HRSMC, A Geant4 Simulation for HRS Jixie Zhang CREX Collaboration Meeting April 2014 Jixie Zhang1April 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEANT Simulation of RCS Vahe Mamyan Hall A Analysis Workshop December 10, 2003.
Advertisements

Robert Michaels HAMC Hall A Analysis Workshop 09 C HAMC = Hall A Monte Carlo ROOT / C++ Design Somewhat like SAMC & genercone For HRS only. Uses LeRose.
Kinematics from GEM hits for pvdis Rich Holmes March 2013 SoLID Collaboration Meeting.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Ozgur Ates Hampton University HUGS 2009-JLAB TREK Experiment “Tracking and Baseline Design”
Run Plan Document E04-007: Threshold Pion Production.
HRSMC, A Geant4 Simulation for HRS and Beyond Jixie Zhang Hall A & C Data Analysis Workshop December 2013 Jixie Zhang1Data Analysis Workshop, Dec 2013.
E : HRS Cross Section Analyses Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology GMp Collaboration Meeting September 24 th, 2012.
Jin Huang & Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Boson 2010 Workshop Sept 20, JLab.
Zhihong Ye Hampton University Feb. 16 th 2010, APS Meeting, Washington DC Data Analysis Strategy to Obtain High Precision Missing Mass Spectra For E
T. Horn, SHMS Optics Update SHMS Optics Update Tanja Horn Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009.
Min Huang Duke University, TUNL On Behalf of the E g2p collaboration Hall A Analysis Workshop, 12/12/12.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: D(e,e   p RTPC )X D(e,e   p RTPC p CLAS )X N(e,e   )XD(e,e   p CLAS )X E = 5.3GeV Simulation Procedure.
Spectroscopic Investigation of P-shell Λ hypernuclei by the (e,e'K + ) Reaction - Analysis Update of the Jlab Experiment E Chunhua Chen Hampton.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
TWIST Measuring the Space-Time Structure of Muon Decay Carl Gagliardi Texas A&M University TWIST Collaboration Physics of TWIST Introduction to the Experiment.
HRSMC, The Geant4 Simulation of HRS for G2P|GEP Jixie Zhang For the G2P Collaboration Hall A & C Data Analysis Workshop December 2012 Jixie Zhang1Data.
HKS Analysis Status Report HKS Analysis Status Report Liguang Tang (Hampton/JLAB) Hall C User Meeting, Jan. 15, 2011 HKS has data taken in 2005 (E01-011)
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Collaboration Meeting Sept 24, JLab.
A Study of Mapping for g2p instead of Reconstruction? Jixie Zhang Nov 27, 2012.
Possibility for Double DVCS measurement in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne SBS Meeting June 4 th 2013.
Spectrometer Optics John J. LeRose. The Basics Charged particles moving through static magnetic fields.  Magnetic Rigidity Local radius of curvature.
Jin Huang M.I.T. Hall A Analysis Workshop Dec 14, JLab.
SoLID baffle update Zhiwen Zhao 2013/04/02. Current Baffle The total distance from plane 1 to 6 is 150cm which is a few cm overlapping with endcap nose.
SoLID simulation Zhiwen Zhao Uva SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2011/6/2 1.
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
TWIST A Precision Measurement of Muon Decay at TRIUMF Peter Kitching TRIUMF/University of Alberta TWIST Collaboration Physics of TWIST Introduction to.
LDC Meeting Vienna 17. November 2005 Karsten Büßer LDC Machine Detector Interface Update.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
E Analysis update Adjust of the Splitter-HKS Side Yuncheng Han May 09, 2012 Hampton University JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting.
Preparation for E Pi0 Collaboration Meeting Tuesday Feb R.Lindgren.
Hypernuclei Production Experiment E05115 at Jefferson Laboratory by the (e,e’K + ) Reaction Chunhua Chen March 31, 2012  Introduction  Experimental Setup.
APEX Septum Analysis G.M. Urciuoli. Comparison between PREX septum field (from SNAKE input), and APEX septum field (from TOSCA simulations). Y axis.
PREX Mtg, July 2008R. Michaels, JLab Hall A Monte Carlo -- HAMC Similar to A. Deur’s ``Single Arm Monte Carlo’’ “Fast” Monte Carlo -- not Geant ROOT /
Update on the Hall C Monte Carlo simulation for 12 GeV Mark Jones.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Workshop on General Purpose High Resolution.
Dual Target Design for CLAS12 Omair Alam and Gerard Gilfoyle Department of Physics, University of Richmond Introduction One of the fundamental goals of.
SBS Magnet, Optics, and Spin Transport John J. LeRose with help from David Hamilton and others Technical Review of the Super BigBite Spectrometer January.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting Toshi Gogami 27/June/2012.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
SANE Collaboration ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hampton University January 12, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio at High Q 2 by Using The.
Hall C - 12 GeV pCDR Max. Central Momentum 11 GeV/c 9 GeV/c Min. Scattering Angle 5.5 deg 10 deg Momentum Resolution.15% -.2% Solid Angle 2.1 msr 4.4 msr.
Run Coordnator Report 2012/04/ /04/10 Jixie Zhang
Measurement of Exclusive  - Electro-production from the Neutron in the Resonance Region Jixie Zhang Physics Department Old Dominion University 11/30/2006.
STAR Simulation. Status and plans V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
1 Simulation, Formatter & Analysis Kyo Tsukada Tohoku Univ.
1 Kenematic Calibration of Hypernuclear Missing Mass by using Geant4 simulation Outline: 1, Data Generating 2, Kenematics Calibration a) E 0 &P Calibration.
G0 Backward Angle Request: Q 2 = 0.23, 0.48 GeV 2 Main points G0 goal is to measure G E s, G M s and G A e over range of momentum transfers with best possible.
HKS collaboration 2008/5/16 Wedding Party 2008/5/10.
Simulation of Heavy Hypernuclear Lifetime Measurement For E Zhihong Ye Hampton University HKS/HES, Hall C Outline: 1,Physics 2,Detectors 3,Events.
Jin Huang Brookhaven National Lab ● Optics General ● Test Run Calibration ● Comment on Full Runs Trying to collect materials from three years ago. May.
CHEP ’06 GEANT4E 1 GEANT4E: Error propagation for track reconstruction inside the GEANT4 framework Pedro Arce (CIEMAT) CHEP 2006, Mumbai, 13-17th February.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
HRSMC, The Geant4 Simulation Program for G2P|GEP Jixie Zhang 10/30/2012.
Min Huang g2p/GEp Collaboration Meeting April 18, 2011.
Understanding the 3 He Nuclei: Asymmetry Measurements in Quasi- Elastic Ge Jin University of Virginia For the E Collaboration.
Pb-Parity and Septum Update Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 12/05/2008 Thanks to Robert Michaels, Kent Pachke, Krishna Kumar, Dustin McNulty.
Jixie Zhang1 A Geant4 Simulation for RTPC 12 Jixie Zhang University of Virginia Spectator Tagging Workshop March 11, 2014.
Target Effect, Beam correction and T0 Adjustment
SBS Magnet, Optics, and Spin Transport
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Presentation transcript:

HRSMC, A Geant4 Simulation for HRS Jixie Zhang CREX Collaboration Meeting April 2014 Jixie Zhang1April 2014

Introduction HRSMC is a Geant4 program developed to simulate the physics for HRS, especially for the G2P and GEP experiments. It was also designed to support other HRS experiments. Geometry: – Full G2P|GEP geometry: g2p target, target field coil, g2p scattering chamber, local dump, septum, platform itself, 3 rd arm – HRS QQDQ magnet geometry (no field, using SNAKE transportation ) – BigBite – Hall A Neutron Detectors (HAND) – BoNuS RTPC – SuperBigBite – HMS – CREX: HallA scattering chamber, CREX target, Septum. Fields: g2p chicane fields, target field, septum fields, BigBite field. HRS QQDQ fields are not included yet. The HRS transportation came from the program SNAKE and MUDIFI.(Thanks to J. LeRose and M. Huang) Jixie ZhangApril

Geometries in HRSMC Detectors and fields can be turned on or off in configuration files. Jixie ZhangApril

G2P|GEP Geometries G2P|GEP Geometries include the following: chicane magnet, target platform, scattering chamber, target coil, target nose and the target itself, local dump, sieve slits, septum magnet, plastic shielding blocks, 3 rd arm. Jixie ZhangApril

CREX Geometries CREX Geometries include the following: scattering chamber (need tuned), target sieve slits (same as G2P’s) septum magnet(same as G2P’s) From Jixie ZhangApril NO SNAKE model yet!

Reference Jixie ZhangApril

Target Reference Jixie ZhangApril

Adding New Geometries Different experiments usually vary from geometries on the target platform. Each target or detector is hard coded, associated with a configuration file to turn each individual component on or off. Jixie ZhangApril CREX target + G2P septum HRSMC can support any new experiment by adding a new geometry class. All sensitive detectors share a standard hit processing but vary in Sensirtive Detector ID. All hits will be recorded automatically. HRS Detector.ini G2P Detector_G2P.ini CREX Detector_CREX.ini XXX, Future Exp Detector_XXX.ini RTPC Detector_RTPC.ini SBS Detector_SBS.ini HMS Detector_HMS.ini

How to simulate HRS transportation and reconstruction in G2P|GEP ? Jixie ZhangApril

Strategy for without Target Field Vertex to Sieve: propagated by Geant4 with a physics model (i.e. MSC, Decay, Ionization, EM physics...) Sieve to Focal: linear project the particle from sieve to target then using SNAKE forward model, software collimator cuts are applied along the trajectory to make sure that particle can really hit the focal plane. Focal to target: using SNAKE backward model or real optics matrix. Target to Vertex: linear projection. Jixie ZhangApril Target plane Vertex plane Sieve plane Virtual boundary Focal plane Snake forward Snake backward Propagated by Geant4

Strategy for with Target Field Vertex to Sieve: propagated by Geant4 with a physics model Sieve to Focal: project sieve to target then using SNAKE forward model, 8-10 software collimator cuts are applied along the trajectory to make sure particle is really hitting the focal plane. Focal to Sieve: using SNAKE backward model or real optics matrix from focal to target, then project from target to sieve. Sieve to Target: using Drift-In-Field model. Target to Vertex: using Drift-In-Field model. Jixie ZhangApril Target plane Vertex plane Sieve plane Virtual boundary Focal plane Snake forward Snake backward Propagated by Geant4 Drift-In-Field

Sieve to Focal Sieve2Focal = Sieve2Target + Target2Focal Sieve to Target: linear projection to get the effective vertex Target to Focal: using SNAKE forward model to propagate effective vertex to focal plane, 8-10 software collimator cuts are applied along the trajectory to make sure particle is really hitting the focal plane. Jixie ZhangApril Target plane Vertex plane Sieve plane Virtual boundary Focal plane Snake forward Hit at sieve, propagated in Geant4 Image the hit at sieve plane to target plane, this is the effective vertex... Very important

Effective BPM X0_tr and Theta_tr Jixie ZhangApril Variable in target plane imaged by NO target field SNAKE model Thrown variable in target plane X0_tr is the BPM vertical measurement, it will be used to reconstruct the focal plane to the target plane. When the target field is on, the BPM measurement is no longer the one we should use in the NO target field SNAKE model. 5.0 T target field

With Target Field: Focal to Sieve Focal2Sieve = Focal2Target + Target2Sieve Focal to Target: using SNAKE backward model or real optics matrix Target2Sieve: linear projection Sieve to Target: using Drift-In-Field model to swing the particle in a field. Jixie ZhangApril Target plane Vertex plane Sieve plane Virtual boundary Focal plane Snake backward Drift-In-Field

HRS Transportation HRS transportation function usually come from SNAKE and MUDIFI. Always fitting from target plane to focal plane. There will be end planes along the trajectory to make sure that the particle do not hot the magnet blocks. Currently the following SNAKE models are ready to use: – Standard HRS, 12.5 degrees, NO septum – Two models of 6 degrees HRS with septum for E One is for larger X0 and the other is for normal X0 – Several models of 5.65 degrees HRS with septum and 3 cm circular raster for G2P|GEP, varying in the active septum coils in the right septum: No Shims, , and – Can add more SANKE models (Min Huang and John LeRose are the experts) Usually need to make correction in focal plane in order to match real data Alternate method: use optics calibration result, generate data from focal plane to target, then run MUDIFI to fit a forward transportation function. this will guarantee to match the real data! Jixie ZhangApril

Documentation Source code is available in SVN: Instruction for Geant4 installation, environment setup and update history are available. Usage manual will be printed by typing these commands: HRSMC -h, HRSMC --h, HRSMC -help, HRSMC --help Usage: HRSMC [option1 argument_list] [...] [optionN argument_list] To get the detail usage of an option, just type 'help' after it. For example: HRSMC - physicsmodel help Description for internal commands (html format) are already: Output root ntuple structure description is ready here: A lot of macro files and root scripts are available: Jixie ZhangApril

Resolution of HRSMC Using SNAKE Model shim, No Target Field Jixie ZhangApril Raster=2.4cm, BPM resolution: 1 mm in vertical, No target field

Resolution of HRSMC Using SNAKE Model shim, Stop at Target Plane,5T Jixie ZhangApril Raster=2.4cm, BPM resolution: 1 mm in vertical, 5.0 T target field Reconstructed to the target center

April 2014 G2P Optics Data, All Sieve Holes Jixie Zhang 19 G2P Optics data: HRS Angle = 5.7 deg HRS P0 = GeV/c No target field Delta_P = 4.4 MeV/C 12 C 4 He 12 C and 4 He Y fp X fp Can not separate in focal plane! 5.5 cm width Thanks to M. Huang

April 2014 G2P Optics Data, 3 rd Row Sieve Holes Jixie Zhang 20 G2P Optics data: HRS Angle = 5.7 deg HRS P0 = GeV/c No target field Delta_P = 4.2 MeV/C 12 C 4 He 12 C and 4 He Y fp X fp Can separate in the focal plane if cut by vertical sieve position (Out- Plane-Angle|Position)

April 2014 To Separate 2 Elastic Peaks Jixie Zhang 21 G2P Optics data: HRS Angle = 5.7 deg HRS P0 = GeV/c No target field Delta_P = 4.2 MeV/C 12 C and 4 He Y fp X fp At center hole: dP = 0.19%  dX fp = 2.6 cm To separate 2 elastic peaks in the focal plane without other helps, the difference between these 2 deltas should larger than 0.4%! Only for NO Raster beam.

April 2014 Test SNAKE: to Separate 2 Elastic Peaks Jixie Zhang 22 From snake: to separate 2 elastic peaks in the focal plane without other helps, the difference between these 2 deltas should larger than 1%! For 4 mm raster beam. Not consider energy loss and multipole scattering yet for outgoing electrons.

April 2014 Geant4 Simulation: The Target Jixie Zhang 23 Momentum at Sieve Plane

Summary HRSMC is designed for multiple HRS experiments, especially for G2P and GEP. SBS, BB, HMS, HAND and RTPC are ready to use. It can be easily modified to support other experiments by adding the geometries. HRSMC has been used to simulate the optics for G2P|GEP. We have another dedicated program, g2psim, too. One can use real optics matrix to reconstruct simulated focal plane data. In other words, HRSMC can cross check the quality of optics matrix and help to improve it, which is useful for those experiments with large raster. The strategy of the reconstruction with target field is: No-Target-Field-HRS + Drift-Sieve-to-Target-in-field. A lot advance features are included. Need support for SNAKE models. Thanks to Min Huang and John, need their continuous contribution. Jixie ZhangApril

Acknowledgment Thank John LeRose for providing guidance and SNAKE models Thank Min Huang for providing SNAKE models and her hard work in optics optimization for real data Thank Chao Gu for helping in both simulation and optics optimization Thanks to all G2P Collaborators Jixie ZhangApril