia Chris Richardson 19 November The big picture: World income shares.
Chapter 16 Corporations. Learning Objectives Determine the types of entities that can be classified as a corporation for federal income tax purposes Calculate.
© 2008 John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ Food and Beverage Cost Control, 4th Edition Dopson, Hayes, & Miller Chapter 9 Analyzing Results Using The Income.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright (c) 2003 by the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc Principles of Taxation: Advanced Strategies Chapter 4 Income Measurement and Reporting.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright (c) 2002 by the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc Principles of Taxation: Advanced Strategies Chapter 8 Chapter 8 Multiple Entity.
McGraw-Hill© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
PDP & Graduate Recruitment. Supporting Lifelong Professional Development.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
HEDGEYE 1 SPEAKER SERIES: WALL STREET MEETS MAIN STREET May 6, RESTAURANT REMODEL ANALYSIS.
1Third Party Assurance Optimization and Control RationalizationCopyright © 2016 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Third-Party Assurance (TPA)
IRC 199, Domestic Production Activities Deduction December 2, 2006 NJSCPA’s Mercer Chapter Tax Seminar.
© 2015 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG.
© 2014 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved. June 30, 2014 Emergency Medical Services Authority Data portrayed in the attached graphic presentations were.
Employee versus Independent Contractor
Capital Project / Infrastructure Renewal – Making the Business Case
Innovative Financial and Non-financial Reporting
Modernizing compliance: Moving from value protection to value creation
Evaluating Financial Performance
Cooperative Tax Developments Co-op Professionals Conference
Presentation transcript:

Domestic Production Activities Deduction – Section 199 March 26, 2007 Pamela C. Beckey

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.2 Agenda Introduction -General Application Key Impact of TIPRA Changes Changing certain Section 861 elections Rev Proc Exam Experience –LMSB Examination Guidelines – Minimum Checks –IDR / Exam Experience

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.3 Introduction – General Application Deduction equal to a fixed percentage times the lesser of: –Qualified Production Activities Income (“QPAI”) or Taxable Income QPAI is Domestic Production Gross Receipts (“DPGR”) less COGS and directly and indirectly allocable expenses Fixed percentage increases from 3% to 6% for FY beginning after 12/31/2006, then 9% after 12/31/2009 Taxable income & wage limitations Broad application to US activities manufacturing, film, software, sound recording, construction, engineering & architectural, power generation, mining, agricultural

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.4 Introduction – General Application Requirements to identify DPGR and COGS at Item Level Definition of an “item” is critical –Shrink-back QPAI can be positive or negative –Loss transactions may not be excluded Safe Harbor vs. Substantial in Nature Documentation

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.5 TIPRA – Key § 199 changes TIPRA effective for taxable years beginning after May 17, 2006 W-2 wages include only amounts described in (e)(1) that are properly allocable to DPGR Pass-thru entities report each owner’s share of wages instead of 2 x 3% x QPAI

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.6 Limitation on W-2 wages May use any reasonable method to determine amount of W-2 wages properly allocable to DPGR –Method must be satisfactory to the Secretary based on all of the facts and circumstances Temporary regulations provide two safe harbors –Wage expense safe harbor for taxpayers using the § 861 method or simplified deduction method –Small business simplified overall method safe harbor for taxpayers using the small business simplified overall method

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.7 Limitation on W-2 wages (cont.) Wage expense safe harbor –W-2 wages properly allocable to DPGR are equal to W-2 wages multiplied by ratio of wage expense included in computing QPAI to total wage expense used in computing taxable income W-2 wages X QPAI wages Total wages –Must use the same allocation and apportionment methods used to determine QPAI to allocate and apportion wage expense for safe harbor

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.8 Limitation on W-2 wages (cont.) Wage expense included in cost of goods sold (“COGS”) determined using any reasonable method, including –Direct labor in COGS or § 263A labor costs in simplified service cost method included in COGS COGS often includes goods manufactured in prior years –COGS would therefore include W-2 wages from prior years attributable to DPGR –Creates difficulty in determining amount of W-2 wages in COGS

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.9 EAG caution TIPRA amendments may impact EAG members –EAG member uses employees of another EAG member to perform activities attributable to DPGR and does not have W-2 wages Each EAG member computes its taxable income or loss, QPAI, and W-2 wages, which are aggregated to determine the EAG’s § 199 deduction –With the TIPRA changes, an EAG member with W- 2 wages must also have DPGR to which the wages are properly allocable to qualify those wages as W-2 wages –What if EAG members file a consolidated return?

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.10 Pass-thru entities The Secretary is authorized to permit a pass- thru entity to calculate an owner’s share of QPAI at the entity level –By publication in the Internal Revenue Bulletin –Determination currently made at owner level Under TIPRA, a pass-thru entity must allocate its W-2 wages among its owners in the same way wage expense is allocated –Includes W-2 wages from a lower-tier partnership of which the pass-thru entity is a partner

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.11 Changing certain Section 861 Elections Rev Proc provides guidance for securing automatic approval to change certain pre- existing expense allocation elections under Section 861 –Interest Expense –Research and Development Expenditures Must file appropriate statement on Form 1118 with either the 2005 or 2006 tax return filing

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.12 Exam Issues LMSB-Directive re: § 199 exam procedures -December 6, 2006 Minimum audit checks to examine 199 and incorporated in a team's risk analysis Domestic Production Deduction (DPD) technical advisor, significant support identified from the Computer Audit Specialist (CAS), engineering, and international programs Each programs has designated personnel to assist in key aspects of § 199 relevant to their programs Designated 14 industry technical advisors The DPD is not an accounting method that would permit teams to challenge the computation at any time Directive to challenge in early years even when # is not material, significant issue seen with attempts to challenge later Identification of 199 as a Tier 1 coordinated issue

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.13 LMSB Examination Guidelines Minimum Audit Checks to be performed by examining agents: –Does the taxpayer's business make sense with the activity requirements of the domestic production deduction? –Comparison of the domestic production gross receipts (DPGR) reported on Form 8903 to the gross receipts or sales less returns and allowances on the taxpayer's tax return, line 1c of the Form –Is the taxpayer required to allocate gross receipts to remove nonqualified embedded service income, or determine the qualified income portion of a component of an item? If so, how did the taxpayer determine an allocation method? –If the taxpayer is required to use the Section 861 method to allocate and apportion deductions has the taxpayer used it and is it consistent with the application of Section 861 for purposes of the foreign tax credit, if applicable? –Has the taxpayer applied the wage and taxable income limitations?

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.14 IDR / Exam experience Standard § 199 IDR Describe qualified activities and income Is DPGR => Line 1c? –Did the taxpayer use the 95% rule? –If yes, show support Provide item-level detail files showing 20% safe harbor testing –Distinct preference for safe harbor approach

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.15 IDR / Exam experience (cont.) Standard § 199 IDR (cont.) Benefits and Burdens Describe use of “Shrink Back” to remove embedded services Confirm consistency with § 861 method for FTC and ETI purposes Confirm application of taxable income and wage limitations and show supporting schedules

Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLP. All rights reserved.16 The information contained in this publication is for general purposes only and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting, or tax advice or opinion provided by Deloitte & Touche to the reader. This material may not be applicable or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances of needs. Therefore, the information should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting, tax, or other competent advisors. Please contact a local Deloitte & Touche professional before taking any action based upon this information.

About Deloitte Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, a Swiss Verein, its member firms and their respective subsidiaries and affiliates. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu is an organization of member firms around the world devoted to excellence in providing professional services and advice, focused on client service through a global strategy executed locally in nearly 150 countries. With access to the deep intellectual capital of 120,000 people worldwide, Deloitte delivers services in four professional areas, audit, tax, consulting and financial advisory services, and serves more than one-half of the world’s largest companies, as well as large national enterprises, public institutions, locally important clients, and successful, fast-growing global growth companies. Services are not provided by the Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Verein and, for regulatory and other reasons, certain member firms do not provide services in all four professional areas. As a Swiss Verein (association), neither Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu nor any of its member firms has any liability for each other’s acts or omissions. Each of the member firms is a separate and independent legal entity operating under the names “Deloitte”, “Deloitte & Touche”, “Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu” or other related names. In the US, Deloitte & Touche USA LLP is the US member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and services are provided by the subsidiaries of Deloitte & Touche USA LLP (Deloitte & Touche LLP, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP and their subsidiaries), and not by Deloitte & Touche USA LLP. The subsidiaries of the US member firm are among the nation's leading professional services firms, providing audit, tax, consulting and financial advisory services through nearly 30,000 people in more than 80 cities. Known as employers of choice for innovative human resources programs, they are dedicated to helping their clients and their people excel. For more information, please visit the US member firm’s web site at Copyright © 2006 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.