Association of Defense Communities June 23, 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From Disaster Management to Resilient Communities.
Advertisements

Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy Priorities Sara Pinheiro European Commission DG Home Affairs.
Comparative Emergency Management
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Organization w A Small Independent Federal Agency w Headquartered in Washington, D.C. w 10 Regions, Caribbean.
DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES (DSCA)
A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management April 2006 Prepared By: The Spartanburg County Office of Emergency Management.
GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY Center for Infrastructure Protection and Homeland Security Integrating Critical Infrastructure into Emergency Management Programs.
 Emergencies can happen anywhere, any time  It doesn’t matter how developed a country is, or wealthy or prepared.   Impact on communities  Disruption.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 1—Community Preparedness
FEMA’s mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain, and improve our capability.
National Infrastructure Protection Plan
Preservation and Disaster Management. Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA’s mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that.
For Discussion Purposes Only
Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Catastrophic Preparedness Incorporating Whole Community Philosophy  We must plan for the real, not the manageable  Plan.
Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness Mr. James Kish, Director Technological Hazards National Preparedness Directorate.
National Disaster Recovery Framework Matt Campbell -FEMA National Coordinator for Community Planning & Capacity Building Recovery Support Function.
Progressiveness A Vital Principle in Emergency Management.
All-hazards readiness in the United States Learning to communicate and build a culture of preparedness David Passey Senior Representative U.S. Federal.
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 9b - Department of Homeland Security Strategic Plan.
Community Planning & Capacity Building Recovery Support Function Presented By: Michelle Diamond Community Planning & Capacity Building Coordinator FEMA.
National Disaster Recovery Framework Overview Presented By: Ken Rathje Federal Disaster Recovery Coordinator FEMA Region III.
Disaster Drills, Testing, and Evaluation  A part of any management program, testing, and evaluation is critical.  The purpose of an organized drill is.
Protection and Disaster Risk Reduction (Place) – (Date) Session 6.1: Integrating Protection into Disaster Risk Reduction.
Crisis Management Planning Employee Health Safety and Security Expertise Panel · Presenter Name · 2008.
An Orientation to the National Mass Care Strategy A Whole of Community Approach to Mass Care.
National Disaster Recovery Framework. National Disaster Recovery Framework Reasons for establishing the Framework Past large-scale recovery efforts revealed.
Session 16: Distribution of Geospatial Data 1 Distribution of Geospatial Data in the Public Environment Hazard Mapping and Modeling.
Part of a Broader Strategy
Jeffery Graviet Emergency Services Coordinator, Salt Lake County Chairperson, Salt Lake Urban Area Working Group.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Disaster risk reduction – How did we get here?
Hazard Resilient Coastal Community Index Keelin Kuipers WAS*IS Workshop II March 13, 2006.
Isdefe ISXXXX XX Your best ally Panel: Future scenarios for European critical infrastructures protection Carlos Martí Sempere. Essen.
Mitigation can include structural and nonstructural efforts.
1 Hyogo Framework for Action 2005 – 2015 “Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters” ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM The 8 th.
IS-804: ESF #4 – Firefighting Firefighting
Planning for Resiliency. Primary Reference Emergency Management Principles and Practices for Healthcare Systems, The Institute for Crisis, Disaster and.
1 Inter Agency Board Meeting San Antonio, TX February 29, 2012.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Critical Infrastructure Protection: Program Overview
INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT Decision Maker Workshop February 26, 2013 Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security.
Rehabilitation in agriculture What can we learn from recent experiences? Laurent Thomas, Director FAO Emergency Operations and Rehabilitation Division.
Survivor Centric Emergency Management Integrating the Access and Functional Needs of the Whole Community Before, During and After Disasters August 2015.
White House Climate Change Adaptation Initiatives June 3, 2014 Eric Letvin Director for Hazard Mitigation and Risk Reduction Policy National Security Council.
UNCLASSIFIED As of W Mar 08 Mr. Scott A. Weidie, J722 1 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) 04 March 2008 Governments and Crises: Roles.
What APEC Task Force for Emergency Preparedness (TFEP) has progressed in the implementation of HFA Presented by Vincent Liu Program Director APEC Secretariat.
International Recovery Forum 2014 ~ The Role of Private Sector in Disaster Recovery ~ 21 January 2014 Kobe, Japan Dr Janet L. Asherson THE LINK BETWEEN.
Engineering | Architecture | Design-Build | Surveying | Planning | GeoSpatial Solutions November 16, 2015 THE AWWA J100 - WHAT IT IS, WHY IT IS BEING UPDATED,
USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Workshop Sandra K. Knight, PhD, PE, D.WRE Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, FEMA August.
2015 USACE Exercise – December 1, 2015 New Madrid Seismic Zone – Earthquake FEMA Mission, Legal Authorities and Regional Capability Overview Gus Wulfkuhle.
Facing Tomorrow’s Challenges USGS Natural Hazards Science in the Coming Decade Facing Tomorrow’s Challenges USGS Natural Hazards Science in the Coming.
Public Health System Training in Disaster Recovery (PH – STriDR) This work was supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cooperative Agreement.
2016 THIRA & State Homeland Security Grant. Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) National Preparedness Goal driven Annual Assessment.
Climatic Recovery: Brownfields as Backdrops to Community Health and Resilience Suzi Ruhl, JD, MPH Senior Attorney Advisor Office of Environmental Justice,
Horizon 2020 Secure Societies Disaster-Resilience Workshop 18 Mar /06/2016.
Citizen Corps Volunteer for America “Engaging Citizens In Homeland Security”
Healthcare Coalitions. John Heywood English Writer
Keys to THIRA/SPR Results driven by participants
Overview Briefing Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) Presidential Policy Directive 8 / PPD-8: National Preparedness May 2012.
Disaster and it’s management
and Security Management: ISO 28000
April 21, 2017 Workshop Overview
Emergency Operations Planning
Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy Priorities
The Forgotten Phase of Emergency Management
Disaster Mitigation Mitigation reduces the impact of disasters by supporting protection and prevention activities, easing response, and speeding recovery.
The People in Your Neighborhood; A Whole Community Partnership April 23, 2018 Title Slide Sample.
Unit 5- IS 800 Introduction to the National Response Framework
Foundations of Homeland Security & Emergency Management Law & Policy Post NPHS 1510.
THE USA’S NEW POLICY DIRECTIVE ON NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS
Presentation transcript:

Association of Defense Communities June 23, 2015 Eric Letvin Director for Hazard Mitigation and Risk Reduction Policy National Security Council The White House

What is PPD-8? This policy directive from the President asks multiple Federal agencies to work together with the whole community to improve national preparedness It is aimed at “strengthening the security and resilience” of the United States through “systematic preparation for the threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the nation.” Resilience refers to ‘the ability to adapt to changing conditions and withstand and rapidly recover from disruption due to emergencies’. Experience tells us that when the whole community comes together to tackle a challenge—and everyone plays a role—the end result is more effective. You see this happening in communities every day. Recognizing that preparedness is a shared responsibility, Presidential Policy Directive 8 / PPD-8: National Preparedness was signed by the President on March 30, 2011. At its core, PPD-8 requires the involvement everyone—not just the government—in a systematic effort to keep the nation safe from harm and resilient when struck by hazards, such as natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and pandemics. When we way “everyone,” we mean: Individuals and families, including those with access and functional needs Businesses Faith-based and community organizations Nonprofit groups Schools and academia Media outlets All levels of government You’ll hear the phrase “whole community” a lot in this presentation. It’s a guiding principle of PPD-8. It means two things: 1.) Involving people in the development of the PPD-8 documents. Example: We are using innovative technologies and traditional methods of involving the public (including online collaboration on fema.ideascale.com, interactive webinars, and in-person workshops.) 2.) Ensuring their roles and responsibilities are reflected in the content of the PPD-8 materials. The President signed the policy directive on March 30, 2011, and it replaces Homeland Security Presidential Directive-8 / Annex 1. PPD-8 is aimed at “strengthening the security and resilience” of the United States through “systematic preparation for the threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the nation.” It’s an evolution, not a revolution. PPD-8 recognizes the value of existing efforts and builds on the progress everyone has already made.

PPD-8 Links a Range of National Efforts It is organized around key elements: National Preparedness Goal The ends we wish to achieve National Preparedness System Description The means to achieve it National Planning Frameworks Federal Interagency Operational Plans The delivery; how we use what we build Annual National Preparedness Report The reporting of our progress Build and sustain preparedness (ongoing) The sustained engagement The Directive calls for the development of a few specific things. We’ll talk about each one in detail in a few minutes, but here’s the quick list for your reference: National Preparedness Goal: This is the ends we wish to achieve. We are all working toward the National Preparedness Goal, which is… “A secure and resilient nation with the capabilities required across the whole community to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from the threats and hazards that pose the greatest risk.” National Preparedness System: This is the means to achieve the goal. National Planning Frameworks and Federal Interagency Operational Plans: This is how we will deliver the core capabilities, and how we will use what we build. National Preparedness Report: This is the annual report on our progress. Effort to Build and Sustain Preparedness: This is the ongoing engagement. Many other supporting documents also are being developed, as needed. But these are the primary requirements.

National Mitigation Framework The Mitigation Framework covers: The capabilities necessary to reduce the loss of life and property by lessening the effects of disasters. Resilience is a key focus.

Core Capabilities Listed by Mission Area PREVENT PROTECT MITIGATE RESPOND RECOVER Planning Planning Planning Planning Planning Public Information and Warning Public Information and Warning Public Information and Warning Public Information and Warning Public Information and Warning Operational Coordination Operational Coordination Operational Coordination Operational Coordination Operational Coordination Forensics and Attribution Access Control and Identity Verification Community Resilience Critical Transportation Economic Recovery Intelligence and Information Sharing Cybersecurity Long-Term Vulnerability Reduction Environmental Response / Health and Safety Health and Social Services Interdiction and Disruption Intelligence and Information Sharing Risk and Disaster Resilience Assessment Fatality Management Services Housing Screening, Search and Detection Interdiction and Disruption Threats and Hazard Identification Infrastructure Systems Infrastructure Systems Physical Protective Measures Mass Care Services Natural and Cultural Resources These are the core capabilities for each of the mission areas as outlined in the National Preparedness Goal. The first three (Planning, Public Information and Warning, and Operational Coordination) cut across all five mission areas. Without these three cross-cutting capabilities, the other capabilities might not be achieved or could be weakened. For example, if you don’t coordinate ahead of time you may not have the resources necessary during a response. Other core capabilities are aligned under a specific mission area, based on where it had the most relevance. When you look at how the core capabilities are aligned, you’ll notice that… Prevention capabilities focus on things related to preventing an imminent terrorist attack; by imminent, we mean an attack that is about to happen. Protection capabilities focus on security— making sure things, systems, and people are protected. Mitigation capabilities focus on risk, resilience and building a culture of preparedness. Response capabilities focus on meeting a community’s immediate needs when disaster strikes. And finally, Recovery capabilities focus on getting communities back on their feet. (Speak to specific capabilities that would be of interest to the audience.) Risk Management for Protection Programs and Activities Mass Search and Rescue Operations On-Scene Security and Protection Screening, Search and Detection Operational Communications Supply Chain Integrity and Security Public and Private Services and Resources Public Health and Medical Services Situational Assessment

Critical Tasks for Community Resilience Know the community’s systems Understand the risks facing a community Foster sustained communication Convince community members of the value of mitigation Recognize the interdependent nature of the economy, health and social services, housing infrastructure, and natural and cultural resources Community resilience is expressed through a holistic approach to risk reduction