The ADQ Adventures of LFV by Roger Li, Group Manager AIM 28th of May, Brussels.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
1 of 21 Information Strategy Developing an Information Strategy © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Strategy Developing.
1 of 17 Information Strategy The Features of an Information Strategy © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Strategy The.
Eurostat Progress report SDMX-NA ESTAT, Unit C.2.
1 Welcome Summary - First visit Delhi Integra A/S Independent consultancy company Headquarter located in Copenhagen, Denmark Working worldwide.
1 Welcome Summary - First visit Dhaka Integra A/S Independent consultancy company Headquarter located in Copenhagen, Denmark Working worldwide.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA - State of Play Octavi Quintana Trias Brussels, 19th April 2013.
1 The new ESF Investing in your Future -
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
- GDP 2011 versus 2010 – increase by 5.5%
How to improve the technical and financial management of the TEN-T projects? Ioannis Giogkarakis-Argyropoulos, Head of Unit T2 – Road and Rail Transport,
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
How to do intraday capacity pricing in a continuous trade environment? 10 October 2011 NRA-TSO-PX meeting (Informal minutes, made during workshop, of the.
Scoping the Framework Guidelines on Interoperability Rules for European Gas Transmission Geert Van Hauwermeiren Workshop, Ljubljana, 13 Sept 2011.
UNFCCC Recent Challenges in Implementing PoAs from a Commercial Perspective 8 th May 2011 Mischa Classen Senior Project Manager Regulatory Affairs and.
First ICAO Global Symposium on TEM and NOSS Luxembourg November TEM & NOSS The EUROCONTROL Perspective Alexander Skoniezki Head of Business.
ICAO State Safety Programme (SSP) Implementation Course
Module N° 7 – Introduction to SMS
LINK update Datalink Implementation EC Regulation 29/2009
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office of Civil Aviation FOCA Safety Division - Infrastructure.
ADQ – An ANSP/AISP Perspective
ADQ Implementation workshop Eurocontrol May 2013 Erika Billen.
ADQ Implementation Workshop Austro Control – Status and Issues
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation DAL/DQR Workshop Introduction Brussels, February 2013 Presented by: Manfred Unterreiner.
CAA UK Preparation Activities for the ADQ IR
EASA ATM/ANS Standardisation “State Inspection”
ADQ Implementation Avitech’s Approach and Experience
ADQ Implementation Support Cell
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Implementing DQR - A Practical View DAL/DQR Workshop Brussels, February 2013 Presented.
James O’Sullivan Pans-Ops & Airspace Inspector Irish SRD/NSA
The EMERALD RTD Plan and the ASAS Validation Framework R P (Bill) Booth 10 October 2002.
2008 May 31Standards PD: Day 2 morning: slide 1 Feedback from Yesterday We want to begin today by reviewing some the things you said yesterday afternoon.
0 - 0.
Addition Facts
Neighbourhood Planning - A Local Authority Perspective Beryl Guiver Principal Planning Policy Officer Tom Rice Planning Enquiry Officer.
Guide to Compass Evaluations and
Government Services Group Wednesday, 18 September 2013 Purchase Cards Government Services Group Presented by Miro Dabek, Manager Procure to Pay Reform.
Software change management
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
Presentation of the proposed Annex 19 – Safety Management
Karl-Heinz Kühnlein Conquest 2009: Experiences with model centric Testing in Standard-based Medical IT Environments Test Management Aspects.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
A-16 Portfolio Management Implementation Plan Update
Information Technology Project Management – Third Edition
Human Capital Investment Programme Disability Activation Project (DACT) WELCOME Support Workshop Thursday 7 th February
IHPA and the National Efficient Price (NEP) Independent Hospital Pricing Authority.
Industry Initiative between Ticket Vendors and Railways: completing the Full Service Model Brussels, 18 January 2011.
Regulatory Landscape for Leased Federal Airports Archerfield Airport Community Aviation Consultation Group (AACACG) 2 November 2011 Helen Gannon Aviation.
Project Overview Slide 2 of 15 Overview Project in a Nutshell ◦Motivation ◦Aims and Objectives ◦Expected Outcomes PlanetData Programs Join PlanetData.
HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Sessions 13-14: using the training cost model as part of a hypothetical regulatory procedure to establish costs and.
AIM Operational Concept
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Why Take EXPLORE? EXPLORE shows your strengths and weaknesses in English, mathematics, reading, and science. EXPLORE helps you search for careers and.
Nadia Konzali Project Coordinator, COSCAP-GS
LEI – Legal Entity Identifier 27 March Why a Legal Entity Identifier ? Driver: –New regulatory framework for swaps (US, Canada, Hong Kong, Australia.
In partnership with Lead Schools Induction Training Event 27 and 28 th November 2013 Pauline Marson Mark Lancett CfBT.
Madrid, 27 th October th IG Meeting South Gas Regional Initiative.
Addition 1’s to 20.
1 A risk-based approach to auditing procurement in English councils Mark Wardman Senior Manager Audit Commission 19 May 2014.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
HIPSSA Cost model training workshop: Session 12: Common pitfalls in regulatory cost modeling – regional and international case study examples EXPERT LEVEL.
Week 1.
Highlights From the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A
African Aviation Training Organization
11 Securing the Future of Canada’s AHSCs… NATIONAL CONSULTATION FORUM Sheraton Hotel – Ottawa January 28 & 29, 2010 Dr. Nick Busing Co-chair, Steering.
David Blevins 28 July, 2014 Ontologies in Medical Care Data Integration and Reuse Challenges Ontologies in Medical Care: Data Integration and Reuse Challenges.
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
AIXM 5.1 – Interoperability issues
Presentation transcript:

The ADQ Adventures of LFV by Roger Li, Group Manager AIM 28th of May, Brussels

28 May 2013 Agenda Yesterday Today Tomorrow …and the challenges along the way

28 May 2013 Background – up until 2009 Low involvement from LFV in the work with drafting, reviewing and commenting the preparatory ADQ IR work due to resource constraints within the LFV AIM domain. …leading to lower awareness about ADQ IR and its impacts within LFV AIM than what could be expected. 3

28 May 2013 Background – 2010 With the actual release of the ADQ IR (73/2010) LFV AIM becomes more aware of the impact it will have on LFV and other stakeholders ADQ awareness work within LFV (mainly towards management) led by LFV AIM is initiated but the outcome of this work is rather scarce – message received but probably not understood to the full extent. No additional funding to really start preparing for ADQ Available funding in 2010 for ADQ preparation and implementation (in % of expected total cost) 0 % 100 % 4 0 %

28 May 2013 Background – 2011 Awareness work continues within LFV (mainly towards management) led by LFV AIM but still the outcome of this work is poor ADQ awareness meeting led by LFV AIM with the major airport owner Still no additional funding to really start preparing for ADQ Available funding in 2011 for ADQ preparation and implementation (in % of expected total cost) 0 % 100 % 5 0 %

28 May 2013 Background – Q1-Q Finally(!) LFV internal awareness work pays off and an understanding about a possible major impact on AIS operations is now on all levels A pre-study is initiated (and funded) to: Analyse and interpret the ADQ IR to sort out ambiguities and questions To further detail/explain the requirements from an LFV perspective Create LFV ADQ IR implementation plan Investigate possible partnerships/cooperations for the ADQ implementation A business case to describe possible future new businesses as a result of ADQ implementation Estimate a total cost for ADQ implementation Available funding in 2012 for ADQ prep. and implementation (in % of expected total cost) 0 % 100 % 6 4 %

28 May 2013 Background – Q3-Q The result of the pre-studys business case and ADQ implementation cost estimate gives LFV management the hick-ups – potentially BIG investment needed Questions arise regarding LFVs designation from the state to perform AIS (AIS open for competition or not?) Uncertainties regarding the risk that another company can get the designation to perform AIS in Sweden in near future hampers full funding decision Available funding in 2012 for ADQ prep. and implementation (in % of expected total cost) 0 % 100 % 7 4 %

28 May 2013 Background – Q Continued uncertainties regarding AIS designation open for competition hampers full funding decision A smaller part of funding approved to continue planning activities but no investments …meanwhile time flies… Available funding up until Q for ADQ prep. and implementation (in % of expected total cost) 0 % 100 % 8 10

28 May 2013 Background – Q LFV decision for full funding of the ADQ IR implementation The show can begin! Available funding for ADQ preparation and implementation (in % of expected total cost) 0 % 100 % 9 100

28 May 2013 Current status Approximately 5 Full Time Equivalents (FTE) needed for ADQ implementation from now and coming years, dealing with: Project management Service Level Agreements (SLA) Awareness Training Architecture and requirements Quality and Safety Management (QMS/SMS) System adaption and verification Safety and Security IAIP Production Expertise …but these 5 FTE need to be distributed on a larger number of individuals, 10+ core and 10+ ad hoc 10

28 May 2013 Current status – completed activities Funding – completed Implementation plan – completed Identification of stakeholders/information owners/data originators – completed Initial Awareness – completed Definition of initial web portal for AIP publication requests (NOTAM not included initially) – completed 11

28 May 2013 Current status – started activities Assignment of personnel to work in the ADQ Implementation Project Service Level Agreements with stakeholders/information owners/data originators (focus on major actors) – started and ongoing Development of initial web portal for AIP publication requests – started and ongoing Identification of training activities – started and ongoing Survey of possible system solutions 12

28 May 2013 Planned future activities 2013 Enterprise Architecture framework definition Current system survey and documentation System requirement specifications Updates of QMS, processes and routines – step 1 Continued awareness activities Initial Training Safety Case LFV will fulfil the ADQ 1 st of July 2013 requirements by 1 st of January 2014 according to current plan. 13

28 May 2013 Planned activities 2014 and beyond Procurement of system solutions and /or updates(?) Updates of QMS, processes and routines – step 2 Continued awareness activities Training – step 2 LFV will fulfil the ADQ 1 st of July 2014 requirements by 1 st of July 2015 according to current plan. LFV will fulfil the ADQ 1 st of July 2017 requirements in time according to current plan. 14

28 May 2013 Main challenges, so far and upcoming Designation Funding Information ownership SLA level of detail Obstacles Staff involvement in parallel with daily production ADQ maturity in the aviation community. How to ensure that all information triggered by a certain event gets updated. (e.g. VOR goes down (CNS provider), procedures affected (airport) – one event but different information owners, etc…) Dependency on other stakeholders progress (or lack thereof…) Annotation of non-ADQ-compliant information in AIP and database 15

28 May 2013 Main challenges, so far and upcoming Separation between regulating authority (who can also be an information owner/data originator) and AIS provider achieved in theory but not 100% in practice. AIS still doing interpretations of regulatory text instead of just publishing what is provided from the regulator. Whos the information owner? Who approves what…? Clean up our system architecture 16

28 May 2013 Conclusion If everything goes as planned well be late… 17

28 May 2013 Thank you! 18

28 May 2013 Back-up slides Information ownership identification 19