FAMILY SURVEY STUDY Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Statewide Meeting September 25, 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Variety Completion of this tutorial will allow the user to easily extract the variety of patient reported information available. This tutorial is designed.
Advertisements

Start with your equation Move the # term to the other side, and leave a space Determine what HALF of the coefficient of X is Factor the left side Write.
Parent Survey 2014 Topline Results December 2014.
Statistics in Bioinformatics May 2, 2002 Quiz-15 min Learning objectives-Understand equally likely outcomes, Counting techniques (Example, genetic code,
Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Technical Assistance for Local Early Intervention Systems Infant & Toddler.
Chapter 13: Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
STAT E100 Exam 2 Review.
8/2/2015Slide 1 SPSS does not calculate confidence intervals for proportions. The Excel spreadsheet that I used to calculate the proportions can be downloaded.
Grade 3-8 English. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With the new individual.
Sample : Template Table of KPI for HR Manager
SW388R7 Data Analysis & Computers II Slide 1 Multiple Regression – Split Sample Validation General criteria for split sample validation Sample problems.
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
©SHRM 2008SHRM Weekly Online Survey: February 13, Benchmarking Metrics Sample comprised of 423 randomly selected HR professionals. Analyzing 423.
8/20/2015Slide 1 SOLVING THE PROBLEM The two-sample t-test compare the means for two groups on a single variable. the The paired t-test compares the means.
Confidence Intervals. Estimating the difference due to error that we can expect between sample statistics and the population parameter.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
+ Unit 6 - Comparing Two Populations or Groups Comparing Two Proportions 11.2Comparing Two Means.
Example 1: a) Describe the shape, center, and spread of the sampling distribution of. Because n 1 p 1 = 100(0.7) = 70, n 1 (1 − p 1 ) = 100(0.3) = 30,
Question of the Week. What is an Open Question and how is it used as a scaffold for mathematical instruction?
+ Section 10.1 Comparing Two Proportions After this section, you should be able to… DETERMINE whether the conditions for performing inference are met.
Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Technical Assistance for a Local Early Intervention System Infant & Toddler.
Understanding Population Dynamics. Agenda Layout 1234 The world at 7 billion Demographic transitions 3 Patterns of population change Strategies needed.
CHHS AP Test Performance 2015 Results and Trends Presented to: Advanced Academics Booster Club September, 2015.
A Report on the Texas Parent Survey for Students Receiving Special Education Services DataSource: Statewide Survey of Parents of Students Receiving Special.
WELCOME EPAS Reports: Maximizing the Impact on Student Achievement in Mathematics.
Assisting GPRA Report for MSP Xiaodong Zhang, Westat MSP Regional Conference Miami, January 7-9, 2008.
Check it out! : Differences Between Populations and Samples.
Child Outcomes: Understanding the Requirements in order to Set Targets Presentation to the Virginia Interagency Coordination Council Infant &
The Practice of Statistics Third Edition Chapter 13: Comparing Two Population Parameters Copyright © 2008 by W. H. Freeman & Company Daniel S. Yates.
The application of selective editing to the ONS Monthly Business Survey Emma Hooper Office for National Statistics
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 12 Statistics.
Virginia Department of Education May 8, English Language Proficiency Targets: Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) 2.
T- and Z-Tests for Hypotheses about the Difference between Two Subsamples.
Survey Methodology Four Point Scale Very SatisfiedSatisfiedDissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied.
Evaluation Results Missouri Reading Initiative.
+ General Education Assessment Spring 2014 Quantitative Literacy.
2008 FAEIS Annual Longitudinal Assessment With a Comparison to the 2007 Survey Results The purpose of the FAEIS annual evaluation is to develop longitudinal.
+ Chi Square Test Homogeneity or Independence( Association)
Aron, Aron, & Coups, Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course (3e), © 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter 12 Making Sense of Advanced Statistical.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov Hilary Rhodes January 11, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
CREATE – National Evaluation Institute Annual Conference – October 8-10, 2009 The Brown Hotel, Louisville, Kentucky Research and Evaluation that inform.
12/23/2015Slide 1 The chi-square test of independence is one of the most frequently used hypothesis tests in the social sciences because it can be used.
* Chapter 8 – we were estimating with confidence about a population * Chapter 9 – we were testing a claim about a population * Chapter 10 – we are comparing.
Using Marketing Data. Working with Simmons Data Identifying potential consumers Segment prospect markets Narrow consumer targets Characteristics Media.
The Normal Distribution and Norm-Referenced Testing Norm-referenced tests compare students with their age or grade peers. Scores on these tests are compared.
Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Impacts on a First Cohort of Fifth-Grade Students June 8, 2009 IES Annual Research.
Spring 2013 Scores for SHHS October 7, 2013 Expository Writing.
Key Stage 2 tests Presentation to parents Thursday 4 th February 2016.
3.3 More about Contingency Tables Does the explanatory variable really seem to impact the response variable? Is it a strong or weak impact?
Learning & Language Modules: Learning strategies Neuropsychology of Learning; Left & Right Brain Individual learning style & 7 Intelligence Profile Language.
Good Morning and welcome. Thank you for attending this meeting to discuss assessment of learning, pupil progress and end of year school reports.
CT Birth to Three System – ECO 08/ Connecticut’s FY06 Family Survey Sending them out, getting them back, and analyzing the data… Process.
Unit 1.1 Test Review. 1) Which equation was used to create the table below? xy
Inference for Linear Regression
Year 9 Mathematics Algebra and Sequences
CHAPTER 8 Estimating with Confidence
Preliminary Review of the 2012 Math SOL Results
Who wants to be in the top 1 percent?
Homework Assistance Guide
Solving Quadratic Equations by Completing the Square
Making Sense of Advanced Statistical Procedures in Research Articles
Ch. 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Let’s Review -- An equation is similar to a scale. Both sides of the scale need to be equal in order for the scale to balance. Properties of equality.
Christina Kasprzak, ECTA/ECO/DaSy September 16, 2013
Review of Chapters 7,8 and 9 Be comfortable with all homework assignments Check out stop to think questions in each chapter Review the summary of formulae.
3.8 Solving Equations Involving Absolute Value
Advanced Placement Statistics
CHAPTER 12 More About Regression
Chapter 13: Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Standards Based Grading
Presentation transcript:

FAMILY SURVEY STUDY Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Statewide Meeting September 25,

New Survey Added “Does Not Apply” option Only Impact on Families Scale Revised wording of 2 questions Replaced 2 questions Added 4 Virginia-specific questions

Study Method Use both old and new survey in Spring 2012 Randomly assign half of families to old survey; half to new survey Compare results to determine equivalence

Key Findings Families did use the “Does Not Apply” option Percent left blank on old form less than combined percent left blank and answered DNA on new form Some families were not leaving blank Better data!

Key Findings Old survey – clear pattern of checking VSA for every item New survey - fewer VSA responses “Does Not Apply” = stop and think Better data!

Key Findings Differences in mean scores Lower on new form For full sample, statistically significant For representative sample, similar trend

Key Findings Differences in % of families meeting indicator Higher for new survey Not statistically significant

Results – Indicator 4 Old SurveyNew Survey a. 72.3%a. 75.4% b. 70.3%b. 72.2% c. 81.9%c. 84.2%

Options 1. Call them equivalent 2. Use formula to equate the two surveys 3. Start fresh with new survey

Reporting in APR Use results of old survey Describe study, including results of new survey Re-set targets

Met Targets! 2011 Actual 2012 Target 2012 Actual 4a70.1%71.5%72.3% 4b67.6%68.8%70.3% 4c80.0%81.3%81.9%

Reporting Local Results Results from both surveys sent Publicly reporting best results Determinations based on best results Local results on individual survey items available for both surveys at FamilySurvey.htm FamilySurvey.htm

Survey Reports Full survey by Randall Penfield Explanation of Results Available at FamilySurvey.htm FamilySurvey.htm