Water for Monterey County Regional Project Capital and O&M Cost Description 1 Lyndel Melton, P.E. RMC Water and Environment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONTERY COUNTY 2005 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE STUDY SESSION – WATER RESOURCES May 19, 2005.
Advertisements

July Coastal Water Project Capital and O&M Cost Description Moss Landing Power Plant - Desalination Plant Site.
Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project - Presentation to Monterey Co. Water Resources Agency June 25, 2012.
Test Slant Well Construction Cost Estimate 1 Slant Test Well - Drilling & Installation$2,300,000 Material Advance Purchase - Pump, Column, Casing, Screen$700,000.
Presented by: Kevin J. Spencer, P.G. R.W. Harden and Associates, Inc. Benefits and Challenges of Developing Brackish Groundwater Supplies WATER Supply.
MSSC 2011 Annual Salinity Summit Charles Ahrens Vice President / Water Resources and Conservation Challenges in Brackish Groundwater Desalination Project.
2015 Legislative Session Update: Tax Relief, Tax Law Changes & Tax Credits and Exemptions June 25, 2015 Ryan Rauschenberger Tax Commissioner.
July Coastal Water Project Capital and O&M Cost Description North Marina Alternative - Desalination Plant Site.
Jordan Lake Partnership Western Intake Feasibility Study Jordan Lake Partnership Western Intake Feasibility Study 1.
United Water & Sanitation District Stonegate Village Metro District Water Supply Opportunities 1.
 Groundwater Supply ◦ Quantity ◦ Quality  Infrastructure ◦ Treatment ◦ Transmission ◦ Distribution  Response Plans ◦ Long-term ◦ Short-term ◦ Emergencies.
1 South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination (SOCOD) Project, Ocean Desalination Costs and Recent Public Opinions November 2011 Status Update Karl Seckel,
1 Investing in your water … investing in your future California American Water General Rate & Conservation Case Applications.
Delta Conveyance: Update on the Planning Process and Analysis of Water Supply and Costs CCWA Board of Directors February 25, 2010.
Equus Beds ASR Program – Wichita’s Future Water Supply September 6, 2012.
Newark Desalination Facility
February 24, 2015 Presented by: Heidi Springer, P.E. Brian Ginter, P.E.
2015 Needs Assessment Our Strategy for Success Scott Torpie Washington State Office of Drinking Water.
Eric Hansen, P.E. Capital Planning Program CPUC Recycled Water Order Instituting Rulemaking (R ) San Francisco January 20, 2012 Workshop 3: Understanding.
Policy Position Statement.  Ground Water Replenishment (GWR) - by Monterey Regional Pollution Control Agency (MRWPCA) and Monterey Peninsula Water Management.
Southern Delivery System NSPE-Colorado State Meeting February 19, 2010.
Jim Heitzman General Manager Marina Coast Water District
BAWSCA’s Strategy In 2009, BAWSCA embarked on the Long- Term Reliable Water Supply Strategy to: o Determine the Water Supply Problem When, where, and how.
Marina Coast Water District: A California Special District ORD COMMUNITY WATER AUGMENTATION DIRECTORS Dr. THOMAS P. MOORE President JAN SHRINER Vice President.
B-WSFWP-1 Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) Adoption Hearing May 19, B-WSFWP-1 Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) Adoption.
San Diego County Water Issues 2010 Update Maritime Business and Technology Summit November 16, 2010 Seawater Desalination for San Diego.
Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project April 23, 2012.
SAWS' Twin Oaks Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project SAWS' Twin Oaks Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project October Texas Innovative Water 2010 Roberto.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Withlacoochee Regional Water Supply Authority Water Supply Plan Update - Progress Report #3 May 15 – June 18.
Technical Workshops on Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project A July 26 & 27, 2012.
Desalination Becomes A Reality In Tampa Bay Florida Jim Jensen Senior Project Manager PB Water Area Manager Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc.
1 Update Ocean Desalination Feasibility Studies Karl Seckel Assistant General Manager.
Considerations for Brackish Groundwater Use as a Water Supply for Small Water Systems and Municipalities Eddie C. Livingston, MSCE, P.E. Livingston Associates,
Texas Innovation Water 2010 Seawater Desalination What is the benefit to the State from implementing the Brownsville Seawater Demonstration Project?
Western Delta Diversion Gary W. Darling Delta Stewardship Council September 22, 2011 Delta Diablo Sanitation District.
1 NORTH VALLEY REGIONAL WATER AND WASTEWATER PROJECTS MEETING OF THE NEW MEXICO-TEXAS WATER COMMISSION May 19, 2005.
City of Tallahassee Wastewater Treatment System Hydrogeology Workshop – 2005 May 12 – 13, 2005.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Draft Cease and Desist Order Community Leader Workshop March 28, 2008.
MSSC 2011 Annual Salinity Summit February 17 – 18, 2011 Thirty Years of Success in Implementing Desalination By Roger K. Noack, P.E. HDR Engineering, Inc.
Oakdale Irrigation District Agricultural Water Management Plan Briefing on 2015 Update January 5, /5/2016 OID AWMP Update Briefing.
City of San Diego’s Recycled Water Study Item W15a October 10, 2012 Presentation to the California Coastal Commission.
Decentralization = New Supply? The North Bay Watershed Association’s Satellite Treatment Plant Study.
California Water Jeffrey Kightlinger, General Manager
California Water Plan April 14, 2005 Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Technical Analysis.
December 10, 2009 TOWN OF PALM BEACH WATER COMMITTEE Discussion of Water Plant Options.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Water Supply Strategic Plan Brian Jack Powell, P.E. Director of Planning June 17, 2015.
Water Supply Planning Workshop February 27, 2008 City of Hallandale Beach Commission Mayor Joy Cooper Vice Mayor Bill Julian Commissioner Keith London.
Richland Creek Water Supply Program Update and Design-Build Contract for 48” Raw Water Pipeline Paulding County, Georgia Board of Commissioners Workshop.
Overview of Desalination Trends and Jaffna Project
1 | emwd.org AquaSel Brine Concentration Demonstration Project Khos Ghaderi, P.E. May 18, 2016.
GWRS Final Expansion Project and SP-173 Update GWRS Steering Committee Meeting April 11, 2016.
1 | emwd.org Indirect Potable Reuse (IPR) Public Outreach and Preliminary Design Services Joe Mouawad, P.E. and Jolene Walsh August 11, 2016.
1 TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expanded and Updated Project and Financing Plans December 8, 2009 Presented to the City Council Jay Chapa Housing & Economic.
Recycled Water Project Basis of Design Report
Nikolay Voutchkov, PE, BCEE
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund and Performance Based Infrastructure Janet Cherry, PE Office of Drinking Water.
Recycled Water Project – Sharon Heights GCC
Sam Aminfard CATEE 2017 – Texas Energy Summit November 15, 2017
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Elizabeth Waite GIS Water Resources 29 November 2012
Southern Delivery System
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Future Water Supply Evaluation
Brackish Water Desalination Project
Delta Water Supply Project
City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program
California Water Commission
Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency
Early Funding (Regulations Section 6010)
Presentation transcript:

Water for Monterey County Regional Project Capital and O&M Cost Description 1 Lyndel Melton, P.E. RMC Water and Environment

Capital and O&M Cost Description Agenda Regional Project Description Basis for Cost Estimates Capital and O&M Costs Comparison of Costs 2

Regional Project Updated Phase 1 Description 3

Phase 1 Project Description DEIR Phase 1 Project 10 mgd Desal Plant 14 mgd SWTP +3 ASR Wells Common Facilities – Terminal Reservoir – ASR Wells & PS – Monterey Pipeline – Valley Greens PS Revised Phase 1 Project 10 mgd Desal Plant No SWTP No Added ASR Wells Common Facilities – Terminal Reservoir – ASR Wells & PS – Monterey Pipeline – Valley Greens PS 4

5 Surface Water Treatment Plant With Surface Water Treatment Plant

6 No Surface Water Treatment Plant

Regional Project Supply Sources 7 To ASR To MCWD CAW Only Supplies

Coastal Water Project Supply Sources 8 CAW Only Supplies

Desal Plant Vicinity Plan 9

Desal Plant Site Plan 10

Need for Partial Second Pass RO System 11 With single pass: Boron concentrations can be toxic to some crops & foliage Maximum chloride and sodium concentrations are anticipated to be 200 & 180 mg/L Partial second pass would: Reduce boron levels to <0.5 mg/L Reduce chloride and sodium concentrations to 100 & 80 mg/L

Intake Well Locations 12

Intake Well Locations 13

Regional Project Basis for Cost Estimates 14

Basis for Capital Cost Estimating 15 Used CAW’s cost criteria/unit costs Reviewed for appropriateness and agree with bases Supplemented with vendor quotes Design/Build for Desal Design-Bid-Construct for Other Facilities

Basis for O&M Estimating 16 Used CAW’s O&M Labor Chemical R&R *Membrane Replacement Power supply costs Desal Plant – MRWMD Winter – $0.08/kW-hr Summer - $0.12/kW-hr Desal Wells – PG&E Winter – $0.09/kW-hr Summer - $0.14/kW-hr

Expected Accuracy Ranges for Cost Estimating (Same as CAW Estimates) 17 0% +60% +40% +20% -20% Expected Accuracy Range for Cost Estimate Level of Project Definition 10% Project Complete (Class 4) 30% Project Complete (Class 3) 100% Project Complete (Class 1) Project Completion

Regional Project Capital and O&M Cost Estimates 18

Table 7 – Estimated Cost – Phase 1 DEIR Project 19 Construction Costs DEIR Regional Project DEIR Regional Project w/Partial 2 nd Pass Intake Facilities $ 10,300,000 $ 10,700,000 Desalination Plant $ 64,400,000 $ 81,100,000 SWTP $ 26,000,000 Product Water Delivery $ 39,100,000 Common Components $ - Contractor's O&P $ 13,400,000 $ 13,500,000 Implementation Costs $ 36,300,000 $ 38,900,000 ROW/Land Acquisition $ - Contingencies $ 37,900,000 $ 41,900,000 Total Capital $ 227,400,000 $ 251,200,000 Total Annual O&M $ 9,840,000 $ 11,040,000 Cost of Water ($/AFY) $ 2,400 $ 2,670 Annual Production (AFY)10,500

Table 8 – Estimated Costs of Common Facilities 20 Construction Costs Common Components $ 37,700,000 Contractor's O&P included above Implementation Costs $ 11,300,000 ROW/Land Acquisition $ 3,900,000 Contingencies $ 10,600,000 Total $ 63,500,000

Table 9 – Estimated Costs of Phase 1 Project With No Surface Water Supply 21 Construction Costs Regional Project w/no SWTP Intake Facilities $ 10,700,000 Desalination Plant $ 81,100,000 SWTP $ - Product Water Delivery $ 30,500,000 Common Components $ - Contractor's O&P $ 7,300,000 Implementation Costs $ 26,700,000 ROW/Land Acquisition $ - Contingencies $ 31,300,000 Total Capital $ 187,600,000 Total Annual O&M $ 11,300,000 Cost of Water ($/AFY) $ 2,290 Annual Production (AFY)10,500

Alternative Project Cost Comparisons 22

Basis for Cost Comparisons 23 Used CAW’s & MCWD’s cost and production numbers Cost of capital for Regional Project – 5.15% over 30 years Cost of funds for CAW alternatives – 8.55% over 30 years Unit water costs developed to compare all alternatives (Annualized Capital Costs + Annual O&M Cost) Average Annual Water Production in AFY Unit Cost of Water =

Table 10 – Comparison of Estimated Costs of DEIR Based Projects 24 Construction Costs Regional ProjectCAWCAW Moss Landing Intake Facilities $ 10,300,000 $ 20,000,000 $ 2,800,000 Desalination Plant $ 64,400,000 $ 80,600,000 $ 96,400,000 SWTP $ 26,000,000 $ - Product Water Delivery $ 39,100,000 $ 25,200,000 $ 41,400,000 Common Components $ - Contractor's O&P $ 13,400,000 $ 10,900,000 $ 11,200,000 Implementation Costs $ 36,300,000 $ 30,700,000 $ 27,700,000 ROW/Land Acquisition $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 3,300,000 Contingencies $ 37,900,000 $ 33,700,000 $ 36,600,000 Total Capital $ 227,400,000 $ 202,100,000 $ 219,400,000 Total Annual O&M $ 9,840,000 $ 10,100,000 $ 9,300,000 Cost of Water ($/AFY) $ 2,400 $ 3,350 $ 3,440 Annual Production (AFY)10,5008,800

Table 11 – Comparison of Estimated Costs with no Surface Water Supply 25 Construction Costs Regional Project w/no SWTP CAWCAW Moss Landing Intake Facilities $ 10,700,000 $ 20,000,000 $ 2,800,000 Desalination Plant $ 81,100,000 $ 80,600,000 $ 96,400,000 SWTP $ - Product Water Delivery $ 30,500,000 $ 25,200,000 $ 41,400,000 Common Components $ - Contractor's O&P $ 7,300,000 $ 10,900,000 $ 11,200,000 Implementation Costs $ 26,700,000 $ 30,700,000 $ 27,700,000 ROW/Land Acquisition $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 3,300,000 Contingencies $ 31,300,000 $ 33,700,000 $ 36,600,000 Total Capital $ 187,600,000 $ 202,100,000 $ 219,400,000 Total Annual O&M $ 11,300,000 $ 10,100,000 $ 9,300,000 Cost of Water ($/AFY) $ 2,290 $ 3,350 $ 3,440 Annual Production (AFY)10,5008,800

Table 13 – Sensitivity Analysis 26 Assumptions (No SWTP Regional Phase 1 Project) Net Benefit Before Sensitivity Net Benefit After Sensitivity Percent Change Notes Obtain Grant Funding $1,060 AFY$1,320+24% Assumed $40 million in grants. Potential exists for greater levels of grant funding. 50% Increase in Capital Costs with no grant funding $1,060 AFY$450-42% Doubling the capital costs of the Regional Project with no Federal or State grants results in a unit water cost that is still $450/AF less than to the CAW North Marina Alternative. 50% Increase in capital costs and obtain grant funding $1,060 AFY$710-67%Doubling the capital costs of the Regional Project but including Federal and State grants increases the unit cost of water by 67%, which is still $710/AF less than the CAW North Marina Alternative.

Regional Project – Phase 1 Implementation Schedule 27 Project Component Anticipated Water Delivery Date Seaside Aquifer Storage & Recovery2009 Sand City Desalination2009 Recycled Water for Urban Irrigation2010 Regional Desalination Project2012 Surface Water Treatment Plant2014