1 Results - Experience of Participating Air Traffic Controller By T. Symmans EUROCONTROL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
Advertisements

SAFETY MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
© Integra A/S SAFETY MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP Karachi - January 2006 PRESENTERS: PETER THORSEN STEFAN REIB.
The Future Air Traffic Control System Presented by: Geoffrey BaileyKors van den BoogaardDon Willis EurocontrolInternational Air Transport AssociationU.S.
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
First ICAO Global Symposium on TEM and NOSS Luxembourg November TEM & NOSS The EUROCONTROL Perspective Alexander Skoniezki Head of Business.
Jeffrey T. Williams Manager, RNAV & RNP Group Air Traffic Organization
1 PHARE Achievements Dr. H. Schröter PHARE Programme Manager EUROCONTROL version 1.1,
1 PHARE Operational Scenarios J-P. Nicolaon, Operational Task Force Chairman EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
Ground Human Machine Interface (GHMI): trends and the future
1 PHARE Demonstrations Overview of Results Marc Bisiaux PD/3 Project Leader Eurocontrol Experimental Centre.
1 PHARE and Reality by Wolfgang Philipp Senior Director EATMP EUROCONTROL.
1 The PHARE Concept and Scenarios by Job Brüggen Head Air Transport Division National Aerospace Laboratory, NLR.
1 Validation & Measurement Methods for the PHARE Demonstrations R A Whitaker Validation Project Leader.
1 Airborne Programme by E. Bailey, Airborne Project Leader EUROCONTROL.
1 Managed Airspace or Free Flight by Steve Zerkowitz Assistant Director Infrastructure Europe IATA.
1 The role of human in ATM automation: a key issue Alain Printemps head of DNA/CENA.
1 centre dÉtudes de la navigation aérienne COMMON METRICS FRAMEWORK FOR ATM PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING Almira Williams, CSSI Inc.
RESULTS – EXPERIENCE OF PARTICIPATING PILOT By T R Price DERA Boscombe Down UK.
GENSPACE Air Traffic Management
Using dynamic flow network modeling for global flight plan optimization CARE workshop 14th –15th March 2001, EUROCONTROL Brussels. Dritan Nace Heudiasyc.
Total Airport Management CARE Innovative Study
Introduction ATMCP and Performance Dominique Colin de Verdière (CENA) Bernard Miaillier (Eurocontrol) TIM9 - ATMCP-RTSP May 2002.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation dynamic Demand Capacity Balancing WP Marcel RICHARD Expert ATFCM Operational Specifications.
1 4th FAA - EUROCONTROL AP6 Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM -4) Ground-based Decision Support for Conflict Detection and Resolution.
Performance Requirements – Dynamic Density & Dynamic Resectorization Concepts Rich Jehlen Manager, Air Traffic Planning Division Toulouse June, 2002.
FAA/Eurocontrol Technical Interchange Meeting on Performance Metrics
FAA/Eurocontrol TIM 9 on Performance Metrics – INTEGRA Rod Gingell 16 May 2002.
The EMERALD RTD Plan and the ASAS Validation Framework R P (Bill) Booth 10 October 2002.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OSED.
Airspace Volumes and Sectorisation Good Design Practice Airspace Volumes and Sectorisation Good Design Practice 1.
Federal Aviation Administration International Flight Inspection Symposium June 24, 2008 James H. Washington Vice President, Acquisition and Business Services.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation ASM Solutions at Network Level ASM / ATTFCM / ATS Workshop EUROCONTROL HQ September 2012.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A AI Planning at airports:Departure Management PLANET Industry Day.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR AI Planning, Waiting for the Results? H.H. Hesselink R.R.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-05/ PIA 4 Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
International Civil Aviation Organization Trajectory-Based Operations(TBO) Saulo Da Silva SIP/ASBU/Bangkok/2012-WP/25 Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12.
Area Nav: RNP Evolution
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
Will we ever automate the tasks of the ATCO? Job Brüggen Safety Manager LVNL Will we ever automate the tasks of the ATCO? Ir. Job Brüggen.
Study Continuous Climb Operations
Page Lufthansa ASAS It's Time for a paradigm change... Workshop May 2003, Rome
ICAO Flight Plan 2012 Workshop ARE YOU READY? Durban 24 August 2012.
Can our ATM systems cope?
Computerised Air Traffic Management Tools - Benefits and Limitations OMAR BASHIR (March 2005)
2 nd ASAS-TN2 Workshop - Rome, 4 th April 20061/13 Civil-Military cooperation as a key factor in ASAS implementation Italian Air Force (IAF) Ltc. Maurizio.
- Session 4: Interoperation José M. Roca Air/Ground Cooperative ATS Programme Eurocontrol.
Direction générale de l’Aviation civile centre d’Études de la navigation aérienne First ASAS thematic network workshop The user’s expectations and concerns.
Slide 1 July 2004 – FALBALA/WP5/FOR4/D – CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, Sofréavia & UoG Mark Watson & Richard Pugh ( NATS) CARE / ASAS Action FALBALA Project Dissemination.
DIRECTION TECHNIQUE CERTIFICATION Paris, April 2008 SL ASAS TN2 Workshop ppt ASAS & Business.
1 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Jan Van Doorn Director EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre April 2006 ASAS / ADS-B: Implementation.
2 nd Workshop, April 2006 ASAS in Tomorrows Airspace Pierre Gayraud, THALES Bob Graham, EEC Tony Henley, BAe Systems Dr Anthony Smoker, IFATCA ASAS-TN2.
NATIONAL AVIATION UNIVERSITY Institute of Air navigation Air Navigation Systems Department Graduate work MASTER’S DEGREE THESIS «Modeling of flight using.
Enhanced Flight Following. Major Concepts  “Second Opinion”  Positive Flight Following  Resource for Captain.
ASAS Crossing and Passing Applications in Radar Airspace (operational concept and operational procedure) Jean-Marc Loscos, Bernard Hasquenoph, Claude Chamayou.
19-21 April 2004ASAS TN – 3 rd workshop AIRLINES/IATA OVERVIEW Needs and Considerations Anthony van der Veldt/IATA Assistant Director Safety Operations.
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Impact of Operating Context on the Use of Structure in Air Traffic.
Mr. Lagomarsino Money Power with Technology Applications.
Basics of RNP. Outline  What is RNP?  Why implement RNP?  What does it mean for communities?
Digital In The Skies Simon Daykin NATS Chief Architect.
FF-ICE A CONCEPT TO SUPPORT THE ATM SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Agenda Item 1 A Vision Based on Achievable Expectations Jack Howell Director / Air Navigation Bureau.
Ground System implication for ASAS implementation
Trajectory-Based Operations(TBO) Saulo Da Silva
Aviation Innovation for Regional Integration
DATA LINK IMPLEMENTATION IN EUROPE
USER’S EXPECTATIONS AND CONCERNS Aena’s ADS Programme Manager
Presentation transcript:

1 Results - Experience of Participating Air Traffic Controller By T. Symmans EUROCONTROL

2 My Background l Air traffic controller l Approach/tower l ACC l National and local examiner l Supervisor/training officer l Other related l Jet/piston flying l Avionics (radar, comms, nav systems) l Phare l PD 2 and PD 3 l Current l Eurocontrol airspace management and navigation unit

3 Caveat l Personal viewpoints l Augmented by canvassing opinions among some other participants l Not solicited or influenced by any organisation participating in PHARE l Not the position of any official body

4 Ease of Understanding the Concept l Increasing traffic demands l Unlikely to be met by existing ATM systems l Need for advanced assistance l Change in controller philosophy l New relationship between air and ground systems

5 Initial Concerns l Safety? l Workload? l Efficiency?

6 PHARE Training l Need l Training supplied/atcos reaction l CBT l One-to-one OJT l Handouts/charts

7 Some ATCO Issues l Safety l Workload l Monitoring l Decision-making time l Track predictability and repeatability l Sequencing efficiency l Awareness of pilots about ATCO planning

8 More ATCO Issues l Education (hearts and minds) l Training in new techniques l Legal aspects l Deskilling/currency l Teamwork l Safety again!!

9 Tools l Easy to understand l Easy to use l Time available for monitoring l Trustworthy

10 Functionalities l System generated advisories l System generated predictions (FPL and/or dynamic) l Arrival managers l Understanding of co-ordination methods and messages

11 Perceived Plusses l Remarkable increase in traffic handling ability l Reduced RTF workload l Planning much easier and relaxed l Profiles more easily accommodated l Increasing 4D proportion means consequent improvement in accommodating non-equipped aircraft l Stripless environment gives more looking at radar time

12 ATCO Concerns l Robustness of system l What happens if system fails? l Uncertainty on who was responsible for and who was actually resolving conflictions l Is solution efficient ? l Ease of understanding conflictions

13 The Future ? l Effectiveness in busy or complex airspace l Computer power requirements l Controller acceptance l Transition to implementation l System responsibility issues l Value of programme to date l Need for further research

14 Some ATCO Comments l It is difficult to imagine, that in the core part of europe, all these flights will appear in your sector from all different directions, at different speeds and descending and already be arranged into an efficient sequence - certainly not in my lifetime!! l I couldnt do this without the computer - I just hope it doesnt hiccup! l It was remarkable to find that, at 45 years of age and having not been an operational ATCO for 5 years, they gave me 2 days training, to carry out 2 peoples jobs at traffic levels which were at one-and-a-half times todays peak, and yet I was only moderately busy!