Objective ENV01 ESSIP Plan 2013 Bernd HILL DSS/EIPR 13.09.2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Objective AOM 19 ESSIP Plan 2013 Octavian CIOARA DSS/EIPR
Advertisements

Objective ATC 16 ESSIP Plan 2013 Luca DELLORTO DSS/EIPR
Objective ATC 12 ESSIP Plan 2013 Luca DELLORTO DSS/EIPR
Objective FCM05 ESSIP Plan 2013 Octavian CIOARA DSS/EIPR
Objective AOM 21 ESSIP Plan 2013 Octavian CIOARA DSS/EIPR
LSSIP Objective AOP04.2.
Objective ITY-AGVCS2 ESSIP Plan 2013 Oscar ALFARO DSS/EIPR
Objective SRC-CHNG ESSIP Plan 2013 Agnieszka DYBOWSKA DSS/EIPR
LSSIP Objective AOP04.1.
Objective INF04 ESSIP Plan 2013 Ana Paula FRANGOLHO DSS/EIPR
Objective ENV02 ESSIP Plan 2013 Bernd HILL DSS/EIPR
Objective SAF11 ESSIP Plan 2013 Ingrid FEIJT DSS/EIPR
Objective ITY-FMTP - Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) ESSIP Plan 2013 Oscar ALFARO DSS/EIPR
Objective ATC 15 ESSIP Plan 2013 Luca DELLORTO DSS/EIPR
LSSIP Objective AOP01.2.
Objective AOM 13.1 ESSIP Plan 2013 Octavian CIOARA DSS/EIPR
Objective ITY-COTR ESSIP Plan 2013 Luca DELLORTO DSS/EIPR
Objective COM11 ESSIP Plan 2013 Adriatik KOKONA DSS/EIPR
Objective COM09 - Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) ESSIP Plan 2013 Oscar ALFARO DSS/EIPR.
Objective FCM01 ESSIP Plan 2013 Octavian CIOARA DSS/EIPR
Objective COM10 ESSIP Plan 2013 Adriatik KOKONA DSS/EIPR
Objective SRC-SLRD ESSIP Plan 2013 Agnieszka DYBOWSKA DSS/EIPR
Objective FCM04 ESSIP Plan 2013 Octavian CIOARA DSS/EIPR
Objective NAV03 ESSIP Plan 2013 Adriatik KOKONA DSS/EIPR
Objective ATC 17 ESSIP Plan 2013 Luca DELLORTO DSS/EIPR
Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/ASBU/2012.
Objective NAV10 ESSIP Plan 2014 Adriatik KOKONA DSS/EIPR
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Objective INF07 ESSIP Plan 2014 Ana Paula FRANGOLHO DSS/EIPR
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Objective AOP04.1.
Objective ITY-SPI ESSIP Plan 2014 Octavian CIOARA DPS/PEPR
LSSIP Objective AOP04.2.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi.
Objective ATC 15 ESSIP Plan 2014 Luca DELL’ORTO DSS/EIPR
Objective ATC 17 ESSIP Plan 2014 Luca DELL’ORTO DSS/EIPR
Objective COM10 ESSIP Plan 2014 Adriatik KOKONA DSS/EIPR
Objective AOM 19 ESSIP Plan 2014 Agnieszka DYBOWSKA DPS/PEPR
Objective ATC 02.6 ESSIP Plan 2014 Ingrid FEIJT DSS/PEPR
Objective ATC 02.2 ESSIP Plan 2014 Ingrid FEIJT DPS/PEPR
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Objective AOP05.
Objective ITY-ADQ ESSIP Plan 2014 Ana Paula FRANGOLHO DSS/EIPR
Objective FCM03 ESSIP Plan 2014 Octavian CIOARA DPS/PEPR
Objective ATC 16 ESSIP Plan 2014 Luca DELL’ORTO DSS/EIPR
Objective AOM 21 ESSIP Plan 2014 Agnieszka DYBOWSKA DPS/PEPR
Objective FCM04 ESSIP Plan 2014 Octavian CIOARA DPS/PEPR
Objective ATC 02.2 ESSIP Plan 2013 Ingrid FEIJT DSS/EIPR
Objective FCM01 ESSIP Plan 2015 Octavian CIOARA DPS/PEPR
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Objective AOP03.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Objective AOP05.
Objective FCM05 ESSIP Plan 2015 Octavian CIOARA DPS/PEPR
Objective ATC 07.1 ESSIP Plan 2013 Luca DELL’ORTO DSS/EIPR
1 From Planning to Implementation. 2 Aviation Needs ECIP Institutional Arrangements EATM Programmes Implementation & Operations Europe wide Planning LCIPs.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Objective ITY-ADQ ESSIP Plan 2015 Ana Paula FRANGOLHO DPS/PEPR
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Objective ENV02 ESSIP Plan 2015 Bernd HILL DPS/PEPR
Objective NAV10 ESSIP Plan 2015 Adriatik KOKONA DPS/PEPR
Objective COM10 ESSIP Plan 2015 Adriatik KOKONA DPS/PEPR
Objective AOM 19 ESSIP Plan 2015 Agnieszka DYBOWSKA DPS/PEPR
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
LSSIP Objective AOP05 Note: objective postponed 12 months in ESSIP Plan Edition 2015.
ASEAN PBN Routes Objectives:
Objective NAV03 ESSIP Plan 2015 Adriatik KOKONA DPS/PEPR
LSSIP Objective AOP04.1.
Objective INF04 ESSIP Plan 2015 Ana Paula FRANGOLHO DPS/PEPR
Objective ITY-AGVCS2 ESSIP Plan 2015 Oscar ALFARO DPS/PEPR
Objective ATC 16 ESSIP Plan 2015 Luca DELL’ORTO DPS/PEPR
LSSIP Objective AOP03.
ROMATSA – SAFETY, EFFICIENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN ATM
Presentation transcript:

Objective ENV01 ESSIP Plan 2013 Bernd HILL DSS/EIPR

ESSIP Plan 2013 / Objective ENV012 Explanation The objective aims at implementing Continuous Descent Operations (CDO 1 ) techniques that will produce a number of environmental and cost benefits including reductions to fuel burn, gaseous emissions and noise impact. FOC: 12/ : ICAO uses Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) and replaced the Term Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) with Publication of ICAO Document 9931.

What has changed since LSSIP 2012 ? The Term CDO replaced the Term CDA in the text The following additional Note was added: Note 2: In principle, it is not required to implement CDO on a 24/7 basis, but is preferable, where applicable. Depending on National legislation and/or National court decisions and/or local constraints at airports, a limited introduction, for example during night time, is considered equally valid. ICAO Doc Continuous Descent Operations Manual, Edition 1, dated was added as supporting material for the implementation of this Objective.

Link to European ATM Master Plan OI step - [AOM-0701]- Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) Description: When applied at an airport, CDA would offer a flexible and simple continuous descent approach technique that does not adversely affect safety and capacity and will produce a number of environmental and cost benefits including reductions to fuel burn, gaseous emissions and noise impact. IOC: 07/2007 FOC: 12/2013

Most important SLoA(s) ENV01-ASP01 To cater for Successful implementation of CDO at designated airport If procedures are not published, do not have progress Completed ENV01-ASP02 Completed if all approach Controllers at airport are suitably trained and make use of CDO ENV01-APO01 To cater for AOP role in implementation: Support CDO measures, implement monitoring of performance and feedback to ANSP and users where equipment is available. Provide the main link with the local community

Finalisation Criteria and Closed Questions (1) ENV01-ASP02 If CDO is implemented, please confirm the period for which you offer CDO to pilots? e.g. Night time only / Day-time only / 24/7 hours/ as traffic density allows / Majority of flights offered a CDO during period of x. If CDO is implemented, what % of total airport approaches (approximatively) are achieving a CDO profile? Select one among 0-20% / 20-40% / 40-60% / 60-80% / % or provide any more precise figure

ENV01-APO 01 If CDO is implemented, please indicate whether the monitoring results are being regularly reported to all Stakeholders involved? Y/N, and if Y (above) please indicate which type of results (e.g. fuel consumption, noise, emissions)? Note: Monitoring of performance is not compulsory for SLoA Status Completed, but is recommended for best practice. If CDO is implemented, what % of Airlines are being active at your airport in applying CDO? Indicate the % of Airlines applying and using CDO Finalisation Criteria and Closed Questions (2)

Objectives completion criteria Partially completed: At least, either a CDO design has been approved or a CDO trial has commenced Completed: CDO is established as an operational procedure and procedures are formally published and used in practice. A working arrangement to track performance and seek improvement has been established.

ESSIP Report 2012 – Interim Deployment Programme IDP View: From the Airspace Users perspective on CDO implementation it is clear that there is no real CDA when aircraft is vectored, as real CDA needs closed-loop routing. In addition, from Airspace Users viewpoint it would be more appropriate to measure the level of CDO implementation by measuring the percentage of time when the pilot is performed the CDO procedure vs total number of approaches. This is because there are many cases where CDO procedures are published but not used during a whole 24h period.

Objective Coordinators Analysis States should verify that CDO procedures have been published and are in practical use before declaring the objective as Completed.

Links and contacts Objective Coordinator: Hill, B DNM Objective Expert(s):Adamson, P., Day, B.,