2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Experiences with Information Technology and their Relationship to Other Aspects of Student Engagement Thomas F. Nelson Laird and George D. Kuh.
Advertisements

2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
College of Engineering. Table of Contents Introduction about the National Survey of Student engagement. NSSE response rate Benchmarking areas Areas of.
Getting to know your audience: Queen’s Students Roger Healey, Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Getting Faculty Involved in the Student Engagement Conversation: The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Thomas.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) measures faculty expectations for student engagement in educational practices that are known to be empirically.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
Student Engagement at Northeastern Illinois Analysis and Use of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2009.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
1 Presentation of Results NSSE 2005 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
 NSSE Results Austin Peay State University.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE): Overview of 2008 Results for Rutgers University.
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Faculty Senate Pat Hulsebosch, Office of Academic Quality 11/17/08.
National Survey of Student Engagement Noel-Levitz Satisfaction Surveys
The University of Texas-Pan American
NSSE Results for Faculty
The University of Texas-Pan American
2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Johnson Center Presentation Dr. Karla McCain
The University of Texas-Pan American
GGC and Student Engagement
Presentation transcript:

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009

Points to Cover Response Rates What is NSSE? Benchmarks UVU’s strengths & weaknesses Comparison of NSSE with FSSE (Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Comparison of NSSE with FSSE (Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Comparisons between UVU colleges

Response Rate 2009 – First Year Students – 32% (812) 2008 response rate – 18% (200) Peer response rates ranged from 20% - 26% – Seniors – 47% (1,180) 2008 response rate – 31% (569) Peer response rates ranged from 29% - 37%

UVU Colleges School of the Arts (ART) Woodbury School of Business (BUS) School of Education (EDU) College of Humanities and Social Science (HSS) College of Science and Health (SCI) College of Technology and Computing (TCH) University College (UNI)

Responders by College First Year /Freshman StudentsSeniors % of Responders% of UVU% of Responders% of UVU ART6.5%7.3%5.6%5.5% BUS12.8%10.0%18.4%23.1% EDU3.8%6.3%4.6%7.7% HSS12.3%13.7%17.9%18.3% SCI6.9%7.4%17.4%16.7% TCH23.5%20.0%32.1%27.1% UNI34.1%35.5%4.0%1.5% Total100.0% Based on Spring enrollment, Freshman are equated with First Year students.

What is NSSE? National Survey of Student Engagement – Collects information annually from samples of first-year and senior students about the nature and quality of their undergraduate experience. – Introduced in 1999, nearly 1400 baccalaureate- granting colleges & universities in the U.S. and Canada have participated, including 8 in Utah.

Data Groups UVU 2008 UVU 2009 UVU Peers – Selected Peers for 2009 Carnegie-Engaged – Selected Carnegie-Engaged institutions for 2009 Bacc/Assoc College – Selected Bacc/Assoc institutions for 2009 NSSE 2009 Median

NSSE Benchmark Categories Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) Active and Collaborative Learning (ACL) Student-Faculty Interaction (SFI) Enriching Educational Experiences (EEE) Supportive Campus Environment (SCE)

First Year Students NSSE Benchmark Scores

Seniors NSSE Benchmark Scores

First Year Students Student Faculty Interaction

Seniors Student Faculty Interaction

FSSE Scores For These Items Percentage of Instructors who said that half or more of their students did the following:

FSSE, NSSE and Research 56% of Lower Division instructors and 67% of Upper Division instructors indicated that having students work on research projects with faculty outside of class is ‘Important’ or ‘Very Important’. Compare to 13% of Seniors and 5% of First Year students who have done research with faculty outside of class.

First Year Students Course Work Emphasizes

Seniors Course Work Emphasizes

First Year Students % that were assigned 5 or more written papers or reports

Seniors % that were assigned 5 or more written papers or reports

First Year Students % that were assigned 3 or more problem sets in a class

Seniors % that were assigned 3 or more problem sets in a class

First Year Students To what extent did the examinations challenge you to do your best work? VERY LITTLEVERY MUCH

Seniors To what extent did the examinations challenge you to do your best work? VERY LITTLEVERY MUCH

First Year Students Student Satisfaction

Seniors Student Satisfaction

Internal Comparison (2009 Only) School of the Arts (ART Woodbury School of Business (BUS) School of Education (EDU) College of Humanities and Social Science (HSS) College of Science and Health (SCI) College of Technology and Computing (TCH) University College (UNI) UVU (ALL)

Respondent Counts by College CollegeFirst YearSeniorsTotal ART BUS EDU HSS SCI TCH UNI ALL

Full Time vs Part Time Students

First Year vs Seniors

Benchmark Scores by Sex

Responders by College First Year /Freshman StudentsSeniors % of Responders% of UVU% of Responders% of UVU ART6.5%7.3%5.6%5.5% BUS12.8%10.0%18.4%23.1% EDU3.8%6.3%4.6%7.7% HSS12.3%13.7%17.9%18.3% SCI6.9%7.4%17.4%16.7% TCH23.5%20.0%32.1%27.1% UNI34.1%35.5%4.0%1.5% Total100.0% Based on Spring enrollment, Freshman are equated with First Year students.

NSSE Benchmarks – First Year

NSSE Benchmarks - Seniors

Course Work Emphasis – First Year % answering that their coursework emphasizes this aspect ‘Quite a bit’ or ‘Very Much’.

Course Work Emphasis – Seniors % answering that their coursework emphasizes this aspect ‘Quite a bit’ or ‘Very Much’.

Inclusiveness– First Year % answering that their coursework emphasizes this aspect ‘Quite a bit’ or ‘Very Much’. % answering in agreement

Inclusiveness– Seniors % answering that their coursework emphasizes this aspect ‘Quite a bit’ or ‘Very Much’. % answering in agreement

Overall Satisfaction – First Year Good or Excellent Probably/Definitely

Overall Satisfaction – Seniors Good or Excellent Probably/Definitely

Questions, Comments