1 Measurements & Validation R G Stamp Head of Department of ATM Research National Air Traffic Services Ltd, UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Kapitel 21 Astronomie Autor: Bennett et al. Galaxienentwicklung Kapitel 21 Galaxienentwicklung © Pearson Studium 2010 Folie: 1.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
1 PHARE Achievements Dr. H. Schröter PHARE Programme Manager EUROCONTROL version 1.1,
1 Validation & Measurement Methods for the PHARE Demonstrations R A Whitaker Validation Project Leader.
Whole Airspace ATM System Safety Case - Preliminary Study
One Sky for Europe EUROCONTROL © 2002 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) Page 1 FAA/Eurocontrol Technical Interchange.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
Multiplying binomials You will have 20 seconds to answer each of the following multiplication problems. If you get hung up, go to the next problem when.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
ZMQS ZMQS
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
1 of Audience Survey Results Larry D. Gustke, Ph.D. – October 5, 2013.
(This presentation may be used for instructional purposes)
ABC Technology Project
© S Haughton more than 3?
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A Page 1 The ONESKY (Single-Sky) project and what it means for ASAS.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
VOORBLAD.
1 Breadth First Search s s Undiscovered Discovered Finished Queue: s Top of queue 2 1 Shortest path from s.
“Start-to-End” Simulations Imaging of Single Molecules at the European XFEL Igor Zagorodnov S2E Meeting DESY 10. February 2014.
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
SIMOCODE-DP Software.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
PSSA Preparation.
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
Chapter 30 Induction and Inductance In this chapter we will study the following topics: -Faraday’s law of induction -Lenz’s rule -Electric field induced.
Traktor- og motorlære Kapitel 1 1 Kopiering forbudt.
Presentation transcript:

1 Measurements & Validation R G Stamp Head of Department of ATM Research National Air Traffic Services Ltd, UK

2 What is Validation? l EATMS Validation Strategy (EVAS) The process through which a desired level of confidence in the ability of a deliverable to operate in a real-life environment may be demonstrated against a pre-defined level of functionality, operability and performance

3 What is Validation? l EATMS Validation Strategy (EVAS) The process through which a desired level of confidence in the ability of a deliverable to operate in a real-life environment may be demonstrated against a pre-defined level of functionality, operability and performance

4 What is Validation? l EATMS Validation Strategy (EVAS) The process through which a desired level of confidence in the ability of a deliverable to operate in a real-life environment may be demonstrated against a pre-defined level of functionality, operability and performance

5 What is Validation? l EATMS Validation Strategy (EVAS) The process through which a desired level of confidence in the ability of a deliverable to operate in a real-life environment may be demonstrated against a pre-defined level of functionality, operability and performance

6 What is Validation? l EATMS Validation Strategy (EVAS) The process through which a desired level of confidence in the ability of a deliverable to operate in a real-life environment may be demonstrated against a pre-defined level of functionality, operability and performance l Validation builds confidence that the system is fit for purpose

7 How to Validate

8 Operations Operational trial Shadow-mode trial Field test Large-scale real-time simulation Small-scale real-time simulation Fast-time simulation Analytic modelling

9 Where to Validate Small-scale real-time simulation

10 Where to Validate Small-scale real-time simulation NATS DLR DLR CENA CENANLR EEC EEC real-life environment real-life environment

11 Validation Methodology l Consistent Application of Validation Methodology Across All Sites

12 Validation Methodology l Consistent Application of Validation Methodology Across All Sites

13 Validation Methodology l Consistent Application of Validation Methodology Across All Sites

14 Validation Methodology l Consistent Application of Validation Methodology Across All Sites

15 Validation Methodology l Consistent Application of Validation Methodology Across All Sites

16 Validation Methodology l Consistent Application of Validation Methodology Across All Sites of functionality, operability and performance pre-defined level of functionality, operability and performance

17 Measures of Merit l MoMs Chosen to Test Hypotheses l Controller Workload l Airspace Capacity l Quality of Service l Usability l Safety l Measurements Taken: l e.g. Workload: ISA, TLX, R/T, ….. l Objective; Subjective; Observed

18 Analysis l Descriptive Statistics

19 Analysis l Descriptive Statistics l Inferential Statistics l significant at 5% confidence level

20 Analysis l Descriptive Statistics l Inferential Statistics l significant at 5% confidence level l Backed up by Controller Subjective Comments lI can still handle the aircraft while doing the crossword!

21 Analysis l Descriptive Statistics l Inferential Statistics l significant at 5% confidence level l Backed up by Controller Subjective Comments lI can still handle the aircraft while doing the crossword! desired level of confidence

22 Effectiveness of PHARE Validation l Core Validation Group with Representation from all Participating Sites l Common Methodology Crucial l Methodology Improved with Experience l Validation Conducted by Individual Sites l Lessons Re-learnt &/or Lost l Effectiveness Diminished l Validation Should be Applied Throughout Project - Not Just at the End

23 Summary l Validation Methodology Major Contributor to Credibility of PHARE l Forms the Backbone for much of the Validation Activities within European ATM R&D

24 Summary l Validation Methodology Major Contributor to Credibility of PHARE l Forms the Backbone for much of the Validation Activities within European ATM R&D