Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Effects of visual and cognitive load on the Lane Change Test – preliminary results Johan Engström.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1. Define the problem by OBSERVING.

Advertisements

Correlational and Differential Research

©2014 IDBS, Confidential Statistical Process Control Workshop An Introduction to the Principles behind SPC Ilca Croufer.

Testing Theories: Three Reasons Why Data Might not Match the Theory.

Measuring Cognitive Distraction in the Vehicle Joel Cooper Precision Driving Research David Strayer University of Utah.

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005) 939–953 Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a.

Mobile Phone Use in a Driving Simulation Task: Differences in Eye Movements Stacy Balk, Kristin Moore, Will Spearman, & Jay Steele.

The Comparison of the Software Cost Estimating Methods

 Metacognition refers to a learner’s ability to be aware of and monitor their own learning processes.  Usually defined by it’s component parts.

The Use of Eye Tracking Technology in the Evaluation of e-Learning: A Feasibility Study Dr Peter Eachus University of Salford.

Summary 1 l The Analytical Problem l Data Handling.

Introduction to Database Development. 2-2 Outline  Context for database development  Goals of database development  Phases of database development.

Institute for Transport Studies Distracted Driving: An Overview Oliver Carsten Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds UK.

The Effects of Text Messaging On the Driving Performance of Young Novice Drivers MUARC: Kristie Young, Simon Hosking & Michael Regan NRMA Motoring & Services:

Software Quality Assurance

Experimental Design Tali Sharot & Christian Kaul With slides taken from presentations by: Tor Wager Christian Ruff.

Inferential Statistics

ETSC Best in Europe Conference 2006 Changing Human Machine Interfaces Towards the development of a testing regime Samantha Jamson University of Leeds.

Solver & Optimization Problems n An optimization problem is a problem in which we wish to determine the best values for decision variables that will maximize.

Handling Data and Figures of Merit Data comes in different formats time Histograms Lists But…. Can contain the same information about quality What is meant.

Principles of User Centred Design Howell Istance.

Theory testing Part of what differentiates science from non-science is the process of theory testing. When a theory has been articulated carefully, it.

Federal Highway Research Institute Evaluation of the Tactile Detection Response Task (TDRT) in a laboratory test using a surrogate driving set-up Roland.

CriteriaExemplary (4 - 5) Good (2 – 3) Needs Improvement (0 – 1) Identifying Problem and Main Objective Initial QuestionsQuestions are probing and help.

Testing Theories: Three Reasons Why Data Might not Match the Theory Psych 437.

Cognitive demands of hands-free- phone conversation while driving Professor : Liu Student: Ruby.

Comparison of manual vs

Direct metrics of driver performance

Why do we … Life cycle processes … simplified !!!.

Presentation on “On the Reliability of Implicit and Explicit Memory Measures” by Axel Buchner and Werner Wippich - Leonard Läer - Philipp Schleenvoigt.

. Do Now: 1. Differentiate between qualitative and quantitative observations/data. 2. True or False (explain why): A theory can be proven correct or incorrec.

Sekaran and Bougie; Research Methods for Business : A Skill Building Approach, 5th Ed; Wiley Scientific Investigation Ch. 2.

Learning Progressions: Some Thoughts About What we do With and About Them Jim Pellegrino University of Illinois at Chicago.

Research Questions & Research Hypotheses Nearly all research proposal-regardless of the research methodology employed in the study- include at least one.

Decision-Theoretic Views on Switching Between Superiority and Non-Inferiority Testing. Peter Westfall Director, Center for Advanced Analytics and Business.

Statistical Hypotheses & Hypothesis Testing. Statistical Hypotheses There are two types of statistical hypotheses. Null Hypothesis The null hypothesis,

How do we assess whether we are improving instrument design? Alice McGee.

Review of Research Methods. Overview of the Research Process I. Develop a research question II. Develop a hypothesis III. Choose a research design IV.

Comparison of manual vs. speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems Driving Behavior Simulation Lab Jannette Maciej ∗, Mark Vollrath.

24 June Thoughts on Jet Corrections in Top Quark Decays Outline: 1. List of some issues regarding jets 2. Figures of merit 3. Eg: Underlying Event.

Classify the theses you are reading. Historical Research Historical research is involved with the study of past events. Example: –Evolution of Hard drive.

The effects of working memory load on negative priming in an N-back task Ewald Neumann Brain-Inspired Cognitive Systems (BICS) July, 2010.

"Classical" Inference. Two simple inference scenarios Question 1: Are we in world A or world B?

NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 slide - 1 Analysis of Temperature Basic Calibration Workshop March 10-13, 2009 LMRFC.

V May-04 Driver Metrics Workshop: Interactive Tool For Assessing Visual Demand Begin ► To start, select the “Begin” button below and answer the questions.

 Example: seeing a bird that is singing in a tree or miss a road sign in plain sight  Cell phone use while driving reduces attention and memory for.

Intensity discrimination is the process of distinguishing one stimulus intensity from another Intensity Discrimination.

Hypothesis Testing. Suppose we believe the average systolic blood pressure of healthy adults is normally distributed with mean μ = 120 and variance σ.

Eye Movements and Working Memory Marc Pomplun Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts at Boston Homepage:

DIFFERENTIAL COMPONENTS OF PROSPECTIVE MEMORY? EVIDENCE FROM FMRI J. Simons, M. Scholvinck, S. Gilbert, C. Frith, P. Burgess By Alex Gustafson.

1 Prepared by: Laila al-Hasan. 1. Definition of research 2. Characteristics of research 3. Types of research 4. Objectives 5. Inquiry mode 2 Prepared.

Paul van Mulbregt Sheera Knecht Jon Yamron Dragon Systems Detection at Dragon Systems.

Combination of Speech and Tangible Interfaces for Automotive Dialog Systems: An Experimental Study Margarita Pentcheva.

LOGO Visual Attention in Driving: The Effects of Cognitive Load and Visual Disruption Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.

Natalija Budinski Primary and secondary school “Petro Kuzmjak” Serbia

Chapter 1: Chemical Foundations AIM: By the end of this chapter, you are expected to have reviewed: 1. the scientific method 2. measurements (uncertainty,

The Scientific Method.

Alejandro Lleras & Simona Buetti

Transportation Safety & Distracted Driving

Scientific Reasoning Forensic Science.

Metrics of time in longitudinal models

Counting counts Quantifiable methods and data easy to learn

Lesson 1 Foundations of measurement in Psychology

Yap Von Bing NUS Statistics

Issues in measuring sensory-motor control performance of human drivers: The case of cognitive load and steering control Johan Engström, Volvo Technology.

Gerald Dyer, Jr., MPH October 20, 2016

Lecture 1: Descriptive Statistics and Exploratory

Inference on the Mean of a Population -Variance Known

Scientific Method Vocabulary

STA 291 Spring 2008 Lecture 17 Dustin Lueker.

Presentation transcript:

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Effects of visual and cognitive load on the Lane Change Test – preliminary results Johan Engström & Gustav Markkula Volvo Technology Corporation Driver Metrics Workshop Ottawa October 2-3, 2006

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Background Existing results from (HASTE and other studies) show that visual and cognitive tasks have rather different effects on driving Effects of visual tasks Reduced lateral control (increased standard deviation of lane position) Reduced event detection performance (e.g. PDT) Speed/headway compensation Effects of cognitive tasks Improved lateral control (reduced variance of lane position) Gaze concentration towards road centre Reduced event detection performance No speed/headway compensation Visual and cognitive tasks both result in increased LCT normative path deviation – but could this common effect have different origins? Discussed at LCT TF meeting in Shonen Village in connection to reference tasks…

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Visual vs. cognitive tasks - definitions Purely visual=requires diversion of gaze from the road centre but no cognitive activity (e.g. just looking back and forth…) Purely cognitive=does not require gaze diversion (e.g. phone conversation, speech interaction etc.) In practice, most visual tasks involve a cognitive component – however, the degree of cognitive load varies (e.g. for the Arrows and Circles tasks the cognitive load could be assumed to be minimal) However, many real tasks could be regarded as purely cognitively loading

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Hypotheses tested Visual tasks mainly lead to reduced lateral control during the lane changes but also (to a lesser degree) to reduced detection performance Cognitive tasks mainly lead to late or erroneous detection Thus, both tasks lead to increased deviation from the normative path, but (partly) for different reasons

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Existing work: Mattes et al. (in AIDE D2.2.5, Östlund et al., 2005)

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Results, Mattes et al. (in AIDE)

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Method Same data as used by Mattes et al. in AIDE 30 subjects (subset of data in the study) No task priority in instructions Sign: content pop-up Secondary tasks: Cognitive easy: Count up by 2 Cognitve hard: Count down by 7 Visual easy: ”Ring detection task” – large difference between rings Visual hard: ”Ring detection task” – small difference between rings

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Results: First qualitative analysis, example 1 = detection/ interpretation errors = loss of control = Baseline = Cognitive (easy + hard) = Visual (easy + hard)

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology = detection/ interpretation errors = loss of control = Baseline = Cognitive (easy + hard) = Visual (easy + hard) Results: First qualitative analysis, example 2

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology = detection/ interpretation errors = loss of control = Baseline = Cognitive (easy + hard) = Visual (easy + hard) Results: First qualitative analysis, example 3

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Results: First qualitative analysis – manual classification of errors

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology First conclusions from qualitative analysis Qualitative analysis seems to support the hypothesis: Visual task mainly leads to errors related to reduced control, but also some detection errors Cognitive task almost only lead to detection/interpretation errors But can these effects be quantified?

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Preliminary results of quantitative analysis

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Quantifying loss of control (I): Mean difference of lateral position (~mean lateral velocity) BaselineCogEasyCogHardVisEasyVisHard Baseline CogEasy CogHard--- VisEasy VisHard---

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Quantifying loss of control (II): High-pass filtred standard deviation of lateral position BaselineCogEasyCogHardVisEasyVisHard Baseline CogEasy CogHard--- VisEasy VisHard---

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Towards quantifying missed detection/interpretation Fraction consistent lane selected (any single lane selected >75% of distance between two signs) BaselineCogEasyCogHardVisEasyVisHard Baseline CogEasy CogHard--- VisEasy VisHard---

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Quantifying missed detection/interpretation: Fraction correct lane selected (of those consistently selected) BaselineCogEasyCogHardVisEasyVisHard Baseline CogEasy CogHard--- VisEasy VisHard---

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Qualitative analysis of CogEasy vs. CogHard Almost all errors occur for CogHard..

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology Conclusions Cognitive and visual tasks have different effects on lane changes Cognitive tasks leads only to detection/interpretation errors – changing to wrong lane or continuing straight ahead (mainly for CogHard) Visual tasks mainly induce control errors (”overshoots”) but also some detection/interpretation errors These different effects clearly visible from qualitative analysis of lane change plots The effects can also be differentiated in quantitative analysis Present quantitative results very preliminary – further analysis needed Late detections not yet looked at (promising results from Trbovich)

Volvo Technology Humans System Integration Volvo Technology How can these results be used in the LCT development? Provides a stronger scientific basis for the LCT – better understanding of why the deviation metric is so sensitive to both visual and cognitive load Consequences for calibration tasks – both visual and cognitive reference tasks needed (at least in theory) Specific ”control error” or ”detection error” metrics could be used to quantfy the visual and cognitive components (as complement to the standard LCT metric)