Session #25 General Provisions and Non- Loan Program Issues - Institutional Carney McCullough U.S. Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Miscellaneous Topics Program Integrity. Evaluating the Validity of High School Diplomas.
Advertisements

State Authorization Program Integrity Final Rule.
Return of Title IV Funds - Modules Dan Klock NASFAA 2013.
Final Regulations Published 10/29/10.  Repeating Coursework  Ability to Benefit rules  Validity of High School Diploma  Gainful Employment  Definition.
© 2013 Cooley LLP, Five Palo Alto Square, 3000 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA The content of this packet is an introduction to Cooley LLP’s capabilities.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators The following is a presentation prepared for: MASFAA Indianapolis, IN October 6 – 9, 2013.
Program Integrity’s Greatest Hits Presenters: Mary Heid and Matt McCreary.
THOMAS J. DALTON, EXCELSIOR COLLEGE HOW TO AWARD AID IN MODULAR PROGRAMS.
2014 Tri-State Fall Conference Presented by Yvonne Davis and Julie Lindenmeier.
STUDENT FINANCIAL AID UPDATE University Seminar Instructors Workshop
Written Agreements Between Schools WVASFAA Conference April 1, 2015 Consortiums & Contracts: Craig D. Rorie, Training Officer Federal Student Aid US Department.
Program Integrity Regulations. Agenda Program integrity regulations Provisions: –State authorization –Credit hour –Gainful employment –Misrepresentation.
Dealing with Modular Courses and Other Unique Scheduling Options Carol Egan PHEAA Compliance Services.
RETURN OF TITLE IV AID REGULATORY CHANGES 34 CFR Final Regulation Published October 29, 2010 OASFAA Dublin, OH May 24, 2011.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators The following is a presentation prepared for: ILASFAA Springfield, IL April 1 – 4, 2014.
RAWR……or R2T4 Crystal Bruntz Director of Financial Aid Avila University.
Return of Title IV funds Sandra Cronin Senior Associate Director Point Park University.
Compliance Concerns: R2T Spring Conference WASFAA Federal Issues Committee Susan Johnson, UW-Whitewater Kristina Klemens, UW-Parkside Julie Waldvogel-Leitner,
TASFAA Conference 2014 Dianne Cox, UTC Jeanne Hinchee, Chattanooga State Based on NASFAA Fall 2013 Training Compliance and Campus Collaboration – R2T4.
2015 PACE/USO TDN Conference Angela Smith, Training Officer U.S. Department of Education Return of Title IV Funds – The Basics.
Regulatory Update – Program Integrity Presented by: Betsy Mayotte Presented to: ANZFAA Conference via Skype Date: September, 2010.
Dan Klock and David Musser | Dec U.S. Department of Education 2014 FSA Training Conference for Financial Aid Professionals Return of Title IV (R2T4)
Gainful Employment - Overview Rhonda Mohr, Student Financial Assistance Programs Myrna Huffman, Management Information Systems.
Session #34 Program Integrity: Institutional and Program Eligibility: State Authorization Sophia McArdle Fred Sellers U.S. Department of Education Note:
Session 6 ACG & National SMART Grant Update: Transfer Student, Rigorous Secondary School Programs of Study, and Academic Major Issues Sophia McArdle Office.
Session 21 Requirements and Suggested Practices for ACG and National SMART Grants Sophia McArdle.
Session 39 The Big Picture Linda Burkhardt Kevin Campbell.
Session #29 Foreign Schools R2T4 Greg Martin Byron Scott U.S. Department of Education.
Return of Title IV Funds R2T4 NYSFAAA REGION VII PRESENTER DEBRA HANSEN STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY.
2 Session 102 The Return of Title IV Funds 3 Your presenters are Wendy Macias Philip Aaronson
Dan Klock and David Musser | Nov U.S. Department of Education 2014 NCASFAA Fall Conference Return of Title IV Funds – Modules.
U.S. Department of Education 2012 Fall Webinar Training Series Return of Title IV Funds: Modules.
Session FF-02 The Big Picture Michael Roberts Angela Smith U.S. Department of Education.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Presents… John Kolotos Carney McCullough US Department of Education CASH MANAGEMENT Current.
2015 PACE/USO TDN Conference Angela Smith, Training Officer U.S. Department of Education Gainful Employment – Reporting & Disclosures.
FEDERAL PROGRAM INTEGRITY REGULATIONS Spring 2011 Webinar Series Webinar 1.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Chief Academic Officers Minneapolis, MN June 19,
Cash Management NMASFAA 2014 Brent Small Director Financial Aid Eastern New Mexico University.
Robert Vallas, Trainer U.S. Department of Education R2T4 for Modules.
MASFAA 2013 October 6 th – 9 th, 2013 Indianapolis, Indiana Return of Title IV Funds Jamie A. Malone U.S. Department of Education.
Return to Title IV: Are Your Withdrawals Passing the Compliance Test? Presented By: Vanessa M. Fulton Georgia Institute of Technology.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Presents … © NASFAA 2011 Return of Title IV Funds.
Program Integrity Regulations Fred Sellers Office of Postsecondary Education NYSFAAA January 7, 2011 Carney McCullough Office of Postsecondary Education.
General Provisions – (Non-Loan) Institutional Issues PASFAA Conference October, 2011 Pittsburgh, PA Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education.
Hot Off the Press The Negotiated Rulemaking Process and Final Regulations Brendan Furey American Student Assistance Zack Goodwin Harvard University.
MASFAP CSU/UC/CCC Federal Update Jeff Baker March 25, 2011.
Navigating the ED Program Integrity Rules: What Everyone Needs to Know (Even if You Really Don’t Want To) Presentation © Dow Lohnes pllc 2012.
Session 107 Study Abroad Issues Marianna Deeken Federal Student Aid Anthony Jones Office of Postsecondary Education.
Title IV Administration for Clock-Hour Programs MAFAA 2012 Spring Conference.
Cash Management Current Issues John Kolotos Carney McCullough Anthony Jones Session 29.
Jessica Finkel and Cynthia Hammond | Nov U.S. Department of Education 2012 Fall Conference Gainful Employment Disclosures Session 47.
Session #46 R2T4 – Back to Basics Dan Klock U.S. Department of Education.
Session #45 R2T4 Funds New Regulations Dan Klock U.S. Department of Education.
Session 45 - Tribal Colleges: The Basics 1 Tribal Colleges: The Basics Return of Title IV Funds R2T4 Deborah Tarpley Department of Education, Region VIII.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Program Integrity Final Rule Gainful Employment. Lays the groundwork for future, substantial changes regarding gainful employment programs Establishes.
Return of Title IV (R2T4) The basics of R2T4 plus a look at the rules for programs offered in modules.
Satisfactory Academic Progress To be eligible for FSA funds, a student must make Satisfactory Academic Progress, and your school must have a reasonable.
NASFAA 2003: Reconnecting With Students!. 2 The Return of Title IV Funds.
Demystifying R2T4 for programs offered in modules.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Roundtable
Chief Academic Officers Minneapolis, MN June 19, 2012
2016–17 Return of Title IV Funds A NASFAA Authorized Event Presented by [Name of Presenter/Association] [Location] [Date], 2016.
Assistant Director of Financial Aid
R2T4: Return of Title IV Funds
Monitoring Satisfactory Academic Progress
MASFAA Conference November , 2015
It’s Time to Light the Lights 2016 ILASFAA Annual Conference
R2T4 for Modular Based Programs
Presentation transcript:

Session #25 General Provisions and Non- Loan Program Issues - Institutional Carney McCullough U.S. Department of Education

2 Negotiated Rulemaking Hearings in Denver, Little Rock, and Philadelphia—June 2009 Federal Register Notice—September 2009 Two teams—Program Integrity and Foreign Schools

3 Program Integrity 14 issues Three meetings—November and December 2009 and January 2010 Consensus not reached

Program Integrity Notice of Proposed Rulemaking— June 18, 2010 Comment period ended—August 2, 2010 Nearly 1,200 comments received Final regulations—October 29, 2010 Effective date—July 1,

Today’s Agenda State Authorization (§§600.4(a)(3), 600.5(a)(4), 600.6(a)(3), 600.9, and (b)) Credit Hour (§§600.2, , , and 668.8) Gainful Employment (§§600.2, 600.4, 600.5, 600.6, 668.6, and 668.8) Misrepresentation (Subpart F of Part 668) Written Arrangements (§§668.5 and ) 5

Today’s Agenda (cont’d) Incentive Compensation (§668.14(b)) Disbursement (§§ (i), (b), (e), 686.2(b), and (b)) Return of Title IV Funds (§§668.22(a), (b), (f), and (l)) 6

State Authorization §§600.4(a)(3), 600.5(a)(4), 600.6(a)(3), 600.9, and (b)

State Authorization Why revise state authorization provisions? To strengthen State role in approving and monitoring institutions To clarify what is required for an institution to be considered legally authorized by a State for purposes of Federal programs 8

State Authorization (cont’d) In order for an institution to be eligible to participate in the Title IV, HEA programs, it must be legally authorized to provide postsecondary education by the State in which it is located. 9

State Authorization (cont’d) Clarify requirements based on whether the institution is— Established by name as an educational institution Authorized to conduct business Authorized to operate as a nonprofit charitable organization Federal, tribal, and religious institutions are exempt from these requirements 10

State Authorization (cont’d) If established as an educational institution by a State— Must comply with any applicable State approval or licensure requirements State may exempt the institution from State approval or licensure requirements based on— –The institution’s accreditation or –The institution being in operation for at least 20 years 11

State Authorization (cont’d) If established on the basis of an authorization to conduct business in the State or to operate as a nonprofit charitable organization— Must comply with the State approval or licensure requirements Must be approved or licensed by name May not be exempted from State approval or licensure based on accreditation, years in operation, or a comparable exemption 12

State Authorization (cont’d) State must have a process, applicable to all institutions except tribal and Federal institutions, to review and address complaints directly or through referrals For a tribal college, provides that the tribal government has a process to review and appropriately act on complaints 13

State Authorization (cont’d) Defines religious institution as an institution that is owned, controlled, operated, and maintained by a religious organization and awards only religious degrees or certificates Exempts religious institutions that are exempt from State authorization under State law or under a State’s constitution 14

State Authorization (cont’d) If an institution offers education through distance or correspondence education to students in a State in which is it is not physically located or in which it is otherwise subject to State jurisdiction, it must meet State requirements to be legally offering postsecondary distance or correspondence education in the State. It must be able to document the State’s approval, upon request. 15

State Authorization (cont’d) Effective July 1, 2011, however— An institution may request a one-year extension to July 1, 2012 and, if necessary, an additional one-year extension to July 1, 2013 if the State is unable to provide appropriate State authorization 16

State Authorization (cont’d) To receive the extension, an institution must obtain from the State an explanation of how a one-year extension will permit the State to modify its procedures to comply 17

Credit Hour §§600.2, , , and 668.8

Credit Hour Why develop a credit hour definition? No current definition for programs funded under the HEA To establish consistent measure of eligibility for Federal funding 19

Credit Hour (cont’d) Establishes definition solely for Federal program purposes Provides that a credit hour is an institutionally established equivalency of amount of work that reasonably approximates not less than the measures in the definition 20

Credit Hour (cont’d) Reflects intended learning outcomes & evidence of student achievement that approximates not less than— –One hour classroom/two hours out of class student work, or –Equivalent work for other academic activities as established by the institution 21

Credit Hour (cont’d) Create procedures that accrediting agencies must use to determine if an institution’s assignment of a credit hour is acceptable 22

Credit Hour (cont’d) Modifies provisions on when an institution must use clock or credit hours and standards for credit-to-clock-hour conversions 23

Credit Hour (cont’d) Undergraduate nondegree credit hour programs must use clock-to-credit hour conversion unless each course in the program is fully acceptable to a degree program at the institution Institution must be able to demonstrate that students enroll in and graduate from that degree program 24

Credit Hour (cont’d) New conversion ratios— One semester or trimester credit hour is equal to at least 37.5 clock hours One quarter credit hour is equal to at least 25 clock hours 25

Credit Hour (cont’d) Exception for institutions that demonstrate that the credit hours meet new definition and there are no deficiencies identified by accreditor or State for assigning credits; however, must meet these minimums— One semester or trimester credit hour is equal to 30 clock hours One quarter credit hour is equal to 20 clock hours 26

Credit Hour (cont’d) For students enrolled in programs subject to the conversion as of July 1, 2011, the institution may— Use current regulations until the students complete the program; OR Apply new regulations for all students enrolled in payment periods assigned to the award year 27

Credit Hour (cont’d) For students who enroll or reenroll on or after July 1, 2011, the institution must use the new regulations 28

Gainful Employment §§600.2, 600.4, 600.5, 600.6, 668.6, and 668.8

Gainful Employment Why make these gainful employment changes? To provide students and families with better information about programs that lead to gainful employment 30

Gainful Employment (cont’d) Applies to certain programs that are Title IV eligible because they lead to “gainful employment in a recognized occupation” 31

Gainful Employment (cont’d) All programs at for-profit schools except for— –Program leading to baccalaureate degree in liberal arts (proprietary institution) Any program at a public or not-for-profit school that is not— –A program leading to degree –A transfer program of at least two years 32

Gainful Employment (cont’d) Recognized occupation is redefined as— One identified by a Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code established by OMB, or One identified by an Occupational Network O*NET-SOC code established by DOL 33

Gainful Employment (cont’d) Outdated reference to the Dictionary of Occupational Titles is replaced with current references to SOC codes established by OMB and DOL 34

Gainful Employment (cont’d) Institution must annually submit information on students who complete a program leading to gainful employment in a recognized occupation including— Student and program information Amount from private loans or finance plans Matriculation information End of year enrollment information 35

Gainful Employment (cont’d) Reporting by October 1, 2011 – award year information (if available) – , , award year information Reporting for and beyond –No earlier than September 30 but no later than the date established by the Secretary in a Federal Register 36

Gainful Employment (cont’d) Required disclosures in promotional material for prospective students and on Web site to include— Programs’ occupations Cost Completion rate Placement rate Median loan debt 37

Gainful Employment (cont’d) “New Programs” Notification— An institution must notify ED at least 90 days before the first day of class when it intends to offer a new educational program that leads to gainful employment in a recognized occupation Effective July 1,

Gainful Employment (cont’d) “New Program” Notification includes— Demand for program, including needs of various markets Wage analysis information Program review/approval process Demonstrate approval through school accreditation First day of class 39

Gainful Employment (cont’d) “New Program” Approval Process— Unless ED requires approval for new programs, school is not required to get ED approval after notification is submitted If notification is not timely, school must obtain ED approval If ED needs to approve the program, an alert notice will be sent to the school at least 30 days before first day of class 40

Gainful Employment (cont’d) Department’s “New Program” Review Evaluates financial and administrative capability Determines whether program replaces or expands existing programs Looks at how program fits with historic offerings, growth, and operations Determines whether process and determination to offer program is sufficient 41

Gainful Employment (cont’d) For “New Program” denials, ED will— –Explain how program failed –Provide opportunity for school response School may request reconsideration 42

Misrepresentation Subpart F of Part 668

Misrepresentation Why revise the provisions on misrepresentation? Regulations last revised over 20 years ago Complaints from students who allege they were victims of false promises GAO undercover audit Strengthen ED’s regulatory enforcement authority 44

Misrepresentation (cont’d) In general, the misrepresentation regulations describe— The actions ED may take if it determines that an institution has engaged in substantial misrepresentation The types of activities that constitute substantial misrepresentation 45

Misrepresentation (cont’d) In addition, the regulations— Provide that an eligible institution is deemed to engage in substantial misrepresentation if the institution, one of its representatives, or an entity under contract to the institution for providing educational programs or marketing, advertising, recruiting, or admissions activities makes a substantial misrepresentation regarding the eligible institution 46

Misrepresentation (cont’d) Finally, the regulations— Clarify that substantial misrepresentation is prohibited in all forms 47

Misrepresentation (cont’d) Misrepresentation Any false, erroneous, or misleading statement made by the institution directly or indirectly to a student, prospective student, member of the public, accrediting agency, state agency, or to ED 48

Misrepresentation (cont’d) Misleading statement Includes any statement that has the likelihood or tendency to deceive or confuse. Statement is any communication made in writing, visually, orally, or through other means. Includes student testimonials given under duress or because such testimonial was required to participate in a program 49

Misrepresentation (cont’d) Substantial misrepresentation Any misrepresentation on which the person to whom it was made could reasonable be expected to rely, or has reasonably relied, to that person’s detriment 50

Misrepresentation (cont’d) Describes misrepresentation with respect to— Nature of the educational program (668.72) Nature of financial charges (668.73) Employability of graduates (668.74) Relationship with the Department of Education (668.75) 51

Misrepresentation (cont’d) Not covered under the misrepresentation regulations— Does not provide an additional avenue for litigation for students, employees, and other members of the public Does not create a new Federal private right of action 52

Written Arrangements §§668.5 and

Written Arrangements Why revise these provisions? Address arrangements between institutions under common ownership Restrict arrangements with ineligible institutions Align with definition of an educational program Expand student notification requirements related to written arrangements 54

Written Arrangements (cont’d) Clarify that another institution may provide part—not all—of an educational program under a written arrangement Clarify that degree-granting institution has all necessary approvals to offer the educational program in the format in which it is being provided (i.e., distance education) 55

Written Arrangements (cont’d) Under written arrangements between two eligible for-profit institutions under common ownership, requires that the degree- granting institution provide more than 50% of the educational program 56

Written Arrangements (cont’d) Added to the list of conditions under which a written arrangement between an eligible institution and an ineligible institution or entity is not permissible if the ineligible institution or entity— –Had its certification to participate revoked –Had its application for recertification denied –Had its application for certification denied 57

Written Arrangements (cont’d) Requires institutions to make information available to students about— –Portion of the educational program provided by the nondegree-granting institution –Name and location of the nondegree- granting institution/organization –Estimated additional costs to students –Method of delivery 58

Written Arrangements (cont’d) Applies to blanket, programmatic arrangements but not to individual, student- initiated arrangements 59

Incentive Compensation §668.14(b)

Incentive Compensation Why revise the incentive compensation provisions? Complaints from consumers about aggressive sales techniques Improve compliance 61

Incentive Compensation (cont’d) Institutional requirement— School will not provide a commission/bonus or other incentive payment based, in any part directly or indirectly, on success in securing enrollments or financial aid to any person or entity engaged in any student recruiting or admission activities or in making decisions regarding awarding Title IV funds 62

Incentive Compensation (cont’d) Does not apply to recruitment of foreign students who reside in foreign countries and who are not eligible for Title IV aid 63

Incentive Compensation (cont’d) Removed safe harbors Added definitions to clarify who, how, and what is affected Use questions to evaluate employee bonus or incentive payments 64

Incentive Compensation (cont’d) Two-part test to evaluate if a payment is incentive compensation— (1) Whether the payment is a commission, bonus, or other incentive payment, defined as an award of a sum of money or something of value paid to or given to a person or entity for services rendered; and 65

Incentive Compensation (cont’d) (2) Whether the commission, bonus, or other incentive payment is provided to any person based, in any part directly or indirectly, upon success in securing enrollments or the award of financial aid If the answer to each question is “yes,” the payment would be prohibited. 66

Disbursement §§ (i), (b), (e), 686.2(b), and (b)

Disbursement Why revise these disbursement provisions? To prevent student withdrawals due to lack of funds To reduce disbursement delays and promote timely disbursements To ensure that students have timely access to books and supplies 68

Disbursement (cont’d) For Pell Grant eligible students Offers a way to purchase required books and supplies— –If institution could disburse 10 days before payment period and credit balance would result –Must provide by 7 th day of payment period 69

Disbursement (cont’d) Institution provides lesser of— –Presumed credit balance OR –Amount needed by student, as determined by the institution Institution uses –Actual costs or –Allowance in COA 70

Disbursement (cont’d) Student must be able to buy books and supplies by 7 th day of payment period unless the institution knows the student isn’t attending May use stored value card, prepaid debit card, or book store voucher 71

Disbursement (cont’d) No change in R2T4 treatment If funds have been credited and student doesn’t begin attendance, institution must return funds according to § If funds have been credited and student withdraws, institution must return funds according to R2T4 Counseling required under §668.16(h) Disclosures required under §§ and (a)(1) 72

Disbursement (cont’d) Policy required under § (i) must specify— –How a Pell-eligible student can opt out –That no written authorization required if a student purchases books using the institution’s system 73

Return of Title IV Funds §§668.22(a), (b), (f), and (l)

Return of Title IV Funds Why revise the R2T4 approach to modules? To ensure equitable treatment for students who withdraw from credit hour programs, regardless of whether the programs— –Span the length of the term, or –Include compressed courses and those offered in modules 75

R2T4 - Modules “Offered in modules” defined as— –Course or courses in a program that do not span the entire length of payment/enrollment period 76

R2T4 – Modules (cont’d) For credit hour or clock hour programs— –Withdrawn if doesn’t complete all days in payment/enrollment period scheduled to complete prior to withdrawing 77

R2T4 – Modules (cont’d) To calculate percentage of payment period/enrollment period completed for credit hour programs: –Include calendar days scheduled to be completed regardless of whether any course was completed that is less than the length of the term Excludes scheduled breaks of at least 5 consecutive days 78

R2T4 – Modules (cont’d) Student who ceases attending a module but who confirms that he/she will attend a module beginning later in the same payment/enrollment period is not considered a withdrawal 79

R2T4 – Modules (cont’d) Must get confirmation when ceases attendance For nonterm and nonstandard-term programs, must attend module no later than 45 days after ceasing attendance 80

R2T4 – Modules (cont’d) To determine if a student in a progrm with modules has withdrawn, ask 3 questions: (1) Did the student cease to attend or fail to begin attendance in a course scheduled to attend? (If yes, go to question 2.) 81

R2T4 – Modules (cont’d) (2) When ceased to attend or failed to begin attendance in a scheduled course, was the student attending other courses? (If no, go to question 3.) 82

R2T4 – Modules (cont’d) (3) Did the student confirm attendance in a later module in the payment/enrollment period (45 day rule, if applicable)? –If no, student is a withdrawal If not a withdrawal, Pell recalculations may apply. 83

Return of Title IV Funds Why revise the R2T4 position on taking attendance? Ensure that best information is used More accurate determination of how much Title IV aid is earned by a student who withdraws 84

R2T4 – Attendance An institution is required to take attendance if an outside entity or the institution itself— Requires instructors to take attendance, or Has a requirement that can only be met by taking attendance or a comparable process 85

R2T4 – Attendance (cont’d) If required to take attendance— For some students—use attendance records for those students For a limited period of time—use attendance records for withdrawals during that limited period of time On a specific date—NOT considered to be required to take attendance 86

R2T4 – Attendance (cont’d) Attendance must be “academic attendance” or “attendance at an academically-related activity” including— Physically attending class Submitting academic assignment Taking exam, interactive tutorial or computer-based instruction Attending school assigned study group, or 87

R2T4 – Attendance (cont’d) Participating in online discussions about academic matters and/or initiating contact with faculty to ask questions about subject matter 88

R2T4 – Attendance (cont’d) Attendance does NOT include— Living in institutional housing Using meal plan Logging into an online course without active participation Academic counseling Student’s certification of attendance without school documentation is not acceptable. 89

Questions?? 90

91 Contact Information I appreciate your feedback and comments. I can be reached at: Phone: 202/ Fax: 202/