PAST PERFORMANCE Conference Theresa Kinney. 2 2 Agenda  Past Performance Categories  Past Performance Matrix  Rating Measurements  Website  Feedback.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Traditional SIPOC Approach
Advertisements

GSRS 2.1 Training Module S.2.1 Navigation General
MoversSuite Getting the Most Out Of Your Investment.
Weekly Risk Report & Performance Metrics
The Power of One, or Why is Adherence important? This presentation has been placed on the Mitan web site since a number of contributors to the Professional.
The Contract Holder Model Darlene Coen / Al Marshall.
ICASAS305A Provide Advice to Clients
New Supplier Set-Up Process Training Session. Contents Background & Introduction Before Set-Up What forms you need Where to find the forms How to complete.
MyFloridaMarketPlace Roundtable July 9, 2003 MyFloridaMarketPlace.
Date: 03/05/2007 Vendor Management and Metrics. 2 A.T. Kearney X/mm.yyyy/00000 AT Kearney’s IT/Telecom Vendor Facts IT/Telecom service, software and equipment.
The Quote Request Model Joanne Woytek. 2 Conference ‘11 Why Use the Quote Request Tool  Only recommended method for: Determining what is available on.
Problem Management Overview
EProcurement Job Aid Requisitions & Receipts. Table of Contents Creating a Requisition Define Requisition Vendor.
The Customer Service Model. 2 Symposium‘12 The SEWP Customer Experience  Customer Service Staff for Helpline and Order Processing Nine Dedicated Contractor.
Office of Project Management Metrics Report Presentation
MyFloridaMarketPlace Roundtable August 20, 2003 MyFloridaMarketPlace.
QMS/EMS Can Thrive, not just Survive, Contract Turnovers ASQ Energy & Environmental Conference Orlando Sept 14, 2004 Ken Gidlow, CQE / CQA / Quality Manager.
Project Manager’s Survival Guide PMI Westchester - Quality SIG Presentation June 11, 2013 By: Annmarie Gordon, PMP.
At the login page, you will enter the following: Click “Logon” Do not use dashes in User ID.
Bite sized training sessions: Data Modelling – Part 1 of 2 Data Model Diagrams Feb 2011 Prepared by Guy Beauchamp Group Projects & IT.
When using a Visa card to make a purchase which shipping address do you use? A. Purchasing B. Canal Street C. School / Department.
MyFloridaMarketPlace MyFloridaMarketPlace User Meeting October 26, 2005.
RIDING THE ROLLER COASTER OF IMPLEMENTATIONS Implementation! Lynn Otani Otani Consulting Group, Inc. AAHAM Winter Session AAHAM - Otani Consulting Group,
Jack Schmidt Fermilab NLIT  The 1 st Year  Staffing Issues  Internal Tool Audit  Problem Management  Change management  Process Improvements.
MyFloridaMarketPlace Roundtable January 21, :00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. MyFloridaMarketPlace.
Use of Procurement Cards - Including Control and Auditing PASBO Conference March 9, 2006 Presented by: Daniel R. McConachie
WELCOME to SpeakmanCompany.com!! The following guide will outline the key tools available on the Speakman Company web site. Please contact the marketing.
State Program Review Process Presented by GSFC Compliance Team.
Oncor Electric Delivery October 2010 Oncor’s 500 In-Home Monitor Program.
MyFloridaMarketPlace Vendor Performance Tracking Overview: Requestor Interface February 23, 2006.
1 FY04 ORS Performance Management Manage Information Technology Team Members: Charlie Jones, Ben Ashtiani, Denny Bermudez, La'Tanya Burton, Ron Edwards,
SEWP: The Catalog. 2 Conference ‘10 Glossary – Who are the Players  Federal Customer Most of us here  Contract Holder Sort of like a vendor  Manufacturer.
Code Blue Quality Assurance Management Created by HSG.
1 WARFIGHTER SUPPORT STEWARDSHIP EXCELLENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT WARFIGHTER-FOCUSED, GLOBALLY RESPONSIVE, FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE SUPPLY CHAIN LEADERSHIP.
“The Monitor" System Training Guide For Providers IMS Health.
NWPP Multiple-Award Technical Support Contract Training (eff. 08/2005) Unit 10 Unit 10 “Closing Out a Task Order”
Risk Management How To Develop a Risk Response Plan alphaPM Inc.
Confidential Web Ordering Overview. Confidential LOG ON:   Enter your login name &
Theresa Kinney Surcharge Fee Issues. 2 Checks being made payable to NASA SEWP Program Correct way – Payment made payable to: NASA Goddard Space Flight.
Innovation Software Corporation's Cultural Awareness Training Program Presentation by:
Surcharge Past Performance (Payments) Theresa Kinney.
Innovation Software Corporation's Cultural Awareness Training Program Presentation by:
PTC sales force.com Training Section 2 Application Exercises PTC Sales Enablement.
Contract Invoice Guide
Darlene Coen & George Nicol Unique SEWP Program Features.
This presentation, including any supporting materials, is owned by Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and is for the sole use of the intended Gartner.
QA Program2 Quality Assurance Program WELCOME March 4, 2003.
Monitoring Contractor Performance GRAHAM CONSTABLE P496 Rev 0.
1 Overview of the NF 1680 Evaluation of Performance Process Overview/Training Charts April 7, 2008.
1 2 SEWP Quarterly Statements  Reconciliation statement  Old Orders (2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010)  Open Order Statements (SEWP.
Solutions for Enterprise Wide Procurement (SEWP).
1 Chapter 8 karvaytMélKMerag nig kareFVIr)aykarN_ nig karbiTKMerag Project Evaluation, Reporting, and Termination.
Month Day, Year Alliance Data Breaking Down FCR to Drive Change.
APPLICATIONS What’s New in MPPM? March 2013 APPLICATIONS01 March 2013| 1 Quality Function.
1 RSS User Guide for PSC USER ROLE. 2 User Guide Table of Contents PageContentPageContent 1Cover page19Invoicing-Attach Completed SO (s) to Invoice 2Table.
© 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 1 © 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential.
The Customer Service Model
MEETING PLANNER SATISFACTION TRACKING SOLUTION
CallTower Implementation Process Overview
ERO Portal Overview & CFR Tool Training
Texas Instruments Supplier Portal- Web Invoice Overview
Introduction to the New SSA OnePoint Online Website
Rest of Project Management
Solicitation # Healthcare Simulation Products & Services
Status Symbols on Order Search Results page
Quick reference: entering a requisition In escape RECEIVING AN ITEM
CFR Enhancement Session
Concord Products Online
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG)
Presentation transcript:

PAST PERFORMANCE Conference Theresa Kinney

2 2 Agenda  Past Performance Categories  Past Performance Matrix  Rating Measurements  Website  Feedback

3 3 Past Performance Categories 1. Customer Satisfaction 2.Information Distribution 3.Contract Adherence 4.Delivery Schedule 5. Program Management

4 Past Performance Matrix Past Performance will have a four tier system which is shown below. Color Blue = Excellent Color Green = Very Good Color Yellow = Good Color Red = Poor

5 Rating Measurements  This rating is based on the business activities of each Contract Holder for each category and their matrix of the past performance.  Depending on the number and type of infractions the Contractor’s rating will drop down one color for each set of infractions.

6 Past Performance Category Scoring CUSTOMER SATISFACTION Refers to customer satisfaction with Contract Holders performance including but not limited to the quality of products and services, responsiveness, and problem resolution Blue = 0-5 reports of quality issues or concerns and all resolved to customer satisfaction with little or no delay; Random QA surveys average Excellent on Contract Holders. Green = 5 or more reports of minor issues all resolved to customer satisfaction quickly; or 2 or more issues not resolved quickly; random QA surveys average Very Good Yellow = More than 5 reports of issues not all fully resolved; or a continuing pattern of 2 or more issues not resolved quickly; random QA surveys average Good. Red = More than 10 reports issues not all fully resolved; or a continuing pattern (after 3 months in the Good range) of 2 or more issues not resolved quickly; random QA surveys average Poor.

7 Category Scoring Continued INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION Refers to information provided by Contract Holder to Customers through sales agents, associated companies, website, handouts and etc. Blue = All information is correct and fully articulated Green = one to two instances of incorrect or partial information and contract holder quickly resolved situation Yellow = More than two instances of incorrect or partial information and contract holder quickly resolved situation or instances of incorrect or partial information were not resolved and/or we repeated. Red = Request to fix incorrect or partial information continuously ignored.

8 Category Scoring Continued CONTRACT ADHERENCE This section refers to adherence to contract requirements including but not limited to following quote and ordering procedures, sales training and meeting participation and timeliness on required reports and fee payments. Blue = Zero or one issue(s) occurred Green = One to two issues occurred and contract holder quickly resolved situation Yellow = More than two issues occurred and contract holder quickly resolved situation or issues occurred and were not resolved and/or were repeated. Red = Request to fix issues continuously ignored.

9 Category Scoring Continued DELIVERY SCHEDULE The delivery schedule rating is based on two parts (1) meeting the user’s expected delivery date (default of 30 days) and (2) minimizing requests to update user’s expectations Blue = 100% deliveries within user expected delivery time and/or no more than 1 request for any order to extend an expected date and/or no excessive requests for extensions in general Green = 95-99% deliveries within user expected delivery time and/or no more than 2 occurrences requesting an order to be extended more than once and/or rare requests for extensions in general Yellow = 80-94% deliveries within user expected delivery time and/or no more than 5 occurrences requesting an order to be extended more than once and/or occasional requests for extensions in general Red = <80% deliveries within user expected delivery time and/or more than 5 occurrences requesting an order to be extended more than once and/or numerous requests for extensions in general

10 Category Scoring Continued PROGRAM MANAGEMENT A key factor to the SEWP Program’s success is the Contract Holder’s commitment to ensuring their company properly manages the contract as evidenced through their Program Management team. This factor rates the interaction between the SEWP Program Office and the Contract Holder Program Management Blue = Continue to support the SEWP Program at 100% Green = Continue to support the SEWP Program with one or two issues that have been resolved Yellow = Continue to support the SEWP Program with three to four issues that have been resolved. Red = Not fully supporting the SEWP Program and issues have not been resolved.

11 Past Performance on the Website Vendor Information Past Performance

12 Feedback  Customer Survey  An Customer is welcome to send the SEWP Program an to let us know of any issues or problem they are having with the Contract Holders. An example of some of the issues would be: - Quality of Product/Service - Interaction and Responsiveness to Customers - Problem Resolution - Numerous Order Rejection Requests